OCTOBER 5, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Before 2013 begins, catch up on the best of 2012. From now until the New Year, we will be re-posting some of The New Republic’s most thought-provoking pieces of the year. Enjoy.
NO RECENT TV moment has gotten more cultural attention than the opening of HBO’s “Girls”—in which aspiring memoirist Hannah Horvath, shoveling noodles into her mouth, is told by her parents that they’re cutting her off. “You graduated from college two years ago, we’ve been supporting you for two years, and that’s enough,” her mother declares, and Hannah’s wounded hangdog look morphs into outrage: “Do you know how crazy the economy is right now?” she says. “I mean, all my friends get help from their parents.” When “Girls” premiered, the general response to that exchange was a resounding cry of recognition. An NPR reviewer pointed to it as the moment when he “fell in love” with the show. The clip was shown by a presenter at a recent Stanford conference called “Promoting Positive Development in the Third Decade of Life.”
“Girls” is part portrait and part send-up of a particular type: relatively privileged, newly ejected from the liberal arts bubble, armed with an expectation that the world will react to their quest for fulfillment with appreciative patience. And one reason the show struck such a chord was surely that its real-life inspiration is everywhere right now. A steady stream of articles and books is constantly reminding us that today’s young people, the recession’s unlucky children, are experiencing their twenties as an unprecedented period of paralyzing limbo.
When The New York Times’s Style section profiled 24-year-old Emma Koenig, creator of the popular Tumblr FUCK! I’m In My Twenties, it cast her as an emblem of millennials everywhere. “She is typical,” said the caption accompanying a picture of Koenig at home on the couch with her mom, “of her generation: bad jobs, duds for dates and an assist from her parents, whose house she recently moved out of.” During the past year, the Times has also chronicled the recessionary blues of “offspring who cling to the nest” (like the 26-year-old living at home and launching an Etsy-style Web business for small-scale artisanal-food purveyors) as well as Ivy League grads who flock to unpaid internships or who are waiting out the bad economy altogether (like the Harvard lit major who abandoned her job search to tour the country in an old Chevy minivan with her band).
The most recent addition to this cultural chorus is an ambitious generational study, stuffed with data and statistics, titled Twentysomething: Why Do Young Adults Seem Stuck?. The book was penned by mother-daughter team Robin Marantz Henig (a contributing writer at The New York Times Magazine) and Samantha Henig (a 28-year-old Web editor at the same magazine). Reading Twentysomething, it is hard not to feel a persistent familiarity in the back of the mind—and not just because its authors’ thoughts on the subject have been aired in assorted forums, including the Times and Slate. The déjà vu has to do with the strikingly specific portrait of the twentysomething that emerges, despite the book’s all-inclusive title and the broadness of its anthropological ambitions. The twentysomethings of Twentysomething are mostly angsty aspiring creatives whose Art is incompatible with adulthood. Many have parents willing to bankroll them, to a point. They are constantly tweeting and Tumbling, always about themselves.
Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.
It goes without saying that self-absorbed twentysomethingdom is nothing new. In the 1991 novel Generation X, Douglas Coupland coined the term “me-ism” to describe “a search by an individual, in the absence of training in traditional religious tenets, to formulate his own personally tailored religion.” The worldview of this new set is instead a kind of “you-ism”—a tendency to look inward under the pretense of looking outward. This, after all, is a generation of twentysomethings taught to indulge and unpack every psychic injury online and to expect that endorsement for their own experiences is just a few clicks away.
THERE ARE NUMEROUS places on the Internet where you can read all about the particular torments of being a young person adrift in a grim economy, but perhaps none captures the spirit of the genre better than Thought Catalog. The group blog was launched in February 2010, gets some 20 million page views a month, and now has a permanent office in Brooklyn. Its posts are heartfelt meditations on subjects like “Why Does Graduating From College Suck So Hard?” (Answer: “Having a degree that felt like it was written on a cocktail napkin.”) Ryan O’Connell, Thought Catalog’s 26-year-old creative director, is its defining voice, cranking out earnest dispatches from his private life. In an essay titled “How to be a 20-Something,” he plays the misty-eyed mentor offering up tidbits of spiritual encouragement: “Work at a coffee shop but feel hopeful about your career in advertising, writing, whatever. Remember that you’re young and that the world is your oyster. Everything is possible, you still have so much to see and hear. You went to a good school and did good things.” Hundreds of commenters respond to his musings with grateful enthusiasm. “How do you know my life?” one wrote.
