SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The Hillary Clinton Of Private Schools

POLITICS NOVEMBER 25, 2008

The Hillary Clinton Of Private Schools

Until this month, I never quite realized I had become a loyal alumnus. In the nearly two decades since I’d graduated from my private high school, I’d thought of the place often, and fondly--though usually with that embarrassed sort of affection that a certain class of liberals feel for those essentially inegalitarian institutions responsible for making us the worldly folks we are today.

Then a funny thing happened just after the election: The new First Family was looking for a school, and all of a sudden the chattering class was chattering about old alma mater. This was especially odd for someone who was a student at Georgetown Day School during the Reagan years, when my friends and I felt bonded to the place precisely because the pizza-strewn hallways and my Manic Panic-haired classmates made it seem like precisely the sort of place a president would want to avoid. Now old friends forwarded around breathless articles about the search--a Huffington Post page here, a New York Times column there. David Brooks called the school “posh” and “leftish,” the former term news to anyone who remembers the 1980s-vintage public-toilet exterior of the high school building, the latter nonetheless triggering a little jolt of belated pride.

And then it struck me, in all its absurdity: I was rooting for the most powerful man in the world to send his kids to my extraordinarily expensive private school. Not so leftish, as instincts go. But very loyal!

As it turned out, alums weren’t the only ones interested. According to a raft of news accounts, the decision was a matter of obsessive interest to the elite Washingtonians whose own kids might wind up being classmates with the first-daughters-elect, the prospect of rubbing elbows with the Obamas at parent-teacher conference night proving utterly intoxicating. “For a town that measures itself in increments of power,” the Washington Post’s report concluded, “such proximity is priceless.”

This logic, I think, gets it backwards. For denizens of D.C.’s private-school universe, the lingering fascination isn’t so much about what the new president can do for the school. Rather, it’s about what the choice of schools says about the new president. Within its own absurdly limited sphere, the costly collection of schools has a baroque sociological taxonomy. Ambitious Washingtonian careerism may be key to paying the bills, but where a Beltway blowhard’s kids go to school says something about that blowhard’s private values and ambitions. Same goes for the bright new couple from Chicago. Like learning about their favorite TV show or bedside reading library, it’s a chance for some insight on who they are.

For nerdy liberal types who’ve just shuddered through the Bush years, the desired answer, of course, is: A lot like me.

The initial reports held little surprise. The Obamas were said to favor coed schools, which eliminated sporty, country-clubby Maryland campuses like Holton-Arms, alma mater of Gerald Ford’s daughter, as well as most of the big D.C. Catholic schools, such as Gonzaga, the Jesuit boys’ school whose brawling alums include Pat Buchanan. It also meant a no to National Cathedral, sister school of Washington’s most famously elite private school duo, along with Saint Albans. Their parent politics are likely much more pro-Obama than at the other single-sex institutions, but the blazer-clad aesthetics decidedly are not.

There was talk, of course, that the couple would take a gander at the public schools, but even in the thinly-sourced reporting about the hunt, that seemed far-fetched--like circulating the name of some constituency-pleasing potential nominee that everyone knows will never be named to the Supreme Court. On the other hand, there was no need for even a courtesy-mention of Potomac, the bucolic Virginia private school reported to be a popular spot among wealthy Bush appointees who lived in McLean. The major Democrat associated with the place? Terry McAuliffe. ’Nuff said.

Thus the choice apparently came down to a handful of Northwest D.C. schools known for earnest politics, high SATs, and higher prices. Michelle Obama was rumored to have visited Maret, initially founded as a French school, but never had the buzz of to the two early favorites: Sidwell Friends, where Bill and Hillary Clinton sent their kid. And Georgetown Day, where my parents sent theirs. Objectively, the two schools have a great deal in common, right down to the parking lots full of Volvos adorned with Obama campaign stickers and Oberlin decals. But beneath the surface, in matters of style and aesthetics and the sorts of symbolism that are so silly that only devotees pay any attention, there are some pretty big differences. Not unlike a certain recently concluded Democratic primary battle.

