SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Texastential Crisis

POLITICS AUGUST 17, 2010

Texastential Crisis

Rick Perry should be riding high. Chasing his third full term as governor of Texas, Perry is a blood-red conservative running in a blood-red state in a blood-red cycle. In April of last year, he cheered a bill in the statehouse aimed at reasserting Texas’s sovereign rights against an “oppressive” federal government. A few days later, he began publicly musing about how, in its struggle against tyranny, Texas might find it necessary to secede. And who could forget that fateful February morning when the governor took down a coyote (in one shot!) with the laser-sighted Ruger .380 he carries on his morning jogs (loaded with hollow-points, naturally). The man clearly knows his audience: The Lone Star electorate is so pro-GOP that a Democrat has not won statewide office in 16 years and so anti-Obama that it’s home to seven of the 13 House sponsors of the “birther bill.” A February report by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling noted that the president’s approval rating in Texas had dropped to an “eye-popping” 19 percent, prompting The Houston Chronicle to observe that, among the state’s independent voters, “he’s fallen off the cliff.” If the political winds at Perry’s back were any stronger, they’d blow him face-first off the Congress Avenue Bridge into Lady Bird Lake.

So how is it that Governor Wingnut now finds himself in a real race against a Harvard-educated ex-Clinton appointee with about as much charisma and machismo as, well, a Harvard-educated ex-Clinton appointee? A two-term mayor of Houston and onetime chairman of the Texas Democratic Party, challenger Bill White is described in terms like “low-key,” “reasoned,” “deliberate,” and “thoughtful”–qualities that would seem to make him a poor fit for office in this political age of fear and loathing and rage. Yet White is holding his own against the hootin’, hollerin’ Perry in both polling (a June Public Policy Polling survey had them tied at 43 percent, and even the Republican-friendly Rasmussen gives Perry only a “slight,” single-digit lead) and money-grubbing (White has a cash-on-hand edge of $9 million to Perry’s $5.9 million). In March, political handicapper Charlie Cook moved the race from “leans Republican” to “toss up,” positing that Perry faced “the most difficult race of his career.”

Now, Texas being Texas, it’s tough to find a political realist in the state who thinks White will actually win this thing. But pretty much everyone (who doesn’t work for Perry) acknowledges that the former mayor is giving the governor an unusually good run for his money, which begs the question: What in the heck is happening?

First, let’s look at what White has going for him: He was a popular mayor of Houston, earning a reputation for managerial competence. Despite his Democratic pedigree, he is regarded as neither terribly partisan (big city mayoralties in Texas are nonpartisan) nor terribly liberal. He has experience raising money and has plenty of rich friends–a big plus in a state with no limits on individual campaign contributions. He also seems to be benefiting from the fact that, as Democratic consultant Dan McClung puts it, his party’s activists “haven’t had anything at all to look forward to in years.” White’s early promise, observes McClung, has them “all maxed out in vigor and vim.”

But this race isn’t really about White or the enthusiasms of Democrats; it’s about Rick Perry. For a while, White tried running as an education candidate, says James Henson, a pollster with the University of Texas. “It didn’t really get him anywhere. Only with direct attacks on Perry has he gotten a little traction.” Of course, in Texas, it’s tough to generate widespread outrage over even Perry’s most conservative positions, like his denial of global warming, his rejection of federal education funds, or his nomination of a young-Earth creationist to chair the State Board of Education. In addition to the state’s conservatism, there is a strong strain of Texas exceptionalism, meaning that criticism of how things are run can backfire if voters think you’re dissing their beloved homeland. “It’s like a bunch of drunken German soccer fans,” jokes a non-native Republican operative who has done work in the state.

So what’s a battle-minded opposition to do? Rather than focus on Perry’s positions, Team White has been attacking the governor as an arrogant, out-of-touch incumbent grown soft and lazy during his ten-year reign. Using state schedules, Dems estimated that Perry spends only seven hours a week on state business–a figure they have been touting loudly. They’ve also been fanning the storyline of how Perry, having moved out of the governor’s mansion in 2007 to allow for restoration work, has since been living in an upscale, gated community in suburban Austin at a cost to taxpayers of $10,000 per month. And the Travis County District Attorney’s office has taken an interest in Dems’ allegations that Republicans, including Perry’s people, paid an out-of-state firm (with illegal corporate donations, no less) to help put a Green Party candidate on the ballot in an effort to drain liberal votes from White. “There has been a series of stories emphasizing that Perry has a lot of connections in the political community and that he’s willing to win at any cost,” says Henson.

