SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Extra-Cheesy

POLITICS DECEMBER 16, 2008

Extra-Cheesy

Did you know Chris Matthews was from Philadelphia? I’ll bet you did.

Even those who can’t quite place the MSNBC star’s accent would have a hard time remaining ignorant of his roots in the Keystone State. For years, Matthews’ books and columns and endless gusts of airtime have featured his reminiscences of growing up in the City of Brotherly Love--a sepia-toned place of ruler-wielding Catholic-school nuns, hard-working blue-collar dads, and burly, unglamorous pols like the former mayor and current governor, Edward G. Rendell, a Hardball regular who to Matthews is often just plain “Eddie.”

Until this fall, Matthews’ penchant for on-air evocations of his hometown seemed like a mere televisual shtick. Like Tim Russert’s adoration for Buffalo, it was an easy way for a well-connected and -compensated D.C. figure to cast himself as a working-class outsider. Sure, he may eat canapés with the capital’s prissy VIPs, but he’d rather be wolfing down a soft pretzel with Eddie and the guys at Frankford and Cottman. Same goes for guests like Philly-based Michael Smerconish: “This is tame,” the local columnist and radio host interjected during a primary-season discussion about one of Bill Clinton’s tantrums. “You know what a Philly mayor’s race is like? It makes this stuff look like patsies.” Matthews quickly noted that he’d recently moderated one of the bare-knuckled city’s mayoral debates.

So there, you Washington wussies.

Conveniently for Matthews, Pennsylvania’s status as an election-year battleground provided all sorts of legitimate reasons to drop the names of hometown neighborhoods and Keystone State worthies--small-city mayors, veteran Congressmen, a party boss--or, better yet, to invite them on the show to dissect the state’s demographics and opine about how the state would break at the polls. To his credit, Matthews has cited home-state knowledge in speaking about issues like white racism, even the variety of it his beloved Phillies directed against Jackie Robinson. But his own take on state politics mainly involves shout-outs to every possible euphemism for middle-class. “In Pennsylvania, for example, up in Scranton--mostly white people, Irish-Americans, regular people, not rich, not poor, very much in the middle; northeast Philly, where I grew up, regular people,” he said during one discourse about Barack Obama’s purported difficulties. “How does he connect with the average white guy?”

Just a week before the election, the generally preppy Matthews seemed to be trying to look like one of those mythical average types, doing a show clad in a Phillies hat and matching sweater in a tribute to his team’s World Series triumph. On election night itself, after Obama’s surprisingly solid win in the state, Matthews careened through an impressively thorough list of the state’s off-stage political organizers who made it happen. “I think it’s a big victory for the young people who ran the Pennsylvania campaign,” he said. “Craig Schirmer, Sean Smith, unless they know, I feel like the Academy Award giving out the awards here. Of course, the Philadelphia organization led by Bob Brady and, the Michael Nutter, of course, the mayor. And, of course, the big winner here, besides the candidate, Ed Rendell, who delivered.”

I don’t recall any similar acknowledgement to the unsung Democratic foot-soldiers of Indiana or Virginia or Nevada. But such is the genius of the Hardball host’s on-air persona that even then, with rumors swirling about Matthews’ interest in running for the state’s Senate seat, the roll-call of folks he’d be happy to have helping his own potential campaign seemed somewhat less than gratuitous. Matthews may well be a calculating pol stroking potential allies, but the digression still seemed more like an eight-year-old baseball fan, happily reeling off old on-base-percentage stats just because he can.

Since the election, though, the rumors have gained strength and specificity, if not confirmation. Matthews has reportedly been chatting up Keystone State fundraisers and strategists while sussing out the Philly real estate market, and a poll released on Friday showed him handily leading the Democratic primary field. (His pal Ed Rendell called him “the strongest Democratic candidate without any doubt” on a Bloomberg TV interview this weekend.) In the event he decides to take on incumbent Republican Arlen Specter, of course, every political-geek aside and happy-days recollection would start being parsed. For a lot of would-be candidates returning to home states they left behind decades ago, this could present a problem. Nostalgia for California as it existed during the Reagan governorship won’t get you very far with voters of the Schwarzenegger era; ditto the prospects for someone whose hometown New York banter seems stuck in the age of Abe Beame. Luckily for Matthews, Pennsylvania is an easier place to rediscover: With one of the nation’s oldest populations, and a demographic map that’s been little altered by either domestic or foreign migrations, it’s essentially just like it used to be. Even Philadelphia, where Rendell’s administration capped a renaissance that brought sophisticated restaurants, boutiques, and thousands of new residents to the central city, retains a lowbrow political culture largely unchanged since it was ruled by the decidedly non-cosmopolitan Frank Rizzo.

