SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Not To Be Repeated

POLITICS JANUARY 1, 2010

Not To Be Repeated

WASHINGTON--As they enter this difficult election year, Democrats seem ready to engage yet again in a debate they never seem to tire of: whether winning demands "moving to the center" or "mobilizing the base."

If they get stuck on this one, they're in for a very bad time.

The simple truth is that in midterm elections, no party can win without its base because turnout is lower than in presidential elections. Those who do vote are more committed to their parties and their ideological priorities.

Behind the 1994 Republican midterm sweep was a dispirited Democratic base unhappy about the failure of heath care reform, grumpy about the economy, and badly split over the North American Free Trade Agreement for which President Clinton pushed so hard. While Democrats stayed home, Republicans mobbed the polls and won races all the way down the ballot. It's the midterm rule: No base, no victory.

But this doesn't mean independents or swing voters can be ignored, and there are ways to turn out the base that don't turn off the middle. For the out party, opposition to the in party is often enough. Democrats swept the 2006 midterms because their base was wildly enthusiastic about rebuking George W. Bush, and the political center had turned on the president, too. Republicans would like to repeat that in reverse this year.

Preventing this will require President Obama to draw on what he did in 2008 when he inspired the left and won the middle. If he's lucky, an improving economy might do part of his work for him, and he intends to focus relentlessly on jobs between now and Election Day.

The president must distance himself from Wall Street, to which his administration looks much too close. The bank bailouts and the arrogant behavior of the titans of finance enrage not only progressives, but also moderate middle-class voters unaccustomed to multimillion-dollar bonuses. On the right, the tea party movement gains traction by casting big government and the big banks as unseemly bedfellows.

Selling health care reform as real progress is also key to winning both the middle and the left. Many progressives are disillusioned over the loss of the public option. Less ideological voters wonder what they will get out of the bill. Both groups need reassurance about a plan tarred by the convoluted legislative process that created it.

As the Senate and House make a deal on the final bill, they need to keep an eye on where progressives and middle-of-the-road voters agree. That would include making insurance affordable for middle- and lower-middle-income Americans, securing additional concessions from the drug companies, and strengthening insurance company regulation. 

At the same time, the president will have to make clear that legislation on certain controversial issues--notably immigration reform and a cap-and-trade plan on carbon--simply can't happen unless a significant number of Republicans are willing to cooperate upfront in crafting proposals that can get 60 Senate votes. This would put a public burden for achieving comity on the Republicans. After the bitterly partisan health care fight, the public has little stomach for another lengthy legislative battle that would drown out discussion of the economy, its highest priority.

Republicans could also make mistakes that would take the focus off the Democrats. Their politicizing the Christmas Day airline bombing attempt created a backlash that rallied even disillusioned progressives to Obama's side. (No one is more effective in ginning up Democratic loyalists than Dick Cheney.) The growing power of the GOP's right wing gives Democrats an additional lever to use in recapturing moderates. And the tea party crowd could force even quite conservative candidates into debilitating primaries.

Republicans who don't face primaries can cast themselves as pragmatic problem-solvers from the beginning of their campaigns, as Bob McDonnell did so effectively in last year's Virginia governor's race. But having to win over increasingly conservative primary voters can force Republican candidates to move far outside the mainstream. Representative Parker Griffith of Alabama got a taste of this when he abandoned the Democrats--and was welcomed to the Republican Party with allegations from primary opponents that he was a species of liberal.

Democrats will almost certainly lose House and Senate seats. But they can escape a rout if they avoid going around in circles by constantly wondering if they should tack left or right. Steadiness in governing, a bit of tactical shrewdness and a little help from the Republicans may be enough to save them from the abyss.

E.J. Dionne, Jr. is the author of the recently published Souled Out: Reclaiming Faith and Politics After the Religious Right. He is a Washington Post columnist, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a professor at Georgetown University.

(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show 1 comment

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

1 comments

Right Diagnosis:"The simple truth is that in midterm elections, no party can win without its base because turnout is lower than in presidential elections. Those who do vote are more committed to their parties and their ideological priorities." Wrong solution: "At the same time, the president will have to make clear that legislation on certain controversial issues -- notably immigration reform and a cap-and-trade plan on carbon -- simply can't happen unless a significant number of Republicans are willing to cooperate upfront in crafting proposals that can get 60 Senate votes." If any Democratic politician or pundit is designing strategies depenednt on 60 Senate votes for passeage, they've been drinking and sleeping with Rip van Winkle for the last year. Unless the filibuster in he Senate can be broken, very little reform of anything is going to happen. The filibuster is a parliamentary maneuver requiring at present 60 votes for cloture to be able to vote on a bill, nominee, whatever. However, it is no big secret that the filibuster can be broken (probably for good) by 50 votes plus the VP. The nuclear option is perhaps the best known filibuster-breaking parliamentary maneuver. Google it, if you don't know how it works. It's not Rocket Science. You think the Republicans would not have used the nuclear option in 2005 if what they wanted wasn't handed to them by a "Gang of 14?? [They wanted a set of right-wing judges approved for Federal bench positions -- and they got most of what they wanted by threatening the nuclear option.] You think they wouldn't use it again to pass whatever once they again become a majority? You think “Senate Tradition” is going to stop them -- like it now paralyzes Democratic Senators and many pundits from seriously advocating breaking the filibuster?? Get Real. If 50 Democratic Senators and the current VP don't have the spine/ cajones to do so, then in all likelihood forget fairy tales with happy endings for this Senate and Chief Executive -- and Democratic control of US Government. If there are not 50 votes to end a filibuster, then passing bills or amendments to really reform or improve health care, climate change, judicial nominations, whatever, are going to be dysfunctional exercises in "pass inadequate bills and pronounce those bills as ground-breaking". And hope the American voters don’t notice. Voters on average may be generally uninformed, but they are not THAT dumb. In health care and other issues, Obama and Senate Democrats , most Pundits, and many Broderesque -bloggers constantly reinforce a meme that liberal or progressive Democrats are easily rolled by those making intransigent demands. This reinforces a long-standing meme that Progressives/Liberals are wimps, wusses, chumps-- pick your term. McCain, Coker, DeMint and most Republicans may be batshit bonkers pushing insane ideologically-based solutions, but they appear very willing to take a lot of flack to push their agenda. To coin a phrase, politics ain't beanbags. Voters consistently reject candidates they view as weak wimps, no matter what their ideology or personal heroism (Google: Wilkie, Dewey, Stevenson, Stassen, McGovern, Rockefeller, Carter, Dukakis, Gore, Kerry, etc).

- gdbittner

January 4, 2010 at 12:48am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close