SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Hard Right

MARCH 26, 2008

Hard Right

This was not what Patrick Cordova had bargained for. The Stanford junior, a member of the school's student government, had wanted to host a lecture on sexual health. And he figured that a provocative and fun way to tackle the issue would be to bring a prominent pornographer to speak on campus. So Cordova sent out some invitations. The first person he heard back from was Michael Lucas—longtime porn actor and director of such films as Hunt & Plunge, The Bigger The Better, and Fire Island Cruising (editions one through eight). A fixture in New York nightlife and head of his own production company, Lucas is one of the biggest names in gay porn. His 2006 epic La Dolce Vita had a $250, 000 budget, which Lucas says makes it the most expensive porn film in history. The movie garnered best-picture honors at the annual GAYVN Awards, the Oscars of gay porn. (It also garnered a lawsuit from the company that controls the rights to the original Fellini film.) New York magazine has dubbed him the “last of the New York porn moguls.“

Lucas—a staunch advocate of safe sex who, unlike some porn directors, uses condoms in his movies—sounded like exactly the kind of guest speaker Cordova had in mind. “We were hoping that people would embrace his ideas on sexual identity and sexual health,“ Cordova told me. But, after Stanford had already booked him, controversy erupted. Some students felt that Lucas shouldn't have been invited to lecture. By the day of his speech, the storm surrounding Lucas had made its way into the pages of The Stanford Daily, where organizers found themselves defending the invitation against the protests of their outraged peers.

What had provoked such heated debate? It wasn't Lucas's porn. It was his politics. Lucas, it turns out, is a fervent supporter of Israel and a harsh, often offensive, critic of the Muslim world. He has called the Koran “today's Mein Kampf” and regularly inveighs against Muslim homophobia and anti-Semitism in less-than-charming terms. “It totally escapes me how gay people can side with burqa-wearing, jihad-screaming, Koran-crazed Muslims,“ he opined last year. At the talk itself, which took place this past Valentine's Day and drew an audience of about 50, Lucas stuck to his guns. “What's the point to respect their culture, or supposed culture, when they have a strong contempt for mine?“ Lucas asked. And he wasn't content to leave it at that. The day after he spoke, he published an op-ed in The Stanford Daily responding to the charge that he is racist. “I never in my life said or wrote a bad word about Arabs—go read any of my articles,” he explained. “My criticism was always addressed towards the religion and ideology of Islam. So I would like to ask Stanford students not to exploit the word 'racism' at their own convenience.“

The Stanford controversy wasn't an isolated incident. Over the past few years, Lucas has developed a side career in political commentary to go along with his more lucrative day job. He frequently updates his blog with thoughts on world affairs, writes a regular op-ed column for The New York Blade (a gay newspaper), and has feuded with the popular, liberal gay blog Queerty. “I would be better financially if I didn't open my mouth,“ he tells me. And, yet, Lucas can't seem to help himself.

 

 
BORN ANDREI BREGMAN TO A  secular Jewish family in Russia, Lucas is a graduate of Moscow State Law Academy. But he always craved celebrity, and the allure of fame enticed him to Berlin in 1995 to work as a model and prostitute. He came to the United States in 1997 and founded Lucas Entertainment the following year, eventually earning enough to move his parents and grandparents from Russia—“the putrid country of my birth“—to New York. Ever the resourceful entrepreneur, he put his father to work as a set constructor on his films.

I had read about Lucas in gay magazines like The Advocate and Out, and had met him when he gave a talk about the porn industry at Yale, where I was a student at the time. But it wasn't until last spring—when Lucas began writing his column for the Blade—that I realized how obsessed he was with international affairs. To be sure, Lucas writes about other topics as well. On his blog, interspersed between hard-core photos, he comments on everything from professional boxing (“I would not be surprised if the majority of boxers are repressed gay or bisexual men“) to the dumbing-down of society (“half the people you speak to think Pol Pot is something you buy at Home Depot“). But it is Middle Eastern politics that captivates him most.

When I called Lucas to arrange an interview, he said he was a longtime subscriber to The New Republic, and, arriving at his Manhattan office, I found The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Times of London spread out on his glass desk. (I couldn't tell if the papers were there to impress, were film props, or were actual reading material.) When Lucas, who turns 36 this month, does wear clothes, he tends toward the form-fitting, and he sported a sharply tailored suit for our interview. He has a strong Russian accent, which is very much on display in his films. As we spoke, he occasionally paused to yell instructions at his publicist. Meanwhile, models entered and exited the room, slamming doors in search of sex toys.

