POLITICS SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
America’s schools have “lost their way,” and have become “bastions of moral relativism and moral compromise with the culture of death.” To be saved, those schools must change, so students can find “the God of the Bible and Biblical values in the classroom.”
It sounds like Pat Robertson. But this is the latest from none other than Chris Smith, the longstanding Republican New Jersey Congressman who remains enormously popular in his largely suburban district encompassing several well-to-do towns. In a state that has been reliably Democratic since 1992, Smith seems like a moderate Republican. In his current re-election campaign, he’s been endorsed by the state AFL-CIO, the League of Conservation Voters, and the National Education Association, all traditionally liberal interest groups. His lifetime ranking from the American Conservative Union is only 62 percent.
But behind his moderate guise is a politician who is much more conservative than is widely known. With the recent passing of Illinois Congressman Henry Hyde, Smith has become the House’s most outspoken anti-abortion voice, leading a sometimes quixotic struggle as an anti-abortion purist. He has sponsored bills to ban abortions in military hospitals, reinstate restrictions on federal funding to family planning groups abroad that sponsor abortion, and require doctors to inform pregnant women that a fetus can feel pain after 20 weeks. And new reporting shows that Smith got his start in politics in concert with very hardcore groups on the Christian right--an alliance Smith has worked hard to obscure.
A devout Catholic, Smith became executive director of the New Jersey Right to Life Committee in 1976, just a year after graduating from Trenton State College. This was the era when the Christian Right was coalescing to fight the women’s and gay liberation movements, and, less frequently discussed today, to preserve racially segregated Christian educational institutions.
In 1978, the Internal Revenue Service announced it would institute stricter regulation of private schools, stripping them of tax-exempt status if they were violating civil rights standards. Fearing that these regulations could spell the end to their holiday from Brown vs. Board of Education, conservative religious activists leapt into action. “It galvanized the religious right,” said Richard Viguerie, the founder of direct mail fundraising. Asked why he became involved in politics, Jerry Falwell said that, “It was the IRS trying to take away our tax exemptions that made us realize that we had to fight for our lives.” In 1979, on the back of this crusade against the IRS, Falwell founded the Moral Majority. That organization, so crucial in paving the way for the Reagan Revolution, led an array of religious right groups in moving the Republican Party ever further to the right.
One of the formative religious right institutions was the National Christian Action Coalition (first called Christian School Action), a group started to oppose the IRS regulations. In 1978, Smith ran for Congress and lost, but that was the last time he’d lose. In 1980, the group’s political wing donated $200 to Smith’s campaign.* Another early religious right group Smith was involved in was Christian Voice, founded in June 1979 by the evangelical pastor Robert Grant in Pasadena, California. (Grant had cut his teeth in political advocacy a year earlier on legislation that would have banned gay people from teaching in public schools; the proposal failed, due in part to opposition by then-Governor Ronald Reagan). Christian Voice was the first group to utilize now ubiquitous “voter guides” to circumvent IRS regulations prohibiting religious organizations from endorsing political candidates. In October 1980, the group boasted 200,000 members and 30 million viewers of its satellite and cable television broadcasts. On its advisory board sat Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch and Georgia Representative Larry McDonald, a prominent member of the John Birch Society. Also on the board was Chris Smith, then a newly minted congressman from the not-so-Moral Majority territory of suburban Trenton, New Jersey.
A perusal of Christian Voice literature reveals it to have been concerned with three main issues: virulent criticism of the women and gay rights movements, opposition to abortion, and fierce anti-communism. An annual section on “Homosexuality-Lesbianism” in its “Biblical Scorecard” cited a list of dubious statistics on gay people’s sexual practices, noting, for instance, that “the average gay has had more than 500 (usually anonymous) sexual partners” and that “[m]any ‘serial’ killers are homosexuals.” The group also disseminated misleading information regarding HIV/AIDS, warning readers in a 1988 document to “avoid ‘French kissing’ except within a secure marriage relationship,” and to “use mosquito repellent and protective clothing when in mosquito-infected areas with a high concentration of AIDS carriers.” It was known at the time, however, that neither kissing nor mosquitoes could transmit HIV; such disinformation was part of the religious right’s broader campaign to stigmatize HIV-positive individuals.
Smith is no longer affiliated with Christian Voice, though he remains one of the religious right’s favorite congressmen. (Christian Voice still exists, but like most of the groups that once comprised the mighty force that was the religious right, it is but a shell of its former self. The group today says that it has no formal affiliations with anybody on Capitol Hill.)
