SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home 'Mad Men' Mondays: 'Chinese Wall'

OCTOBER 4, 2010

'Mad Men' Mondays: 'Chinese Wall'

Don Draper suffered a panic attack near the end of last week's episode, "Hands and Knees." This week it was the entire firm's turn. And Roger Sterling's to blame. No, it wasn't his fault that Lucky Strike took its business elsewhere (although Don wasn't wrong when he said his old friend could have worked harder babysitting his only account—or worked, period). But it was Roger's fault that the company was caught unprepared. Roger had wrested a 30-day stay of execution from Lee Garner Jr. to break the bad news and come up with a plan of attack. Instead, what Draper and company got was an ambush that didn't have to be an ambush, with Roger covering for his duplicity by staging an Oscar-worthy one-way "phone call" with the client, then embarking on a phony rescue mission to North Carolina that took him no further than a New York hotel room. The agency is now living on borrowed time. And this week's installment (written by Erin Levy and directed by Phil Abraham) captured the chaos of such a scenario—panic leading to a lack of confidence among clients, leading to yet more panic.

When you're down, some people can't resist kicking you. As soon as news started spreading on Madison Avenue that Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce had lost most of its revenue with a single announcement, clients and colleagues began running for the lifeboats. Don's call to a representative of Glo-Coat—the company for which Don masterminded a Clio-winning ad—was supposed to be a Hail Mary pass, or at least damage control. But as we've seen before, Don's not very good in a crisis—at least not one that can't be solved with a clever slogan—and the scene where we saw this demonstrated yet again was wonderfully written and played. Don stood by his desk, steeling himself, commenced with the usual "Hail-fellow-well-met" pleasantries, then almost instantly freaked out out, sounding more like a jilted lover than a creative executive. Then he blamed Pete—who's sitting on a motherlode of incriminating information about Don—accusing him of letting his anxiety over his impending fatherhood distract him from reassuring the client. When the incorrigible Ted Chough buttonholed Pete in the hospital and suggested he start over as a partner at Chough's firm, I found myself talking to the screen for the first time in several weeks: Just do it.

"It's the last days of Rome," Stan says, presaging his latest clumsy pass at Peggy. "I was in an agency that went down. The women got sex-crazed." Wishful thinking? Not entirely.  Megan seemed to sense Don's momentary estrangement from Faye, or maybe she just shifted into Gal Friday mode at the sight of Don suffering, as so many "Mad Men" women are inclined to do. She seduced Don and saw him off the next day like a wife-in-training. (The way she looked at him I half-expected her to hand him a bag lunch.) Peggy bedded Abe after seeming to write him off weeks earlier: Was it Abe's too-short bathing trunks that did the trick? (The ensuing crisis at work didn't manage to kill Peggy's post-nooky buzz; the woman's damn near unflappable.) Don drove away Faye by pushing her to give him inside information about her clients that he could use to staunch the firm's red ink hemorrhage. She walked away—a stand-up-and-applaud moment—then showed up at his doorstep to tell him she'd finagled him a meeting with a representative from Heinz. Between the psychology of the character and the politically delicate position of working women in the mid-'60s, this turnabout felt believable to me. But it was still depressing. Peggy consistently shows more backbone in similar situations. So does Joan, which seems rather remarkable considering all that she's been through. "I'm not a solution to your problem," she told Roger, when he came sniffing around her door yet again. "I'm another problem." After all she's endured, she proved herself capable of making a rational decision under horrendous circumstances. That's more than you can say for most of her coworkers.

On an a mostly unrelated note, it was great to see Ray Wise showing up in a small role as Ken Cosgrove's future father-in-law. Beyond being a world class character actor and the proud owner of one of the most charismatically cryptic grins in show business, Wise is a living shout-out to one of the great, groundbreaking series in TV history, David Lynch's "Twin Peaks."  Wise played the demonically possessed Leland Palmer, the hounded-to-death newscaster Don Hollenbeck in Good Night and Good Luck, and the bad guy in Rising Sun, among other juicy parts. I seriously doubt Wise will get to raise hell on "Mad Men" in quite the same way as he did on "Twin Peaks." Nevertheless, his one modest scene seemed a harbinger of more to come.  

Matt Zoller Seitz is a contributor to Salon and the founder of Slant's “The House Next Door,” where he has written extensively about “The Sopranos” and other series.

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

 

 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 8 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

8 comments

On a slightly different issue, does anyone else think that the final-credits music choices for the last couple of episodes have been exceptionally dull and forgettable?

- ironyroad

October 4, 2010 at 1:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How intriguing. So are you sitting through the episode agonizing as to what the final-credits music choices will be? You mentioned them before so I gather they are important to you.

- noga1

October 4, 2010 at 3:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I hated Roger in this episode. I thought he was a cowardly punk and I don't conclude Lucky Strike was necessarily gone. We don't know what the agency might have done had it been given notice of the 30 day grace period, however quickly American Tobacco moved, despite the 30 days being given. Roger didn't go to Salem: another completely punk ass move. We are left to wonder whether had anyone gone to Salem things might have been, last minute, been rescued. Probably not, but we don't know. Then Roger spreads his poison to Joan telling her the truth and jamming her with a terrible conflict between what she should be telling the partners and some sense of loyalty, or some such, to Roger. And she incorrectly keep quiet. And then he wants to fuck Joan again oblivious to her as a person, only to satisfy his own her hurt feelings, and get some nooky-filled assuaging. Seeing sitting by himself stewing in his office after being taken out, properly, by Don, is to see a selfish jerk wallowing in is own pissy self pity. Don't mean to crow, but I called the imminent consummation between Don and Ms Monteal. As for the play out music, really, no offence, but really who gives a shit.

- basman

October 4, 2010 at 3:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I remember reading somewhere about Tolstoy that when he started writing Anna Karenina he disliked his creation and meant to portray her in a negative manner, a weak woman, soft, feminine, and somewhat overweight. But as he kept writing he fell in love with her, which is why she turned out to be this magnificent female of the species. Something in basman's comment made me think about that. I don't know why.

- noga1

October 4, 2010 at 5:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

" . . . but really who gives a shit[?]" Me? Unless I don't count as a "who," of course.

- ironyroad

October 4, 2010 at 8:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Horton hears a who

- noga1

October 4, 2010 at 8:31pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Hey ironyroad, a bit offtopic but I thought you might be interested in this article about the assault upon the traditional structure of the German language: http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/30040 "The European Commission on Languages has passed a landmark resolution against the lengths of German nouns. From next year it will be against European law for the Germans to string individual words together to create lengthy so-called ‘super-nouns’. "

- noga1

October 5, 2010 at 7:55am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Ha! Yes, it's a hardy perennial (sp?) and I've seen a few versions in my time. The grandfather of them all is Twain's "The Awful German Language," of course, with its great syntax-faithful translation of "Wenn er aber auf der Strasse der in Sammt und Seide gehüllten jetzt sehr ungenirt nach der neusten Mode gekleideten Regierungsräthin begegnet . . ." as "But when he, upon the street, the (in-satin-and-silk-covered-now-very-unconstrained-after-the-newest-fashioned-dressed) government counselor's wife met . . . " The whole thing is here: http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/awfgrmlg.html#x1

- ironyroad

October 5, 2010 at 2:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close