You wouldn't know it from watching his movies—which are apolitical—but Lucas has opinions on everything. He is a fan of David Brooks and the late Oriana Fallaci (though he acknowledges her homophobia), thought the Iraq war was a bad idea (“the wrong target“), considers the press soft in portraying Islamist terrorism (“it's very upsetting that they don't allow people to see the beheadings“), loves Nicolas Sarkozy (“I think Marc Jacobs told me that Sarkozy went to synagogue“), and hates Jimmy Carter (“this fucking peanut farmer“). While he originally disagreed with Russia's brutal policies toward Chechnya, he now believes that America could learn something from Vladimir Putin. “The American Army can't take Fallujah?“ Lucas asks me, incredulous. “Level it!“

He criticizes Republicans, whom he calls “homophobic and anti-Semitic,“ while labeling ultraOrthodox Israelis “anal warts on the body of Israeli society.“ But the true objects of his ire are gay liberals whom he sees as overly sympathetic to the Arab side in the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Like many Russian Jews who were forced to repress their identity under Soviet rule, Lucas's Jewish heritage is the anchor of his worldview. He visits Israel annually. Not long after touching down there last month, he penned a manifesto on his website titled, “I stand with Israel, I stand with Jews.“ Shortly after the Lebanon war in 2006, he put on a live sex performance in a Tel Aviv nightclub where IDF members were given free admission (“in the tradition of American USO-style shows,“ as a Lucas press release described it).

“He's so deeply invested in, and in love with, his roots and his people,“ says Heather Fink, a former publicist for Lucas who is writing a memoir about her experience working for him. But, she adds, “I think it's very hard for him to empathize with Muslim people, and he does sometimes write them off.“ That's a gross understatement. Last year, in his Blade column, Lucas hailed gay artist Charles Merrill's decision to burn a rare copy of the Koran, estimated to be worth $60,000, and, in a subsequent radio interview, called the Koran an “absolutely evil book.“

Sometime after visiting Lucas, I received a package from his company. Expecting it to be Lucas's latest cinematic masterpiece, I instead found a copy of Lee Harris's The Suicide of Reason: Radical Islam's Threat to the West.

 

 
Like the Stanford students who thought they were putting together a lecture on safe sex only to find themselves embroiled in a controversy over Islam, members of the porn community have learned a lot recently about Lucas's views on international affairs—probably more than most of them care to know. Unlike Stanford, however, the porn world is a place where people say and do outrageous things for a living. No wonder that, according to most of the porn community insiders I spoke with, the industry seems to be greeting Lucas's emergence as a pundit with a collective shrug.

These insiders tend to view Lucas's punditry as a mere extension of his brash personal style—a style that has led to frosty relations with other pornographers. Several years ago, Lucas told sex shop owners in New York that he would stop distributing his movies to them if they continued to stock those of a rival, a former Lucas actor with whom he had fallen out. “The entire industry is terrified of Michael Lucas,“ an employee of a competing studio tells me, before politely explaining that's all he can say. “He's from the East Coast,“ says Mark Kernes, a senior editor at Adult Video News. “Us people on the West Coast are more laid back.”

Lucas's website describes him as “the epitome of the American Dream,” and, in some ways, that's true. Americans, particularly immigrants, are experts at borrowing from different cultures in order to create something new. In the end, that capacity for borrowing may help explain Michael Lucas: He has married the pornographer's taste for the outrageous to the brash self-assuredness of an immigrant entrepreneur to the ethnic nationalism of a Russian Jew to the subject matter of Bernard Lewis. And if the results are sometimes ridiculous or noxious—well, that's the American way.

James Kirchick is an assistant editor at The New Republic.  This article appeared in the March 26, 2008 issue of the magazine.

 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 41 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

41 comments

Interesting piece about an unusual, interesting guy of whom I had never heard and about a subject about which I know equally little. Well written and straight forward too, without any tendentious moralizing. Good stuff.

- basman

March 8, 2008 at 10:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wondering where the actual interview is James? And PS - did he show you his (infamously) big dick??