And here my unexpected rush of boosterism kicked in, right alongside the vanity of small differences. In the analogy, my alma mater would have to be Obama to Sidwell’s Hillary Clinton. Race is at the center of the school’s identity: It was founded by New Deal liberals dismayed that the capital’s public and private schools were all segregated. The kids call their teachers by their first names. There’s no football team. There’s no dress code. It doesn’t, to coin a phrase, look like all those other Ivy-funneling private schools on a $20 bill. That a president would plunk his kids among its twitchy, blazer-free overachievers would represent change indeed--a countercultural revolution, or at least what passes for it in the $27,000-a-year tuition zone.

Sidwell, on the other hand, was the sort of place presidents already sent kids. It was founded by old Quakers, not New Dealers. They call teachers “Mister,” though the teachers are pedagogically up to date all the same. They have a football team, though not a famously fierce one. Surely, I reasoned, the Obamas would see it for what it was: Private-school triangulation! When I was growing up, self-styled campus activists at Georgetown Day would claim that any unpopular new school-administration policy was a sign of the leadership’s desire to transform our school into an ersatz Sidwell, all establishmentarian and proper. Obama, that great restorer of liberal confidence, wouldn’t follow in its Clintonian educational footsteps, would he?

In the real world, people--at least those folks with a choice--have all kinds of reasons for sending their kids to one school or another. Maybe the commute is easier. Maybe junior loves theater. Maybe mom always wanted her kids to study Russian. That’s especially true, I’d imagine, for presidents, who have security to think about, too. Outsiders may judge, but it’s never all about any one thing.

But of course, I would say that: My school lost. The news, not yet official, was reported last week, around the same time as the confirmations that Hillary Clinton would accept the job of Secretary of State. And in both cases, my first thoughts had little to do with either education or foreign policy. I was livid about the nomination of a woman still unapologetic about her Iraq war vote, and I veered into anxious thoughts about Obama abandoning the New Dealers and the integrators and the Democratic Wing of the city’s elite Democratic private schools. How could he?

So this is where school loyalty leads, at least on the level of political symbolism: You wind up feeling rejected because the President of the United States chose one powerhouse private-school over another. Better, I think, to revert to my old, vaguely embarrassed version of alumni affection. Here’s hoping Obama sees the differences between all the choices as less significant than a certain narrow stratum of D.C. natives does.

Michael Schaffer is the author of the upcoming One Nation Under Dog.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 43 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

43 comments

Personally? I think it has to do with the Bidens. Public school was too much of a risk for the Obama girls, but with Private schools it was between Sidwell Friends, which the Biden's granddaughters attend and another school. I think that for a transition, going to a school where they are comfortable and with friends seems like the best way to do this.

- Chris

November 25, 2008 at 12:24am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Michael, "old quakers"? you know actually there are bunches of young quakers too -- we're a very ongoing and vibrant faith community. And to that point, quite possibly the Obama's chose Sidwell because of the Quaker connection and in particular the focus within the school, as with other Quaker/Friend schools, on the spiritual development of the student -- the most overt evidence of that being weekly Meeting for Worship that all students attend. Yes, at its heart a faith-based school and therein might be the fundamental draw for the Obamas.

- Quaker John

November 25, 2008 at 12:29am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As alumni of Sidwell Friends, which i specifically choose over GDS, I was very delighted by this choice. I feel it makes sense because the Obama's have always been about the new but have always respected system and the establishment as a whole. Sidwell's decorum and rules situated in a platinum certified campus fit perfectly in this mold. The weekly hour of meeting for worship should also appeal to obama's notion of spirituality as personal and traditional.

- gfgoffman

November 25, 2008 at 2:02am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's hard not to be disappointed. It seemed like such an obvious fit, I'd already started to brag about it to friends. Oh well. At least we have the guy from the Bravery.

- Rob Diener

November 25, 2008 at 2:19am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think it's funny that the most liberal writers always seem to come from private schools. None of them have ever been to public schools where white is the smallest minority like some of us. This just proves the hypocrisy of the "liberal elite". "O well we must spend billions on the failing public schools. But they're too dangerous so I'm sending little Maximillian to the Friends school" Just a thought

- M.

November 25, 2008 at 2:48am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"But of course, I would say that: My school lost." Shouldn't you say, "public schools lost."

- T. Quinn

November 25, 2008 at 5:49am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"There was talk, of course, that the couple would take a gander at the public schools, but even in the thinly-sourced reporting about the hunt, that seemed far-fetched..." But...why? Anyhow, tough luck on the non-attendance of BO's kids at your old school. It's probably because you're a bad person.

