SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Invisible Man

OCTOBER 22, 2008

Invisible Man

On my way to Denver for what is being billed as the political speech of my lifetime, I am doing my best to open up a lotus-like space inside my head in which I can enjoy the pleasurable sensation that comes to lucky Ivy League meritocrats of a certain age, when friends from college and graduate school are on the verge of really running things in America. On any given Sunday, you stand a better-than-even chance of knowing Barack Obama's speechwriters, his economic advisers, the New York Times correspondent covering his campaign, or someone who played basketball last Tuesday with the candidate. While I don't know the candidate personally, I feel as if I do, in part because he was at Harvard Law School when I was at Harvard, and he lived a few blocks away from me in a "transitional neighborhood" in Manhattan where rich people brought their dogs to poop. I know where the candidate is coming from, I am thinking, as I watch the fluffy white clouds float by my airplane window in a sea of antidepressant Obama blue.

It is hard not to like the idea of a writer becoming president, even if most writers I know would run for cover when confronted with the collapse of the financial system or the threat of Iranian nukes. I enjoy reading Barack Obama the writer for his particular mix of personal empathy and isolation, his abstract sentimentality and carefully modulated personal bitterness about his father, who appears as much more of a monster than the gauzy title of Obama's first memoir might alone suggest. Open on the gray plastic tray table in front of me is my heavily marked-up first edition of Dreams from My Father, which I found in a used bookstore in Manhattan and bought and read with pleasure without the slightest inkling that the author might someday run for public office, and which I am bringing with me to Denver in something of a continuing state of shock that Obama is likely to be elected president. How wonderful and strange it would be if our creaky American empire were to be governed by poets! It is true that Barack Obama isn't Shakespeare or Cervantes, or even John Ashbery, and that most writers would make lousy presidents, especially in America, where literature and politics have learned to keep the other at arm's length. Still, it is hard to argue with the fact that Dreams is a terrific book--an insightful, well-written, cunningly organized black male bildungsroman that also serves as a kind of autobiographical rejoinder to one of my favorite American novels, Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man. Obama cites Invisible Man as a major influence on his personal evolution along with The Autobiography of Malcolm X, two classic first-person narratives in the African American literary canon that can properly be thought of as novels with strong autobiographical components. (Malcolm X is ostensibly based on a series of taped interviews with the ex-Black Muslim leader and was written after Malcolm's death by Alex Haley, who also wrote Roots.)

What's even more remarkable about Dreams from My Father is the fact that it was written by a man who has since decided to run for president by disowning the most striking parts of his own voice and transforming himself into a blank screen for the fantasy-projection of the electorate. It is hard to overemphasize how utterly remarkable it is that Dreams exists at all--not the usual nest of position papers and tape-recorder talk, but a real book by a real writer who has both the inclination and the literary tools to give an indelible account of himself, and who also happens to be running for president. In which connection, it seems right to mention that the Barack Obama who appears in Dreams, and, one presumes, in his own continuing interior life, is not a comforting multiracial or post-racial figure like Tiger Woods or Derek Jeter who prefers to be looked at through a kaleidoscope. Though there are many structural parallels between Dreams and Invisible Man, Obama believes in the old-fashioned, unabashedly romantic, and, in the end, quite weird idea of racial authenticity that Ellison rejected. He embraces his racial identity despite his mixed parentage through a kind of Kierkegaardian leap into blackness, through which he hopes to become a whole, untroubled person.

My own belief is that Barack Obama has the makings of an unusual and unusually effective president, because he might combine a writer's sense of the dramatic moment, and of how language helps to shape reality, with the brain--and perhaps the soul--of a Harvard-educated technocrat. At the same time, I find it hard not to wonder about how President Obama will see the world, and what the major fault lines in his personality might be. The fact that the talking heads and the voters alike are unable to see him plain is an optic effect that Obama anticipates in his first book. It is no accident that the literary model for Obama's narrative of self is Ellison's Invisible Man, just as it is no accident that liberals and conservatives alike seem to be talking about five or six wildly different people when they talk about Obama, none of whom bears all that much resemblance to the narrator of Dreams.

Dreams from My Father is a story about the consequences of a fiction created by a white mother and well-meaning white grandparents in order to give a fatherless black child a sustaining myth by which to live. It is one of the more interesting facts about Obama the writer that the father he chooses to represent, and whose legacy he chooses to embrace, is a bona fide monster--a scary polygamist who abused his wives and children and drank away his intellectual promise and his career, then crippled himself in a car accident that left him with iron legs, and finally wrapped his car around a tree in a second accident that luckily proved fatal to no one other than himself. Dreams is a book about Obama coming to terms with this troubling monster and creating a workable self out of the ruins of his father's life.

Obama's distanced and writerly view of a self as something that is summoned through a creative act of will is at odds with the author's hand-me-down ideas about racial authenticity; the tension between the created self and the given self animates Obama's writing, but is not resolved in any satisfactory way. Filled with striking, well-disciplined sentences and observations, Dreams is also shot through with the vanity of a young man trying on borrowed clothing in front of a mirror as he attempts to figure out exactly what kind of black man he will be, a process that tells us that the narrator comes from a privileged place in society. The structure loosely but deliberately mirrors the structure of Ellison's novel--a picaresque, which shows an intelligent and bookish young black man's struggle with internal and external definitions of self as he moves through a series of institutional settings and self-defining impulses cloaked in the garb of communal politics or culture: the campus anti-apartheid movement, black and anti-colonialist literature, community organizing, the black church.

Where Obama's narrator provides the reader with a model consciousness, sensitive, responsible, and aware, who moves from triumph to triumph along the road to successfully embracing the fullness of his black identity, Ellison's story ends badly. The Ellisonian collision between the individualist consciousness and the realities of the color line in America produces a kind of fatal and indigestible dark matter that is aware of itself yet can never claim a full share of humanity. Ellison's protagonist is invisible because the symbolic radiance of his black skin queers the efforts of others to relate to him as an individual, and makes him prey to the manipulations of whites and blacks alike who utilize the brutal and absurd dynamics of the color line to satisfy private lusts for power and domination. The tragic thrust of Ellison's novel is often reduced to the banality that black people are invisible to white people. Ellison's deeper point is that the symbolic and actual baggage of race makes it difficult if not impossible for a black man to ever realize his full humanity in the eyes of anyone--white, black, communist, capitalist, or himself. A lone atom aware of his fate but powerless to change it, Ellison's narrator winds up in an underground room in a whites-only building in Manhattan lit up by 1,369 light bulbs powered by stolen electricity, listening to the startlingly original recordings of the young Louis Armstrong--completely illuminated and yet totally invisible.

Obama's decision to identify with the lineage of his black Kenyan father to the exclusion of his white U.S.-born mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, and her parents allows him a measure of release from the cruel racial logic that binds Ellison's narrator--he comes from outside American society, and therefore he is not entirely bound by the overdetermined racial logic that unites the children of slaves and masters. Yet, while Obama's rejection of his "white blood" may seem familiar from the writings of African American authors like Malcolm X, it is actually much stranger; Obama's partial "whiteness" is not the product of an ancient rape by an anonymous slave-master but is instead the color of the mother who raised him. Obama's embrace of authenticity separates him from Ellison's profoundly modernist consciousness, and prevents him from seeing the serial absurdities of his own story. Where Invisible Man bubbles with fiery, absurdist humor, the narrator of Dreams rarely cracks a smile. One can only imagine what Ellison would have done with Obama's straight-faced account of his futile career as a community organizer in Chicago, or with the incredibly juicy character of Dr. Jeremiah Wright--a religious con man who spread racist and anti-Semitic poison while having an alleged sexual affair with a white church secretary and milking his congregation for millions of dollars and a house in a gated community whose residents are overwhelmingly rich and white.

The fact that Obama is hip to Ellison's rather depressing take on what race might mean for his career in American politics comes through in occasional moments of brutal honesty in his later writing, like his analysis of the basis of his political appeal in The Audacity of Hope: "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views." Here, Obama seems to agree with Ellison about the effect of the racial baggage that people bring to his public performance as a politician. The black candidate is rendered invisible to his white audience, a fact that would appear to leave him with little choice but to use that blindness in a strategic way if he wishes to lead.

It is one of the outstanding ironies of Obama's story that his political rise has been fueled by a tactical grasp of the same racial logic that condemned Ellison's invisible man to living in a basement by himself. The blank screen approach that Obama has embraced works well in a moment dominated by the collapse of Wall Street and the Iraq war, issues for which all possible solutions seem unpalatable; what voters want is to feel that things will change, without too much uncomfortable detail about what will actually happen. The fact that the candidate does not make the usual appeal to the authenticity of his personal story makes the usual attacks on him seem nonsensical, regardless of whether or not they are true, a fact that the Clintons lamented during the primary season and John McCain will find equally frustrating during the general election. Crazy right-wing charges that Obama shares the loonier opinions of Dr. Wright or that he is a secret Muslim blend seamlessly into reports of his calls for immediately beginning the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq or his promise to sit down with the leaders of Iran and North Korea without preconditions, or the fact that he began his political career at Bill Ayers's house in Chicago, or that his financial backer Tony Rezko was a scummy slumlord who paid for the Obamas to have a new backyard. None of it sticks, because Obama is not that kind of candidate. The campaign uses the Ellisonian condition of invisibility to its advantage while also exerting a powerful form of mental jujitsu on guilty white liberals, a species that Obama knows well: Attacks on the candidate are simply projections of the (racist) mentality of his accusers. As they erase the weirder and more specific points of his sensibility in a blizzard of superlatives, whites create an image of a black superman as a kind of photo-negative image of liberal guilt.

 

On the copy of Time that I take with me to Denver, Obama emerges on the cover from some weird murk that makes it look like he was photographed from the head up while naked in a hyperbaric chamber. This being Time's seventh Obama cover in the last year, it seems fair to observe that his face is looking a little fleshier than usual. Whereas he once seemed to channel Denzel Washington playing Malcolm X circa 1963, he now looks more like a man who is tired from the physical ordeal of the campaign. The most striking thing about this week's Obama photograph is his mouth, which is a little bit hard, with upturned corners giving a suggestion of a smile. He's a political Mona Lisa. "He hears America singing--and griping, fretting, seething, conniving, hoping, despairing. He can deliver a pitch-perfect expression of the racial anger of many American blacks," writes David von Drehle, "and, just as smoothly, unpack the racial irritations gnawing at many whites."

Yet, however much the candidate is adored, and no matter how powerful the Democratic Party's mojo seems this year, it is hard to imagine that the Ellisonian premise of black invisibility can survive the premise of a modern presidential campaign, which is that the candidate should make himself known to the voters. Obama's failure thus far to construct a convincing public story about who he is and where he comes from is not an accident, but rather a product of the strategy that won him the Democratic nomination, and which informs his larger take on the realities of race in America. Of course, Barack Obama has already spelled out a convincing story of who he is and where he is coming from in Dreams from My Father--a story that has real literary merit but does not accord in every place with the usual pieties about race in America. Obama's put-downs of peers with mixed racial backgrounds who define themselves in a more ambivalent way seem at odds with the author's self-proclaimed talent for empathy. "That was the problem with people like Joyce," he writes of a female classmate who was not interested in campus activism. "They talked about the richness of their multicultural heritage and it sounded real good, until you noticed that they avoided black people."

The uniqueness of Obama's campaign rhetoric about race has been identified by seemingly grateful (white) commentators as a profound ability to identify with both races that is assumed to be a product of his mixed racial heritage. The assumption that Obama racially identifies to some strong extent with his white mother and grandparents comes naturally to white people, but it is contradicted by the evidence of his work. A reader conditioned by the dynamics of modernist writing, in which personal identity trumps allegiance to the group, keeps waiting for the author to become equally disenchanted with his black family and emerge at the end as a radically isolated but purified hero, beholden to no one, aware of the larger absurdity of the human condition. But Obama's reading of Ellison tells him that the modernist ending is a trap that should be avoided at all costs. Dreams from My Father does not end with the expected discovery that we are all radically alone in the world, but rather with the discovery that he is a member of a strong and loving black African family--even if the father he identified with as a child is a myth created by guilty white liberals. Throughout his narrative, Obama's evolving "blackness" requires a deliberate and increasing degree of mental and physical alienation from the white relatives who cared for him as a child. Frank Davis, the black communist poet who plays Obi Wan Kenobi to Obama's Luke Skywalker, explains to Obama that his grandfather--Davis's friend--is a kind of closet racist, because he is unaware of how much power he wields by virtue of being white: "That's why he can come over here and drink my whiskey and fall asleep in that chair you are sitting in right now. Sleep like a baby. See, that's something I can never do in his house."