- Curious

March 10, 2008 at 3:09am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I disagree with you about certain things: I don't think Michael Lucas is a Neo-con--like Andrew Sullivan in his vast stupidity used to be (Sullivan has switched over to civil libertarianism without some of the fiscal libertarian hogwash). He is, instead, just not letting the labels pin him down. But the thing that really bothers people is that Michael Lucas, unlike most porn stars, though certainly not all (the famous Harry Reams was a Shakespearean actor before he got into porn) has a brain and uses it. So he's more in the line of people like Gypsy Rose Lee, a stripper who could think at a time when women who did that were not supposed to. In this era, that makes Michael Lucas unusual, and also, often, delightful.

- Perry Brass

March 10, 2008 at 7:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Gay porn isnt scared of Michael Lucas they think hes a joke. His lips full of calligen. he in fact is the anal wart that just wont go away...and the industry has tried all kinds of creams.

- GayPornFan

March 11, 2008 at 3:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wow. Good for him. I too am tired of leftie gays without a brain defending the poor little terrorists and the poor little Palestinians. Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, the only place there where women and gays are treated as equal citizens (even more so than in the U.S.) The other Middle Eastern countries do not deserve any respect or understanding for their treatment of homosexuals or women or dissidents. If their "culture" and religion are obscene by human standards we have the right to call them so. If they were in charge, the lefties that seem to love them so much would be the first to be executed.

- Michael C.

March 12, 2008 at 12:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I've read many of his blog post and agree with quite a lot of what he says. The reason the west coast porn world doesn't like him is he puts out a far superior product.

- ousslander

March 12, 2008 at 6:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I agree with the writers assessment of Lucas. While I find him profoundly obnoxious, he has every right to his opinions. It is quite refreshing to hear from a member of the gay community who has a perspective and the audacity to share it without apology....even if his views are asinine and the manner in which he communicates these ideas are not entirely useful.

- Lucas

March 16, 2008 at 10:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Lucas: Yet another pro-Israelite who ignores or denies Israel's own use of terrorism in building the modern Jewish state.

- rigoletto

March 18, 2008 at 11:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Nobody watches his movies because he is in them.

- mango_pickle

March 19, 2008 at 5:22am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think you mean most expensive gay porn movie ever made. See here: http://nymag.com/movies/features/23146/ The movie Pirates was straight porn and had a budget of over $1 million...

- Sam

March 20, 2008 at 2:02am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'm actually only curious to know what Chan is going to say about all of this. For myself, what do I care what some smut peddler has to say...about anything? Though, I must say, this was a rather more nuanced article than I would have expected from this particular author.

- drdannyu

March 20, 2008 at 8:52am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Jamie gets a bad rap around here, drdan. He's clearly capable of writing interesting and nuanced pieces. In fact, I've liked (or at least enjoyed) the majority of his features. It's just that his neocortex seems to shut off when he blogs.

- ratnerstar

March 20, 2008 at 9:56am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

While I'm thankful not ever to have conversed with Lucas myself and think his occupation corruptive on several different levels, I find your commentary one of the more entertaining things I've read in TNR in quite some time. It's unfortunate that Lucas is so heavy-handed and inflammatory in his speech. The actions of Islamic extremists who kidnapp and execute civilians or strap on explosives with the intent of blowing up civilians in a marketplace have not been condemned nearly enough by Western leftists and moderate and conservative Muslims. Intention is very significant in analyzing ethics--and such actions say that extremists will purposely go after the weakest or the least prepared as they engage in a peaceful, quotidian activity. The people who plot these events and train their disciples are not interested in negotiation or diplomacy, but seem more addicted to personal power and a heightened, sometimes almost erotic, sense of control. It is quite possible to condemn these actions without writing off Arabs or all Muslims. It takes merely a bit of critical thinking and some bravery.

- RL, expat in the Middle East

March 20, 2008 at 11:06am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

God, the thing that made me shudder is that this obnoxious smut peddler, impressively endowed one can only assume given his line of work, is a long time subscriber to tnr! I wonder if he blogs? Humm, given his charming m.o., I wonder if he is any number of our more civilized neo conners, though I have to admit, I always assumed that these rude ruffians had smaller equipment than this Lucas autodidact...

- thejauntyboulevardier

March 20, 2008 at 11:09am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Oh good, another hot-head in to talk about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We needed more of those, so now I suppose we're on our way.

- Excellent,

March 20, 2008 at 11:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

If I was 10 years younger and he was straight, I'd lock him in my bedroom and never let him out. Does he have an older (straight and single) brother?