Thought Catalog revolves around a single rhetorical tic: the word “you.” Its organizing principle is the comfortable presumption of consensus. O’Connell himself graduated from The New School as a creative-writing major in December 2009. He did several unpaid journalism internships. He fled to Europe and wandered. In conversation, his voice is strikingly similar to his Thought Catalog persona. “Everyone has that Europe moment, and if you didn’t have that moment, you want to have it,” he told me on the phone. “I recognize that everything I write could be considered navel-gazing, but I always try to direct it back to the reader,” he explained. “Take my experiences,” he added, “and make them yours.”
“Take my experiences and make them yours”: This could be the rallying cry of this school of urban twentysomethingdom. On Koenig’s FUCK! I’m In My Twenties, the bad economy is a constant low-level hum. Like Thought Catalog, it is animated by a kind of pseudo-survivalism, often conflating the specific difficulty of breaking into the culture industry with hardship in the economy at large. One post is a fake resumé that lists Koenig’s education as “Prestigious/Pretentious Art School” and cites skills such as “Procrastination and avoidance.” “There should be a union for interns,” another post contends.
Koenig majored in drama at New York University, and the months that followed her graduation, she said in a phone interview, were pretty low: “I felt like all I could talk about was how I’m in my twenties, I just graduated from college, and it sucks. The topics I had to speak about at parties were like, some guy that screwed me over or how the job I have sucks or how frustrated I am that I can’t get any acting work.” And so FUCK! I’m In My Twenties was born. Her parents were paying her rent, and she had an unpaid internship at a production company, which, she says, made her feel like “the most pointless human.” For months, she said, “I was creating material for [the blog], but I just hated myself so much and was like, this is so dumb, why am I doing this?” And then the responses started rolling in. Common reactions were: “This just happened to me.” “Is this person reading my thoughts?” By the time the Times selected her as the symbol of an entire generation’s ills, Koenig had a book deal and had requested leave from her job at a sandwich shop in order to write it.
I spoke to Koenig the morning after her New York book party. It had gone well. She’d sung a few songs she had written, one of which was called “Personally,” about frustrating relationships and the stress of trying to work in the entertainment industry. “When I said, ‘Thanks to Tumblr for sponsoring this,’” she told me, “I could feel myself getting a little choked up.”
It is striking that FUCK! I’m In My Twenties and Thought Catalog feel so likeminded—there’s a sameness to their voices and a narrowness to their perspectives that transcends standard youthful narcissism. After all, the “me-ism” of Coupland’s Gen X slackers at least contained a kind of critique of the society that had shaped their ennui. “You-ism” is less a matter of twentysomethings trying to understand their circumstances than simply taking inventory of their feelings, reassuring themselves by projecting their worldview onto the world. It has its origins in the self-affirming echo chambers of social media— all those retweets and likes and shares build the easy illusion that your problems are everyone else’s problems, too. And listening to Koenig explain the roots of her anguish is to be reminded of just how particular her reality is. “My dream is to survive doing what I’d like to think I’m good at, what I enjoy doing,” Koenig said. “I don’t think I’m being entitled to desire employment in the field I spent so much time and money training for,” she added. “But the fact that it’s next to impossible to stay alive is so frustrating. ... My education was $200,000 and I have a BFA [Bachelor of Fine Arts], and what does that mean?”
Even the book Twentysomething falls into this trap, despite all its gestures toward a generational birds-eye view. Twentysomething is massive in scope. It roams through chapters on marriage and fertility and youth psychology and sociology and midlife crises and quarter-life crises and student debt. And yet it ultimately feels like social media brought to bear as a research method, the result of flinging an idea at your personal network and waiting for supportive comments to cluster around it. The Henigs see this charge coming, and try to preempt it, noting that its interview subjects were chosen not by employing any “scientific method” but by conducting “a casual survey among friends of friends.”
Researching the book, “Sam e-mailed a copy of the questionnaire,” Robin Marantz Henig writes, “to every twentysomething she knew, and asked them to forward it to everyone they knew. I did the same for Baby Boomers.” They got 127 responses: 96 from millennials, 31 from boomers. The survey, included as an appendix, includes some plainly self-selecting questions like: “Have you gone to or considered graduate school?” And so, even though the Henigs wade through swaths of sociological data, they produce a cast of characters that could have been plucked exclusively from Brooklyn cafés.