What's interesting about the above passage is that Obama quotes Davis's sentiments without a shadow of dissent: The logic of the narrative gives the author permission to show his white family members in a bad light because, as Davis suggests, he is more closely related to other black people than he is to the white-skinned members of his family. Obama's uncharitable treatment of his white family serves the additional function of explaining why his father left. Speaking of his grandfather's love for the black singer Nat King Cole, Obama summons up a scene of his African father coming to dinner at his white family's house, and then turns his gentle, liberal-minded white grandparent into a bigot: "I imagine him asking my father if he can sing, not understanding the mortified look on my mother's face." Did this embarrassing scene actually happen? The language of Obama's book suggests that it did not. The more immediate function of the imagined scene is to distract the reader's attention from a more likely cause of his grandfather's concern--the fact that his 18-year-old mother was being courted by a mature man in his mid-twenties whose family lived in another country.

Yet there is also a catch to this easy black-white dichotomy, namely the fact that the princely African father that Obama imagined as a child was in large part a gift from the same white people whose naivete the author belittles. Even on her death bed, Obama's mother, Stanley, who joined her son in the task of inventing his father, read draft after draft of his first memoir, helping her son finish the job of destroying the father-image of his childhood and becoming a man--while presumably ignoring the parts of his book that are dismissive of or insulting to her. The price of this kind of psychologically difficult work for both mother and son can only be wondered at.

One of the great themes of Dreams is the author's extreme isolation as a child and as a young man and his dislike for the company of other people--a familiar theme in the lives of writers but an unusual element in the biography of an American politician. Living on 94th Street between 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue while he attends Columbia, Obama describes the student poverty of his surroundings, and explains that "[n]one of this concerned me much, for I didn't get many visitors. I was impatient in those days, busy with work and unrealized plans, and prone to see other people as unnecessary distractions."

The one person with whom he feels a sense of common purpose is an old man who lived next door and seemed to share the author's disposition: "He lived alone, a gaunt, stooped figure who wore a heavy black overcoat and a misshapen fedora on those rare occasions when he left his apartment." One day, the young student returned to find that his neighbor was dead, adding a perfect isolate's touch--$1,000 rolled up and stuffed in the refrigerator. "I felt as if an understanding had been broken between us--as if, in that barren room, the old man was whispering an untold history, telling me things I preferred not to hear. " It's a freaky scene, which begs the question of what exactly the author is getting at.

The image of the old man living alone in a room in New York, "whispering an untold history, telling me things I preferred not to hear," carries an unmistakable echo of the high-wattage opening of Invisible Man. The Obama at the beginning of Dreams is the Invisible Man Jr., a role that the author alternately embraces and resents. He identifies with the lonely old man next door, but makes no effort to befriend him. He wants the old man to stay locked up inside his room. The old man's death is immediately followed in the narrative by a telephone call informing Obama of the death of his father. The fact that these two deaths are so intimately conjoined suggests that the lonely old man is in some ways a psychologically safe version of Obama's own father--a silent, neutered version of the violent, alcoholic, polygamous African man who threatens his son's emerging sense of self. The darkness of his father's actual life stands in sharp contrast to the invented character who was present throughout Obama's childhood and adolescence--a man who was universally liked, brilliant, strong, athletic, a great dancer, who never backed down from a chance to stand up for the universal rights of man; a figure so perfect and yet so troubling in his absence that it is easy to see how the young writer would need to uncover his failings in a public way.

Obama's father, whose lessons about the paramount importance of self-confidence were transmitted to his eager son through the agency of Gramps, in one of the few lines of actual instruction that he ever gives, can also be read in light of another memorable character from Ellison's novel, the black school principal, Dr. Bledsoe, who undermines the young narrator's career and his sense of self and also offers a memorable disquisition on the nature of power: "Power doesn't have to show off. Power is confident, self-assuring, self-starting and self-stopping, self-warming and self-justifying. When you have it you know it." Invisibility, Bledsoe instructs, can be a source and an instrument of power, not just a sign of weakness--a lesson that Obama the politician seems to have taken to heart.

The character of Dr. Bledsoe also shadows the figure of Jeremiah Wright, who tried his best to destroy his protege's political career by traveling to Washington and making racially incendiary remarks at the National Press Club just to show that his previous remarks had not been misreported by the press. The fact that Obama can't wrap his mind around the shabbiness of his chosen mentor comes through quite clearly in his soft-minded portrait of the preacher and his relationship with his flock. Contrary to the feverish claims of his right-wing critics, Obama's decades-long attachment to Wright doesn't seem to reveal the candidate's secret belief that the CIA sells crack and spreads AIDS in black communities. Rather, it shows the depths of the author's longing for a suitable father. Obama's susceptibility to an older man who peddles nonsense seems like the product of his need to assume a clear and definite personal identity that will serve as a bulwark against childhood feelings of abandonment and vulnerability--a constellation of traits that eerily seems to mirror the fatal cracks in the personality of our current president, whose own father was largely absent.

The self-sacrifice involved by the Dunhams in raising their grandson is one of the most admirable parts of Obama's story, and there is every sign that Obama is fully aware of how hard his mother and his grandparents worked in order to help him find a place in the world. But in the end, they can't. Ann Dunham was taunted as a nigger-lover at the age of eleven, when she lay on her front lawn in Texas with a black schoolmate--and yet her dark-skinned son is quick to dismiss her as a silly, naive dreamer, "a lonely witness for secular humanism, a soldier for New Deal, Peace Corps, position-paper liberalism," whose liking for Marcel Camus's film Black Orpheus is physically embarrassing and uncomfortable because it uncovers the childlike and sentimental basis of her erotic attraction to black men.

At the same time, his distaste for his mother is also a product of her own belief that there is something superior about identifying with dark-skinned people, and he empathizes with her personal sufferings and loneliness in the way of a sensitive, dutiful son. "She wasn't prepared for the loneliness. It was constant, like a shortness of breath," he says, pointing out in one of the relatively few passages about large-scale world-historical events that, the year before he and his mother arrived, Indonesia had undergone a bloody U.S.- backed coup followed by massacres of up to half a million Indonesian communists. At least part of Obama's rejection of his "whiteness" can be understood in light of the fact that the author was abandoned not only by his father but also by his mother, whose attraction to another dark-skinned man had led her to Indonesia, where she chose to stay by herself after sending her son back to Hawaii.

It is in Indonesia as much as any place else that Obama discovers the global dimensions of the color line. If Obama's narrative is Invisible Man with a happy ending, it is important to remember that he defines himself as the son of a Kenyan, and that his actual understanding of race owes as much or more to critics of European colonialism as it does to Ellison or Malcolm X. There is a much-commented-upon scene in Dreams in which Obama is sitting in the library of the U.S. Embassy in Indonesia and discovers a photo in Life of a black man who burned his skin off trying to become white. Right-wing critics like Jerome Corsi, who adds the honorific "Ph.D." after his name in order to make the contents of his book Obama Nation seem less shabby, have denied that any such picture ever appeared in Life or any other popular magazine and point out that another picture that Obama describes, of a Japanese woman holding her physically disfigured daughter in a bathtub, which is most likely one of a series of photographs published in Life of Japanese children who were damaged by atomic fallout, only appeared in print after Obama moved back to the United States. What this politically motivated nit-picking obscures is the revealing way that colonialist racism and the suffering of dark-skinned people are conjoined in Obama's narrative. The picture of the Japanese woman and her disfigured daughter follows an image of happy French children laughing and playing, and leads directly into the image of the black man whose skin is burned off, and whom Obama initially perceives as a victim of radiation sickness. (The idea that the Hiroshima bomb and murderous anti-black racism were two sides of the same coin is a theme of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's sermon, "The Audacity of Hope," which Obama describes at length later in Dreams, and which would be the title of his second book.) Colonialist powers like France and the United States, the conjunction of these images suggests, destroy the lives of dark-skinned people overseas just as white racism causes black people to destroy themselves at home. "There were thousands of people like him, " Obama writes, "black men and women back in America who'd undergone the same treatment in response to advertisements that promised happiness as a white person." Since no such picture ever appeared in Life, Ebony, or any other major U.S. magazine during the author's sojourn in Indonesia, it seems fair to see Obama's reading of the photograph as a reflection of his own understanding of the impulse to "become white" as a powerful and disfiguring product of a racist white society.

Like the British Empire that turned his grandfather into a house servant, the postwar American empire that the young Obama reads about in Life is guilty of systematically devaluing the humanity of dark-skinned people. At the same time, however, it seems clear that Obama himself sees the exercise of power as a necessary and inevitable part of life. Because Obama does not identify as white, he is free to exercise power without being overly troubled by past sins for which he is not guilty--an attitude that separates him from hair-shirt leftists like Jimmy Carter.

One of the more interesting arguments of Dreams is the narrator's suggestion that his dark skin affords him a better shot at understanding power and how to use it. In a scene that owes an obvious debt to Ellison's famous Battle Royal, in which two black boys are made to fight each other in a boxing ring, the narrator is taken out into the backyard of his Indonesian stepfather Lolo Soetoro's small house in Jakarta and is made to put on gloves and fight. "The world was violent, I was learning, unpredictable, and often cruel," he saw. "My grandparents knew nothing about such a world, I decided; there was no point in disturbing them." Emboldened, Obama asks his stepfather if he ever saw anyone killed, and Lolo says yes.

"Why was the man killed? The one you saw?" the young Obama asks.

"Because he was weak," Lolo answers, instructing his half-American, half-Kenyan stepson in the age-old logic of the world outside sunny Hawaii. Obama's version of the scene ends with a searing recognition that the white part of his family lives in a fantasy world in which the need to learn such ugly lessons simply does not exist. While Obama's Third World-ism carries with it a certain assumption of American historical guilt, it should not be confused with the cult of victimization that is still popular on college campuses. Obama identifies with his father, Lolo, and other post-colonial men because they are strong. Dark-skinned men can understand power in a way that white men like his grandfather can't. If you are not strong, Lolo continues, "be clever and make peace with someone who is strong. But always better to be strong yourself. Always."

The most outstanding characteristic of the portrait that Obama draws of his white mother, who also serves as a stand-in for white liberal readers of his book, is her hatred for power--a characteristic that her son finds naive and contemptible. "Power. The word fixed in my mother's mind like a curse," Obama wrote, of his mother's response to the inequities of Indonesian society. "Guilt is a luxury that only foreigners can afford," her husband Lolo responds. "Like saying whatever pops into your head." What is notable about this and other passages in Dreams from My Father is the extent to which Obama's identifies with the verbal slap and with its speaker, rather than with his mother, a girlish and naive white American liberal. White Americans like his mother and his grandfather are unsuitable sources for the author's evolving subjectivity because they are blinded by the privileges of their race to the realities of power.

Obama understands the white liberal American distaste for power as a symptom of white privilege, and he is certainly right. Yet it is hard not to be haunted by the feeling that Obama's admiration for dark-skinned strength is the mirror image of his personal feelings of weakness and inauthenticity, and that the personality that he has cobbled together out of the historical experience of other men in other times and places is more of an abstraction than an expression of the fullness of the author's humanity. In part, this abstraction is the product of a biography with too many loose ends to fit comfortably anywhere. With a few tweaks here and there, it is easy to imagine the narrator of Dreams as Barack Obama Jr., a rising young American-educated Kenyan politician, or, less likely--but still possible--as Barry Soetoro, a successful Indonesian-American businessman, or as Barry Obama, a mixed-race Hawaiian party boy--each of whom would have had his own identity issues to sort out. Obama the writer may think that he has escaped from his lonely room in Manhattan into the warm embrace of his Kenyan family and his identity as an African American man, but he also has his doubts. His wife, Michelle, worries about him. When he finally journeys to Kenya to meet his father's family, he gets the unvarnished truth from his African relatives about the man who had been presented to him as a paragon of early civil rights-era virtues:

"You know Obama was quite crazy, don't you?" a relative asks. "The drinking made it worse. Did you ever meet him? Obama, I mean?"

