SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Gone South

POLITICS APRIL 29, 2010

Gone South

These are obviously dark days for the Roman Catholic Church. For over a decade, the U.S. church has been assailed by abuse charges and devastated by the resulting litigation. The Vatican used to console itself with the belief that this was a peculiarly American crisis, but, this year, similar abuse cases have arisen all over Europe—most agonizingly in Ireland, one of the world's most faithfully Catholic countries. Across the continent, bishops are facing demands to resign, while critics are urging Pope Benedict himself to consider standing down. Some media commentators are even asking if the Church can survive the crisis.

But most evidence suggests that the Church will endure and even enjoy a historic boom--just not in places it has flourished historically. For years, its core has been migrating away from Europe, heading southward into Africa and Latin America. Some Church observers have remarked that the Vatican is now in the wrong location: It’s 2,000 miles too far north of its emerging homelands. The recent abuse scandals will accelerate this radical shift, discrediting older European elites and opening the door to new generations of leaders who are more attuned to the needs and concerns of believers in the southern hemisphere. Literally, the Catholic world will turn fully upside down.

 

For centuries, the Catholic Church was unquestionably strongest in Europe. In 1900, the continent accounted for perhaps two-thirds of the Church's nearly 270 million members. Latin America had another 70 million believers, while Africa barely appeared on the map, with about two million followers. As Anglo-French sage Hilaire Belloc proclaimed in 1920, “The Faith is Europe and Europe is the Faith.”

Since then, and especially since the 1960s, Catholicism has been moving south. Partly, this is due to evangelism sponsored by the Church and its religious orders; new conversions, for instance, have surged in Africa. But shifting demographics have also played its part: While populations have increased modestly in Europe, they have boomed across the global south—and Catholic numbers have grown apace. Today, the world has 900 million more Catholics than it did in 1900, but only 100 hundred million of those new additions are Europeans.

In part, European Catholicism has been declining because of a general trend toward secularization and religious indifference. Recent survey evidence, for instance, shows only half of the French claiming to belong to the Church—down from about 80 percent two decades ago. There has also been a massive decline in practice of the faith. Particularly in Western Europe, millions of Catholics are members of the Church only in the technical sense of having been baptized; they never darken the door of a church, and don't support official Church policies on issues of morality or sexuality. At the turn of the millennium, only around 18 percent of Catholics in Spain and 12 percent in France reported attending weekly mass; the figures for Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands ran between 10 percent and 15 percent.

Latin America, in contrast, is now by far the world's most Catholic region. Rapid population growth over the past century has boosted the official number of believers to around 460 million, and this number should rise to 600 million within two decades—comprising some 45 percent of the Church’s worldwide membership. Vatican statistics show Brazil as the world’s largest Catholic country, with 160 million believers, or around 85 percent of the population. (More reliable estimates suggest that 65 percent of Brazilians are Catholic, because of the rise of fervent Pentecostal churches. Still, the number of Catholics is huge.)

Africa, meanwhile, is the scene of a religious revolution. During the twentieth century, Christian numbers boomed across the continent, and Catholics did particularly well. In 2000, Africa had 130 million Catholics, which, as Vatican observer John Allen, Jr. points out in his book The Future Church, represented a growth rate over the century of 6,700 percent. By 2025, there should be at least 220 million African Catholics, making up around one-sixth of the Church's worldwide membership. (I say “at least” because the African Church is likely under-counting its followers as it lacks the institutional framework to track what's happening on the ground. According to the Gallup World Poll, the number of Africans claiming to be Catholic is already pushing 200 million, which is more than 20 percent larger than any official Church figure.)

By 2050, according to projections, Africa will have far more Catholics than Europe. Indeed, projections show that, by the half-century mark, Europe will account for perhaps 15 percent of Catholics—and many of those will be immigrants from Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

 

So, while the Catholic Church will remain a major—likely still the major—player in the world’s spiritual economy, it will be a very different entity. And its transformation will only be hastened by the current abuse crisis.

