SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Bogota Brouhaha

POLITICS JULY 24, 2010

Bogota Brouhaha

Venezuela and Colombia are the original odd-couple of Hemispheric diplomacy. With the former run by a rambunctious socialist autocrat and the latter by a U.S.-aligned hard-right hawk, the two countries have been on a collision course for years. The proximate cause and biggest irritant has long been the Venezuelan government's tacit alliance with FARC, Colombia’s oldest and largest Marxist guerrilla movement. 

This week, tensions just about boiled over as Colombia presented detailed evidence of Venezuelan collusion with FARC and a smaller rival guerrilla, the ELN. In a speech to the Organization of American States, Colombian ambassador Luis Alfonso Hoyos accused the Venezuelan government of allowing the rebels to set up and consolidate more than 80 camps on the Venezuelan side of the lightly-governed 1,375 mile border between the two countries. He also asked for an international verification mission to visit the sites within 30 days. Less than an hour later, President Chávez responded by breaking off all diplomatic relations with Colombia and placing his armed forces in a state of alert ahead of possible air raids into Venezuelan territory.

The moves are notable more for the timing than for their substance. That FARC has long enjoyed a safe haven inside Venezuelan territory has been an open secret for years: books have been written about the Colombian rebels' extensive racketeering operation on the Venezuelan side of the border, and a Spanish investigative journalism TV show even managed to record Venezuelan army officials openly discussing the location of FARC and ELN camps inside Venezuela. What isn't clear, however, is why Colombia's president Alvaro Uribe would choose to make this evidence public now, less than three weeks before he's set to hand power over to his protegé and one-time Defense Minister, Juan Manuel Santos. 

Long considered even more hawkish than Uribe, Santos was the defense minister who ordered the 2008 raid that killed FARC's number two leader at a camp inside Ecuador, setting off a major diplomatic crisis at the time. Back then, Santos complained that Colombian requests for the Ecuadoreans to move on suspected FARC sites in their country had gone unheeded, an accusation echoed in Thursdays's report on Venezuela. Yet, since being elected by a landslide in June, Santos has struck a conciliatory pose towards Venezuela, appointing a former Colombian ambassador to Venezuela with deep connections in Caracas as Foreign Minister and moving towards rekindling the once-thriving bilateral trade relationship between the two countries. 

It's at this point that motivations get murky. One school of thought—particularly prevalent inside Venezuela—sees the supposed Uribe-Santos rift as carefully orchestrated political theater: a ruse to set up an elaborate Good Cop/Bad Cop routine, with Uribe in charge of airing out some politically explosive charges and Santos then stepping in to repair the relationship with key facts already out in the open. This approach would spare president-elect Santos the blowback from personally disclosing the facts included in Thursday's report, while ensuring that a post-transition rapprochement includes a forthright negotiation over rebel sanctuaries in Venezuela.

The second interpretation, more prevalent in Colombian political circles, sees the Uribe-Santos rift as real, and Uribe's decision to air Venezuela's collusion with FARC as a last ditch attempt to sabotage Santos's intended rapprochement with Venezuela. Santos's refusal to stake a position either in favor or against Uribe's move could be taken as evidence for either of the two interpretations. 

If the Santos-Uribe rift is indeed just for show, it's easy to imagine a process of normalization under Santos that includes specific demands from the Colombians on ending the rebels' safe haven in Venezuela as a pre-requisite. But if, as many in Colombia believe, Uribe is acting without Santos's approval, a cross-border Colombian attack on FARC positions inside Venezuela is not out of the question before the August 7th transition. At that point, the Good Cop could find himself inheriting not so much a tattered relationship as an imminent war. 

Francisco Toro blogs about Venezuela in the Chávez era at Caracas Chronicles

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 7 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

7 comments

Francisco, my question is what benefit does Venezuela get from coddling the FARC and other Colombian guerrilla movements? There must be some benefit to the government or to Chavez himself for Venezuela to maintain the pretense that there is no cooperation with the FARC. I can't believe that romantic revolutionary ideology could explain this behavior -- does the FARC give key people a cut of their drug trafficking and kidnapping proceeds?

- JEFF FREY

July 24, 2010 at 11:56am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Jeff, There are two basic reasons Venezuela abets FARC: drugs and politics. On the drugs front, you have to keep in mind that the rising power of the Mexican Cartels and the rising enforcement efforts in Mexico have left FARC eager for more profitable distribution channels. One's to go by air or fast-boat, through the Caribbean, to Florida - sidestepping Mexico all together. The second is to go for the European market instead three high-ranking Venezuelan military officers as suspects in drug trafficking operations. One of the three was even Chávez's Interior Minister at one point. So the drugs link is pretty clear. Then you get to the politics. You have to remember that, for Chávez, the long-game is to craft a pan-Latin American alliance of radical socialist governments to confront the U.S. That might seem far-fetched (it is far-fetched) but Chávez has repeated it time and again for many years. Helping destabilize Washington's key ally in the region is just one cog in Chávez's longer-term hemispheric strategy. (Allowing FARC to traffic drugs through Venezuela, in this context, is an attractive way for Chávez to ensure FARC stays properly funded without having to fund them directly.) In my view, the FARC relationship just slipped out of his control over time, though. When Chávez first crafted a tacit alliance with FARC, Uribe wasn't even elected yet, the Democratic Security Policy hadn't been implemented. FARC was far stronger back then, controlling key roads and many mid-sized towns all over Colombia. In the intervening years, FARC has gotten dramatically weaker in Colombia as Uribe has pursued them much more intensively. The demand for a safe-haven over the border has grown exponentially, as the rebels run out of places to hide in Colombia. Little by little, FARC's racketeering operations have grown inside Venezuela, and their partnership with crooked Venezuelan army personnel has solidified. Over time, what we've seen is the gradual Venezuelanization of FARC - with 1,500 fighters now inside Venezuela, they're arguably bigger in Venezuela now than our own home-grown guerrilla was at its peak in the late 1960s. These days, the rump-FARC inside Colombia doesn't really threaten the country's stability like the pre-Uribe FARC could in the late 90s early 2000s, so their strategic value to Chávez has diminished. But they have no place to hide in Colombia anymore and they control more and more Venezuelan territory on the border so...in my view, Chávez is sort of stuck with them.

- Francisco Toro

July 24, 2010 at 1:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thanks, Francisco. Very interesting. Running drugs to Florida by fast boat is so very much back to the future. Sounds like the 1980s all over again.

- JEFF FREY

July 24, 2010 at 2:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you so very much Francisco Toro. I find it hard to believe Chavez has any interest in rapprochement with any Colombian government that does not fit his long-game as you describe.

- K2K

July 25, 2010 at 1:16am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Yes, the 1980s. Miami Vice. Pastel colors and violence -- nothing like it!

- ironyroad

July 25, 2010 at 11:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mr. Toro, Its far-fetched, but what changes in South American politics would happen if Colombia (and Brazil!) was offered membership in NATO? Do you think this would effectively moderate Venezuela's foreign policy goals and make Latin America more stable?

- jeremyarc7

July 26, 2010 at 12:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's the first time I hear this idea, Jeremyarc! I can't imagine it, though. Colombia's military has its hands full at home, and the Brazilian elite - both right and left - cherishes the country's military and diplomatic independence: I can't imagine them joining NATO. But, as they say, the future lasts a long time...

- Francisco Toro

July 27, 2010 at 12:22am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close