Interviewees include a “broke, aimless vegan baker,” a 26-year-old “who works part-time in a transcription office in Boston,” “a 29-year-old yoga instructor,” a woman “who graduated from Harvard in 2007 intending to work in publishing,” a 25-year-old woman “who lives in Brooklyn and works for a fashion photographer.” The book is padded with personal observations from Samantha such as, “We can put on biz-caz clothes and swipe into our fancy office buildings, but it still feels more like dress-up ... than like anything real.” Despite the dutiful statistics, it’s the biz-caz clothes and the vegan bakers that stay with you. It is easy to forget that Twentysomething set out explicitly to answer an enormous and global question: whether “Millennials’ experience of the twenties is anything new.”
DURING THE early twentieth century, seismic social and economic changes created a new phase of life, which we now know as adolescence. The cultural mythology of modern twentysomethings is undergirded by the theory that they, too, are experiencing a completely new life stage called “emerging adulthood.” In a 2004 book, the psychologist Jeffrey Jensen Arnett writes that this period lasts from ages 18 to 25 and has arisen in developed countries over the last 50 years. Catalysts include the climbing median age of first marriage and the demand for higher education in an information-based economy. Arnett describes emerging adulthood as “the most unstable period of life,” driven by a search for “identity-based work.” The Henigs’ book quotes Arnett extensively, as did the 2010 Times magazine piece that the book grew out of, and his theory has propped up many a newspaper trend story.
But mostly missing from the cultural conversation is the reality that the majority of twentysomethings don’t have the luxury of a long, winding passage to adulthood. At least one out of five twentysomethings does not have a high school diploma. Of those who graduated in 2011, slightly less than 70 percent enrolled in college—and only about 15 percent of those students went to relatively select colleges and universities. About half of all young Americans become parents before age 25.
Yes, the economy is bleak for twentysomethings: The current unemployment rate is about 13.9 percent for 20- to 24-year-olds, versus 8.1 percent for the population as a whole. But the twentysomethings getting airtime are, needless to say, not the ones feeling the brunt of those statistics. For white 20- to 24-year-olds, the unemployment rate is 11.5 percent; for black youths, it is 24.9 percent. The Henigs point out that twentysomethings comprise more minorities than any other age group in the United States, and that some 42 percent of people aged 18 to 29 are living in poverty, versus 34 percent for the population as a whole. They offer up plenty of demographic data, but there’s not a single voice in their book from below the poverty line.
Kathy Edin, a sociologist at Harvard who studies urban poverty and family life, is one of the most prominent critics of the emerging adulthood theory. The notion that an entire generation is consumed by the desire for “identity-based work” is, she said, “completely ridiculous.” “The myopia is galling,” she added. “While people on Thought Catalog are struggling to find themselves, there are young families struggling to survive in an economy where two jobs can’t pay the food bill.” Edin cited a study she is conducting of 150 low-income youths in Baltimore. “These kids will take any job they can get. Identity at the bottom has to come from things that are not part of employment.” One young man she’d interviewed worked at a Coca-Cola bottling plant before getting trained as a medical assistant; his identity, she said, was wrapped up in a vintage Lincoln he had painstakingly detailed and reupholstered, and which sits parked outside of his family’s clapboard house. “The car is who he is,” Edin said. “But his goal is to get by.”
Sandy Darity, a researcher and economist who studies race and inequality, said that the image of the emerging adult is entirely missing “young people whose families don’t have the resources to enable them to devote much time to psychological angst.” He himself plays the harmonica, he added. “I never thought I could actually make a living that would be adequate to support a family doing that.”
IT’S EASY to fault the twentysomethings of “Girls” and Thought Catalog and FUCK! I’m In My Twenties for their obliviousness to privilege, the way they rue the recession for thwarting their search for creative fulfillment or use it as a set-piece to justify their floundering.
But in the end, the adults are the ones who are lavishing all the attention on their plight. Koenig’s book based on her blog has been optioned for television. O’Connell is also writing a book, to be published by Simon and Schuster and titled I’m Special and Other Lies Twentysomethings Tell Themselves. Arnett, too, has a new book on the way next spring, which he describes as “a parent’s guide to emerging adults.” Twentysomethings are, of course, entitled to write about whatever they want, no matter how cloistered their worldview. It’s the tastemakers at places like HBO and the Times who have thrust them into the cultural spotlight and fixated on their every move.
