POLITICS SEPTEMBER 29, 2008
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
WASHINGTON -- September began as John McCain's month and ended as Barack Obama's. McCain's high-risk wagers aimed at shaking up the campaign turned into very bad investments. And Friday's debate eliminated McCain's best chance to deliver a knockout blow to an opponent whose most important asset may be his capacity for self-correction.
McCain is supposed to own the foreign policy issue--and he should have owned Friday's debate. During their respective primary battles, McCain was a better debater than Obama, who could be hesitant, wordy and thrown off his stride.
But the Obama who showed up at Ole Miss was sharper and more concise than the man who frequently lost debates against his Democratic foes. He was also resolutely calm in standing his ground against McCain, whose condescension became a major talking point following the debate. If Al Gore suffered from his sighs during the 2000 debates, McCain will be remembered for his supercilious repetition of seven variations on "Senator Obama doesn't understand."
This gave special power to Obama's peroration about McCain's "wrong" judgments on going to war in Iraq. McCain's dismissal of Obama brought back memories of how advocates for the war arrogantly dismissed those who insisted (rightly, as it turned out) that the conflict would be far more difficult and costly than its architects suggested.
McCain's derisive approach may help explain why the instant polls gave Obama an edge in a debate that many pundits rated a tie--and why women seemed especially inclined toward Obama. CNN's survey found that 59 percent of women rated Obama as having done better, with just 31 percent saying that of McCain.
An Obama adviser who was watching a "dial group"--in which viewers turn a device to express their feelings about a debate's every moment--said that whenever McCain lectured or attacked Obama, the Republican's ratings would drop, and the fall was especially steep among women.
But if the debate was indeed a tie--and McCain certainly looked informed and engaged once the discussion moved from economics to foreign affairs--this would count as a net gain for Obama. A foreign policy discussion afforded McCain his best opportunity to aggravate doubts about his foe. That opportunity is now gone.
As for the first 40 minutes devoted to the economic crisis, Obama was more forceful in addressing public anxieties. He used the occasion to tout his middle-class tax cut that a large share of the electorate doesn't even know he's proposing. Obama's campaign quickly went on the air with an ad noting that McCain did not once mention the words "middle class" during the discussion.
Thus ends a month that began with such promise for McCain. His choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate at the end of August created a fortnight of excitement among Republican loyalists who were less than enthusiastic about McCain. Some said Palin would also enhance his appeal to women voters and help him recast his candidacy as a maverick's crusade.
But it was a reckless choice. Palin has proved herself to be spectacularly unprepared for a national campaign and embarrassingly inarticulate and unreflective. She is held in protective custody by a campaign that trusts her less and less. A few conservatives suggested she should be dropped from the ticket.
Then came McCain's abrupt foray into Washington's negotiations over a Wall Street bailout bill. His showy call for postponing Friday's debate was serenely rebuffed by Obama and McCain was forced to retreat. The candidate with 26 years of congressional experience lost a test of wills to an opponent with just four years on the national stage.
And when McCain intervened in the rescue package discussions, his position on the matter was muddy. This champion of bipartisanship briefly stood up for a House Republican minority that was battling against a bipartisan accord largely accepted by his Senate Republican colleagues, and then pulled back. The McCain who had once allied with such liberals as Ted Kennedy and Russ Feingold was suddenly flirting with an approach to the economic rescue recommended by Newt Gingrich.
The post-Labor Day period has thus brought the campaign to an unexpected point.
McCain, once the candidate of tested experience, must now battle the perception that he has become the riskier choice, a man too given to rash moves under pressure. Obama, whose very newness promised change but also raised doubts, has emerged as the cool and unruffled candidate who moves calmly but steadily forward. However one judges the first debate, it did nothing to block Obama's progress.
E.J. Dionne, Jr. is the author of the recently published Souled Out: Reclaiming Faith and Politics After the Religious Right. He is a Washington Post columnist, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a professor at Georgetown University.
Subscribe to The New Republic for only $29.97 a year--75% off cover price!
13 comments
Luckily more than 50 million people saw the debate for themselves and don't have to be convinced by pundits that McCain didn't wipe the floor with Obama. Cause he did.
- susan k. (NYC)
September 29, 2008 at 12:46am
susan K. might I suggest going back to elementary school and learning basic English because with all of your negatives I have no idea if you mean that McCain did or didn't win. Based on your incoherence, I have to assume you are a McCain supporter which is fitting since the McCain campaign itself is so incoherent.
- blackton
September 29, 2008 at 10:19am
You must have watched a different debate. I didn't see McCain wipe anything. (Of course that might have happened later, in the backstage restroom.)
- philbertr
September 29, 2008 at 10:23am
"Luckily more than 50 million people saw the debate for themselves and don't have to be convinced by pundits that McCain didn't wipe the floor with Obama. Cause he did." I suspect that like the McCain campaign, you concluded that he won the debate some time early Friday morning. How about the other 49,999,999?
