POLITICS JULY 13, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

In the summer of 2010, I harvested a small crop of marijuana I’d grown in my basement and sold it to a twentysomething college student who replied to an advertisement I’d posted on Craigslist. The transaction was conducted under the auspices of Colorado’s medical marijuana law, and so a certain degree of farce was involved. I wasn’t sick, yet I qualified as a stateapproved pot patient, which allowed me to grow and sell marijuana to other similarly qualified “patients.” Say what you will about the merits of such a system, but at least no one died as a result.
Marijuana may be one of the safest intoxicants known to man—in thousands of years of unregulated use, there has not been a single known fatality attributable to overdose. However, the system by which millions of Americans obtain their pot is deadly and growing deadlier. Mexican cartels have long supplied heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine to the United States, but marijuana is the most widely used drug in the United States, and the cartels are in a murderous frenzy to provide it. Since 2006, approximately 50,000 people have been killed in a gruesome war to control lucrative smuggling lanes into the United States.
My little marijuana farm wasn’t a conscious attempt to provide certified violence-free weed, however. It was a one-time experiment for a book examining the explosive growth of the medical marijuana industry, which is now permitted in 17 states and the District of Columbia. I’d conceived of the project as a change of direction from a previous book, Blood Diamonds, in which I’d traveled to Sierra Leone to investigate the global trade in conflict diamonds. The rough stones were mined by brute force by the Revolutionary United Front—a ruthless rebel group who used murder, torture, and terror to control mining areas—and then smuggled through neighboring countries, passed into legitimate channels, and eventually sold to an unwitting public in the form of tennis bracelets and engagement rings.
As I delved into the economics of pot, I began to see uncanny parallels between blood diamonds and Mexican marijuana. Both are high-demand commodities controlled by vicious gangs who seek maximum profits regardless of the human cost. Both are traded through well-established black markets immune to governmental schemes to eradicate them. Violence-fueled greed threatens the very fabric of the countries where they’re produced. But there was one striking difference. Unlike the consumers of blood diamonds, who were once kept in the dark about the brutal origins of their luxury goods, pot smokers can’t feign the same ignorance about the vicious gangs who grow and sell their weed. Considering the tonnage of marijuana smuggled annually into the country from Mexico, it’s certain that millions of American smokers are getting high on blood-tainted pot.
IN MEXICO, the drug war is not metaphorical, as it is in the United States. There, it means 49 headless bodies dumped on a highway, chainsaw beheadings posted on YouTube, and full-scale battles among cartels and the military with civilians mowed down in the crossfire.
The violence among Mexico’s narco-traffickers reached new levels of savagery following the 2006 election of President Felipe Calderón, who mobilized the military to go head to head with the cartels. The military made some high-profile arrests and disrupted supply chains, but this only created power vacuums that the cartels fought to fill. For a time in 2009, the border city of Juarez was overtaken by the forces of competing gangs, whose power rivaled that of the Mexican Army, which was dispatched to take it back.
Throughout it all, the flow of drugs northward barely paused. In fact, marijuana production increased: The Department of Justice estimates that acreage devoted to marijuana farming has more than tripled, from 13,800 acres in 2005 to 43,200 acres in 2009 (the latest figures available). This is partly because the Mexican government has prioritized its military crackdown over eradicating cannabis crops. But the cartels have also boosted their production because marijuana is easy money compared with cocaine, which must first be bought from the Colombians.
In 2010, Mexican officials estimated that cannabis now provides the cartels with as much as half of their revenue. There are no reliable figures on exactly how much pot is smuggled to the United States, but considering that more than 1,500 metric tons were seized at the border in 2010, it’s a safe bet that thousands of tons more made it through. “It has always been the type of drug trafficking that generated the most amount of money for the distributors,” Jeff Sweetin, the former special agent in charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Denver field office told me in 2010.
So what is the socially conscious pothead to do? This is where the similarities between blood diamonds and blood pot begin to unravel. Buying and selling diamonds is legal within a set of rules and regulations. Diamond dealers can take steps to ensure none of their goods have come from conflict zones. In fact, many have marketed this fact to customers, creating a competitive advantage that pressures others to do the same. Consumers’ growing demand for proof of origin hasn’t eradicated the trade, but it has at least provided a financial incentive for the industry to clean up its act.