This raises the intriguing possibility that, even in Texas, voters’ toss-the-bums-out grumpiness goes beyond despising Democrats to distrusting anyone in power. “Perry does have a problem being a ten-year incumbent,” says Evan Smith, the longtime Texas Monthly editor now heading up The Texas Tribune. “There’s not a whole lot of undecided opinion out there. Even some Republicans will say he’s been in office too long or his conservatism is too much, even for Texas. And that’s an opening for White.” McClung asserts, “Perry is his own worst problem because he’s been there for so long.” And it’s not as if the governor is a low-key, low-profile kind of guy, he adds. “It’s a big state, it’s got a lot of TV stations, and he is on constantly.”

Of course, most political watchers note that few voters are tuned in at this stage. (“It’s a hundred degrees and nobody’s paying attention,” says Republican consultant Reggie Bashur.) Worse still for White, Perry has a history of floundering, then morphing into Supercandidate as Election Day approaches. “He has a really well-run, tough, aggressive, well-funded” team, says McClung. Complicating matters, notes Henson, Texans who identify as “independents” or “don’t knows” in campaign polls break disproportionately for Republicans on Election Day.

With all this in mind, it’s unsurprising to hear the governor’s people pooh-poohing White. “Who says he has a race?” challenges Perry pollster Mike Baselice. Baselice concedes that White’s chances are greater than zero, but that’s as far as he’s willing to go. Running through the numbers–from party affiliation to voter enthusiasm–Baselice predicts another GOP sweep of statewide races. “It’s nothing more than mathematics,” he insists.

Indeed, this basic equation seems likely to hold. Still, as November approaches, White’s performance may provide insight into the precise nature of the electorate’s discontent. If an uncharismatic, Ivy League Clintonite can get within spitting distance of Governor Wingnut in this unfriendliest of climes, the political winds may be more complicated than they seem.

Michelle Cottle is a senior editor of The New Republic.

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 8 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

8 comments

Believe Baselice. The Republican primary created some bad feelings but in the end it won't be close. It's Texas.

- emccded

August 17, 2010 at 11:14am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Governor Wing-Nut" -- as you call him -- is an ex-Democrat who governs through a weak office but a strong party. He leads a combination of what was once Lyndon Johnson's ("conservative") Democratic and George H. W. Bush's ("moderate") Republican parties. Indeed, Rick Perry has finished the work done by his political forebearers, John Connelly, Ben Barnes, and Bob Bullock, as re-architected by self-proclaimed strategic geniuses Newt Gingrich and Karl Rove: (i) Rick Perry has returned the Texas Election Code to its original form -- list-managed property qualification -- from the egregiously racist form under the affidavit-based poll tax; ... (ii) He has evaded constitutional limitations on the Governor's Office to exploit a radical right-wing majority on the state Supreme Court; this has allowed him to dominate the legislative branch through gerrymandering, pork, and patronage, as well as to privatize our state's "fourth branch" of government -- the Permanent University Fund (something like and nearly as big as the Harvard Endowment) -- by favoring Texas A&M University in College Station over the University of Texas in Austin; and ... (iii) He has continued the radical but proficient political professionalism and organizing it takes to make Texas a "red-state" bastion despite a latent popular Democratic majority. As long as relatively poor, young, and non-white households -- an elusive majority of the politically useless "Hispanic" census category -- cannot or do not vote, Texas has a very "Permanent Republican Majority". Perry's opposition has included Washington politicos -- including Bill White and Matt Angle today -- who have tried and failed to restore what was a bi-partisan concession-tending regime in state government up until the transition started by Governor-President George W. Bush in 1994 was completed in 2002. Democratic politicos on the Washington-Austin axis are still trying, but likely to fail in their political restoration project just like they are failing in the BoWash and Londinium triangle to restore the economy. No, unilateral bi-partisanship and Anglo-American cronyism do not work in Washington, Austin, anywhere. The Washington and Austin politcos have nonetheless maintained one sturdy remnant of that old regime -- a Grisham novel of "doctors, lawyers, and preachers", combining professional and racial patronage, in "non-partisan" Home Rule Cities, including the City of Houston. Houston has a Democratic majority at the polls but a bi-partisan version of the same "borrow-and-spend", regressive taxation regime in municipal government as the whole country under President George W. Bush or Governor Rick Perry. We balance the state and local budgets with increasingly dubious "financial innovations" concoted by the greatest legal minds in either or no party, no state or country, actually. These legal and technical innovations include pervasive economic surveillance -- a "credit-scored" franchise -- and discrimination leading to high incarceration, low political participation rates, and -- of course -- involving bi-partisan support for con-artists like Sir Alan Stanford or tera-larceny like Enron. The only real difference between Republican one-party government in the state and county and Democratic non-partisan government in enclaves like the City of Houston turns out to be wee bit of "affirmative action". The GOP does not allow even a whiff of that in state and county government, but just a little of it in non-partisan municipal regimes serves the GOP well in maintaining a mostly white party with a strong, reliably aggrieved "base". Using urban Democrats, non-white or elite, as foils, the GOP in Texas raises money as an all-powerful ruling party but runs as the opposition party against the clueless and confused Democratic Party establishment -- a patronage-chain with almost no patronage. With no coherent national, state, or muncipal agenda at all, -- just a bunch of flimsy, half-baked deals we have made with the GOP -- Democrats, both statewide and countywide here in Houston, are running on superior "qualifications", as if we were seeking appointed office. Voters who are told every day now that they are "pre-approved" but don't actually "qualify" for much of anything are increasing resentful -- regardless of race -- of smug Democrats running with their noses in the air. Democrats in Texas have no compelling platform, no party governance by convention, nor any other traditional, popular-patriotic foundations of a republican or democratic party. We have nothing to compete with the small, but powerful, "machine" the GOP has constructed along the lines of the old Jim Crow or, now, a new-fangled East-German politice-state. So, if the national "enthusiasm gap" is bigger than whatever a negative margin three Democratic ad campaigns can generate against Perry, then White and nearly all other Democrats statewide and countywide will lose this fall. Will dueling negative campaigns depress the GOP voters? No, they are used to being ridiculed by the "media elite" and having grievances concocted and nursed by hate radio. Will the dueling negative campaigns run on broad-cast or narrow-cast media inspire both Democratic and independent voters the way "Hope and Change" did here memorably? Probably not. But, the Democratic Party establishment is sanctimoniously "non-partisan", while the GOP is not. So, it is hardly a contest at all.