-

November 25, 2008 at 8:11am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Aww. You can go back to ignoring the thousands of kids lost for life in the hideous mess of the DC public school system. Don't want to upset your day or anything. Certainly don't want to soil your precious children by making them rub elbows with the proles. But it's OK. You feel guilty about it. So you don't have to worry about it. Congrats. Maybe it'll tickle your conscience the next time you get into a debate about school choice. Or you can just roll out the standard rationalizations that Democrats use, surround yourself with like-minded people, reassure yourselves that golly, you care, but what are we going to do? A river in Egypt, yep. Pay no attention to generations of kids screwed for life, I got mine. Besides, they're all dark skinned. Hey! We have black people at our school! I'm totally liberal! It's not my fault! It's OK, though. As long as you feel guilty....

- rhinoman

November 25, 2008 at 8:35am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I wish, wish, my family had even had the financial option of sending me to such a renown private school. Despite getting a "decent" education from our public school system back in the 70's, not a single day has gone by that I don't feel ripped off by an educational system that benefits the wealthy and screws the middle class. Looking back, I would have given anything to have attended a school that could have challenged me to push the limits of my intellect. Instead, I have spent the past thirty years playing "catch up" because I wasn't lucky enough to have been born in to wealth and the familial connections needed to open doors that would otherwise remain forever closed.

- Paul

November 25, 2008 at 8:55am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Writing like this makes it easy for the enemy to trivialize liberalism.

- Connie Boyd

November 25, 2008 at 9:03am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Their school choice says they want a good, safe learning environment for their children. It also says, though neither the Obamas or Mr. Schaffer will admit it, that the public school system is not in consideration because of the pathologies of the black underclass.

- jeanag

November 25, 2008 at 9:13am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wait. I just thought of something - assuming there are even spots open at this school, is there a competitive application process? What if the kids are rejected? Worse, what if only onle of them gets in? Or is that something only scrubs need worry about?

- selish70

November 25, 2008 at 9:22am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

There is a reason there are no comments here... Oh! Wait!

- Charlie in Boston

November 25, 2008 at 10:11am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thanks for the diverting article. I can't say I mind where the Obamas send their kids, and I'm not really horrified about them (the kids, not the Obamas) calling teachers 'Mister', but I agree that we can glean some interesting insights from their choice. There was a post on The Plank a couple of weeks ago about how Barack and Michele were stereotypical eduction-focused strivers... PS: I presume "never had the buzz of to the two early favorites" might want to lose the 'to'?

- Thomas Ash

November 25, 2008 at 10:12am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

For heavens sake, if you are going to engage in an act of mental masturbation, please do it in private. What a geniunely silly article.

- blackton

November 25, 2008 at 10:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It IS tough, isn't it, the affectionate embarrassment nice liberals feel at their $30K/year educations? What a profoundly irritating article.

- philtable

November 25, 2008 at 10:55am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I never realized Georgetown day made the cut of powerhouse schools... ;) Sidwell Friends School '94

- Tijan

November 25, 2008 at 11:02am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What this exposes is the hypocrisy of affluent liberals and progressives who oppose vouchers and other methods to give working-class and middle-class people more choices but send their kids to pricey private academies. I hope that this will inspire Obama (who I voted for) to stop kowtowing to public school teachers unions and give other parents the ability to choose better schools for their kids as he and Michelle did.

- Daniel A.

November 25, 2008 at 11:18am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Michael Shaffer: Proving, once again, that pampered pseudo-intellectual northeastern WASPs are, deep down, pedantically solipsistic navel-gazers.

- twarren08

November 25, 2008 at 11:25am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I understand where you're coming from. My brother-in-law went to Maret and was hoping the Obamas would consider it, even though he pegged the chances at 10% before the final selection was made.

- Marcy

November 25, 2008 at 11:32am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Puke!

- julie

November 25, 2008 at 12:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This country is going straight to hell.

- Eric

November 25, 2008 at 1:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Disgusting column. The New republic should be ashamed of itself publishing this tripe. Well to do liberals have some nerve gloating about how rich they are and how much better their kids are than the children of poor and middle class families. That Obama is sending his little princesses to some posh private school with the children of the well to do left while he promises to fix public education is beyond hypocritical. It is criminal. It is time to introduce a private school tax. For every dollar rich liberals spend paying the tuition of their spoiled brat kids they should be forced to pay two dollars to improve the local public schools the left routinely kicks in the crotch.