Marijuana, on the other hand, is illegal in the United States. That means the simplest option—growing it yourself—comes with varying degrees of risk. Even in states that allow cultivation for medicinal use, it’s still a federal felony to grow a single plant. And outside those states with well-regulated dispensaries, it’s impossible to say where the weed stashed in countless sock drawers originated. Demanding proof of origin for every dime bag is impossible when domestic growers with no affiliation to the cartels must, by necessity, remain in the shadows.
The closest thing to a closed-loop system can be found in Colorado, where lawmakers require the state’s retail dispensaries to grow their own product. Regulators inspect farms and review sales data, ensuring (at least theoretically) that every gram sold to qualified patients was grown locally. But some communities in Colorado have voted to ban retail sales, meaning that private growers are completely off the regulatory radar and accountable to no one. For as long as marijuana remains illegal at the federal level, measures by the states to ensure transparency will always fall short.
And because the laws in each of the medical marijuana states vary widely, they are vulnerable to exploitation by the cartels. According to the Department of Justice and the U.S. Forest Service, some cartels have moved their cultivation operations within U.S. borders. Last year, drug enforcement agents seized some 10,000 plants and an AK-47 in a Wisconsin forest, part of a growing operation connected to the Sinaloa cartel. In 2010, almost all of the pot eradicated from national forest land—some three million plants—came from California, the first state in the country to legalize marijuana for medical use. Law enforcement officials believe many of these grows were connected to Mexican organized crime. “It is only a matter of time before we find organizations that are closely linked to violent Mexican cartels that are supplying these dispensaries,” Sweetin told me.
Many smokers will point to the carnage south of the border as an argument for legalization. They’re right, of course, but legalization isn’t likely to happen anytime soon. In the meantime, the responsibility for ethical behavior falls squarely on the end-user—the casual marijuana smoker. When diamond customers learned that their purchases of rings and necklaces were inadvertently supporting a barbaric insurgency, they were outraged and changed their buying habits; some stopped buying diamonds altogether if they couldn’t be certain of the source. Marijuana users should adopt the same moral calculus.
In other words, if you can’t prove your pot is conflict-free, you shouldn’t be smoking it. The only people who face a genuine ethical dilemma are medical patients who find relief from debilitating illnesses with cannabis and who can only access it through the black market. Recreational smokers, though, have no such excuse. Buying marijuana for the purpose of getting stoned is a luxury. And when luxuries come with a cost that is measured in thousands of human lives, continuing to fund the killers is simply indefensible. That’s as true of pot as it is of diamonds.
Greg Campbell is the author of Pot Inc.: Inside Medical Marijuana, America’s Most Outlaw Industry, Blood Diamonds: Tracing the Deadly Path of the World’s Most Precious Stones, and other books.
19 comments
"It's true I have a lot of friends in politics, but they wouldn't be so friendly if they knew my business was drugs instead of gambling which they consider a harmless vice. But drugs, that's a dirty business." Yes, it is. And, unlike the diamond business, it's no secret. Yet, it's made little if any difference to users. We are a callous breed. "But I swear, a woman's [man's] breast is the hardest rock that the Almighty ever made on this earth, and I can find no sign on it." And so it is.
- rayward
July 16, 2012 at 8:13pm
So now I'm supposed to feel guilty about my nightly toke, that lives are being lost in order for me to enjoy my recreational usage. So the author suggests I should stop my deadly habit because in the end, I'm indirectly responsible for this terrible bloodshed south of the border. Well Greg, I think I'll pass on this nonsensical guilt trip, here in rural Oklahoma, we've been growing with pride for several decades without headless corpses littering the roadside, and our biggest fears not being cartels, but cutworms and drought.
- tommyduke
July 16, 2012 at 8:38pm
Just because the people who can do something about this—you know Congress, Obama, the Mexican gangs, the Mexican government, corrupt or otherwise—don't really want to stop the killing, I have to stop smoking black market weed even though that's all I can get? Maybe the author should do some more research and find out what kind of weed is mostly being smuggled by the Mexican gangs so when I get the choice of Northern Lights or Purple Haze from my dealer, I can make an informed decision. If it's in your book, maybe I'll buy it. I'm sorry, but this could be the most futile call-to-arms article ever written.