- JRBehrman

August 17, 2010 at 11:18am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wow. I live in Texas, and JRBehrman's "comment" is about the best and most accurate portrayal of the state I've seen in a long time.

- gary21cp

August 17, 2010 at 11:34am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This is a superb piece, Michelle. And for those who think that Bill White cannot win, well, the polls indicate that it could be otherwise. Rick Perry will probably win on November 2nd but why be defeatist when White has a chance? As for the extended comment on Texas politics, the reference to Lyndon Johnson's "conservative" Democratic Party doesn't resonate. Johnson was from the Hill Country in central Texas and was substantially a populist. Maybe the commenter knows this and hence the quotes around conservative but if so, why not an explication of this?

- liberal reformer

August 17, 2010 at 12:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well written, but a few corrections need be made... First, contrary to what many assume, Texas in 2008 was much less red ( 55.5% McCain, 43.8% Obama) than 8-12 other states... and Obama won in ALL the largest cities--Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin, El Paso). And Hispanics are tghe farst growing demographic. Second, Texas has a long history of occassionally supporting Populist candidates. Third, state budget shortfalls are now hitting Texas, and unemployment is steadily increasing so now is not that far from the national average. Suddenly, Texas as an economic model for the rest of the country as touted by Perry no longer holds. In fact, by October, White may also be running on "its the economy stupid"... secession talk may fire up the base, but turning down stimulus funds may no longer do so. Fourth. It's not at all clear how the Immigrant bashing rhetoric and bills advocated by Repubs nationally will affect Hispanic voters in Texas (see #1). Fifth. oil (sorry, erl) is no longer the dominent big bidness in Texas. Not at all clear how Perry's alignment with BP plays with voters. Sixth. Obama's low poll numbers in Texas, when looked at carefully, are due to hostility from the right---and disappointment from the populist left. As said by Molly Ivens (rest her soul) and others, what you find in the middle of the road are yellow stripes and dead armadillos.

- drofnats1

August 17, 2010 at 2:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Good reporting. More.

- Nusholtz

August 17, 2010 at 9:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As indicated in the piece, Perry's real problem is that a certain number of independents will conclude that he has been there too long. If White can keep it close, he has a chance because of these late, 'let another guy have a chance' non-ideological deciders. But if the turnout energy in November remains on the right (as now seems likely), such sentiments won't matter. I agree that most of the KBH supporters will come home when push comes to shove.

- southbend

August 18, 2010 at 9:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

curious how JRBehrman explains that the State House is split nearly 50-50...

- caseykap

August 19, 2010 at 10:17am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close