So perhaps it’s not the twentysomethings whose self-obsession is driving this trend. All those stories about emerging adults bear a suspicious resemblance to another overcrowded genre about the worries of a small and privileged class: the parents who continue to invest in and manage their kids into adulthood. “I sometimes imagine that there’s an editor at the Times who’s got a thirtysomething kid that he can’t get out of the house who’s putting his shoes up on the coffee table and eating Cheetos on the couch,” the sociologist Michael Rosenfeld told me.
Robin Henig, for her part, says that she never intended for her book to be a blanket statement about all young people. “We were uncomfortable from the very beginning acting as though we were saying anything about a generation,” she told me. She wanted the title to be something like Cusp or Brink, she added, but her editors insisted on Twentysomething. Her main hope was to address the world of her daughters. “If there’s an emotion I want people to come away with from this book, it’s feeling comforted,” she said. A nearly 300-page professional collaboration between a mother and her twentysomething daughter—designed to reassure the daughter’s peers that everything will be OK—feels a bit like helicopter parenting seen through to its logical conclusion. While some of the anxiety at play here is surely the twentysomethings’, perhaps even more of it belongs to the boomers whose basement couches they are occupying.
And yet reading Koenig and O’Connell, it is hard not to think that such smart, funny, articulate, motivated twentysomethings are wasting a decade’s worth of creative energy, that they would be better off living outside of their own heads for a while. But they want to be artists, and they want to be heard, and they are adrift between their own creative ambitions and the pressure that the culture at large has foisted on them: to be, as Hannah Horvath might say, the voice of their generation or at least a generation; to speak for everyone simply because they have a blog and so they can; to take their experiences, and make them ours.
Laura Bennett is a staff writer at The New Republic. This article appeared in the October 25, 2012 issue of the magazine under the headline “Woe is Twee.”
28 comments
My 8-year-old granddaughter with two mommies (who live in Seattle) and two daddies (who live in Chicago) is so yesterday or so tomorrow, I can not figure out whether she is a fucked up child or a brilliant child of the Singularitized future. As I can't figure out whether the human race has a future, I am having a tough time figuring out if she has a future.
- skahn
October 15, 2012 at 12:38am
I think it's okay for people of this sort to navel-gaze, and complain, and wonder, and talk about it. And it's okay for the Times or HBO to talk about it too. One can find fault with this or that particular line of argument, but, generally speaking, it's not *unduly* self-centered to exchange thoughts about one's struggles to find fulfillment, preferably rent-paying fulfillment, without including an obligatory statement that, of course, there are many less-lucky souls out there who can't afford the luxury of navel-gazing or seeking meaning in a successful career and who actually have to just get on the unpleasant stick and bring home a meager paycheck. What these twentysomethings want isn't illicit or cruel or wrong to want -- it's very natural to want, and even to feel that it ought to be available -- and nobody's suggesting that they're a uniquely lazy crowd of ne'er-do-wells. Some may be deluded into thinking that, for them, success in their desired field is within reach, but that's a case-specific inquiry. An aspiring playwright or writer or artist, say, actually might be a break or two from making a living, or she might not. It's hard to know, and hard to know when to stop trying if you think you're good and have something to say, and hard to know, if you're a parent, when or if to discourage your kid from the pursuit or when or if to cut him off. Why should we begrudge some angst in the meantime? Because other people have it worse? One might as well say that a bad review of a fancy restaurant is offensively oblivious because it fails to discuss starvation on our planet, and that the Times aids and abets such thoughtlessness by running that review in its cruelly decadent dining section. Sure, sure, these are the concerns of the relatively privileged few. But they may not be all *that* privileged, and, anyway, they're allowed to have concerns. These kids are no less authentically human for embodying what we've declared this or that irritating cliche. Speaking of cliches, telling kids to stop their whining and appreciate how good they have it ranks among the great cliches of the ages. skahn, whether she's brilliant I can't say, but it's almost a sure thing that she's fucked up in some way or other. Who isn't?