- qball02
July 16, 2012 at 8:45pm
"...here in rural Oklahoma, we've been growing with pride for several decades without headless corpses littering the roadside, and our biggest fears not being cartels, but cutworms and drought." tommyduke, Maybe you should live in an inner city for a while. That's where the bodies show up in the American marijuana trade. A good friend of mine in Detroit, Indian Joe, was one of the sweetest, most generous guys on the planet (he used to give me match boxes full of his best weed when I had no money), and he still got shot. And then there was the case in NYC where some guys set out to rob a woman marijuana dealer, and they shot 7 0r 8 people at a party, killing 4 or 5. And there have been many more shootings associated with marijuana dealing in the U.S. alone. I have nothing against people smoking weed. I did it almost daily myself for over 10 years. People have always been getting high and always will. But there are human casualties in an illegal enterprise, especially one associated with drugs. It's just a fact.
- magboy47.
July 16, 2012 at 11:41pm
Despite my rant response above, it is good that articles like these point out casualties of the marijuana trade that mostly fly under the radar of pot-smokers. One shouldn't be ignorant. Even shows like Weeds that romanticize pot reveal its dark side. And this piece is very even-handed and tries not to preach too much. But there are many more deaths in legal enterprises such as alcohol and cigarettes. People that choose to smoke pot rather than drink or smoke cigarettes are probably doing society a favor comparatively. And you just can't get around the puritanical, hypocritical bullshit that is marijuana prohibition. The day that marijuana gets legalized will come well before the day people stop getting high.
- qball02
July 17, 2012 at 12:32am
I don't think "history repeats itself," in any meaningful sense, But it is very strange to compare the history of alcohol prohibition to the history of marijuana prohibition. Both led to great outbreaks of lawbreaking including violence and and growth of incredibly vicious gang warfare. We have "merged" alcohol back into our society fairly smoothly, though it still exacts a non-trivial cost because of DUI/crashes/deaths, alcoholism (among the genetically prone), misuse by kids, etc. There's no sensible reason I can think of why we shouldn't let marijuana merge into society the same way. Blood diamonds is really strange. Alcohol has some benefits in pleasure, sociability and when used carefully, some modest health benefits. Probably the same would be true of pot without the "pasty" of medical benefits if it were legalized in a fashion similar to alcohol? Why can't we? We don't "need" diamonds in any comparable sense, except as an occasional tool for cutting, rather than decoration, and that doesn't need beautiful, rare stones. I have never worn jewelry; my wife discarded her diamond ring years ago. We are an insane species. Whose turn is it to call me names tonight?
- skahn
July 17, 2012 at 12:41am
"People that choose to smoke pot rather than drink or smoke cigarettes are probably doing society a favor comparatively. And you just can't get around the puritanical, hypocritical bullshit that is marijuana prohibition." One could argue that second-hand smoke and drunk driving makes smoking and drinking a hazard to others, but those are risks. The deaths involved in the marijuana trade are not risks; they're endemic to the process. Marijuana prohibition has its roots in politics, not a puritanical culture.
- arock28
July 17, 2012 at 6:35am
Legalize it. When is the last time anyone got beheaded over a truckload of whiskey? Oh yeah, 'long about 1933.
- AaronW
July 17, 2012 at 7:33am
Meanwhile, down here in San Diego, two more tunnels from Tijuana under the border were discovered last week. The haul was only 400 tons of pot. Chicken feed compared to the 15,000 tons one of our carriers (Enterprise, I think) confiscated last month when it randomly ran across a Mexican vessel off the coast. The runners saw the carrier and dumped their cargo into the ocean. Oh well, more where that came from.
- OkiSaru
July 17, 2012 at 10:35am
Our California-grown medical grade marijuana, still available at certain state-approved outlets here on the left coast, is both of much higher quality (they even check it for fungus, for goodness sake), and meets the author's moral criterium as well, as no persons, Mexican or otherwise, were harmed in the production and distribution of this relief-giving herb. To see the feds interjecting themselves into this relatively benign situation because of concern that someone, somewhere, might be getting high just for the sheer pleasure of it, is both comical & tragic. Comical because of the exaggerated concern about the putatively destructive impact of this euphoric substance on society (and no, I don't want kids smoking it, any more than I want children to be taking nips of gin) - and tragic, because the fed campaign of terror aimed at state-approved medical marijuana distributors only feeds the drug cartels, & all the resulting carnage, corruption & mayhem associated with that scene. Stupid, sad & counter-productive - your tax dollars at work.