Smith is a leading advocate of abstinence education both domestically and abroad, especially relevant when he chaired the House Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights, and International Operations--where he played a powerful role in the disbursement of foreign aid for HIV prevention programs.
Given the extreme positions of these organizations, it’s not much of a surprise that Smith seems to have done his best to paper over his contact with them. In a 1986 congressional debate, Smith’s Democratic opponent challenged him about his sitting on Christian Voice’s advisory board. Acknowledging his affiliation with the organization, Smith protested that he didn’t “even know where their office is.” And in 1982, the Christian Voice Moral Government Fund, the political action committee affiliated with Christian Voice, donated $4,000 to Smith’s campaign.* That same year, Christian Voice was leading the charge against legislation that would have made it illegal to discriminate against gay people in housing, employment, education, and public accommodations. “Thousands of innocent American children may soon be molested by sex deviates,” a mass mailing from the group warned, informing its millions of members that the bill would allow the government to “force every local school to hire practicing homosexuals as teachers, coaches and counselors; force every Christian church to hire a homosexual minister or other church employee; force every family business to hire sodomites.”
Perhaps the reason why Smith would associate with such a far right organization is because he’s not the moderate that so many people believe him to be. His fluency in the fire and brimstone language of the religious right dates back to before his involvement in electoral politics. In a 1973 article for The Signal, the newspaper of Trenton State College (now the College of New Jersey), Smith addressed the “current upsurge in identity reversal, sexual perversion, and permissiveness” pervading the country in the form of homosexuality, which, he concluded, represented “the falling away from God and His law.” It was a bizarre, rambling screed, predicated upon the premise that “Manhood is heterosexuality; so is womanhood,” and concluded with the observation that, “[God] wants good things for all of us and the most basic starting point is the awareness of our sex.”
Though Smith may have tempered his rhetoric over the years to suit the increasing societal tolerance of the times, he has always been a reliable anti-gay vote in Congress. In 1995, he co-sponsored a bill, the entire text of which was the following sentence: “No Federal funds may be used directly or indirectly to promote, condone, accept, or celebrate homosexuality, lesbianism, or bisexuality.” The bill’s author was the notoriously homophobic and rambunctious California Representative Bob Dornan. While it’s unclear what the full implications of the bill would have been had it passed, it likely would have prevented any public employee, or employee of any organization or company that accepts federal funds, from being openly gay. In 2006, Smith earned a zero rating from the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group. A call to Smith's office for comment on this article went unreturned.
With the ascendancy of the religious right in the GOP, the task of being a Northeastern Republican has become a very difficult balancing act. Democrats occupy 60 of the 81 congressional seats in the Northeast and are seriously challenging eight more currently in the GOP column. And those Republicans who remain need to look more and more like their oppositions. A common trait, a la Chris Shays of Connecticut or Maine senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, is to preserve the old-fashioned, Rockefeller Republican creed of social liberalism and fiscal prudence. Smith, however, seems to have done the opposite, and it’s especially strange considering that he’s a Republican in New Jersey, not the Deep South. Is his Christian voice still suited for the times?
James Kirchick is an assistant editor at The New Republic.
*CORRECTION: This article originally
stated that Congressman Smith failed to report a contribution by the political
action committee of the
Christian Voice in 1982. According to documents provided by
Congressman Smith to The New Republic after publication, his
campaign did report this
donation. We regret the error. Smith also disputes the assertion that he did not report a 1980 donation made by the National Christian Action Coalition, but a search of Federal Election Commission filings by The New Republic showed that while the PAC reported its donation, there is no receipt report from Smith. His office has not provided corroborating documentation.
23 comments
He's "not a moderate" because of his stances on two issues? When the Democrats took the House majority, Smith voted with them on every part of the "first 100 hours" plan except the embryonic stem cell research bill. By any reasonable definition of "moderate" he is one. He sides with Republicans on life and family and Democrats on economic justice.
- Sam
September 11, 2008 at 9:04am
May there be a true revival in Washington with Mr. Smith showing the way!
- peaceablekingdom
September 11, 2008 at 10:31am
So depressing. I don't mind so much that this one individual yahoo affiliates himself with such a group, but the fact that there are megachurches full to bursting with like-minded Americans really should give us pause. There is no other Western country where such anti-gay hatred commands such an audience. In a house of worship no less! What is wrong with us? Where does this sickness in our society come from? Is it the macho frontier ideal? The puritanical remnant? Any ideas why Christian Voice can flourish among us?