- jack

November 25, 2008 at 2:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

So, can anyone lend some insight into what sort of benefits one would hope to get from Obama's children attending one's old high school? Would one mericlessly lord it over one's fellow private-school educated chums at these "cocktail parties" that everone seems to enjoy? Or would one practice dropping the information in an off-handed manner and hope that more information is requested? Would it be a little pick-me-up that one could remind oneself of when feeling blue, a sort of personal Merlin Olsen? Is it a validation of one's secondary educational career? Help me out here, I'm from New York and not familiar with the D.C. scene. Also: Is there any admissions process at places like this or do presidents and other luminaries "pick" a school and the kids are in? I mean, they're going to be starting mid-year, too. That would normally be tough to get done, wouldn't it?

- selish70

November 25, 2008 at 2:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I hear you loud and clear Michael Schaffer My maid went to Sidwell Friends, too.

- Jrod

November 25, 2008 at 3:35pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Go Quakers!!!!!! In addition, our football team had its moments.

- Quaker 4 Life

November 25, 2008 at 3:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think this came down to security concerns and the fact that Malia and Sasha have become close with Biden's grandkids. The move is going to be very hard on the children, and the least they can do is try to send them to a school where they will know somebody. The Sidwell lower school is in a very quiet location, and the secret service has experience monitoring the middle / upper school campus. I'm Sidwell alum who very much enjoyed his time at the school, but I agree with Mr. Schaffer that GDS was probably a better fit were it not for other considerations.

-

November 25, 2008 at 4:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I would surmise the Secret Service weighed in against GDS for security reasons, and favored Sidwell since Biden kids were already there. Maret, being the smaller, more brainy/artsy version of Sidwell, was ruled out due to its smaller size. The Lab School in Chicago has 1,700 kids, so a change to Sidwell was downsizing enough.

- Bill

November 25, 2008 at 4:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

IT'S SOMETHING ONLY SCRUBS NEED TO WORRY 'BOUT

- julz, dc

November 25, 2008 at 4:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What happened to Obama's education revolution? Now if he sent his kids to the poorest public school in DC and simultaneously massively pumped up the funding for all public schools now THAT would be putting his money (and family values) where his mouth is. But of course that will never happen. Democrat or Republican they're all the same. If your'e rich, especially a hypocrite liberal, you've got yours and screw the rest of the population. Forget about the pedigree puppy only the best for his pedigree kids.

- mark

November 25, 2008 at 5:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Public school was too much of a risk" Oh, what tripe. The Secret Service would have protected the Obama girls -- they wouldn't have gotten mugged by their classmates when they went to the bathroom. Of course, they wouldn't have learned anything either. Nobody, but nobody, with any choice in the matter sends their kids to DC public schools. Or to just about any majority black school in ANY city. (Unless it is a mostly nonblack "magnet program" within a particular school.)

- white cornerback

November 25, 2008 at 5:22pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Old school ties that bind, like prunes.

- Trashandsend

November 25, 2008 at 6:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

smug. I'm sure you have no idea how detatched from the real world you sound to the rest of the Democrat party- all those who were tricked into thinking Obama was one of them. HA! They really thought he might even consider enrolling his kids in the public schools since he courted the Teacher Unions so ardently. But I guess you count on them to be home watching BTV and not reading this blog to get insulted. By the way, it was Republicans who voted overwhelmingly for the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960's, not Democrats . It was the party of Lincoln, Republican, who fought the Democrats to do away with slavery. So wipe that smugness off your face. No one is impressed with your school choice. We pity you for never being exposed to any ideas other than your politically correct, party-approved ones.

- e pluribus unum

November 25, 2008 at 7:20pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Why is it that reading this post I start to think about how serfs in the middle ages might have pondered what it was like to live in the castle? But then my own daughter graduated from the Friends school in Baltimore. But that was only because she was in the gifted child program in a public elementary school. She attended Friends only because the school offered us a scholarship. I'm grateful she had that opportunity of course but I can't help but acknolwedge just how unfair life is with respect to equal opportunities for all children in America. Among other things it is a national disgrace. george walton

- george walton

November 25, 2008 at 9:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I agree with Danial A. If you went to a private prep school and your pretend to be a liberal, you are a hypocrite. Go to public school (or send your kids there) and figure it out. This site is loaded with prep school grads who don't want vouchers because they have the resources to send their kids to Phillips Exeter, Georgetown Day, etc. Well, maybe after this financial blow out they might change their tune.