"Only once. When I was ten."

"Well, you were lucky then. It probably explains why you're doing so well."

 

Irregular lines of fresh-faced, sweaty people at least a mile long snake around the chain-link fences that mark the secure perimeter of Invesco Field. As I stand in the afternoon sunlight, I study a Xeroxed pamphlet titled "Common Sense," which is handed to me by one of the sadly diminished number of lunatics who once flocked to political conventions and are now medicated into some semblance of normalcy. "We have developed an 'empire' which, when opposed, has responded with 'economic seduction,' and or 'black ops' violence," writes the author, Thomas P., who claims to have worked as a psychotherapist in the Denver area before giving himself over to his work as a concerned citizen. "As a counselor, when a client inflicts psychological harm on someone I suggest that they apologize, make amends, and move on. Let's do that internationally," he suggests. "That will help to reestablish the trust of our allies and set an example of spiritual values set by the majority of civilized people."

As the pamphlet indicates, the promise of Barack Obama is that of the global emperor who could make it possible for America to speak in its true voice to the world, and move on. Obama knows that America is an empire because he grew up on a colonial island possession as the son of an African man and a woman who exiled herself from her country. The same qualities that make Obama invisible to America make him visible to the rest of the world. He is as much one of them as he is one of us, and they will see themselves in him, and like us better. Yet what kind of president will he be? For all his obvious intellectual superiority over the fitful and impulsive McCain, Obama has impaled himself on the horns of a painful dilemma. While the identity that he constructed for himself in his autobiography has allowed him to blossom as a man and as a politician, it bears little resemblance to the conventional narratives of white men who run for president--and contains elements that are likely to frighten off large portions of the electorate, before or after November 4. The story of a man who identifies with a foreign father, and with people who are not Americans, and who does so on the basis of the color of their skin, flies in the face of the simplistic racial pieties that white Americans have embraced since the end of Jim Crow. The identity that Obama so painstakingly created for himself is not one that he can share with the electorate, and so the price of his political success is that he is forced to sublimate the material he had so painfully excavated and again become invisible. His image-makers create new stories about the candidate, which ring false and drain his marvelous abilities as a writer, a speaker, and a leader.

The police finally show up around 4:30, and, 15 minutes later, I am inside the stadium. The stage set, containing two assemblies of four giant drywall and laminated plywood pillars connected by an arc of smaller pillars topped by a fake Greek frieze, has been an easy target for sniggering Republicans and political reporters all week. From video screens flanking the stage, Obama is telling the crowd, "I will always tell you what I think and where I stand." It's a marriage pitch, but the audience is only half listening, which makes sense considering the fact that half the delegates came here to vote for someone else. After a short break, Stevie Wonder appears on stage and starts talking to himself in that weird, sing-song way he has, to organize the voices inside his head. "I love you," Stevie says. "I love you with every song I sing. " Stevie is a blessing. He vamps. "Oh, Bar-ack O-ba-ma," Stevie sings, mining the clattering bass-heavy syllables for any unexpected musicality. "I got to do this one. I got to do this one for the future president of the United States and his wife," he says before launching into "Signed, Sealed, Delivered," the Obamas' wedding song. "I know Barack Obama gonna set this country on fire," he sings, flashing his irresistible thousand-watt smile.

Then there's Joe Biden, whose gleaming white dental work is visible from across the stadium. The spark of genius in the choice of Biden was that it gave the portion of the electorate that makes lame foot-in-mouth jokes about "clean" blacks permission to vote for Obama without feeling like they would have to apologize if they met him in a bar. Other than that, the choice of Biden is clearly wrong. What it signifies is that the candidate is unable to run on his own experience of the world, which would require talking about his African father and Indonesian stepfather, and what it feels like to be a member of the dark-skinned races who live outside our borders, and make up the overwhelming majority of people on the planet. Because he can't, Obama grabs the talking head from Delaware and clutches him like a security blanket. Joe Biden is one more symptom of the candidate's invisibility, which reads like insecurity. A more confident man would have made Hillary Clinton an offer she couldn't refuse before sending her off on a four-year-long vice presidential fact-finding mission to Azerbaijan.

Biden strides off. A light breeze accompanies pictures of baby Barack. "His childhood was like any other," a voice intones. This is utter bullshit. "But it was his mother who saw in him a promise." On the screen are pictures of the elevated train tracks in Chicago, a big city, where Barack Obama arrived as a community organizer. "I loaded up all my belongings in this raggedy old car, and I drove out to Chicago, didn't know a soul at the time," he explains. The line sounds deeply familiar and deeply weird. It's a line from the biography of every writer arriving in the big metropolis: Langston Hughes, Thomas Wolfe, Ralph Ellison, Saul Bellow, James Baldwin, Barack Obama...

The camera cuts back and forth from the candidate's white grandparents and his white mother to his strong black wife and gorgeous black daughters, in the promise that we can all be members of one big family. There is dead silence in the stadium. Up on screen, Obama tells the story of sitting on his grandfather's shoulders and waving an American flag at the returning astronauts. At 8:11, he walks down a landing strip of blue carpet to the microphone, a skinny guy in a dark suit hoping to close the sale.

Standing alone in front of 84,000 people, he carries with him the hopes and dreams of his chosen race, of everyone who wants the bad news to stop. He is handsome, fluent, at home in language. He doesn't stumble over ordinary words. His presence up there on the wedding-cake podium, flanked by giant video screens, is proof of how far we have come as a nation. He is the heir to John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Abraham Lincoln. But who is he?

"Our nation is at war, our economy is in turmoil," says the Invisible Man. And then, angrily, "We are a better country than this," which is clearly the best line of the night--scornful, strong, hopeful. He tilts his chin up to look tough and he looks first to his left and then to his right. "We love this country too much to let the next four years look like the last eight," he proclaims. The rest of the speech is warmed-over stuffing without much turkey.

Still, there is something moving about the contrast between the strong, declarative tone he strikes and the fact that he is so young and thin. He is the most intimately familiar candidate for president that I have seen, a man who is clearly on the side of the angels, and walks in the light, and all the rest of that. Plus, he is a serious writer, with a sure sense of his own voice and a professional's ear for hypocrisy and cant that will serve him well in the White House.

But there is something missing, which I fear might be fatal to his presidency. I believe that the painful process of self-formation that Barack Obama went through, and his self-awareness about the process, might be good equipment for a president to have, but watching Obama give the most important speech of his lifetime, if not mine, it is easy to conclude that Ralph Ellison knew what he was talking about. Here he is, Barack Obama, the first black man to be nominated for president by a major party, and he can't speak honestly about who he is and what he believes. He can't or he won't--either way, he's invisible.

Yet, perhaps it doesn't really, truly, matter whether Ralph Ellison was right about the price that Americans pay for having black skin, or whether the personality that Barack Obama created to deal with the pain of abandonment has a few notable cracks in it. The truth is that America is in big trouble, and the so-called national dialogue about race long ago became a collective act of masturbatory narcissism for whites and blacks alike. Barack Obama's father was never a slave; he was a Harvard graduate whose countrymen kicked the British out of their country just like we did.

 

What we need from Obama is a grown-up commitment to smart ideas that reflect the realities of contemporary society and make it better--as when he calls for lifelong education and for health care and pensions that stay with workers no matter how many times they change jobs, or when he warns that "kids will have to turn off the TV sets and put down the video games and start hitting the books," a phrase that echoes his father's complaints about his son's television-watching during his one and only visit to Hawaii. We need a president with a stereoscopic vision of American power who can propitiate the Russians, cut deals with our creditors, and block the emergence of a nuclear Iran. We need the cool-headed chess player who figured out how to win the Democratic primary despite losing every major state except Illinois to Hillary Clinton. We need a smooth-talking, democratic version of a cranky Third World autocrat like Lee Kwan Yew, who understands the world as it is and who doesn't talk crap. Or else we can continue the way that we are, until America actually becomes a Third World country.

"Say it again."

"Yes, sir."

"That's right."

"We cannot walk alone."

After standing alone for 45 minutes, the writer turned politician is joined by his wife Michelle, as Sasha and Malia skip around in the falling confetti. Malia presents her father with a long blue strip of paper and he winks. She will remember that wink for the rest of her lifetime. The stage explodes, as fireworks go off around the stadium, to what sounds like the music from Star Wars.

Yet, apart from his family, Obama is alone. There are no old friends from grade school eager to touch him. There are no senior party leaders. Millions of people admire him, and are moved by the possibility of change and renewal that he represents, but the scene on stage suggests that he has few friends who want to hug him.

"The arc of the moral universe bent a little more towards justice Thursday night," wrote John Aloysius Farrell in The Denver Post. "This is the defining moment of my lifetime," Anthony Graves, 32, told the Rocky Mountain News. It might be more accurate to say that the fantasy of an escape from history never ceases to pull at America even after we have learned how destructive this fantasy can be. The world didn't turn bad because George Bush made mistakes over the last eight years. The world was always bad. Still, living in darkness is not the American way, because America is always elsewhere. It is a fantasy shared by hundreds of millions if not billions of people around the globe, who want to live in the light. Barack Obama understands both sides of the global equation that makes America possible, but he has decided that he can't speak the truth about who he is and what he has seen and what he knows about the world. Obama is the kind of leader we need, which is why it is a shame that he has decided to remain invisible.

 

David Samuels is the author of Only Love Can Break Your Heart and The Runner: A True Account of the Amazing Lies and Fantastical Adventures of the Ivy League Impostor James Hogue. This article originally ran in the October 22, 2008, issue of the magazine.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 117 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

117 comments

What a load of branless bloviation! But just one point: the principle concern of "Invisible Man" is not the protagionist's encounters with racism; it is his disillusionment with the Communist Party. He does not feel he is invisible because of his color, but because he does not fit comfortably in radical politics. Of course, to know this about the novel, one would have to do what no one does anymore: READ IT.

- Miande

October 5, 2008 at 12:04am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Miande, I read Invisible Man and agree with Mr. Samuels's take. No, he ultimately doesn't feel comfortable with radical politics, most likely because he feels a profound disconnect with his radical fellow travelers, including a white woman who projected on him a feral sexuality for being black. And these were whites who were supposed to be the most sympatico. With friends like those...

- Marcy

October 6, 2008 at 5:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Shorter version (courtesy of Geraldine Ferraro): "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position."

- J Paul

October 8, 2008 at 5:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Shorter version (courtesy of Geraldine Ferraro): "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position."

- J Paul

October 8, 2008 at 5:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I loved reading a careful reading of Dreams to show its parallels to Invisible Man. I have read Dreams and see a man totally divorced from this persona on the campaign trail. Like Samuels says in the piece, Obama did not have a childhood like the rest of us, as his campaign managers are wont to convey. Indeed, it was kind of stark and lonely -- abandoned by his mother, his father clearly another story. I love the radical side to Obama but rarely see it now. I love that he struggled with his identity for so long too. I also agree with Samuels' sentiment of liking the idea of a writer-president: of course it is lovely to think of this ideal of the poet-politician, a seemingly early-modern ideal in the vein of Sir Philip Sidney. Here's what I didn't get really about this article though: The opening paragraph. Okay,it nicely set the stage, and the "antidepressant" adjective for the blue was great. But was it just there to flatter readers? This idea that when you come of age and are a "meritocrat" all of your friends are running things... I don't know. I think I was missing something about the purpose of this opening paragraph, and I think it should have been cut entirely from the piece. Otherwise, a great piece.

- jpnj

October 8, 2008 at 9:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Are we talking about the same book? The narrator's disillusionment with Communism is merely one part of the novel. Invisible Man is about a series of disappointments with "answers" to social inequality, which leads him to drop out of the system entirely. If you think it's only about radical politics, then you aren't paying attention to the rest of the book. It's about the narrator's progress toward a recognition that he is indeed invisible, and that everything that seems like self-improvement is merely a ploy to "keep him running."