- JakeH
October 15, 2012 at 3:12am
To this Gen-Xer this all sounds pretty familiar. I graduated college with a BA philosophy and artistic ambitions (I wanted to write novels) in the middle of another recession (early '90s). I knocked around the country--Richmond VA's Fan which at least back then was like a mini Seattle or Austin for hipsters of average-to-below average intelligence, everyone in a band or wishing he was with lots pot and X and the odd heroin casualty; Kodiak, Alaska; lower Manhattan; New Haven, where I wound up sharing a bed with my (male) friend the Yale architecture student when the garret over his apartment where I was supposed to crash proved so cold I could see my breath. To support myself--I would have refused parental $$ had they been offered--I canvassed for Clean Water Action, mowed grass on a golf course, manned the booth at a parking garage, worked as a deckhand on commercial fishing boats, and guinea-pigged in drug studies. I logged a couple thousand miles hitch-hiking and spent two months living out of a tent. (I don't consider that homelessness as had things gotten truly nasty, I always had a bed at my parents' house.) And after three years of this, during which time I became increasingly isolated and morose--my high-school crew had evolved into the Slacker Kings of RVA with legions of VCU undergraduate followers, but I had nothing to say to them anymore and the women they attracted were depressingly stupid, meanwhile my college friends were busy getting Ivy League graduate degrees, US Circuit Court clerkships and editing gigs with the NY Times magazine. Eventually I said, not Fuck! I'm in my twenties, but Fuck! I need to prepare myself for a real career! I went to medical school. (Lucky for me that I had the grades and the science aptitude to pull off such a self-reinvention.) I'm guessing that the decisive difference between the kids described in this essay and me and my early-90s comrades-in-slackerdom, is the Internet and the vehicle it provides for endless self-expression. These youngsters write and write and write and some of them find an audience of sorts, but then they wake up a realize that they aren't getting paid and it's like a slap in the face. "People read me! I have 2000 followers on my blog! Why do I still have to get rent money from my mom?!?" I don't recall many of us, myself included, feeling like we were at all entitled to be listened to. That was my number one problem: I couldn't find anything to write that I thought anyone else would ever want to read. Thing is, I most definitely did not see that lack of interest as the world's problem. It was all mine.
- AaronW
October 15, 2012 at 6:48am
"[T]hey are adrift between their own creative ambitions and the pressure that the culture at large has foisted on them . . . ." What's missing from the essay is how different this generation's childhood was from those who came before. No, I'm not referring to twenty somethings of the 1920s, but the twenty somethings from the 1950s through 1970s. Today's twenty somethings, and those who immediately preceded them, grew up with a level of affluence never before experienced. And that affluence has created expectations that are way out of proportion to the realities that have awaited twenty somethings of generations past. But it's easy to forget (or never know) that the economy faced by the twenty somethings of the 1950s through the 1970s was anything but robust; indeed, the track of the Dow was a horizontal line. [Of course, twenty somethings of the 1940s faced an entirely different challenge.] And the jobs that awaited the newly minted graduates were not self-fulfilling. Top graduates from law school could expect a starting salary of $12,000 to $18,000, not bad but a far cry from the lofty $100,000 plus starting salaries of those who would graduate in the 1990s and aughts. As for young women who graduated at the top of their law school class, they might expect a few years of glorified secretary work; as for young African Americans who graduated from college, their only white collar option was to teach in a public (segregated) school. No, I did not walk five miles in the snow to get to school. But today's twenty somethings, as well as those who write essays about them, need a little perspective. I grew up before the interstate highway system, before air conditioning in schools and most homes, when public schools were segregated, at a time when parents believed that paying for private tutors or athletic coaches was a waste of both money and their children's time, when the option of a private school was the last resort to avoid integration not to give their children an advantage in admission to the best colleges. My point isn't self-pitying; indeed, it's the opposite. By having so few expectations, twenty somethings of the past were satisfied with whatever they got. Today's twenty somethings, by having such high expectations, can't be.
- rayward
October 15, 2012 at 7:22am
I agree with Jake and Aaron, I graduated at the height of the Reagan recession, bounced around from job to job for a few years barely getting by until I got a good enough job. It sounds pretty much like my life did then and those early years were horrible. I guess I should be thankful there was no internet then to suck down my time, but I think this article is too down on this generation of young people. Why would that line "when I was young and stupid I was young and stupid" be any different for them than it was for my generation, or Aarons, or anyones? Truthfully though I would love to be 23 now but who wouldn't? I only say this because of my benefit of experience without it what could I say? I would feel the same way they do.
- blackton
October 15, 2012 at 9:08am
RE: AaronW I think another big difference is that college has become much less affordable now. If you finish a "useless" liberal arts education now, you might be so inundated with student loan debt that you could never afford to go back to school. That's pretty much where I am. I've had a fairly good job for over two years and it's done almost nothing for my bottom line. If I went to grad school for a career reinvention, I would screw myself over further with monthly student loan payments worse than what I currently have (and my present payments sap nearly every cent I earn). It's a vicious cycle.