- mcorey.geo
September 11, 2008 at 11:18am
Chris Smith is PRO-LIFE! Oh, the horror! He speaks firmly in moral categories! Gather the disinfectant! TNR is too much. You're having intellectual panic-attacks over the continued existence of social conservatism in what you have wanted desperately to believe is a post-modern era. Sad.
- Rob
September 11, 2008 at 11:54am
So Smith wants to ensure that "No Federal funds may be used directly or indirectly to promote, condone, accept, or celebrate homosexuality, lesbianism, or bisexuality.” The most significant word here is “accept”. Let’s get it clear: “No Federal funds may be used directly or indirectly to…ACCEPT homosexuality”; that means every organization receiving Federal funds is PROHIBITED FROM ACCEPTING HOMOSEXUALITY. This means FIRING ALL HOMOSEXUAL government employees, homosexual teachers, first-responders, government workers, and elected officials. Forget prohibition on 'celebrating' homosexuality: Chris Smith wants to ban it altogether. Not only is this a violation of the United States Constitution; it is also evidence of a perverse mindset. If Smith wants to ban homosexuals, I say, homosexuals, ban Smith!
- John Stuart
September 11, 2008 at 11:59am
Yes he is a terrible man...Especially the fact that he has championed the plight of women and children by sponsoring no less then 3 Bills against human trafficking.. But oh my gosh the gays must be first. Gotta love them bitches and their fight to have it all.
- Liz
September 11, 2008 at 12:29pm
I thought I'd post the Zeitz campaign reaction here. I am a volunteer. Zeitz Reaction to Revelations of Chris Smith's Bigotry "Chris Smith is an extremist. There is nothing moderate about racial segregation. There is nothing moderate about denying jobs and education to millions of gay Americans. There is nothing moderate about taking away the right to use common, everyday birth control. These are unacceptable positions that are out of step with basic human decency." For Immediate Release Thursday, September 11, 2008 Contact: Steven D'Amico 609-668-1754 Today, The New Republic (TNR) exposed what many of us thought to be true—that Chris Smith's misguided priorities go far deeper than his twenty-two attempts to ban the common, everyday birth control pill. Thanks to new investigative reporting by TNR's James Kirchick, we now know that Chris Smith is a founding member of the radical right. A reporter at TNR, Kirchick is the author of a highly-regarded article on Ron Paul's ties to segregationists; that article changed the national narrative on Paul earlier this year. Kirchick's new article reveals that Chris Smith has longstanding ties to religious-right hate groups; that he sat on the board of advisers of a pro-racial segregation organization in the 1980s; that he authored legislation that would bar gays and lesbians from working openly as nurses, doctors, first responders, federal employees or federal contractors; and that he played a role in a vicious disinformation campaign about HIV/AIDS that demonized gays and lesbians as "serial killers." The article also reveals that Smith concealed campaign contributions from at least two hard-line, pro-segregation groups. The New Republic only scratched surface of Smith's bigotry. Following up on TNR's reporting, this morning, the Zeitz campaign discovered Chris Smith not only worked with segregationists; he voted with them. In 1981, Chris Smith voted to restore non-profit status to segregated private schools [HR 4121, 7/30/81] that were created as a mechanism for white Southerners to avoid the full implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education. The Zeitz for Congress campaign also obtained a copy of Chris Smith's early college writings. In an article dated 1973, Smith accused gays and lesbians of being in league with "the Anti-Christ": In Smith's words: "We can live in harmony with His [God's] spiritual laws and be like the man, as Christ said, who built on an undestructable [sic] rock, or we can live in disharmony with the Anti-Christ; the devil, not the laughable, fiery and character with horns, but the evil one often spoken of by Jesus and he like the man who built his life on sand which eroded and eventually fell. God wants us happy; His laws are for our welfare, our protection, not Sin!" Chris Smith's bigotry goes beyond his early career. In the 1990s, Smith introduced legislation that would force any company or public entity that receives federal funds to fire openly gay employees. The legislation would deny gays and lesbians the right to work as teachers, doctors, nurses, first responders, federal contractors, or state and federal workers. It might even deny basic rights like student loans to gay college students. What we've learned today: Chris Smith is a founding member of the Religious Right, having sat on the advisory board of the Christian Voice. The Christian Voice strongly supported racially segregated private schools in the South and worked closely with Jerry Falwell. Chris Smith voted to support segregation by allowing all-white private schools (which were created after forced-desegregation) to remain segregated. Chris Smith failed to abide by FEC rules and report contributions from openly racist, misogynistic, and homophobic groups on the radical right. Chris Smith introduced legislation in the 1990s to mandate that the government (or any recipients of federal funds, like local school district, fire departments, police departments and federal contractors) fire any openly gay employees. Openly gay individuals would have been barred from any receipt of federal funds such as school loans, food stamps or unemployment benefits. "Chris Smith is an extremist," said Steven D'Amico, Zeitz for Congress campaign manager. "There is nothing moderate about racial segregation. There is nothing moderate about denying jobs and education to millions of gay Americans. There is nothing moderate about taking away the right to use common, everyday birth control. These are unacceptable positions that are out of step with basic human decency."
