SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Spotify: Access Without Objects

MUSIC AUGUST 5, 2011

Spotify: Access Without Objects

Because their physical form is the quality that most obviously distinguishes vinyl records and CDs from digital music, we forget today that spinning discs were once more important as mechanisms of access than as objects. Music existed before record players, of course, and my grandparents could hear it performed in the dance halls of turn-of-the-twentieth-century Brooklyn, where they courted. Records were revolutionary for providing access to music of many kinds, from many worlds that young people like my grandparents might never have known otherwise, and that access came largely on the listeners’ terms. They could hear what they wanted at home, without going out, and do so for pocket change. I’m trying to keep that in mind now that I’ve signed on to the digital music service Spotify, a sensation in Europe that just became available in the United States this month. 

There are multiple levels of Spotify, and I have only the free one, the one most subscribers to the service use. With it loaded onto my laptop, I’ve spent most of the past several days trolling around and listening to songs I’m curious to hear but don’t particularly care to own. The music streams; I can’t keep it. What I get with my free subscription to Spotify is access to vast catalogs of music; I get no objects, not even digital files to keep on my hard drive. (One of the premium options for the service allows for downloading.)

As a loyal citizen of the ownership society, I felt, at first, deprived by Spotify. What it offers is ephemera—the commodity of our day—with nothing to keep and collect or show off to my friends to prove that I have more than they do. For materialists like me, Spotify provides, along with a wealth of rich musical experiences, the sensation of withdrawl from object craving. It’s doing me good.

To ease the DTs, I rewatched the short film Record Making with Duke Ellington and His Orchestra, made in 1937, my grandparents’ time. Shot in the Master Recording studio in New York, where Ellington actually recorded, the film shows him leading his orchestra in fragments of two of his compositions from the 1930s: “Daybreak Express” (unnamed in the film), a programmatic piece on one of Ellington’s favorite themes, train travel; and “Oh, Babe! Maybe Someday,” a pop tune Ellington wrote for his wonderful vocalist Ivie Anderson. Narrated with tin-can gusto by the radio announcer Alois Havrilla, the film instructs us that spinning discs are “an invention well worth looking into.” Watching the clip in the era of Spotify, it strikes me as well worth remembering that the great innovation documented in the film was not the pressing of records in shellac but the access those records provided people like my grandparents to music like Duke Ellington’s.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

I have embraced the post-ownership society, but I'm not sure it has a coherent economic model, much less one that can support our current standard of living.

- chaitless

August 5, 2011 at 1:37am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I also recently got Spotify and I love it. Immediate access to nearly any music I want, even if only to find out that I don't want it after all. My instinct is that affordable streaming services like this are going to positively change the pop music industry (i.e., the money-making part) in at least two significant ways. First, the custom of filling an album with 50% crap and one hit will end; it will have to once listeners can hear the whole album before buying. More importantly, though, I think this may be a big step in reducing piracy. Most people who pirate music aren't intentional criminals; I suspect many are just too stubborn to pay the extortionate costs of a CD and too lazy not to easily download what they want (and screw The Man!). Apps like Spotify remove both these root causes. Spotify does have its detractors, though, and a lot of them are the musicians themselves. This is especially true of artists who aren't attached to major labels. It turns out that a mostly-free music service doesn't pay much to artists who don't have lawyers behind them. Who'd have thought? I'm with NME on this one: in order for Spotify to succeed--without seeing an exodus of its non-top-40 artists--expect to pay for all subscription levels. But $10 / month for a million songs you can access anywhere in the world? That's still a huge win.

- bacchant

August 5, 2011 at 1:49am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The free Spotify includes commericals, so expect to buy the subscription to avoid them. And as indicated, with the subscription you can make your own playlists. It's not the same as Sirius XM (which offers both satellite and, at a reduced cost, streaming-only subscriptions), which is more of a passive experience.

- rayward

August 5, 2011 at 7:23am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

David! You wrote a good one finally! Yaaaaay! I'm so proud!

- SarabandeG

August 6, 2011 at 6:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Whatever this thing is, it's apparently not available in Canada

- basman

August 7, 2011 at 12:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

But we have rdio, whatever that is.

- basman

August 7, 2011 at 12:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close