Still, local ties only go so far. Specter, after all, managed four terms in the Senate despite hailing from Bob Dole’s native Russell, Kansas. Rendell, Matthews’ cheesesteak-chomping, Eagles-cheering beau ideal of a Pennsylvania pol, is actually an Ivy Leaguer from Manhattan’s Upper West Side. Whatever they may do for him on the stump, Matthews’ on-air encomia to the days when factory work was plentiful and religious morality was simple are actually not part of these two towering vote-getters’ personas.

In fact, the spectacle of the well-connected celebrity dropping knowledge about his beloved old home isn’t much of a Philadelphia phenomenon. Rather, the public contrasting of the earthy, exotic old home and the corrupt, selfish new one is a tune that actually makes me a little nostalgic for the city of my youth, the one I abandoned when I moved to Philadelphia. Ah, for the days when my parents would pine for a return to the native heath, when town’s great men rushed to embrace their honest roots elsewhere, the better to distinguish themselves from their backstabbing contemporary colleagues. From log-cabin presidents to row-house talk-show hosts, it’s a trope we knew well growing up back home. In Washington, D.C.

Michael Schaffer is the author of the upcoming One Nation Under Dog.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 17 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

17 comments

The thought of Matthews slithering from one silly seat of influence to the next is about as cringe worthy as a weekend getaway with George Bush Sr. This can't be volleyed as a possibility in the future. Could it? Is "Who Wants to Be A Senator" just a few exits down the road?

- Zach

December 16, 2008 at 5:42am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Bring him on... with the thrill up his leg and all. Revenge is sweet and I will enjoy a southwest PA loss for Matthews and it will be BIG. This sicko will never win PA. This Democrat will vote Republican. Westmoreland County is a huge Democratic stronghold. OBAMA lost it and Matthews will be embarrassed when it is over. He was disrespectful to Hillary and we wont forget it.

- Pam from PA.

December 16, 2008 at 10:21am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The voters of Pennsylvania would do well to steer clear of Chris Matthews. It's not that he's a bad guy; actually, my impression is just the opposite. Matthews is a wide-eyed idealist...in fact, embarrassingly so. I just don't think he has the tough practicality that he so admires in pals like Gov Rendell, or the cold, calculating, survivor mentality so necessary to thrive or even just survive in the rough and tumble environment of PA state politics. I'll bet that people who knew Matthews when he was in college would recognize the liberal naivete that he still possesses today...really not suitable for the bare-knuckled reality of elective office. I would, however, be delighted if he somehow bested and prevailed over the vicious misanthrope Olbermann at MSNBC...but that's unlikely, because the same character traits that handicap Matthews in pursuing a political career make him an underdog at MSNBC.

- Raconteur

December 16, 2008 at 11:10am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I am not a resident of Pennsylvania... But based on Matthews performance as a so-called 'journalist' for MSNBC, his performance as a Senator 'for all the people' would be a pitiful sight indeed.

- Bill Sanford

December 16, 2008 at 12:51pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mathews will have a rude awakening confronting someone on even terms in a debate. He is a twerp.

- larry

December 16, 2008 at 1:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Matthews is not from Philadelphia. He grew up in Oreland— close enough to root for the Iggles but no cheesesteak with artificial cheese food, or even brie. He went to LaSalle High School, in Springfield Township where Jim Cramer's public high school is also located. I took the S bus to get to school— he didn't. Philadelphia has a low-brow political culture? Yo! If any U.S. city with more than a million people is closer that the City of Brotherly Love to Pericles' Athens, let me know. Michael Nutter, even with the hardships we are facing with the rest of the country, is going to turn out to be the best mayor we had since Richardson Dilworth, and I think, given the hand he was dealt, one of the best mayors in the country. City Council and the rest of the establishment have the good sense not to give him too much of a fight, partly because they don't want to step up, and otherwise because they don't have any better ideas. Finally, the article contains no mention of Matthews brother, who as one of three commissioners in adjacent Montgomery County has angered Republicans state wide by consistently voting with the sole Democrat on the board of commissioners, effectively denying the Republicans all of jobs, contracts, and other slop county commissioners get to hand out. Maybe Chris Matthews thinks this has bought him newly Democratic Montgomery County should he run. That county is one of the five or six you need to win to win a statewide election without winning any of the Alabama portions (i.e. the other sixty-one counties).

- Shane Fergessen

December 16, 2008 at 1:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Oh Please. Matthews for Senate is a joke. I wonder if Obama will get a tingle up his leg when he hears Matthews speak. The two were meant for each other. Can't wait until the pendulum swings in the other direction. Waiting on a Conservative who can save the country, I remain - patient.