- Ian Reifowitz
September 11, 2008 at 12:30pm
The twin pillars supporting Cris Smith's incumbency are his constituent service and the fact that much of his worst mischief affects people overseas. Like Al "Senator Pothole" D'Amato, Smith knows the value of having staff who return phone calls promptly and help out with little problems.
- Steven Hart
September 11, 2008 at 1:08pm
Since we are engaged in "exposing unsavory affiliations", permit me to bring to your attention some Democratic congressmen's affiliations that don't pass my smell test. The attached NYT clip tells the story. Since it was published, Mel Weiss and Bill Lerach are off to jail and the Milberg Weiss firm has settled its criminal investigation by paying tens of millions in fines to the feds. /Users/louissernoff/Desktop/Milberg Weiss Keeps Giving to Democrats - Mergers, Acquisitions, Venture Capital, Hedge Funds -- DealBook - New York Times.webarchive
- lsernoff
September 11, 2008 at 1:37pm
To Rob: I hate to defend "social conservatism," especially from those who like thinking of themselves as social conservatives. But whatever "social conservatism" is, it is not the wholesale bigotry and hatred manifested in Chris Smith's record on life-style issues. Social conservatism may be objectionable in a lot of ways, but it can be defended. Smith's hate-mongering is indefensible and it should not be viewed as "social conservatism."
- O. R. Raymond
September 11, 2008 at 2:13pm
Rob is way off. Just because I think that Chris Smith's "moral" (man if I could use more quotation marks than that, I would!) vision is gravely wrong, does not mean that I do not have my own moral code which I believe is right. It is a false choice to think that there is only moral relativism or the privileging of evil. There is also the privileging of kindness to your fellow man a la Jesus. I believe in right and wrong, and I can get real "judgemental" (to use a pejorative of the relativists) on those who advocate violent hatred of a class of people who aren't hurting anybody. Sorry, this wasn't all TNR-sarcastic, but that is what I feel.
- mcorey.geo
September 11, 2008 at 2:34pm
Did Congressman Smith run over Kirchick's dog this week? What a hatchet job out of nowhere. Obviously the author does not know the fourth district of New Jersey. It is indeed a liberal area, where Gore and Kerry easily carried the presidential races. At the same time, Chris Smith wins with 60-something percent of the vote because all politics is local. His constituents know they can rely on him year after year. They may not all agree with him on his pro-life and pro-family views -- heck, even the pro-abortion Trenton Times and Asbury Park Press still endorse him -- but they respect him for his beliefs and credibility. James Kirchick, on the other hand, grinds his ax with zero dignity. Smith is a man; Kirchick is a hack.
- Ken
September 11, 2008 at 4:38pm
First of all Chris Smith is not so liberal on most issues, I would say moderate and maybe even center right depending on the particulars. He gets endorsed, however, by tons of groups because he is an effective congressman who gets things done for his district. Also, Rep. Smith is not an anti-Gay crusader like you make him out to be. Sure he has voted for traditional values legislation on homosexuality but it is not his big issue. Above all Chris Smith is devoted to pro-life, anti-abortion legislation. He constantly argues against any funding for pro-abortion activities here and abroad. He also is equally outspoken on human trafficking, a supporter of adult stem-cell research, and autism legislation. It is true that Chris Smith is a devout Catholic, and he tries to follow the moral values of the Church, particularly its defense of the defenseless in all he does. Chris Smith is probably the biggest advocate of human rights in the House, from modern-day slavery to the people of Darfur to political prisoners and refugees. He also believes that human rights applies to unborn children, and that women deserve better than abortion.