- maxhencke
October 15, 2012 at 9:43am
It's worth noting that it's not just an American thing. Long long before I came to the US I was in the 1970s and 1980s squatting/alternative scene in London and West Berlin. A lot of bright people who had just finished college, some older anarchist types, some lowlifes who provided the necessary edge. Nobody but nobody was living with their families, but back then (I don't know about now, a lot has changed) you could get small social welfare payments (unemployment benefit or some equivalent) which of course was a very European social democrat thing. But a lot of people also had blue-collar jobs and there was a burgeoning non-profit sector too. There are plenty of caustic things I could say about it (and about me) looking back, there were casualties, but there was also a heck of a lot of energy and good ideas.
- ironyroad
October 15, 2012 at 10:27am
I graduated from high school in 1964 and headed off to college, a little discouraged because in June of that year Time magazine featured a college grad on it's cover (in cap and gown) pumping gas. For the next fifty years I could look forward to variations of that story being published every year. The "dire" problems of twenty-somethings, although that was not a catch phrase at the time. With that fifty years (at least) of backlog of the same story can't journalists find something else to right about? How about a story detailing the angst of the teenage years? Oh wait, maybe that has been done already.
- danyul
October 15, 2012 at 10:42am
*write
- danyul
October 15, 2012 at 10:43am
Today's youth is going through nothing new. A lot of them are just reacting to it differently. I wanted to make a living as a writer when I was young, but nobody wanted to pay me. So I took literally 40 different jobs to survive. I ended up in grad school in Soviet History and was stuck with a student loan (there was no G.I. Bill when I got out of the military), but I had big fun. I didn't see any reason to be bummed about anything. I came from the working class and I didn't expect great things for myself--just survival. I ended up as a self-employed janitor and loved it. I could read and write in my free hours, and I set my own work schedule. There's nothing disgraceful in not making a living through your art. Art is art, paid or not. One thing that was never even considered when I was young was living at home after the age of 17 or 18. Now that was a disgrace. If today's young adults spent less time in the nests they grew up in seeking validation on social media, they could practice their art, while learning to make a living at anything that pays the rent out in the real world. You're Not Special: Get Over It would be the name of my book about young adults living at home. Sometimes social media gives people the impression that they're queen bees with hundreds, maybe thousands of friend-drones gathered around them, validating their experiences (or non-experiences). That stymies their growth as individuals as much as living at home when they're 30 does.
- magboy47.
October 15, 2012 at 11:21am
Cut the kids some slack. Of course they're a bit self absorbed and whiney - those that aren't volunteering for military service WHILE we're actually at war, or doubling down on their education to get advanced degrees, or working their ass off in the jobs they can get while they figure out a way to the ones they should be able to get. Yep, that 10% of so of 20 somethings are indeed self-absorbed and a bit whiney. So, when exactly in the last 4 decades has their not been a few such youngsters. That's the age of self-absorption, and you can't expect it to be entirely stoic and constructive self-absorption, particularly when their economic prospects actually do suck. And even with all that, compared to the rather larger self-entitled fraction of their boomer parents, who are apparently willing to bankrupt the entire country to get their retirement entitlement on the back of their kids, the kids are model citizens.
- IowaBeauty
October 15, 2012 at 11:25am
Judging by the comments, not too many twenty somethings read TNR. Also judging by the comments, baby boomer needs to be re-defined; someone born in 1946 shares little in common with someone born in 1964, yet both are considered baby boomers. Ms. Bennett has gone after two easy marks, twenty somethings and baby boomers. Indeed, the only group more maligned than twenty somethings must be baby boomers. One well-known blogger (with the initials AS) can barely hide his dislike of baby boomers, often describing them as selfish for depleting our nation's resources via social security and Medicare benefits. That the oldest baby boomer is only age 66 doesn't seem to have occurred to that blogger, math never being one of his better subjects. My message to the much maligned twenty somethings: we baby boomers feel your pain.