- Josh

October 8, 2008 at 11:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The disconnect for me about Mr. Obama is simnple. Mr. Obama clains his father abandoned him (thus his mother etc) yet he feels this entitles him to the "black" vote! I am clearly missing something...

- James Nolan

October 9, 2008 at 12:22am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think the defining phrase here is that "HE CAN'T". Obama can't talk honestly about race or his complicated experience because he would never be elected. The state of our political system today does not reward complicated nuances or shades of grey. In fact, I can already see the McCain campaign seizing on some of Mr Samuels arguments here and twisting them to suit their purpose - Obama hates his white relatives, Obama is a man with few real friends, the "real" Obama is a dangerous man who harbors contempt for white people - and so on. I'm sure those are not the points Mr Samuels was trying to make, but in this day and age, those are the talking points that would stick.

- Sarah

October 9, 2008 at 12:51am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Excellent analysis, if I say so myself!

- Steve Sailer

October 9, 2008 at 2:05am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

When I read Dreams of My Father, Invisible Man was the first book that came to my mind as well. It strikes me as exceedingly odd that Miande thinks the book was about the communist party, since it so clearly was not. Invisible Man was about a man trying to figure out who he was, in the face of a world in which everyone had such strong (and conflicting) pre-conceived notions regarding who he should be that he felt as if every action and every thought was in some way a reaction to the expectations of others. Obama asks very similar questions of himself in Dreams, though his answers are somewhat different from Ellison's. To have a reflective, self-aware president would be a welcome change.

- Jay

October 9, 2008 at 3:00am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I've never understood the practical purpose of lambasting guilty white liberals. We know that we can never understand the true plight of people of color, people of third world countries, etc. etc. But it seems to me counter productive to constantly point this out. Is the purpose to drive us to conform to the historical white person? To fulfill our mission to be the beast or oppressor? I mean, I'm reading Meridian, and I simply don't understand the point of criticizing a character like Lynn at such a deep level. This is a woman who is trying to register black voters in the deep south. Why should we dig any deeper than that? Why can't people just accept that sometimes on rare occasion, white people do things that are decent, and fly in the face of what most white people do most of the time, maybe even what that individual does most of the time. Why criticize white people who are out there supporting a black candidate for the top job in the land? Why does Barack attack his mother for creating a sustaining myth about his father, when this is something a lot of mothers might do irregardless of the race issue. What does that actually achieve aside from making guilty white liberals feel more guilty? (I think Barack realized that it achieves nothing, which is why he stopped doing it) I suppose I'll never understand, which is the point, but it is frustrating nonetheless, and it is an impediment to me trying to devote myself to making any kind of difference out there. I mean if this is what were going to get for joining the peace corps or something, fuck it, I guess I should just go work for exxon mobile and get rich, and then everyone can be happy, and angry, and happy in their anger. Specifically though, the section about Wright is dumb. Obama joined that church as a tactical move to improve his status in black Chicago. Choosing such a radical church made this move more effective. It's the same as choosing Sarah Palin as your running mate. People don't become politicians. People are born politicians.

- Max

October 9, 2008 at 3:01am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wow, The Invisible Man wasn't centered on anger about racism and its destruction on being recognized as an individual identity - that's the most remarkably ignorant thing I have read in years - with brainless spelled incorrectly no less. Sarah Palin? Is that you?

-

October 9, 2008 at 7:46am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

A sly written, but insidious and disingenuous piece, aimed at a high brow public, to give them complicated but false and fallacious reasons to vote against Obama. This article is full of backhanded compliments and outright insults. It's of course, much better than the Obama hatchet book by Corsi, but has the same goal: Painting a negative image of Obama-the-Outsider. He's now not only distrustful of whites, but also blacks and those of mixed race like himself! Of course, any article that tries the guilt-by-association via Wright AGAIN, and that repeats the lies and character assassinations about J. Wright, is not worth reading. It desperately tries to paint Wright as an uppity negro, by highlighting his relations with a white woman, or living in a white neighborhood. Even those things were true, which they aren't, how are those bad or even disingenuous? It's not. No, it's a thinly veiled scaremongering about black men "taking the white women and living in our white houses" Yawn.

- F. Douglass

October 9, 2008 at 8:53am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Barack Obama's father was never a slave; he was a Harvard graduate whose countrymen kicked the British out of their country just like we did." The British were ruthless and brutal in their suppression of the so-called "Mau-Mau" rebellion, the defeat of which was total. The British left Kenya voluntarily.

- steve

October 9, 2008 at 10:23am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

First, some of the best writing in America today is found within the pages of The New Republic. Mr. Samuels’ article is no exception. His take on Barack Obama is fascinating. Whether his take on the senator as to the deeper core of his being is correct I can’t say, but it’s a compelling read. As a white man I’ve been active in race related politics for a long time. Out of those experiences I’ve learned this: Only one white person, the late John Howard Griffin, who wrote “Black Like Me”, understands what it means to be a person of color in America. It doesn’t matter how liberal you think you are, or how enlightened, or progressive, you can’t know that experience. In the Christian New Testament, in the book of First John, chapter four, verse 20, we read, “If you say you love God whom you have not seen, but do not love your brothers and sisters whom you have seen, you are a liar.” I am not biblical literalist, but I take that scripture to be literally true. It’s a bit off-point, but come Election Day we will see how many Christians view Senator Obama, not as a black man running for president, but as an extraordinary individual of transcendent gifts, with the potential of becoming a remarkable president. If we as a nation should be so fortunate for that to occur, perhaps then, after so long and troubled a journey as a nation divided over race, we can complete the healing process, and understand for the first, “That all men are created equal.” George Mitrovich San Diego

- George Mitrovich

October 9, 2008 at 10:38am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Interesting article. But i think Obama is closer to Ellison than Samuels gives him credit. Ellison in non-fiction works discussed the importance of changing the conversation of race, looking at Burke's idea of transcendence. Not getting past race but exposing its invisibility. I think Obama does that intentionally and unintentionally. So, i disagree that Obama subscribed to a simple idea of black authenticity. I think what was authentic was the way he experienced the world as a person of color, something his family could not understand. Barack Obama himself has said "There is his assumption that there is only one way of being black. That if you are not conforming to a certain pattern of behavior that somehow you may not be authentic enough. Those of us in African American culture know that there is as much diversity in the African American community as there is in any other community. I think in 2008 the african diaspora in america is more diverse than slave decendants. But what is shared is the treatment of being "black" regardless if you are a natinoalist or a conservative. I dont think he romanticizes black life into this life affirming myth, but instead a place where he finally felt understood. It gave him an identity but his unique experiences shape him in unique ways. I do think its a political tactic, but i also think white masses don't understand the nuances and diversity of black character. and that's the sacrifice he has to make.

-

October 9, 2008 at 10:44am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Miande, it's "brainless" not branless, of course, and it's BOTH racism and politics that alienate the invisible man. But that would be in intellectual interpretation of literature, not an opinionated blast of personal invective. And we have an uncomfortable level of that high one sided passion everywhere, just now. Chill.

- Bloviator II

October 9, 2008 at 11:09am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

wright chief of staff,flagger senior comunication,ayers defense, michelle obama,secretary of state. "the planet of the apes?

- virginia ayers

October 9, 2008 at 11:47am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Sir, Your article was certainly interesting and thoughtful. I find that your explantion of Senator Obama is filled with major gaps and error. Perhaps, hoping to develop your painting, you lost something basic along the way like missing "shades of the color blue and yellow". In the end your description is important, but has no real conclusion. What explains Senator Obama's drive and political intelligence? What explains the last 2yrs of his campaign that has remade him and what has he been made into? Senator Obama throughout his political career- the life after his first novel- has had to know many kinds of people. He and his wife have had to make a journey into what Amercia is as a regional and individual creature all across our country. He could not go through this 2 yrs process - especially- without change and growth of his basic ethics and humanism and definition of his role. Your story aches for explanation about who he is. Your story aches of explanation about this country and what it is teaching him (and us). Your story lacks of explanation of the effects of the crisis and wonder of our time and that convergence on Senator Obama and those around him and us, the American people. Your article is without color.

- Lucy

October 9, 2008 at 12:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Crazy right-wing charges that Obama shares the loonier opinions of Dr. Wright" Yes, I can see where you could be thought crazy for thinking that a guy that sat in a Church for 20 years with his wife and impressionable young children might actually agree with the guy up there behind the altar doing the talking. :)

- Mike

October 9, 2008 at 12:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Lets all feel sorry for BO,SO LET'S GO VOTE FOR HIM

- TIRE GAGE

October 9, 2008 at 12:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Interesting article, but I'm not really sure I buy Mr Samuels argument about Obama's rejection of his white relatives. And Mr Samuels seem to feel that he knows who Obama is and what he believes, as implied in this sentence: "Here he is, Barack Obama, the first black man to be nominated for president by a major party, and he can't speak honestly about who he is and what he believes". I'm interested to know what it is exactly Mr Samuels believe is the truth about Obama and what gives Mr Samuels the authority and insight on the matter.

- Brian

October 9, 2008 at 12:21pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'm Native American and luv this country, I never seen a so racial election before. Yet, I never voted at all. The thing is racistism is always going to be around. It's a manner of who is the real target now and who will it affect more. I'm racist deep inside, mainly becuase i'm a different color or was carried down to me of knowing what happened to my people. I'm pretty sure Obama is racist deep inside. I think it's time for the white men to finally fall.

- posted by church

October 9, 2008 at 12:21pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How was this written and posted on October 22, 2008??!! Today is only October 9, 2008. This is very fishy.

- Don

October 9, 2008 at 12:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

He can not talk openly abour race because if he did Mccain would use it against him because he is not white. Obama does not want sympathy votes, he wants the votes he deserves

- Taylor

October 9, 2008 at 12:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think it's hogwash because he's not even black in the first place!

- George

October 9, 2008 at 12:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Great piece. The reckoning is coming. The long con that has been the political rise of this man will fall apart in the next three weeks. Sadly, the fall of Barack Obama will be blamed upon white racism rather than the fact that a majority of American will, upon entering the booth, weigh this man's life experience against that of John McCain's and do the right thing. We are lurching to the cultural goal line where men and women are judged as individuals. This country is ready to elect a black man ( or any other member of a non-white majority) as it's leader but not this black man. It is not racism...it is pragmatism that will loosen the scales from the eyes of the electorate.

- Tim Cook

October 9, 2008 at 12:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The cosmos forbid that I ever become the subject of such an over-wrought "inner" deconstruction. Repeat after me: We are our appearance, our words and our actions to others; nothing more nor less. While each of us may and likely does hold an unresolved inner conversation on our own dichotomies, our outward being is all that is really knowable to others, writers of pop-pysch long-distance analyses included. Each of us represents a work in progress; otherwise millions of metric tons of self-help books would go unsold. This whole exercise reminds me of an over-dramatized freshman book report filled with self-conscious intellectualism. Regardless, I am the one at fault here -- I let this brainless pap steal my time and attention.

- Rick

October 9, 2008 at 12:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The author, while making excellent points for the uninitiated, is so ridiculously full of himself. Getting into Harvard is not merely a matter of merit, as it's application clearly asks if your daddy's rich and your mama's good-lookin'. He's part of the problem, just like every Ivy League punk I've met in my long technology career.

- KlangenFarben

October 9, 2008 at 12:40pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I am personally tired of hearing Obama use his background and race to get votes. My white, Scotch-Irish and German grandparents struggled over generations to provide for their families. I am the first person in my generation and before it to attend and graduate from a university. I now have an MA degree at age sixty-seven. I graduated with honors. I owe $80,000 dollars + interest in student loans. No one feels sorry for me as a white woman and no one would vote for me based on my struggle and race. I, and others like me are invisible, not Obama. He has had advantages I will never realize.

- Joanne Annecchini

October 9, 2008 at 12:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Give me a break- the reason Obama can't talk openly about race is he would ruin his chances for election- he hates white people and is a follower of those who also hate white people (Wright/ etc) His wife is, if anything more racist that he.

- Fred T.