- Haole45
July 17, 2012 at 12:01pm
I've noticed a lot fewer cars being pulled over by cops on the side of the road having their contents rifled through looking for a stray roach as a pretext to arrest people in the past three or four years as medical marijuana really took off in California and many more people have Cards now. It seemed that I used to see it every couple of weeks: some vato-types sitting on the sidewalk as cops went about their Fourth Amendment-violation exercises poking and prying into the hidden recesses of their cars. Coincidentally, the general crime figures are way down also, counterintuitively in this Great Recession. I wonder if there's a connection, perhaps, with the medicalization of marijuana use.
- gmck1948
July 17, 2012 at 1:23pm
As for the substance of the article: Terrible idea! The Feds would just love it if, like, the 98% of all marijuana users who could not verify the provenance of their marijuana just gave up smoking because of moral qualms about source. The Feds would then just use their budgetary excess freed up by such good fortune to hunt down and arrest the remaining 2% who still used verifiable clean-source marijuana, eliminating the "problem" once and for all. As for why it is that people use black-market marijuana, it's entirely the Feds' fault that there has to be such a vast "dirty market" in the first place.
- gmck1948
July 17, 2012 at 1:52pm
I don't buy your premise, everyone knows Mexican Marijuana is far inferior to domestic, or Canadian strains. No one would kill someone else for Mexican brick, except themselves for stooping to such an inferior product.The death of thousand of Mexicans is due to more lucrative drugs, like Heroine, Cocaine and Methamphetamine..
- kjhallock
July 17, 2012 at 2:23pm
Good article. Just add that USA illegal drug trade is close to a trillion dollar business. Mexican president Felipe Calderon is the first Mexican president that took up the fight with the drug cartels. Previous presidents had some sort of accommodation with the drug cartels. And whenever the USA tried to pressure, the Mexican presidents responded for the USA to solve first the problem in America. Felipe Calderon belongs to the right of center PAN party, this is his last year in office. Calderon's fight with the drug cartels has produced an incredible increase in crime , as the author points out, with more than 50,000 casualties. The Mexicans are fed up with the situation and want a change. Mexico just completed the elections of president, governors, senators, representatives. The old PRI had significant wins followed by the left of center PRD. Calderon's party the right of center PAN was soundly defeated all over and has come a distant third. Calderon's regime was quite successful in the economy. But faired poorly in the security issue. On the other hand Mexico City that has always been controlled by left of center PRD, has done an excellent job in the safety field, and has none of the problems of safety that the rest of Mexico has. In the recent election, in Mexico City, the PRD won overwhelmingly, followed by PRI candidates. While right of center PAN was a very distant third. One of the reasons Mexico City has succeeded in the safety field was the installation of over 12,000 video cameras all over the city, monitored from a mammoth central location. Mexico City center has 8 million people, when you include the suburbs the population is over 30 million people. Making it one of the largest city in the world. On top of that the richest man listed by Forbes is Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, who happens to ownn a significant chunk of the New York Times.
- JAIMECHUCH
July 17, 2012 at 6:02pm
The economics of illegal drug trafficking and more, is available in several UN reports. If you want to find more, just google illegal drugs trafficking and the reports will come up pronto.