Previous abuse scandals, such as those in the United States in the early 2000s, had no obvious effect on Catholic adherence in Europe. Yet the recent allegations, which hit Germany, Ireland, Belgium and other European countries, will resonate deeply on the continent, especially since charges of official negligence seem to reach to the pope himself. The impact will be particularly strong in Western Europe, with its powerful media that are increasingly antagonistic toward the Catholic hierarchy and even the Church itself.

We can’t gauge precisely what impact the crisis will have on the Church's European membership—though, according to the Forsa Institute, perhaps one-fourth of German Catholics are considering leaving the Church. At a minimum, the crisis will likely alienate already lukewarm Catholics and marginalize the minority of devoted believers. It will also severely diminish Church finances, particularly in countries where citizens opt to devote a portion of their taxes to religious and charitable causes: Expect a heavy diversion of funds away from Catholic causes.

Media coverage of the abuse and the Vatican's mangled response will also provide ample ammunition for those who want to keep religion out of the political realm. European opponents of the Church will find it much easier to silence the Vatican's voice in future legislation concerning issues like abortion, gay marriage and adoption, or reproductive technologies. In any of these controversies, the rhetorical conflict is easy to predict: When Church leaders cite the defense of children and their rights as their reason for backing or opposing policies, secularist critics will immediately point out that bishops and cardinals haven't always been so concerned with children's welfare. It will be a tough criticism to counter.

But the effects of the abuse crisis will be far smaller in Africa and Latin America, where religious loyalties are intimately connected with complex social and familial networks. (African Catholicism, for example, is still tied up with loyalty to family, region and ethnicity, a sacred geography and history—much like the system that existed in Europe in bygone centuries.) The secular media also don’t enjoy the same pervasive presence in Africa and Latin America that it does in Europe, and the Church has its own powerful media voices that will defend the faith. If abuse revelations do drive some Catholics away from the Church—and perhaps to rival faiths—then those people were probably on the verge of defecting anyway. The exposés will just have provided a final push.

Indeed, as the crisis quickens the wane of Europe's Catholic influence, it will help solidify the Church's new roots in the south. Membership there will continue to burgeon, and Church's hierarchy will increasingly be paved with southern clerics. When the time comes to choose someone to succeed Pope Benedict XVI, the cardinals, acutely aware of the effects of the abuse crisis, will probably consider more innovative international candidates, untainted by European connections. A Latin American pope would be a likely choice. Yet, in speculating what the Church might look like in 2050, John Allen imagines an African pope who would represent the interests of his home continent on the world stage. It is very possible that the abuse crisis will only push this scenario closer to the present day; the next time the cardinals must choose a new Vatican leader, they may ask, why not an African?

By that point, perhaps, some keen theorist may be boasting, “Africa is the Faith." And who would dare question the statement?

Philip Jenkins is the author of Jesus Wars: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, And Two Emperors Decided What Christians Would Believe For The Next 1,500 Years (HarperOne, 2010).

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 9 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

9 comments

The Catholic debacle in Europe is a victory for Islam in its long war against the West. Let's face it: the Muslim immigrant populations of Europe are breeding like bunnies on Viagra. The last vestige of Western Civilization is the US and its allies in Israel and Eastern Europe. What keeps me awake at night is that the leader of the Free World, Barack Hussein Obama is not certain which side he is on in this conflict of civilizations. What is even more depressing is the fact that the religion of Political Correctness, which is prevalent among the American demi-intelligentsia. forbids all opposition to the Islamofascist beast.

- bulbman1066

April 29, 2010 at 1:38am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This isn't only a geographic shift; it's even more of an ideological shift. And with that ideological shift, expect an even more rapid geographic shift, as the former propels the latter. Modernity? Who needs it now!