October 9, 2008 at 12:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Having re-read this book recently I concur with Marcy. The disconnect that Ellison's character felt was not due to feeling "misfit" within the Communist Party but was the result of being used because of his color by people who claimed to be oblivious or sympathetic to the Black community. Even with all their "ethics", the individuals who comprised the group could not overcome their personal prejudices which were rooted in the most fear based teachings projected by White America. Black man as "militant orator" great as rallying the masses but not much of an independant thinker. And for typical use as a wild sexual "buck" in White womens fantasys. They could not "see" him as an individual human being, hence the title "Invisible Man". They only see what they want to see, a trait that is still all too common in America today as race, sex, religion or any other dividing priciple we cling to for false security.

- Nate3essx

October 9, 2008 at 12:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What a bunch of sensationalism! Did Mr. Samuels come straight out of Barack's... (well, I let you figure it out)... Mr. Samuels is nothing but vainglorious. The talk about Obama being a "writer" with an "Ivy League education" bit made me want to gag... complete lack of substance... And you wonder why people label him an elitist... it's partly because of articles like this, where you might as well rub each other's backs and stare down your nose at the rest of us...

- Jessica

October 9, 2008 at 12:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you for your insightful portrait of a man who would lead us to be a better country. Self-knowledge coming too late is what doomed Ellison's protagonist. Obama's outsider status and his reflective nature will help him avoid a similar fate. Obama's truer self will emerge when he is our leader.

- enion

October 9, 2008 at 12:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I have to say, having read both quite recently, I think this article is sometimes insightful and sometimes oblivious. I think so much of what ended up defining Barack Obama was the context within which he was raised. How, in the 60s in the United States, would a person with dark skin be able to identify as being white. That was never an option to him. In no way did I ever get the impression that he wanted to demonize or use his grandparents or mother--rather that he saw how complicated race and identity is even for people who belong, literally, to the same family. I finished reading that book more confident than I have ever been about a candidate, merely for the fact of that single insight--that nothing, nothing, is ever black and white.

- Christina Fontecchio

October 9, 2008 at 12:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Since I'm interested in psychology and personal motivations and race relations (white female, by the way), I found this fascinating. My first response was that possibly it said more about the author's motivations and personal journey than Sen. Obama's. I thought Sen. Obama's book was fascinating, but I don't feel I know the man intimately based upon that one book. I think he must be exceedingly complex and psychologically contradictory given his background. I also think it would be fantastic and amazing to have a president who is poet-politician--whether he'll be allowed to manifest his poet side is another question. Finally, after years in the wilderness to have an intelligent, sensitive human being in the WH is enough for me. As for this article, many interesting ideas without a huge amount of factual or convincing arguments as back up. Samuels must be primarily a fiction writer rather than a biographer. I'd be interested to read Doris Kearns Goodwin's take on Samuel's analysis.

- klk

October 9, 2008 at 12:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

re: the "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position." True. If he were a white man with equivalent behavior, such as attending a racist church that gave awards to white supremacists and calling that churche's Rev. him mentor for 20 years; then that candidate would have been laughed out of the primary. It is surprising that Obama is faring so much better than David Duke.

- Bob G.

October 9, 2008 at 1:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What was your POINT. SEEMS TO BE NO POINT.

- sdusa

October 9, 2008 at 1:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's admirable that posters (mostly) seek to explore the issue of race, as dangerous an ideological minefield as has ever existed. It's a complex and complicated issue. Those hewing to stereotypical views may find it difficult to accept the possibility of said views being incorrect. Senator Obama's tightrope walk (or any Presidential candidate's, for that matter) would be difficult regardless of circumstances. Though it's difficult, try to view the situation dispassionately. We're struggling through one of the worst economic periods since the Great Depression (and we haven't yet found bottom), jobs are falling away as snow on a winter day, the two-pronged war should be one-pronged and all of this took place under our collective watch. Will debating the meaning of Ellison's work, racism or the truth of the claims being bandied about change any of this? I don't know about any of you, but to vote for the man who willingly cosigned just about every aspect of this fiasco seems un-American and incredibly irresponsible.

- Ben

October 9, 2008 at 1:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Taylor said, "He can not talk openly abour race because if he did Mccain would use it against him because he is not white. Obama does not want sympathy votes, he wants the votes he deserves." I must disagree with that statement. From what I've seen, Obama wants any votes he can get, any way he can get them, deserved or not. When Obama ran for the state legislature in Illinois, he ran unopposed because he had the other three candidates kicked off the ballot by callng enough of their petition signatures into question. For example, one woman signed an opponent's petition shortly before she got married, so her name changed between then and the election, which apparently - due to a ridiculous Illinois law - made it technically no longer count on the petition. If Mr. Obama only wanted the votes he deserves, he wouldn't engage in that kind of hair-splitting and dirty politics.

- Fred

October 9, 2008 at 1:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You had me going for a while, but I saw thru it. You can no more know his upbringing than I and I am biracial. It is a struggle on both sides to be accepted. Both sides of your race and family. What you did not say it that, maybe he cannot be honset about race in America because it would be unpoplar and lose him the election. The America that told black people the didn't count,if they had an ounce of black blood they are black(as if that is a curse); the America where blacks can still get killed for the color of their skin, an America they create, subprime lending programs, AIDS , Syphilis and other killers to commit genocide that back fires and affects all. He cannot tell you, what he is really thinking,(if he even thinks that way). White American(most,not all) has not and probably will not truly deal with Racism in America in our lifetime.

- Tara

October 9, 2008 at 1:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wow, too bad BO didn't actually write the book! And too bad he isn't even really (Black) The revelation that Barak Obama is 43.75% Arab goes a long way to explain his political and business connections to Antoin 'Tony' Rezko, Nadhmi Auchi, Joseph Aramanda, Louis Farrahkan, and other characters he relies on as contacts, advisors, campaign organizers and political contributors. Obama needed the black vote, so he wrote a book and created a fictional African-American profile for himself. His real dealings are with his true heritage, anti-Israel Arabs. I was also suspicious about his claim that publishers had sought him out, while still unknown, contract in hand. I doubted, too, that the publisher would have paid him a hefty advance. And I refused to believe that his publisher would have invested the hefty ghostwriting fee needed to rescue the project after four years of amateurish dithering, a dithering that included an extended stay for Barack and Michelle on Bali. "The whole story smells of purposeful intervention," I wrote. "The whole book does. A political career holds more promise when launched with a lovely memoir under one's belt than with an unfulfilled contract over one's head. Much more." "The question remains," I concluded, "who did the intervening and why?" I sensed and still do an affluent and unseen political godfather, someone with a grander vision than Bill Ayers or Tony Rezko. Perhaps Khalid al Monsour, the benefactor that got him into Harvard?

- gael

October 9, 2008 at 1:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

If this is not racism. Please tell me why ever so called Rep can not tell me why they are really a Rep and why they are voting for John McCain. The fact comes down to color. Let me also ask you this what if John would have picked a Black Female as his running mate. Will the outcome be the same. Just think about it. So know ask your self if racism no alive.

- sdusa

October 9, 2008 at 1:06pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Yes WE can and Yes HE will be the next President of the United States of America. How sweet it isto be loved by YOU!!!!

- Queen32

October 9, 2008 at 1:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

@ F. Douglass: You completely miss what the article is saying. As far as its statements on Rev. Wright, what the author is stating is that Rev. Wright is a hypocrite in that he is all pro-black and down with evil whitey, and then chooses to live in a gated community with same evil whitey. When someone like you says "uppity", they usually mean a black person who "doesnt know their place." That is NOT what Samuels is saying here. It is not that Wright is a strong black man who doesnt know his place, but simply that he is a hate-monger and amplifier of paranoid conspiracy theories.

- Eric D

October 9, 2008 at 1:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I see now how how the saying is ignorance comes inall forms and fashions. I am the mother of a "bi- racial" child therefore making him equal parts of white and black which really shouldn't matter because like everyone else who has a beating heart and requires oxygen to breath he is HUMAN! Is this really the year 2008, is it that hard to look beyond the shade of someone's skin and not judge. If everyone in the world was blind what a better world we would live in

-

October 9, 2008 at 1:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

No white man not even John Howard Griffen knows what it's like to be black in America.

- Robert Grissom

October 9, 2008 at 1:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This author put way too much time analyzing this junk, frankly there comes a point when you have to say, "It is what it is, let it be." You can speculate for the rest of your life what he meant in his writings and nuances* that are linked to the invisible man. So what? This election and the BO/JM debate boils down to one thing. Is a black/mixed etc. person willing to vote for a white candidate when there is someone of race on the card? Conversely is a white person willing to vote against their own race? For a second, step out of all the party affiliations, background flaws that both candidates are guilty of and all the other crap that the media wants to shove down your throat. Is there anyone out there willing to admit they are voting strictly on the race of the candidates? That my friends is the true issue here and regardless of the polls going in to the election I feel the victory is going to be lobsided one way or another. Where's that dumbo eared Ross Perot at when you need him? :) The economy is cyclical so I have no doubt in my mind that either candidate will turn it around for us. Let's face it, the people run this country and we make the opportunities for ourselves to succeed, not the snots in Washington. Anyone relying on the government to make their lives better or blaming the government for their problems is living in a fantasy in which they are their own worst enemy. Step up and be somebody or step aside cause god knows someone else will. "When it comes to gettin' bread I got the keys to the bakery" GOT WAAAAY OFF TOPIC :) Cheers

- Shine

October 9, 2008 at 1:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

iI would say that the American people are ready to vote for a Black Man or of any other Color. the Problem is that Obama does not deserve nothing. with his friends like Ayers and Wright and also Recko that is in prison now. I voted for Obama in the Primary before i really new about him. Lot of people think you are Raceist if you don't vote for Obama that is bull. why not the Blacks are not Raceist because 94% of them are voting for him i do not believe they think he is a great man lot are voteing for him because he is black which is a sorry Excuse. I have been a Dem. for manyyears but i always voted for the person that i though would be for the American people. I believe that McCain will be the best for the American people. Lot of the people will vote for the Person that they think that would give moor to them that is Dem. and Republican. Me i do not want nothing giving to me i want just what i deserve nothing else. don't get me wrong there are lot of Polits in Washington that think the same and lot of people keep putting them back in Office. Now about the books that Obama wrote i have not read any of them and do not care to. I do not read any book written by a politic because i do not beleave what they say. I have not read McCain books but i would beleave lt of what he said I was in Vietnam also but i was not a POW. But i do know lot about how the Vietimese were they were Brutal both sides. Yes i did Mispell some words but i do not really care. as some one said in a Blog that some one mispel a word what difference does it make as long as they say what rights.

- David

October 9, 2008 at 1:35pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

More hot air from another Harvardite...vote for what's best for America...vote McCain.

- Chaz

October 9, 2008 at 1:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

why should he talk about an issue that is really not his to explain? he is 47 years old and like me struggle to expalin 'race' in america. he has however done an excellent job at forcing us all to deal with it personally and make changes in our own lives. were you not listening to his speech on race?? such a defining moment told more than all the talk of 'invisibility' you raise here! he couldn't have been more bold and oh so visible

- pete

October 9, 2008 at 1:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Shortert Version: To J Paul - As they say: If my Aunt had balls she would be my Uncle.

- Pashtun

October 9, 2008 at 1:39pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I am a 68 yr old white mother, when i go into the voting booth on Nov. 4th. I will be voting on the man and what he truly stands for and what he has done with his life. What he can do for this country. If Obama does not make it will be because of narrow minded white bigots.I know because I have 3 in my family. My brother and sister in law are republican no matter what. When my mother asked them if Obama was a republican would you vote for him? They just left. My brother in law who dislikes McCain but won't vote for a black man so he's not voting. How narrow minded and stupid is that. The only thing people like this is missing is their white pillowcases. I love them but I don't like the way they look at other people. You judge a person by who they are. What they made of their lives. and so much more. Obama whould be good for this country. We sure do need something in this country to get back our self respect around the world.

- shirley Mitchem

October 9, 2008 at 1:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you.