- JAIMECHUCH
July 17, 2012 at 6:05pm
AND I KID YOU NOT Home Press Room Multimedia Tools & Services Resources News Focus What, When at UN Print Email 34 New UN report says criminals may have laundered $1.6 trillion in 2009 25 October 2011 – Criminals may have laundered around $1.6 trillion in 2009, one fifth of that coming from the illicit drug trade, according to a new report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). The $1.6 trillion represents 2.7 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009, says the agency. This figure is in line with the range of two to five per cent of global GDP previously established by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to estimate the scale of money-laundering. The report, entitled Estimating illicit financial flows resulting from drug trafficking and other transnational organized crimeAll criminal proceeds, excluding tax evasion, would amount to some $2.1 trillion or 3.6 per cent of GDP in 2009, according to the report., also says that the “interception rate” for anti-money-laundering efforts at the global level remains low. Globally, it appears that much less than one per cent of illicit financial flows are currently being seized and frozen. “Tracking the flows of illicit funds generated by drug trafficking and organized crime and analysing how they are laundered through the world’s financial systems remain daunting tasks,” stated UNODC Executive Director Yury Fedotov, who launched the report today in Marrakech, Morocco, during the week-long meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Corruption. The report points out that “dirty money” promotes bribery and corruption, finances insurgency and, in some cases, terrorist activities. It also destabilizes and deters legitimate enterprise, foreign investment and development. All criminal proceeds, excluding tax evasion, would amount to some $2.1 trillion or 3.6 per cent of GDP in 2009, according to the report. Of this total, the proceeds of transnational organized crime, such as drug trafficking, counterfeiting, human trafficking and small arms smuggling, would amount to 1.5 per cent of global GDP, 70 per cent of which would likely have been laundered through the financial system. The illicit drugs trade, which accounts for half of all transnational organized crime proceeds and one fifth of all crime proceeds, is the most profitable sector, UNODC notes. The report focused on the market for cocaine, probably the most lucrative illicit drug for transnational criminal groups. Traffickers’ gross profits from the cocaine trade stood at around $84 billion in 2009. While Andean coca farmers earned about $1 billion, the bulk of the income generated was in North America ($35 billion) and in West and Central Europe ($26 billion). Close to two thirds of that total may have been laundered in 2009. The findings suggest that most cocaine-related profits are laundered in North America and in Europe. The main destination to process cocaine money from other subregions is probably the Caribbean. The report says that for drug-related crime, there tends to be a significant “re-investment” of illicit funds into drug trafficking operations which have major negative implications for society at large. Once illegal money has entered the global and financial markets, notes UNODC, it becomes much harder to trace its origins, and the laundering of ill-gotten gains may perpetuate a cycle of crime and drug trafficking. “UNODC’s challenge is to work within the UN system and with Member States to help build the capacity to track and prevent money-laundering, strengthen the rule of law and prevent these funds from creating further suffering,” said Mr. Fedotov. News Tracker: past stories on this issue UN crime watchdog helps Iran set up unit to combat money-laundering from drugs trade Advanced Search Related stories UN puts forward roadmap for relocation of Iranian exiles from camp in Iraq UN official expresses concern over incidents on Lebanon-Syria border On visit, Ban notes importance of normalized relations between Kosovo and Serbia Somalia: UN envoy welcomes progress towards adoption of new constitution Related press briefings Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General Press Conference on Launch of 2012 Global Humanitarian Assistance Report Press Conference by Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson at United Nations Headquarters Related press releases Security Council Press Statement on Tokyo Conference Security Council Committee on Liberia Delists 17 Liberian Nationals from Its Travel Ban and Assets Freeze Lists As Conference on Arms Trade Treaty Begins Final Week, Chairs of Committees Negotiating Goals, Scope Brief on Progress UN News Centre Home Latest Headlines Search News E-Mail News Alerts UN Daily News News Focus News Resources Press Releases UN System Links Contact us Back to Top
- JAIMECHUCH
July 24, 2012 at 1:46pm
Cannabis USA consumption is done by 13.7:% of the population. I KID YOU NOT? http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/WDR2011/StatAnnex-consumption.pdf
- JAIMECHUCH
July 24, 2012 at 1:55pm
The facts are correct but the policy prescription is unconscionable. Not smoking 'blood pot' will have absolutely no effect on the blood letting. If it assuages your conscience, it shouldn't, and is more likely an indication you really don't care about the bloodbath. The correct action is to prosecute, for war crimes, the hypocritical politicians who support the Drug War. Until that is done everyone's duty - not just cannabis users' - is to vote against each and every Drug Warrior running for office. Give your money to the organizations fighting against this atrocious 'War.' Hold the political criminals accountable.
- NR042903
August 5, 2012 at 4:27pm
I wonder why TNR continues advertising this article, week after week, month after month. Has very few comments. Somebody there likes cannabis indeed.
- JAIMECHUCH
September 10, 2012 at 5:46am