- debbie

March 20, 2008 at 11:41am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

the only place there where women and gays are treated as equal citizens (even more so than in the U.S.) Ummmm - women and gays are treated as equal citizens in the US? Oy.

- Pogue

March 20, 2008 at 11:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What an interesting article. I freely admit that my prejudice towards those working in the porn industry would hardly have allowed me to imagine some of them to be so politically involved and opinionated. While I do not subscribe to all of his opinions, I do find Lucas rather witty and entertaining. An eloquent and educated porn star - who would have thought!?

-

March 20, 2008 at 12:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It strikes me as intellectually inconsistent for Lucas, who is part of a community in this country that at best, is marginalized, and at worst, is repressed, to be so supportive of a nation (Israel) that also engages in repression against the indigenous peoples on whose land Israel resides -- the Palestinians. Indeed, there are interpretations of Islam that seem supportive of an anti-gay mentality, but is Michael Lucas okay with the Israel's marginalization and repression of Palestinians and other Arab groups simply because of the Jewish state's tolerance for homosexuality?

- non_prophet

March 20, 2008 at 12:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Matt Sterling, not Michael Lucas, directed The Bigger the Better. Perhaps ML made his own inferior version, as he has with Fellini and Laclos. Sounds like his politics are as nuanced (and as utterly boring) as his porn product. Is there an article here?

- Jkop

March 20, 2008 at 1:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

People in the sex industry have brains? Wow, I better write this down before I forget. I hope this doesn't take the edge off the kink: after all, according to the Prohibitionists, we sex consumers treat our providers as objects, and by their definition (not mine!) objects don't have brains...Maybe we should lobotomize porn stars, hookers, strippers etc., just to be safe.

- williamyard

March 20, 2008 at 2:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

People in the sex industry have brains? Wow, I better write this down before I forget. I hope this doesn't take the edge off the kink: after all, according to the Prohibitionists, we sex consumers treat our providers as objects, and by their definition (not mine!) objects don't have brains...Maybe we should lobotomize porn stars, hookers, strippers etc., just to be safe.

- williamyard

March 20, 2008 at 2:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

OK, I have to weigh in on this, living in the Castro as I do: it is not unusual for me to wake up slightly hung over on Sunday morning--after a night of drinking Appletinis and rubbing against half naked sweaty male bodies at dirty SoMa leather bars--and encounter angry lesbians protesting Gaza incursions upon my walk up Castro Street for brunch. When I discuss this at brunch, my gay male comraderie generally dismisses the said lesbians as victims of knotted panties (if they wear them!). So, if we can divide the queer left into camps, I would assume that angry, butch lesbians compose the faction of Arab sympathizers, while gay men are interested in hot, naked democracy.

- Mr. Singer

March 20, 2008 at 2:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mr. Singer wins. I vote we add "hot, naked" as prefix every time "democracy" comes up in political rhetoric. E.g. "Our invasion of Iraq was justified in the belief that we could bring hot, naked democracy to the Middle East."

- ratnerstar

March 20, 2008 at 3:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Interesting. This man pretty much sums up the "spirit of the age". Only the creative genius of someone like Dostoievsky could have invented him if he did not exist... And very disturbingly he let's us understand that the cult of the I characteristic of "gay culture" is very similar to the one that, in politics, leads to fascism. Something that Moravia explored very well in "The Conformist"... Just one side note. It's a piety that in some way this man thinks of himself as a representative of the jewish world. Historicaly, Jews are Jews because they love God and His Law and not because they love themselves... And one last think. The author of the article, a talented writer indeed, deserves credit for presenting such a character. But I'm not sure the article is neutral or impartial... Mr. K. is very much attracted to the king of gay porn and admires him...

- luispc

March 20, 2008 at 3:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Hey the Castro! Love that place. Often go and my kids love to go on the Sing A Longs! Once, about 10 years ago, I went to go see the Godfather movies on a Friday night. Got out at about 11:00 and went across the street to Marcello's for a slice. As I was walking out, I ran into a guy who knew me from work, and when he saw me walking up towards Market, alone, and looking like a 10 year younder jauntycookie, his jaw very nearly dropped and I could swear I saw his eyeballs rolling down Castro towards the BOA. Well, when I went back to work the following Monday, said eyeball popper had been a very busy boy over the weekend, "outing" me to just about everyone he could think of. I remember I laughed when I got in and had about 10 phone calls, some even saying that, now that "it" was out in the open, perhaps a date to the museum could be arranged.... Ah, the Castro...