- Django
September 29, 2008 at 11:45am
Does this mean that if McCain holds his ground on the next debate about econ. issues, that the debate will be considered a tie, but with McCain ahead because he was expected to be weak on the economy?
- Marceline
September 29, 2008 at 1:57pm
This just gives me hope for my country, and the lovely First Amendment tenet of faith that the truth will out, that sunshine is the best disinfectant, all that good stuff. This makes me glad that the race has gone on this long, because it should go to the marathoner who can withstand scrutiny. McCain is SUPPOSED to be this, that, and the other, but what is becoming increasingly obvious is that his temperament is just insanely impulsive and cocky, and that kind of attitude gets the country into bad wars, gets the Republicans an incompetent vp, and - I'll say it! - gets jets crashed.
- psantillana
September 29, 2008 at 2:29pm
Susan K. Sorry to tell you, but there seems to be an emerging consensus that Obama won. All post-debate polls have shown this without exception. The new presidential poll number that collected post debate data reflect this. McCain needed to accomplish a lot during this debate and flat out didn't. Obama looked like the adult in the room.
- Sam from Seattle
September 29, 2008 at 2:53pm
The end of Reagan/Bush/McCain trickle-down economics according to Howard Fineman of Newsweek. Monday, September 15, 2008…… ”At that moment, the conservative era in America, which began with Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980, ended. It did so not with a bang, but with a whimper — a cry of help from erstwhile Masters of the Universe who suddenly feared for their platinum-level lives. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson could hear those cries because, until two years ago, he was a Master himself. For decades, conservatives had fought — in very good conscience — to unshackle free enterprise from the grip of statist thinking, the kind of thinking represented at its most suffocating by communism. It was a worthy fight; Hayek was right: the “road to serfdom” lies in the idea that The State is the answer to everything. But Wall Street and Washington (especially the hacks at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) produced, in addition to colossal profits, a farrago of greed unseen since the Roaring Twenties, which was the last time, by the way, that the gulf between the rich and poor was as wide as it is today. That party is over”………….. I won't miss Ya, St. Ronnie.
- desertdog
September 29, 2008 at 3:17pm
too bad mc cain didn't see the debate--too busy looking down at the floor; how pathetic!
- mike a.
September 29, 2008 at 3:45pm
McCain's new campaign song: "Slip Sliding Away" by Paul Simon ...the tide is turning, short of a major gaffe on the part of the Obama campaign the momentum isn't coming back John. It's a shame, you're not a bad guy really. After Nov. 4th keep reaching across the aisle, be the guy to start the healing of the divisive tactics of your less enlightened party members.
- Gern
September 29, 2008 at 4:22pm
Well stated E.J. It is now time for Obama to move forward without looking back - meaning that he is clearly the front runner and will further the perception that he can be trusted. I know that Republicans and Democrats alike are both moving to him. What shred of respect I used to have for the "war hero" McCain is now completely gone. He does not have the temperament, strength, metal or sheer common sense to be President. No one wants to talk about the elephant in the room - his age - but this is a huge factor. He may reach some of the over 55-60 demographic, but this is no longer a majority of the electorate. His campaign continues to play to the lowest common denominator and hopes that people are as stupid as they were when they voted for Bush. Surprise! Most people are starting to see through the crap - not everyone mind you - but just enough to tilt the campaign to the candidate that has brains for a change!
- CY
September 29, 2008 at 5:21pm
Sarah K, if you htink McCain won, you're probably a Republican. Watch the debate again on CNN with the R/D/I dial testing graphs. When McCain speaks, if the needles move at all, it's R+, but both D and I are -. When Obama's moving the needles, sometimes the Is are above the Ds, and sometimes ALL THREE lines are in + territory. The numbers don't lie. McCain lost his last chance to "shake up the race" in a substantive way. It'll be nothing but "razzle dazzle" the rest of the way in. Look for Palin dropping out in a week or two.
- Mike B.
September 29, 2008 at 6:22pm
McCain won the debate itself. Obama hesitated, Obama interrupted, Obama grinned at Lehrer and the audience to mock McCain. None of this has much to do with the election itself, which Bush is making sure McCain loses, thanks to his Paulson AIG Goldman Rescue Package, and general unpopularity. Truth is, McCain would have to run a great campaign to win, and is not. Nonetheless, Obama is a dangerous candidate, having lied extensively about his past, personally and politically, and with an 'it's-mostly-our-fault' attitude about relations between the US and its adversaries. The US political scene has now devolved to the point that each side is blindly antagonistic towards the opponent, and engages in ridicule and demonization as substitutes for real discourse. Obama as President, should he win, may be rescued by time and his advisers, but in his attacks against those justifiably questioning his credentials, he is shown to be just as ugly as his opponent - or more so. The US is in deep trouble, on all fronts.
- Larry
September 29, 2008 at 11:50pm