- rayward
October 15, 2012 at 11:46am
aaron...you're closing paragraph sums it up "I don't recall many of us, myself included, feeling like we were at all entitled to be listened to. That was my number one problem: I couldn't find anything to write that I thought anyone else would ever want to read. Thing is, I most definitely did not see that lack of interest as the world's problem. It was all mine." As another Gen-Xer who went to college at CU-Boulder (that seemingly haven of East Coast Trustifarian skiing an climbing bums getting an "education") who dabbled in creative writing while working on an engineering and then architecture degree, I saw many of my high school friends go onto mediocre working careers in whatever they could find, and many of my college friends go on to successful yet unassuming careers in architecture, engineering, photography, medicine, archeology, graphics etc. Few, if any, considered themselves "creatives" in the contemporary sense of the word. None of us foolishly spent $200K for a BFA in literature. We all made our own way in the world, without the advent of social media. We had our weekly happy-hour cocktail time for that. As a tight-knit group we soon grew apart, realizing that our daily / weekly / monthly troubles of being short on cash, having a job that was "boring", wondering if we'd every marry, start a family, etcetera, etcetera, was nothing unique. We grew up. By the time we had hit 26-27, we were spread across the country doing our own things. I guess my issue with this recent rash of "Millennial" navel-gazing and specialness is it seems to stem from children whose helicopter parents still hover and encourage listlessness because they can. Coupled with the self-deluded notion that their problems of self-identity are "new" and "unique" when they aren't or never will be.
- singlspeed
October 15, 2012 at 12:28pm
Angsty, as in angsty, not ang sty. I has too look at that word a couple of times before the light went on.
- basman
October 15, 2012 at 1:00pm
...The worldview of this new set is instead a kind of “you-ism”—a tendency to look inward under the pretense of looking outward. This, after all, is a generation of twentysomethings taught to indulge and unpack every psychic injury online and to expect that endorsement for their own experiences is just a few clicks away.... Not sure this is the right formulation though it lands in the vicinity of the resonant. I'd say the last sentence is right but that's not the pretence of "looking outward." Rather, that's the genuine publicizing, of going public with, interiority. Gee, I wonder what new under the sun has enabled that?
- basman
October 15, 2012 at 1:07pm
... It is easy to forget that Twentysomething set out explicitly to answer an enormous and global question: whether “Millennials’ experience of the twenties is anything new.”... An example of a bogus issue: in what society in an increasingly globalized and increasingly technically knit together world will not one generation's experience of their twenties differ in some way and have continuities with predecessor generations' experience of it? So maybe there is something more than I first thought to "youism"--looking under the guise of looking out, the bogus issue offering a chance for some to obsess about themselves under the guise of answering a faux interesting question.
- basman
October 15, 2012 at 1:25pm
Damn Laura. Meow. Hiss! Maybe it's just me but I'm reading a lot of resentment in this article. These young twentysomething girls! Girls with high breasts and smooth skin and ambitions! Girls who are gritching about their lives on the internet with blogs with filthy dirty names! Girls who are getting book and movie deals! Damn them! Honestly, we've had the internet for 18 years now, surely the 20ish creative types have figured out that Big Fame on the internet can generate a Deal in the real world. It goes hand-in-hand with doing-something-odd-for-a-year (exploring BSDM, living as the Bible would truly have you do, having as minimum a carbon footprint as possible) that also can generate a real world Deal. Filthy cunning minxes! Living at home after college and touring with their crappy bands and working odd jobs and blogging about it for 365 days and then getting real Deals!
- Tobbar
October 15, 2012 at 1:42pm
...They offer up plenty of demographic data, but there’s not a single voice in their book from below the poverty line... Bingo!
- basman
October 15, 2012 at 2:00pm
Don't see too much about boomers here.
- basman
October 15, 2012 at 2:04pm
Jake I take your point to a point. You're right that a certain slice of twenty somethings, urban, well educated, arts inclined--where are the aimless twentysomething scientists?--often, though certainly not necessarily, Jewish, talky, writery and so on--have their concerns and their unique voices and what's wrong with that and being interested in that. Certainly. But a striking oddity illustrating a problem at TNR is that this is the umpteenth article about Girls and their ilk, a whole bevy by Bennett herself. But I can't think of any article I've read here in a long time, if ever in my about seven years around here, about youth unemployment and poverty, neither in reporting and analyzing it, nor in their "twentysomethings'" voices. Yet the gist of the critique of the book under discussion is "...They offer up plenty of demographic data, but there’s not a single voice in their book from below the poverty line." This subject--the condition of Girls and their ilk--sells and this magazine and this writer tap into that when continually dealing with it. It's something like Naomi Wolf writing and getting all heavy about her, the, hoo hoo, and that getting traction and spawning furious debate, including for God's sake on Ontario public broadcasting, only because Wolf is glamorously good looking, smart, with a penchant for being topical. And did I say she is glamorously good looking. , Ultimately Girls and their ilk, the chick who created Girls, Dunham, getting a seven figure advance for essays that won't remind anybody of Simone de Beauvoir or even Joyce Carol Oates, Naomi Wolf's pondering the mysteries of her, and the, vagina, and endlessly on and on, are all the distraction, side shows of the circus, dominating ever so temporarily our moment. The disproportion of attention here to this particular side show is revealing and something, I think, to criticized. P.S. Does this essay have an abiding argument? I'm having trouble putting my finger on it.