- DeeDee

October 9, 2008 at 1:46pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

maybe you can make very 'VISIBLE' your reasons for this article written October 22, 2008 ? The New Republic Invisible Man by David Samuels Post Date Wednesday, October 22, 2008 | Issue Date Wednesday, October 22, 2008

- pete

October 9, 2008 at 1:47pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

George- What do you consider him to be if not Black? I guess that what you are saying is that you see him simply as a man? I find that hard to believe and so would the rest of society.

- Joe Sixpack

October 9, 2008 at 1:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As somebody that is the son of a white woman and black man like Barack Obama, I want to give you a bi-ethnic black,white perspective on ethnic relations which many of us experience but both blacks and whites can't relate to. Then it be a lot easier to see what we bi-ethnic black,white people go through and how we often struggle to define our ethnic identities. many of us are conditioned to identify with the black race due to the one drop black rule(if you have a drop of black blood,then you're black). Many of our white parents teach us the reality of race in USA and that we will be labeled 'black' by society. I remember when I was in 3rd grade, my mother made me check out a book on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and she told me "You need to learn about your people" So I checked out the book,and I learned about what it's like being black. I didn't know what it was like being black. I was introduced into the black experience when I was called the n'word on my 9th birthday. Even then,I didn't see myself as black but it taught me about the awareness that I will be labeled black by many blacks and whites. That has been the case. We are not just white, we are not just black. Our black genes are more dominant than our white genes. We often get accepted into the black community as black a lot more than we get accepted into the white community as white. A lot of times,we aren't seen as being black enough by the black community and even called "zebra","halfbreed" and even "confused", but we are still black enough to be called the n'word by some whites. I can relate to all this personally. In spite of all that, I embrace all my heritages and love people of all races and try to transcend the racial lines. Many others are like me in that regard,but many other others aren't like that. It's very understandable. The 2000 Census was the first time survey options for multiracial Americans were provided. 2.4 percent of the American population listed themselves as multiracial. I was one of those people who listed myself as multiracial because of my disbelief in the one drop rule.

- Raymond N. Andrews

October 9, 2008 at 1:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I strongly disagree with David Samuels' suggestion Barack Obama's supposed unwillingness to reveal his inner self might somehow derail his presidency. If the events of the past five weeks are any indication, we could have done much, much worse in selecting our next President. This is a man who thinks before he speaks, and whose message has been consistent throughout this campaign. If his performance as President is anywhere near what he has shown us so far, he will be compared with Franklin D. Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.

- Art Silen

October 9, 2008 at 1:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This psychoanalytic piece pretends to know what it does not. The author, having never met Barack Obama, and knowing nothing about his friends, intimate relationships, nor him personally, has proceeded to do what no doctor can presume: To have diagnosed and dissected his personality and its tendencies. All this by contrasting Ellison's book, which is a search for personal identity, with Obama's. It wouldn't be bad if it were only a book review, but, this essay is more than that: I agree with the comment that the Repubs. will use any and all ammunition contained herein to try to deny the presidency, to perhaps the only person who can save us from this madness. Perhaps the writers intent is that we should race as a nation to third world status. He certainly ends with that dark thought in mind. It is the mind of America, the brave and forward-looking, visionary America, that sees in Obama an opportunity for renewal and guidance. And, this author seems to believe that Obama is one of Eliot's 'Hollow men'. I beg to differ.

- Bert Gold

October 9, 2008 at 1:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Tim Cook I think you are missing the point of this piece. The fact that you are even calling the potential loss of the election by Barack Obama "the fall of Barack Obama" shows a simplistic outlook and what seems to be an inherent bias against this "black man" (is that all he is to you?) that you believe somehow does not compare to John McCain when analyzed on the individual level. Was this piece not about highlighting the complex personal experience that Senator Obama has had in this country that has led him to where he is today? Are you saying that when comparing the lives of Senator Obama and Senator McCain there arises a clear distinction between right and wrong that would somehow allow voters to "do the right thing," which is in itself a complex notion that you seem to want to simplify. In short, you interpretation of this piece as a call for the downfall of Barack Obama and the election of John McCain is logically incoherent and quite frankly, insulting.

- Lisa B

October 9, 2008 at 2:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Tom Cook, If Senator Obama's rise ends at election, it will more likely be due to lies and innuendo on the part of his opponent and the fools who believe them. If John McCain's life experiences of using his wealth and connections to bully his way into whatever situation he wants (as evidenced by his current tactics on the campaign trail) is the "leadership" people in this country support, then God help us all. If the "scales are loosened from the eyes of the electorate" it will be through the naivete of the electorate who fell for the voice of the ultimate con-man, John McCain

- DeeDee

October 9, 2008 at 2:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"The truth is that America is in big trouble, and the so-called national dialogue about race long ago became a collective act of masturbatory narcissism for whites and blacks alike." Well put. Know as well that this collective onanism ( obscenity on wheels ) is not confined exclusively to race. Thank you for illustrating the tedium. Big doses of smallness all around. And the words is giving us a reach around. Or trying at least. Good piece.

-

October 9, 2008 at 2:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I disagree. Barack Obama HAS talked about race openly. He addressed the race issue in a speech towards the end of the primary season, and did so very well. The point in him addressing this back then, was so that we could get past it and focus on the main question: Is he qualified to lead our country? The answer is YES. He has conducted his campaign with class and dignity, often times being the candidate to call for refocusing on the issues important to all Americans and not media-propelled distractions. Although the title of President is a prestigous one, it is also one of service to the American people. Barack Obama's past shows continuous and progressive dedication to hard working people. None of the candidates are experienced in presidency because none of them have been president. Let's not assign automatic leadership to John McCain because of his military past. Let's look at the man he is today, the choices he has made within his campaign, the manner in which he has conducted himself in debates, and the level of empathy he has for the middle class (which he has never been a member of). All of these things considered, if McCain is elected our next president America will become a global joke. Barack Obama is the strong medicine needed to cure eight years of mock leadership. It's time for our country to be well again.

- Clara

October 9, 2008 at 2:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

doesn't this article miss the whole point of the book? mr. samuels's article focuses entirely on only one part of the journey that seemingly leads obama to the assertion that our identity and sense of self-fulfillment can be found in the simple act of helping others. in other words, it struck me that a lot of the identity issues with which obama battles throughout the book are put to rest (or at least are silenced) once he thrusts himself into community activism. anyway, i think that may be one of the reasons that obama is so compelling to a lot of people, especially to the younger generation. at the end of the day, one of the consistent messages to be found in his memoirs and his campaign today is this call to community involvement. i realize that this is a simplistic way of looking at Dreams, but i think that it does bear mentioning. if you're going to provide a full analysis of the book, you can't ignore all the other elements at play.

- dmuzzy

October 9, 2008 at 2:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think this article is very insightful. I'm sure Obama doesn't bring all of his life experiences to the campaign trail because they will distract from the issues at hand. Furthermore, it gives people room to misinterpret these revelations as him "harboring anger" or not identifying as American. It's not like he's keeping this all a secret as it is published. As McCain tells reporters, those who want to know more can "read his books". With that said, I look forward to Barack being the next POTUS. I feel confident that the experiences of his formative years can help him identify with a broader spectrum of people. We need a president who can actually think during a time like this. Fortunately, this election is clearly not about him being black, but I think America is truly ready for something different. As for #27, what makes you so sure that people will change their minds upon entering the voting booth? What exactly IS McCain's "life experience" that puts him at such an advantage to Obama? What about the "life experiences" of George W. Bush? Whatever the case, we will ultimately see on Nov. 4.

- BLAINE

October 9, 2008 at 2:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Tim, you think that after a year and half making his case and defending himself, Obama's political rise will fall apart in three weeks? And how can you be so sure that if it does happen, it's not white racism? When I weigh Obama's life experience against that of McCain's, I have to admit that I'm leaning towards the life that more closely resembles that of most Americans. And that in NOT John McCain.

- AG

October 9, 2008 at 2:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Support is well and good, but I think you're missing the point. What the invisible man should illuminate is that, so often, whites treat blacks like their inhuman (read subhuman) even when they mean well. Pointing out the plight of people of color is designed to get whites to STOPPIT. That's all. Until whites start SEEING people of (hence the title: THE INVISIBLE MAN)as PEOPLE and not color/sexual objects (as the woman in the book saw our protagonist)/charity causes/stereotypes, etc... the point must be rehashed. It's not about attacking, it's about illuminating what makes the black experience so difficult. And while white liberals can mean well, they, too, can sometimes have difficulty with this concept. That's what the black American experience is all about. Having our humanity/individuality stripped from us (even from people who want to help). Ignore the message if you want to, but it's going to keep coming until white Americans see (AND TREAT) blacks like complete, whole, individual HUMAN BEINGS.

- D

October 9, 2008 at 2:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You don't have a problem taking the White man's money at your casino. Self interest is a an amazing thing Geronimo!!!

- Fuqzol

October 9, 2008 at 2:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

So you represent all of Christianity and you know so much about the trouble of african americans from the slums of San Diego. Gimme a break, shut up!

- Fuqzol

October 9, 2008 at 2:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Barack Obama has never taken the black vote for granted. He has campaigned vigorously across ALL of AMERICA not just white America. I have listened to several radio programs where Barack speaks to listeners at least once a month, John McCain has not responded to these stations' requests for him to speak. While Obama speaks to all of America, McCain has turned his back on American minorities. McCain has said repeatedly that he reaches across the aisle but in his run for president he has yet to reach out to ALL of America the way that Obama has. Of course minorities are rallying behind Obama, he acknowledges their existence and value in our country. That is why Barack Obama will be the next president of the Unites States of America.

- @James Nolan

October 9, 2008 at 2:31pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You know, pretty much all candidates are invisible. They are so carefully manicured, expecting intellectual and autobiographical honesty from any of them, regardless of skin color, is pretty naive. McCain turned his stay in Vietnam into a fairy tale, for instance. He doesn't confront the reality of it, and America wouldn't want to listen. They wouldn't want to know what torture likely did for him... how it feeds into his stance on our present war. You say that Obama appeared invisible even as others gushed over his speech, how he was greeted only by his family. But if I see another candidate greeted by a troupe of party leaders and colleagues, that feels similarly invisible to me. The campaign process is a facade, for every one. As for how Obama present himself in more personal moments, we don't know. And it's not really our business except when it affects his ability to carry out his duties as a public servant, or makes us question the veracity of his POLICY claims.

- Nick Ziegler

October 9, 2008 at 2:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wow that is a diffrent book than what I read.. I mean the veiws of the "White folks" were not spoken of at all in this post.. I saw alot of race in that book and there was a lot of anger to the "White folks" when I read the book I got an idea of the mindset of Obama and gave me good reason not to vote for him

- mavric

October 9, 2008 at 2:46pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Jerome Corsi does in fact have a Ph.D., and I think it's even from Samuels' own alma mater.

- Chris

October 9, 2008 at 2:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"A more confident man would have made Hillary Clinton an offer she couldn't refuse before sending her off on a four-year-long vice presidential fact-finding mission to Azerbaijan." I think you need to separate the political game from Obama's personal self discovery.

- Bob Jones

October 9, 2008 at 2:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Tim... I trust you don;t really think that, or you surely are losing your grip on reality. At any rate, the article is bollocks. All of us have a variety of sides, but are rationally and cognitively sound. The homosexual manager of a small marketing company need not project his 'gayness' in every aspect of what he does and how he runs meetings... wuite the same with a CEO or a President . ... Article is a thinly veiled hatchet job.

- Drew

October 9, 2008 at 2:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I thought the article is a wonderful, complicated and nuanced look into Obama. Yet this close to the election, I can't help but fear that it is only going to be used to provide more ammunition and talking points for the McCain campaign. All the nuances and shades of grey that Mr Samuels is trying to depict is going to be lost, and they would pick specific points that would only serve to demonize Obama more. I understand that it is not a journalist's job to worry about the effect of his work on the election prospect of a candidate (unless you are Bill Kristol and is obviously a shill for the Republican party), but the timing of this article is a bit unfortunate. The time for a nuanced, complicated look at a candidate should probably be earlier in the campaign, so people can have time to absorb, reflect, counter etc. At this stage, with the McCain's campaign throwing everything against to wall to see what would stick, I'm afraid this article is only going to help him and hurt Obama.