- rayward

April 29, 2010 at 7:44am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"forbids all opposition to the Islamofascist beast." Yeah, we all saw how Obama has pulled entirely out of Iraq and is doing so in Afghanistan, what? You mean he has increased troop strength in Afghanistan and has not abandoned Iraq? So, according to the like of bulbmann what is his crime? He has not said Islam is an evil religion and all its adherents are illiterate barbarians because, you know, that would really show them if he did. And it amuses me to no end to think of Bulbmann tossing and turning in bed thinking "Obama sounds like Osama, and Hussein is Hussein and Barack sounds like Iraq, no way is this a coincidence, oooohhhh nooooo, I am so scared." As to the article, Brazil has just been wracked by a scandal by an 83 year old priest being caught on video molesting an altar boy. I have said it before, the church needs married priests, and it is not against doctrine either, in the Eastern Rite priests can marry. I am not saying married priests never molest, just that it is far less likely, from lack of opportunity alone, if you got to get home to the wife and kids you won't be having any sleep overs with kids. Leave the celibates to the cloisters.

- blackton

April 29, 2010 at 10:34am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Bulbster's back! I guess he didn't move to Somalia after all. Nirvana still beckons dude. Now on to other matters. Blackie, I'm a practicing Greek Orthodox (Eastern Rite as you refer to it; the proper term really is Orthodox Christian I believe, or are you referring to something else?). Priests are nearly always married in every church I attended but one, and when they stay unmarried they typically want to "move up the corporate ladder" so to speak, i.e., they wish to go into the church hierarchy. The bishops, metropolitans, arch-bishops and the Patriarch are all celibate (we have no cardinals or some of the other ranks in the Orthodox Church). At the parish level though, the priests are routinely married and have the same headaches, misery and joy of family life. I personally think it makes for a better clergyman. Another distinguishing characteristic of the Orthodox Church when compared to the Catholic Church is shying away from politics or political stances. There's the usual anti-abortion stance (but not militant like the Catholics), but otherwise they completely shy away from politics from the pulpit.

- tnmats

April 29, 2010 at 11:02am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

tnmats, I am referring to the Eastern Rite within the Roman Catholic church, they have a lot of the iconography and married priests that the Orthodox churches have but remain under the Pope. In either case, I understand the notion that the hierarchy should be singularly devoted to the church, but when theory meets road the skid marks are often not too pretty. I think the Church would survive fine with a married Patriarch or Pope.

- blackton

April 29, 2010 at 12:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

tnmats, by the way, seattleeng. has a wonderfully delusional posting of the Phantom menace thread. Bulbmann and seattle provide me with endless amusement.

- blackton

April 29, 2010 at 1:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'm imagining a papal visit to Arizona by our first Pontiff from Latin America. I'm wondering how many of the Tea Party Catholics would abide a Pope from Kenya. Wouldn't it be something if American Catholics left the Church in greater numbers in the wake of the papal election of an African or Latin American than they did in response to the child abuse scandals? Personally, I expect to see another European succeed the current Pope, but I'll be watching to see what happens if the Church really does turn to the south. By the way, anyone else find the author's argument, that Africans and Latin Americans are less likely to defect from the Church over the abuse scandals, a little weak? Maybe I don't know enough about people in these regions, but why exactly would they be unfazed by the corruption and cover-up? Neil

- purcellneil

April 29, 2010 at 1:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Celibacy is the root cause of most of the Church's problems. There is certainly noting scriptural about it, any more than there was in the days of Fish on Friday.

- hingston

April 29, 2010 at 2:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I don't think the Church will remain in eclipse forever in Europe. Remember the generation of Simone Weill (who was actually Jewish) and the many others who 're-awoke' to Catholicism after a youth of radicalism or Bergsonism. Also, if I could sink to bulb's depth for a moment (eww...what's this sticky stuff?). what makes you think the middle eastern immigrants of Europe won't walk away from their religion like the native youth of Europe walked away from Catholicism? Assuming you are a person who believes in the power of faith, why do ascribe more faith power to "your" cultural foes than to "your" side, the side you purport to warn? Just to make it clear, we do not trust you to protect us, really.

- haricot

April 29, 2010 at 6:13pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close