SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Saluting the IRS

POLITICS APRIL 14, 2010

Saluting the IRS

Washington—You might imagine that if a terrorist attack killed an American public servant and threatened the lives of 200 people, it would have been big news for weeks and an enduring symbol of the risks taken by those who serve their country.

Yet when an American named Joseph Stack flew a plane into an office building in Austin, Texas, in February, killing Vernon Hunter, a 68-year-old Vietnam veteran, the news reports were remarkably muted, and the story quickly disappeared.

Hunter worked for the Internal Revenue Service, which was housed in the Austin building, and according to Stack's suicide note, the IRS was his target.

On or about April 15, the Web and the commentary pages overflow with assaults on the IRS that cast its employees as jackbooted thugs, to use an old phrase, and our tax system as a form of oppression comparable to the exertions of the worst Russian czars and the most fiendish modern totalitarian dictators.

We should call this propaganda what it is: a sweeping falsehood that libels the work of committed federal employees such as Hunter.

Who are the men and women of the IRS? They are the people who collect the revenue that allows the government to finance our troops who are in harm's way, help our wounded warriors, pay grandma's Medicare bills, cover the costs of keeping our food and drugs safe, and do so many of the other things the vast majority of us want our government to accomplish.

Yes, if you support our troops, you have to support the work of the Internal Revenue Service.

Champions of government's core functions have been far too timid in taking on the slanders directed against the IRS. When right-wingers tell IRS horror stories, progressive politicians are typically defensive: Well, sure, let's correct those abuses, but ... mumble, mumble, mumble.

It's time to tell the truth: that our tax system allows enormous leeway for innocent mistakes, that IRS agents often help hard-pressed taxpayers to work out reasonable ways of meeting their obligations, and that our system provides, as it should, many avenues through which taxpayers can exercise their due-process rights.

And rarely is it pointed out that if we stop IRS employees from trying to collect the money owed by those who cheat on their taxes, we are only increasing the burden on honest taxpayers.

One attack on the recently passed health care bill is that its mandate requiring individuals to buy insurance will be enforced by the IRS. In fact, the penalties for not buying insurance are low. Moreover, Douglas Shulman, the IRS commissioner, told Congress that the IRS would not audit taxpayers to see if they had purchased coverage.

But really, is there another agency that would deal with the mandate with greater efficiency or fairness than the IRS? Of course every bureaucracy has its flaws, but we Americans have one of the most responsive and transparent tax collection systems in the world. We should be proud of it.

In a speech earlier this month at the National Press Club, Shulman told the story of Vernon Hunter. "He was a manager of revenue officers," Shulman explained, "the people who go out in person to collect debts owed to the government. And while these are the very people who could be parodied as the prototypical IRS agent, they actually try to help people resolve their debts."

Shulman added this: "Vernon Hunter's son, Ken, said something profound, which captures the spirit of how people at the IRS view their job. Rather than show anger toward the man who killed his father, he simply said: 'If he would have talked to my dad, my dad would have helped him.'"

We rightly denounce those who offer rationalizations for terrorism. But after Hunter died, here is what Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said of the suicide bomber at the Conservative Political Action Conference: "I think if we had abolished the IRS back when I first advocated it, he wouldn't have had a target for his airplane. ... It's sad that the incident happened down in Texas, but by the same token, the IRS is an agency that's unnecessary."

Shame on King and shame on those who demagogue the work of the IRS. Vernon Hunter was a patriot who died serving his country. We should be grateful to him and to those who carry on his work. E.J. Dionne's e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com. (c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group

For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 7 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

7 comments

Indeed. Maybe we ought to think more often about what terrorism looks like when it isn't wearing a long beard and invoking jihad.

- ironyroad

April 15, 2010 at 1:15am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Shame on King? How about King hates Americans and is a cruel monster. Anyone who blames the innocent murdered for his own death is a sadistic monster. So Congressman King, why are you a sadistic monster who also hates your countrymen? That is the response to that cretin.

- tnmats

April 15, 2010 at 9:43am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The spirit of the article is that because the government needs money that no matter how it's taken it is OK? If they break down your door at night and take whatever they want that's of value, then it's still all OK according to Dionne because the government must be fed???? The country spends $300-$400B dollars A YEAR on our tax code. That would easily pay for health care many times over. The country has more IRS agents than CIA and FBI combined. All all the time and energy is expended on collecting money and enforcing the most complicated law that has ever existing. This is the biggest waste of effort by a civilized society ever. And it's only getting worse. Our tax code needs to be dramatically simplified and flattened. Maybe we can't get to a flat tax. But the waste and abuse of the current system is horrific. yes, the IRS folks are just doign their job. But their job must be simplified.

- seattleeng

April 15, 2010 at 7:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

No the spirit of the article is that rightwing nutjobs (and, sometimes, respectable conservatives) feed fantasies of the IRS as a malignant force while enjoying the benefits of living in a society with the rule of law, transport infrastructure, services for veterans, disease monitoring, and a host of other things, generally paid for by our tax dollars. The same people who would complain if cops walked off the beat, if the interstate was just left to crumble, if the VA hospital closed, or if the CDC said, ah who cares anyway, locked up and went down to the dive bar.

- ironyroad

April 15, 2010 at 8:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

irony already gave the eloquent summary of the article, with which I concur. The occasional conservative proposal to abolish the IRS boggles the mind. What comes after you abolish the IRS and celebrate the death of the beast? The newly formed, more-bluntly-named Agency for the Collection of Taxes? ACT, is a catchier acronym perhaps, but beyond that, the fundamental abolition of taxes means the fundamental abolition of government. Also, seattleeng, I agree with your last two paragraphs (minus the desire for a flat tax). Aside from that...what are you smoking? $300-400 billion a year on the tax code? The entire 2010 budget of the IRS is $12 billion. (And how would you pay for health care with a fraction of $300 billion, exactly?) And why does the existence of more IRS agents than elite intelligence analysts and elite law enforcement agents alarm you? There are also more TSA screeners and U.S. Department of Transportation employees than CIA agents and FBI agents combined; is that not as it should be? Elite agents are, after all, elite, and thus few.

- janus

April 16, 2010 at 10:31am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

My federal income tax bill this year was my highest ever. This is not because Obama is in the White House, but because I have something like a real income after years of grad school. Still, it rankled, and here's why: 1. My withholding was all screwed up, so I had to pay a big chunk all at once. 2. I couldn't find a freaking federal mailbox in my neighborhood to mail my returns, because I live in a neighborhood full of immigrants, and probably some of them are illegal, and no one wants illegal immigrants to have access to mailboxes. But as for the IRS, I have no complaints. Thanks for, e.g., helping Reagan's steely resolve face down the Evil Empire with an actual military to back him.

- frippo

April 16, 2010 at 12:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As for Rep. King's statement, compare for sheer hateful nonsense a putative moonbat congressional representative saying, "If we had avoided invading Iraq as my colleagues and I argued at the time, your son would not have died in that IED blast. It's a shame that it had to happen, but at the same time, the war was completely unnecessary."

- frippo

April 16, 2010 at 1:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close