- Kindaichi

October 9, 2008 at 3:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This article strains credulity and ultimately breaks it. What a load of overblown hogwash. As a longtime TNR reader who much admires the clarity of thought on these pages, I'm disappointed and appalled by this half-baked compare&contrast undergrad lit paper of a piece--"The Lonely and Unknown: A Close Reading of Barack Obama's 'Dreams from My Father' Vis-a-Vis the Image of Black Male Identity in Ellison's 'Invisible Man'". How effn clueless do you have to be to take the parables and literary devices in Ellison's book and apply them directly to Obama's life? Seriously, does being of mixed parentage with an absentee parent and life experience abroad make you THAT exotic? To red-staters, sure, but the author makes such a ham-handed point in the first para of his Ivied connections that I assume he's more cosmopolitan. I grew up in a foreign country, to parents of differing ethnicities, and an absentee parent... and all I see in the Obamas are middle-class, upwardly mobile, self-aware strivers.. sort of like me only vastly more intelligent and clearly more successful. Nice job taking Republic talking points re searching for the REAL Obama, who is the TRUE Obama, etc. and flipping it...Obama is not just an unknown entity, he doesn't even really know himself. Of course, the writer's nth degree connection to Obama (along with his reading of two books) clearly grants him the authority to speculate on the inner workings of Obama's mind and desires of his soul...and somehow find him wanting and incomplete.

- Samantha

October 9, 2008 at 3:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Many fine people in this country have parents of diffrent race. It is not the parents who fall in loves fault. It is how the child is raised and learns how to respect both families upbrings. Yes he was raised in this country but he also went to his fathers tribe in Kenya to see how his father was raised. I do not belive that Barack Obama is ignoring either one of his racial back grounds. I think that it is the people of this fine country who should look at their heritage and think about can they run the country or do they have secrets that will come out of closet when they are brave enough to run. If you think that you can run for president then think can I face what my family had done for generations did my great grandfathers, grandfather sleep with a slave could I have African BLOOD in me? Please think about how you would feel if people were nick-picking about you. THINK do I have something to hide in my closet or i'm I happy of the way I was raised and think is this really about color or is it about BEING PROUD OF THIS COUNTRY WE LIVE IN.

- Sarah

October 9, 2008 at 3:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Don, 10/22/08 is just the print issue date, much like you'll see Time's 10/13/08 issue on the newsstands today. Actually, I've also gotten the impression that Obama may have "rejected" his white family, partially based on something I read about him previously where he was really trying to be black. It may have been in the Chicago Reader. On the other hand, he is visibly "black", albeit light skinned, and unfortunately there's still a sort of one-drop rule that leaves out the continuum of mixed race people. So maybe this is why he chose to identify as "black," because that was the identity allowed him. For some cheap psychologizing, I thought his choice of a black wife was an implicit rejection of his mother. I'm under an impresion that one marries the same race as one's parent. So, my mixed-race nieces (sister-in-law is Senegalese) would probably marry white men, but if I had a cinnamon nephew he'd marry a black girl. No reflection on Michelle Obama soever, she rocks. Then again, the convention videos make it seem like Obama loved his mother and her parents, so I don't really know.

- Marcy

October 9, 2008 at 3:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

We are being buried in the multitudinous pedantic glosses of people who try to justify their bias with rhetoric. There are many reasons to question what a President Obama might do, why he has chosen the advisors he has etc. But there is a very real effort in this article to blame Obama for the miscegenation of his birth. It's low down, nasty stuff.

- Claudia

October 9, 2008 at 3:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

TIME mag's Swampland linked over to this article. Reposting great pithy comment from a commenter over there: "Shorter Samuels: The problem with Obama is that he isn't the kind of black person I think of when I think of black people." Yeah, that about nails it. Can we agree that speculation on the "authenticity" of another man's relationship to his racial identity (ESP if that race is not the speculator's own) is immediately worth ridicule? Also (funny how I rethink using that word since S. Palin appeared on my talking box) wondering about the comment moderating around here. Does each post's author moderate the resulting threads?

- Samantha

October 9, 2008 at 4:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I am sure Obama is a very nice man even though I will not vote for him. It has nothing to do with the color of his skin, it wouldn't matter if he was black or white to me. I could not vote for anyone with the name Obama!! Is this not America!! I do not see how anyone could put a man in the White House with that name. Do we not remember what happened in 911. I know he had nothing to do with that but how can America have a president with the name Obama and how can any American vote for him? Makes me sad to think about it!!

- Nancy

October 9, 2008 at 4:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mr. Samuels is probably correct about Senator Obama's search for a father figure being central in the appeal of Reverend Wright to Senator Obama. Senator Obama's search for Black identity early in his adulthood, and his finding it in Africa and with his African relatives is no suprise. His White family could not have provided this for him. That does not mean that Senator Obama does not love his White family. A definition of what it is to be American that assumes that one cannot be pro-Black without being both anti-White and anti-American out of date, and ignores the reality of an increasingly diversified nation that must unite in the face of an increasingly complicated and potentially dangerous world.

- Bob

October 9, 2008 at 5:58pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

A sly written, but insidious and disingenuous piece, aimed at a high brow public, to give them complicated but false and fallacious reasons to vote against Obama. This article is full of backhanded compliments and outright insults. It's of course, much better than the Obama hatchet book by Corsi, but has the same goal: Painting a negative image of Obama-the-Outsider. He's now not only distrustful of whites, but also blacks and those of mixed race like himself! Of course, any article that tries the guilt-by-association via Wright AGAIN, and that repeats the lies and character assassinations about J. Wright, is not worth reading. It desperately tries to paint Wright as an uppity negro, by highlighting his relations with a white woman, or living in a white neighborhood. Even those things were true, which they aren't, how are those bad or even disingenuous? It's not. No, it's a thinly veiled scaremongering about black men "taking the white women and living in our white houses" Yawn.

- Sarah Bolger

October 9, 2008 at 6:06pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What? He's not Black? What's wrong with you George?!

- Perplexed

October 9, 2008 at 6:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Lessee, is Max correct in thinking that if non-black liberals are to be criticized for not whitewashing their self-loathing enough with good works, then the only alternative is for one to fulfill their destiny as "mostly" a historical beast or oppressor? One would hope to easily find amongst the grey, whether liberal or not, those who George needn't remind to "love your brothers and sisters whom you have seen", as well as those unseen 'invisibles... As interesting an author the Senator would be, I'm not ready to anoint him as "the extraordinary individual of transcendent gifts" who will lead us over the river to Martin's promised land. Heck, I'm still trying to figure out how someone can brag about the diversity of the black community? Isn't the point of being color blind to not lament the diaspora but celebrate the cointegration? I really believe, that away from party politics, that's a gift that someone like Obama can bring to us all. But given some of our concerns for his policies, and level of experience, such that he is should suitably do so as president? I was most impressed by the accidental candor that instead of building accomplishments in Congress, he has gone "through this 2 yrs process" of self-discovery "of his basic ethics and humanism and definition of his role." And I'm most concerned with those who project on him the overturner of moneychangers who can bring about the white and/or European's comeuppance.

- El Quixotian

October 9, 2008 at 6:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Subject: UNBELIEVEABLE... PLEASE READ!! Gunman attacks Nigerian over Obama T-shirt Share Today at 2:19am By Agency reporter Published: Thursday, 9 Oct 2008 An unidentified gunman has shot a Nigerian, Dube Egwuatu, in a London street for wearing a shirt with the image of United States Democratic presidential candidate, Senator Barack Obama. The Daily Mail newspaper of London reported that Egwuatu, 36, was shot on a street in South Norwood on Tuesday by the white gunman, who had threatened to kill him. The Nigerian was buying a mobile telephone top-up card in an off-licence shop when the gunman confronted him and glared at the top, which had Obama‘s image underneath the legend, ‘Believe.‘ The attacker then launched into a tirade of racist slurs, shouting ‘I f***ing hate n*****s‘ and urging the former street warden to leave the shop with him. Although the attacker then left the shop, he later accosted Egwuatu as he made his way to his car. The attacker was waiting for him in broad daylight with fierce-looking dog and holding a gun behind his back, the paper said. Realising what had sparked the increasingly violent assault, the terrified Egwuatu zipped up his jacket to cover Obama‘s image and walked to his car. But the shaven-headed man followed Egwuatu and after pulling open the passenger door, pointed the gun at him. After pleading with the skinhead to leave him alone, Egwuatu put the keys in the ignition and turned the engine on. The attacker then fired the gas-powered ball-bearing pistol three times, hitting the civil servant in the face, hand and shoulder. Fearing for his life and bleeding heavily, Egwuatu raced away in his car and found somewhere safe to call for help. He was taken to hospital and later sent to have a piece of metal removed from his jaw. Egwuatu, a data analyst with Croydon Council, said, ”The venom in his voice was frightening. He was telling me that he was going to kill me. I couldn‘t believe it was happening - and just because I was wearing an Obama T-shirt. He was trying to make me walk somewhere quieter, saying, ‘I‘ve got something for you,‘ and ‘I‘m going to kill you.” The shocked Egwuatu added, ”Obama inspires me, his educational track record alone is quite unbelievable - that is why I was wearing the T-shirt. I did not think for one minute it could stir up such powerful feelings of hatred and I never said a word to him.”

- Prettyporter

October 9, 2008 at 6:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

A sly written, but insidious and disingenuous piece, aimed at a high brow public, to give them complicated but false and fallacious reasons to vote against Obama. This article is full of backhanded compliments and outright insults. It's of course, much better than the Obama hatchet book by Corsi, but has the same goal: Painting a negative image of Obama-the-Outsider. He's now not only distrustful of whites, but also blacks and those of mixed race like himself! Of course, any article that tries the guilt-by-association via Wright AGAIN, and that repeats the lies and character assassinations about J. Wright, is not worth reading. It desperately tries to paint Wright as an uppity negro, by highlighting his relations with a white woman, or living in a white neighborhood. Even those things were true, which they aren't, how are those bad or even disingenuous? It's not. No, it's a thinly veiled scaremongering about black men "taking the white women and living in our white houses" Yawn.

- Kwame N'Beki

October 9, 2008 at 7:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This piece is the ultimate in damning with faint praise. Can't tell if it was ghost-written by L. Wiseltier or if the author is simply the house literary critic for the McCain campaign.

- evets

October 9, 2008 at 9:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Clearly you're not familiar with recent opinion polls, Tim. I too would be interested to hear why David Samuels thinks he knows what Barack Obama really thinks, and what that is.

- Electra

October 9, 2008 at 9:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

A very thoughtful and informative article, TNR at top form. I do hope Mr Obama isn't obsessed with his racial identity, because such concerns may well turn out to be a dangerous distraction from the extremely urgent and serious problems he will have to handle if he becomes President. Here in Australia we see a strong and wisely led USA as essential to our secure future. After Bush's damaging inadequacies it's a great pity that neither McCain nor Obama has clearly demonstrated that he has the personality, leadership talent, capacity for strategic thinking or understanding of economic matters that the job is going to demand. Let's hope whoever wins selects very good advisers (not party hacks) and will be working with a very responsible Congress. Sophisticated foreign friends want nothing but the best for America.

- tim6325

October 9, 2008 at 10:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Why is it that white writers (not all) are always obsessed with race? Year after year the only ones making an issue of someones color is the colorless ones. It's not enough just to treat everyone as equals and evaluate them on their talent. Obama has certainly stayed in that vain, you should try and do the same.

- full time observer

October 9, 2008 at 10:30pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I thought I was the only one who saw this! I wrote a play about the Invisible Man quality of Obama's rise. Thanks for validating my thoughts.

- Kelly

October 9, 2008 at 11:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Now I'm missing something. What makes you think Obama thinks he is "entitled" to the black vote.

- igotnews

October 10, 2008 at 3:05am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Precisely. And I think it's tragic, because I admire his search for identity and always appreciate nuance and shades of gray when it comes to complex issues. We need a thoughtful, self-aware,leader in these perilous first years of the 21st century. I hope we have the guts and good sense to elect one.