- helen

November 25, 2008 at 11:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As a parent of two now in their mid 40's, I did my best to find the best schools; due to moving around a lot, the result was about 60% private; one Merit scholar, one college drop out. All we can do is lead them to water (education) but can't make them "drink" (learn)...I firmly believe the better the school, the better the chance of success. Unfortunately, most of our public schools are so lacking that we graduate functional illiterates...just edited the written work of several high powered "techies"...just awful!! (Almost as bad a listening to college “graduate” Palin speak…although other than Miss South Carolina a few years ago, Palin wins the prize for most ignorant!)

- Barbara in Palm Springs

November 26, 2008 at 8:58am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

All of this discussion about the nuances of choosing one pricey private school over another completely misses the real issue: The complete hypocrisy of a President who presents himself as a champion of the underprivileged while opposing school choice proposals that would allow that same group of people to escape failing public schools. As a middle class person, I am able to send my children to nice private schools by making financial sacrifices elsewhere. What options do poor families have? From where I stand, this is elitest, ivory-tower liberalism at its worst.

- Private School Grad

November 26, 2008 at 9:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Down with the elite schools. Time to close them and send the kids to public schools. This would increase the talent pool in public schools and force the elite to bring true reform to the public school system.

- Lefty

November 26, 2008 at 11:23am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Oh, come on, people! It will take time to correct the public education system, and The Obamas shouldn't sacrifice their children's education to make a political point in the meantime.

- Innocent bystander

November 28, 2008 at 11:46am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

My daughters went to Lab School -- the private school the Obama girls now attend. The first fight my husband and I had was what school to send our children to; mind you we were newly married and had no kids at the time of the fight. I was a product of the Catholic School system of Chicago which, when I went to school, was may be slightly better than the Public School system in the City, may be. My husband, a Hyde Park native, graduated from the local public grammar school; attended a very integrated private school (which no longer exists) for high school -- he did not go the the Lab School -- although it was an option. We argued because I wanted our hypothecial children not to be private school snobs -- rich kids above and beyond others. He, a product of the public school system, wanted our kids to have a good education. He said he got one -- but it was a struggle and he didn't want our children to engage in that struggle. The argument was settled, 5 years later by a massive teachers strike at the public schools in Chicago when our oldest was ready for school -- off she went to Lab. We never regretted it: I read about Sidwell being "intergrated" socially, racially, religiously, and economically. I ain't buying it; Lab School, on the other hand is: The elite at that school claim parents who won the Nobel prize -- not some politician's or movie star kids; anyone -- janitor to professor who works for the University -- can send their kids there for half price. It gets kind of intellectually snobby in the HS, but the lower and middle schools are great. If the Obama girls get half of what Lab offer, they will be doing well.

- gangwayjan

November 28, 2008 at 10:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Vouchers give the illusion of choice when in reality a $10,000 voucher will hardly help a family making $51,000/year (the average wage of the so-called middle-class US citizen) send one child to a private school with tuition and fees ranging from $30,000 to $35,000 per year. Most people will be able to afford a poor private school as opposed to a poor public school. And there are many poor, unregulated private schools whose teachers are no more qualified than public school teachers. Moreover, private schools are not obligated to accept every student who applies, so where does that leave special needs children or those who simply are not at the top of their classes once vouchers have eliminated public schools? The very elite private schools send more graduates to the Ivy League not necessarily because they are better, but because they have weeded out the poor and the underachieving middle class. If you are wealthy or your name is Bush...well who cares whether you can link subject and verb to make a sentence.

- Anne in Vermont

November 29, 2008 at 12:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The friends school was where the Nixon's sent there daughters.

- Peter

November 29, 2008 at 5:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Where is the hypocrisy in sending one's kids to the best school possible and at the same time supporting better schools for everyone? Only in the minds of the ultra-partisan right wing idiots who have done so much to ruin this country. If you want hypocrisy, consider how you wail about the Obama's, or liberals with means, school choices but don't seem at all upset about the country club Republicans whose kids make up 80 or 90 percent of the student populations at expensive independent schools. Face it. If you were smart enough or successful enough, you'd send your kids to the best schools too. If not, you'd be a bad parent.

- chuckling

November 29, 2008 at 7:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close