- basman
October 15, 2012 at 2:35pm
I'm a 20 something and I would like to thank IowaB for pointing out that not everyone our age is like someone from Girls. You just hear about them constantly because they are the loudest ones in the room. Particularly when they get wasted, realize they lost their journal and jump out your 2nd story bathroom window to find it, only to pass out on a sidewalk. Life is more entertaining than tv shows, and we make fun of these characters as well. That doesn't mean boomers don't need to get their shit together and fix the messes they've created. The frustrating thing is that the stimulus we need will be paid for by us in higher interest payments through the increased deficit.
- rusty
October 15, 2012 at 3:20pm
basman, as Jesus said, the poor we will always have with us. Democrats can't pass what needs to be done and Republicans don't care.
- blackton
October 15, 2012 at 3:42pm
Terrific article. For a lighter look at the issue I recommend checking out the new web comic called Settling. http://www.youtube.com/settling Full disclosure, it is one of my son's projects. He has been able to support himself in LA since graduating in 2007 but he is one of the lucky ones.
- maryvasc
October 15, 2012 at 3:52pm
I was expecting Bennetts to take on the facile and reductive journalism that this article discusses for more than ignoring the lower classes, and, being a recent college-grad and, consequentially, a narcissist, I was upset that she didn't take into account me. Granted, maybe my section of the twentysomething generation is different because the recession hit when we came into college, but I found my peers to be obsessed with the practicalities of life. Plenty went straight into the corporate world and the like—and I went to a liberal arts college with decent departments in the arts and humanities. But less than 10% of present college students are humanities majors, after all, and even fewer major in the arts. Being a self-obsessed twentysomething, I could drone on about that intricacies of a generation raised by the Baby-boomers, but I rather go tweet about myself.
- btrude
October 15, 2012 at 10:58pm
The trouble with this article's focus is that it places Koenig, Henig et al in the wrong context: Their culture should be compared not to other twenty-somethings in America, but to other young artists throughout history. Living in your parents' basement and blogging about being an unemployed twentysomething is just a modern day equivalent of starving in a garret and writing self-pitying poetry. The fact that so many young artists now have the luxury to sit in their parents' houses and search for meaning rather than enacting their own version of La Boheme is, if anything, a step up for artists and for society. As a twenty five year old former creative writing major, I have plenty of friends from my liberal-arts college who live in their parents' houses and feel lousy about it. But the problem for them is not that the economy sucks -- several of them do, in fact, have jobs -- the problem is that they are passionate about film or theater or art. If their goal is to move to L.A. and make films, or to produce their own plays, then their ability to live rent-free with their parents is actually giving them an opportunity to save enough money to take a shot at their dreams. You can't afford to start a small theater company when your work at the Apple Store barely covers your rent. So while the self-pity of the "FUCK! I'm in my twenties!" crew might be irritating, I think the scorn for them and their parents is misplaced. The "whiners" are artists, and their parents are their benefactors. We spoiled twentysomethings are incredibly fortunate that we have our own personal benefactors, rather than having to vie, like countless artists before us, for the attentions of some fickle Austrian nobleman.
- NoahBA
October 16, 2012 at 2:47pm
These don't describe jobs at all, and, seriously, if that's how you self-identity, you have a problem: "broke, aimless vegan baker," "a 29-year-old yoga instructor"...
- aanassar
October 29, 2012 at 1:43pm
It's always a treat to have these best-of TNR round-ups at the end of the year. Any chance that the various articles you select can be put in one place on the website?
- mjpc1991
December 27, 2012 at 12:20pm
Who's this Basman guy who said all those wonderful things?
- basman
December 28, 2012 at 12:38pm