- Mark

December 16, 2008 at 3:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Good article... but I would have liked some mention of two analogous celebrity candidates: Al Franken in Minnesota and Jerry Springer in Ohio. What do their stories portend for a possible Matthews run?

-

December 16, 2008 at 4:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

If Matthews thinks any of us will forget his disrespect of Hillary, his downright sexism, and his idiotic, in-the-tank pandering for Obama -- he's got another think coming. I'm a Democrat from Philly and I'll be gearing up to support ANYBODY BUT MATTHEWS. Specter, for all his faults, is worth more than Matthews can ever hope to be worth. Matthews is a foul-mouthed simpleton. The treasure trove of materials on YouTube will help sink his ship. And Pennsylvania will be the better for it. The Senate has enough clowns, cheesy or otherwise, it doesn't need a loud-mouth idiot.

- Cuppajoe

December 16, 2008 at 4:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I supported Hillary in the Democratic primaries this year, and I am so annoyed with the way Chris Matthews took her down. I won't support him in the PA Democratic primary, but like this year, when it comes down to voting for a Republican or a Democrat I don't like, I will absolutely vote for the Democrat. If there's anything that I love seeing more than pissed-off Democrats I don't like, it's pissed-off, miserable Repube-lickins.

- Rodham Democrat

December 16, 2008 at 7:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'm a liberal Democrat and the guy drives me batty. It was really hard hitting journalism when he asked a guest if Biden should help Palin sit in her chair if she struggled to get comfortable when first sitting down. Of course they were standing at lecterns for the debate, but that doesn't take away from the Pulitzerworthy brilliance of Matthews' questions.

- John Cuckti

December 16, 2008 at 9:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Matthews wouldn't have a prayer in PA. First off, not even cancer can beat Specter, who enjoys wide support among many, many Democrats. Matthews would actually end up driving conservative Republicans towards Specter, creating an easy win for a moderate Republican. Matthews would also be completely crushed in Western PA for being an obnoxious liberal geek who worships all things Philly. What a joke.

- Pitt law

December 16, 2008 at 9:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Matthews's insolence toward women is sufficient that this lifelong Democrat, who despised Specter for his treatment of Anita Hill, would love nothing more than to vote against Matthews and for Specter. Moreover, his posing as a journalist while being no more than an Obama flak does not augur well for any concept of Senatorial integrity. It would take Matthews to make Specter look good to women.

- MereMortal

December 17, 2008 at 9:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mark, you don't remain patient, you remain delusional

- Carlingice

December 17, 2008 at 11:20am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Why so much hatred for Matthews? I hear him being called a misogynist, a half wit of sorts, a joke, etc.... Is all this from the pro Hillary Vengeance crew? I am an independent, and thus, I want to hear stance on issues, not emotional venting. I am not referring to the posters, but the articles from the press at large over this. Lets hear what the man has to say on the issues and make an educated decision from there. I won't decide anything based on our "accurate" news coverage and what a pundit was told to "report" on in a ratings battle.

- BYRON7

December 17, 2008 at 12:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How does one "qualify" to run for Senate these days? Many don't want Caroline Kennedy because of dynastic politics and because she isn't "qualified" to be a Senator. Pallin is too "dumb" to be in national politics. Matthews is a "joke" and a "twerp". Jeb Bush is another dynastic politician - politics as the family business - not to mention the Gores and the Cuomos and the Bayhs. Mike Bloomberg "bought" the office - so did Corzine. What will we think if Chelsea decides to enter politics? I used to think (a long long time ago) that being a well educated accomplished person of character was enough to run. Of course it helps to be rich - takes a lot of money to run for the Senate. What wxactly are the qualities necessary to be a credible candidate? Is being a Senator sooooo hard that an intelligent well rounded person can't do a credible job? .....but hey, nobody cares what I think anyway...

- toritto

December 17, 2008 at 5:19pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'd vote for Matthews in a minute if I lived in Pennsylvania. How refreshing it would be to hear from a liberal Democrat who unabashedly loves his country, believes in the perfectability of our democracy, and saw the Clintons for the self-serving cowards they've been -- power hungry pols who fight like the devil for themselves and each other, but give only lip service to the concerns of the not-so-powerful. Matthews is a Catholic willing to criticize his church on its stances on social issues. And have his critics really watched Hardball? He engages his regular team of female panelists with respect and admiration for their talents and intelligence. Unfortunately for him, when he believes a woman is attractive he says so. Could be worse. He could be one of those on the make phonies who carefully plays the politically correct feminist in order to "get a little on the side."

- Michael Weinber

December 19, 2008 at 2:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close