- thejauntyboulevardier

March 20, 2008 at 3:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Luis, baby-doll, you don't know much about "gay culture" if you conflate it with fascism. Best not to hold forth on subjects about which you know very little.

- drdannyu

March 20, 2008 at 4:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This clown's read on that tiny corner of his neighborhood that still has a social conscience would be sad...if it weren't so dated. But havvanother drink there, buddy! Not a Girl and Not a Liberal

- thomas plagemann

March 20, 2008 at 5:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Jaunty, Sorry about that a million times over, I take full responsibility--it does indeed suck that you breeders must come over whatever hill you might be coming from for the only decent attempt at "pizza" here in SF. But rest assured that your experience is not an isolated one, for when I resided in the armpit that is Orlando, FL, I had the fantastic opportunity to witness the courting of Brazillian fathers who just happened to be wearing red by boa-sporting trannies at Gay Days.

- Mr. Singer

March 20, 2008 at 6:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I took off the filters on my google and image searched this Lucas dude. Whoa...and that was cut even! Lad must be very popular in his circles...

- thejauntyboulevardier

March 20, 2008 at 6:12pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Danny, my old friend. What I know is quite enough. It's all over the place, from TV soap operas "chic" to so-called "good novelists", from fashion shows (precisely rehabilitating the fascist aesthetics)to screamers on "gay marriage". Now, it seems, everyone is for such absurdities, for "sex consummerism" and "lesbian chic" (and no one blushes about people talking about "rubbing" other people and placidly going out for breakfast with their "fiancees" the next morning, simultaneously asking the state for tax benefits, believed to be their sacred right...). Well, but what can one say: if soap operas were about pious girls lighting candles to holy images on churches, everyone would be right now lighting candles to holy images on churches.

-

March 20, 2008 at 6:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Someone above commented that the land, on which Israel exists, belongs to the Palestinians. Well, assuming that you are saying that the land is not Jewish, that would mean that as long as Israelis expel the rest of the Palestinians and keep that state of affairs for a hundred years or so... the land will no longer be Palestinian.

- M.A. Personne

March 21, 2008 at 3:47am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

drdannyu, could it be that Chan is Lucas's pseudonym?

- blackton

March 21, 2008 at 4:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As a politico who is a lover of "The Conformist", I profoundly disagree that the movie is some meditation on the nexus between homosexuality and Fascism. The protagonist feels tremendous guilt for a killing that never occured, seeking repentance through social conformity.

- Orlando

March 23, 2008 at 2:31am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

And how do you explain the last scenes, Orlando? When he seeks the male prostitute and simultaneously proudly affirms himself as a fascist, aren't we before the opposite of atonement? Aren't we looking at the assumption of his proud right to compromise the other, taking himself to be what he pervertedly became when rejecting his guilt? But anyway, you're right. Perhaps "The Conformist" is not the best demonstration of what I wish to say. PS: I really can't see how some try to glorify this awfull person portrayed in the article. Jesus, a man that wishes to prevent his ex-lover from getting a job in order to vindicate his ego is a monster. Period.

- luispc

March 24, 2008 at 2:35pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Don't you mean the only place where Jewish women and gays are treated as equals?

- THarms

March 24, 2008 at 6:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I wonder if Kirchick would be such ad advocate for the free speech rights of Lucas if he were a Left-wing Palestinian pornographer speaking at Hillsdale College? Given his history of defending rights only when it's convenient to do so, it seems unlikely.

- THarms

March 24, 2008 at 6:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I would say 99% of the gay community, and, of course, the gay porn industry cannot stand that egomaniacle, infantile Lucas. We're all hoping the Fellini people sue him out of business.

- Greg Normand

May 30, 2008 at 7:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

One should remember that lucas is a jew and that automatically makes him bias towords israel. Take the jewish ideology away from and you would see him become anti-israeli and prohuman rights.

- fishman

October 6, 2008 at 10:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

oh no i thought michael lucus is russin?

- mellin from real world denver

October 28, 2008 at 8:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The last thing Lucas needs is any kind of mainstream credibility. For those swooning over his "intelligence" I recommend reading any of the semi-literate things he's written. The American dream? You mean that ironically, right?

- greg

June 19, 2009 at 7:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close