- igotnews

October 10, 2008 at 3:13am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I don't think the point of Obama's connection to the "black" vote is any devotion to the father who abandoned him, but the one thing that has always made race a much larger impediment or much more recognizable distinction than any ethnic or religious connection - it cannot be ignored. His father left him with one thing that is instantaneously obvious every time he looks in the mirror, and also obvious when he looks in the mirrors of others' eyes. Historically, when race was indeed an impediment, any percentage at all of that racial heritage assigned one to the category. He may have led a privileged life, but nevertheless, at every step, neither he nor those around him could ignore the clear color of his skin. Even during his first years as a State Senator in Illinois, he was treated badly by some of the black legislative leaders because he wasn't "black enough" and by caucasians because he was. I thought his book was wonderful, and not just because I am a writer (by choice, a lawyer by necessity). I admired not only his way with words but the exposure of his inner turmoil that he was not afraid to display.

- Michele

October 10, 2008 at 7:52am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Interesting article but I think it's missing the point in a few ways. I did not get Obama's "rejection" of his whiteness from DREAMS -- rather, the process of coming to terms with the various aspects of his ancestry with the underlying awareness that in America, if you look black, you ARE black, for all intents & purposes. And let's not forget that this is a black man trying to get elected President -- an incredible balancing act.

- Elizabeth

October 10, 2008 at 8:53am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's not racist, of course. You a racist? Never....

- Kim

October 10, 2008 at 10:34am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Prettyporter, that's alarming. Can you please provide a link to the full story?

- Marcy

October 10, 2008 at 12:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How could Obama ever be a Republican? His politics are radical left with a mixture of America hatred and racism. He is the ideal Democrap candidate - he will be supportrd by his far left followers not in spite of his despicable acquaintances but BECAUSE OF THEM!

- Fred T.

October 10, 2008 at 1:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mccain all the way! Obama's change! 1. Smoking dope and cocaine for everyone. like when he was in school. Thats why he nidn't sign up for Military Service he would have flunked the drug test. 2. Put Ares the terrorist as his Ambassador. He new he was a terroist in 1995 Ares can talk for Obama to the terrorist Bin ladin. 3. Him and Ares will put the money that they got as board members, that never went to the Chicago schools back in the schools budgets. 4. He will send money to Africa and not the troops or his brother whom is only making a 1 a month. 5.He will change like Opera did by buying a school in Africa and getting sued buy a staff worker that Opera fired and not helping the great students of Chicago. The students should want nothing to do with either one. 6.He will pull out of iraq and afganistan and send troops to Africa. When ther needed in Chicago. 7. He will get another 2 house for 300,000 when valued at 1,000,000 from the jail bird Reko by way of the poor. 8. He will pardin George Ryan for the License to bribe scandal. 9. Most of all he will be glad to be American Like his wife not until now. Even tho his mom was on welfare and he got grants to go to college not work his way through college. His wife didn't like American back then but she din't complain about being able to get a education on the Tax payers.

- Richard

October 10, 2008 at 7:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I feel one major fault in Obama and in his handlers: dishonesty. David Samuels is afraid to spell it out clearly. Obama wrote two inflated from reality disconnected books, and like Stalin with his 100 volumes, became an invincible stinky ideological icon. End of disillusionment. I intensely dislike fake souls like Obama and his boss David Axelrod.

- NoToDisHonesty

October 10, 2008 at 8:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Jessica no. 33 is right. Obama is like Lenin and Stalin, lots of words, and a murky and corrupt future.

- FanOfJessica

October 10, 2008 at 8:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Now we see the Republican racial bigotry front and center: Barak Hussien Obama is an Arab terrorist with a name to close to Osama for comfort, a color too dark to be "one of us", a religion to "extreme" for us whitey's to ever understand. How dare African Americans rebuke us after we "liberated" them from that dark continent. Never seen that kind of rage in my cushy milk toast church. The "He's not one of us, so he must be one of them" mentality just might pull McCain out of what should have been a hopeless campaign. Yes America is this stupid, don't kid yourselves, afterall, we voted for GW after realizing how dumb he was the first 4 years! He was dumb, but he was one of us!

- Stephen

October 11, 2008 at 12:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Very good article on Mr. Obama and his identity issues. He should have chosen another church in Chicago, perhaps an integrated Unitarian church. He also should have chosen Mrs. Clinton for his VP. So he's made a couple of mistakes? (say with a Jewish inflection) He is learning and a very brilliant man. Some day he will be able to simply say he is a person-of-color, rather than a Black or African American. He needs to become more transcultural, and admit that the only reason we keep calling people like him Black is the antiquated "one-drop rule" that was made up by white racists to keep possession of their mixed off-spring. Too bad this rule is so strongly supported today by the so-called African Americans. Offie Wortham, Vermont

- Offie Wortham

October 11, 2008 at 4:17am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Fred T. in post#31..why do you think "That One" hates white people...? Are you saying he hates his mother, grandparents...? As a person of mixed race heritage, i can identify with Mr. Obama. From personal experience, I would say he probably appreciates his full heritage even more now because it would help his ability to relate across racial lines. And from the way Obama has conducted himself with intellect and dignity in refusing to stoop to personal attacks like his opponnents' camp, his multi-racial appeal can only reinforce his ability to break barriers and bring people together at an important time of uncertainty. Nuff said!

- noncensense

October 11, 2008 at 4:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

People are naive if they believe that a product of black and white procreation has a choice to choose his race. It doesn't work that way. The child 99.9% of the time will identify as black because he will look black. For example, the odds of a blue-eyed white and a black to produce a child with blue eyes is less than 1 in a 1,000. Similar odds hold for hair texture, noses, etc. The child will look black and will identify as black.

- Wake Up Call

October 11, 2008 at 6:42am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Nancy -- WHat if someone said to you they could not vote for someone named Nancy as it is a nickname for Anne and not a proper name?

- SWozniak

October 12, 2008 at 1:41am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The author presumes that Mr Obama has/has a 'free choice' about identity. It is this assumption that is wrong: in the USA today, anybody seeing him will see a 'black man'. This being so he has little choice as to identification. Believe me I know what I am talking about: I'm not Black and I'm not a man but I lived a similar situation: brought up by my mother French Celtic blond Catholic family when my father (who also abandoned me and my mother) was North-African, and Jewish. I stood out as a sore thumb in my blond maternal family. I was 'the Jewess' even though my mother had me baptized at 7 years old. I am French but always had to answer "where do you come from?" and the like. So though I feel French there is no way I can be a White blond Catholic French because all my life I have been made to feel different. No I don't blame anybody and Yes I'm loyal to France, but I cannot choose to identify with the White French middle-class. Like Obama, I manufactured my Frenchness out of the best of French ideals which I want to uphold, those French ideals that give me a place in my nation. Obama's Americanness I feel would be not too dissimilar with my Frenchness: the best of American ideals that give him a place in America.

- Dr Rachel Bloul

October 12, 2008 at 9:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mr. Samuels' opening paragraph condenses better than anything I have read recently why most people can't stand liberals. If the Republicans hadn't screwed up so badly these people would never see power.

- Norm

October 14, 2008 at 10:28am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I've read the book 4 times. It's one of my favorite books of all time. Most recently, I read the last several chapters dealing with the Invisible Man's time in the Brotherhood within the last month. I did this because I'd first compared Obama with the Ellison's Invisible Man several month's ago in a conversation with a friend. The comparison is valid. Read the Brotherhood section again.

- Gloria

October 14, 2008 at 5:46pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Please, please, please do not claim Obama to the heir of Lincoln, King, and Kennedy. It's not that they weren't all great men, it's that they were all killed for being great men. I was reading that on the train and almost thru the magazine across the car.

- jb

October 16, 2008 at 12:21pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Interesting read on Obama's book. I found that he resented his white family and therefore ended up in the Church of Rev Wright. If Obama does not know who he is, we certainly do not. Could I vote for a black man? Yes, a qualified black man or woman, but not Obama. His past is too vague, his ideas too left, his experience, too limited and most importantly, his tract record, too taxing.

- Backgammon

October 16, 2008 at 6:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Profound and fascinating. Thanks...on the money!

- Harold Schulman

October 17, 2008 at 9:44am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

David Samuels: Where Obama's narrator provides the reader with a model consciousness, sensitive, responsible to triumph along the road to successfully embracing the fullness of his black identity, Ellison's story ends badly. The Ellisonian collision between the individualist consciousness and the realities of the color line in America produces a kind of fatal and indigestible dark matter that is aware of itself yet can never claim a full share of humanity. Ellison's protagonist is invisible because the symbolic radiance of his black skin queers the efforts of others to relate to him as an individual, and makes him prey to the manipulations of whites and blacks alike who utilize the brutal and absurd dynamics of the color line to satisfy private lusts for power and domination. The tragic thrust of Ellison's novel is often reduced to the banality that black people are invisible to white people. Ellison's deeper point is that the symbolic and actual baggage of race makes it difficult if not impossible for a black man to ever realize his full humanity in the eyes of anyone--white, black, communist, capitalist, or himself. George: This a prescient evocation of the self-conscious invisible man. The undulating underground man who is fully aware of all the tangled webs he weaves in constructing, deconstructing and reconstructing the fractious ambiguity inherent in ever evolving relationships between I and We and Other. There is really no way in which Barack Obama can name and then embrace what it means to possess a "black identity". And to the extent Obama is self-consciously channeling the existential nature of Ralph Ellison's invisibility is the extent to which he recognizes the futility of trying. All Obama would have to note, for example, is that, had he been a contemporary of Ellison, his background narrative and current accomplisments would have disqualifed him even from being elected mayor of Chicago, let alone president of the United States. It is in broaching the cacophonous and convoluted narrative of "identity" that I have always admired the stunning achievement that is Ralph Ellison's great novel. He recognized how identity [racial, ethnic, gender, cultural, historical etc.] is such that we are invisible even to ourselves in the end. We are a pastiche of ever reconfigured and evolving experiences, memories and interpretations. "I" is always ineffably embedded in shifting contingency, chance and change. We may decide to go our own way, to be "authentic", to be our own person, our own self;. but what does that really mean when who you think you are now is so deeply and opaquely embedded in all that you once were...in all that you were once told you were by others as a child growing up. Obama can never be black [or an "individual" ] on his own terms. Even if he were to go underground and self-illuminate, in turn, it would remain no less opaque and ambiguous. And no less emphemeral in the sojourn to oblivion. I often wonder the extent to which Obama grasps the perilous and problematic paradox that is identity. I would only know this, however, if he were to reveal someday that his belief in God was, in fact, merely a fragment of a political persona. In my view, it is only when we toss God [or autodidactic demigods] out of the Platonic cave and reconcile our point of view with the ever present shadowy fragments of identity, that we learn to communicate more realistically, more pragmatically, more humbly. George Walton

- George Walton

October 20, 2008 at 5:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The sad thing is, why can't we just accept that Barack Obama is a human being like the rest of us and therefore is virtually impossible to put in a box (the nature of man). He had a complicated childhood with identity issues (like most of us), he's evolved over his 47 years intellectually and philosophically (hallelujah -- he learns), and he's playing his cards however necessary to win this election (surprise -- he's a politician, and a smart one at that). Samuels article is convoluted and irrelevant, but then I've never had much patience with literary analysis (my bad). He begins with an interesting idea, but reads too much in...(did he have a required number of words). Who is Barack Obama? Who among us know who we really are? And by the way, of course race affected him and of course he's racist: WE ALL ARE. Judging people based on perceptions such as race (and gender and class and...) is part of the human condition as we know it -- unconscious, unavoidable and extremely complex.

- Catherine

October 22, 2008 at 6:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Barak Obama is regular person with regular people problems dont put what a book says to what a person feels of coarse he might hate his father but that doesnt mean that he hates him totaly on the inside he still loves him and i dont get what these books are talking about but after what i have just read some people have a problem with a black man running for president and if a black person says that he or she is voting for obama they would think that he or she is voting because of his color these days are changing and your just going to have to live with that well if cant you can go somewhere else with the nonsince we are trying our hardest to make things better and just because of one persons comment on how people vote is making it even harder to make things better and what ever you say or another person says cannot change a person mind

- Diamante

July 20, 2009 at 7:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close