- Alphonsus
September 11, 2008 at 4:53pm
Is Kirchick the pen name for Stephen Glass, the TNR writer exposed for making up people, places and events? He accuses Smith of failing to report a $200 donation in 1980 and a $4000 donation in 1982. That would be a violation of federal election law. Except I checked Smith's FEC filings at the Federal Election Commission and found both. The TNR links are to a "user selected itemized transaction" which is a bogus listing easily manipulated to eliminate the actual contributions. This looks more like campaign dirty tricks against Smith than anything resembling investigative journalism. Glass was fired by TNR for fabricating facts. If Kirchick isn't fired, TNR's reputation for integrity will be a joke.
- Ken
September 11, 2008 at 6:50pm
I love the family values chatter.. My wife and I had a profoundly retarded son - he never spoke a word or walked - he never sat up - he never looked at me - for all I knew he was deaf and blind as well. Every meal he ever ate we fed him. Every diaper he ever wore we changed him. Every foot he ever moved from where he was lying we carried him. Every time he went to bed we carried him upstairs. Every morning we carried him downstairs. We became a test marketing project for Depends adult diapers - we got 'em free and had to let the manufacturer know what we thought of them. He lived to be ten years old. We did nothing but worry about what was going to happen to him. Then one day he simply woke up and died. My wife gave up the best ten years of her life caring for Michael. We got no help from any government agency except our local school for handicapped kids. No medicare ; no medicaid; no state assistance. You see I "made too much money" - I was a middle management officer in a bank with two other kids and it was the only income in my home - but I made too much money. Michael is gone now. So is my wife. She never went to church. She was not a believer. If there is a God in his heaven then she is sitting under a massive oak watching her perfect 10 year old son play with his 12 year old brother (yes - we lost two boys) in the green grass under a sunny sky with a cool breeze moving through his hair mop - "Mommy look at me!! Look at my kite!!" and she will wave and smile. There was no preacher at her funeral - except for a local female Methodist minister who knew how this woman, who never went to church, lived Christianity in her daily life . I will not forget her kindness. She spoke of how this woman went on to have two fine daughters after her two disabled sons and how she made a lunch hour appointment for an abortion and changed her mind at the last minute. Talk is cheap. It’s a lot easier talk about having a kid like Mike than to be the parents. Too many of you fine religious folk feel so good about yourselves, then you smile and go on to your next “Fellowship” meeting or casserole supper knowing you saved another life. No one should have to bear a Michael at 30 if they don’t want to.......that’s choice. Those who advocate the opposite should be prepared to urge society to provide care for that child for its entire life, even if you have to raise taxes. It’s the cost of being pro-life. Think of that the next time you see two old people pushing an adult retarded child in a wheel chair in the mall. P. S. This month I am attending the lesbian wedding of my niece to her partner in Massachusetts. Good for them.
- toritto
September 11, 2008 at 8:28pm
Message and Media really did their research on this one before they passed it on to the articles author. Impressive.
- Jim
September 11, 2008 at 9:52pm
Is Kirchick the pen name for Stephen Glass, the TNR writer exposed for making up people, places and events? He accuses Smith of failing to report a $200 donation in 1980 and a $4000 donation in 1982. That would be a violation of federal election law. Except I checked Smith's FEC filings at the Federal Election Commission and found both. The TNR links are to a "user selected itemized transaction" which is a bogus listing easily manipulated to eliminate the actual contributions. This looks more like campaign dirty tricks against Smith than anything resembling investigative journalism. Glass was fired by TNR for fabricating facts. If Kirchick isn't fired, TNR's reputation for integrity will be a joke.
- Ken
September 12, 2008 at 8:05am
Oh geez - how many times are the likes of Josh Zeitz/Carol Gay/Amy Vasquez going to trundle this tripe out like its news? CHRIS SMITH IS A STAUNCH CATHOLIC PRO-LIFER. NOT NEWS!
- Deb
September 12, 2008 at 10:39am
Chris Smith is an ass-hole, phony, opportunist who has consistantly voted the Bush line. He has voted with Bush down the line to fund the war in Iraq. When his constituents have come to discuss this he avoids them at all costs. Seeing as he was in his district 17 days last year it would make it kind of hard to meet up. He claims he is pro-life except when it comes to killing brown people over there. Just because they say he takes care of him district doesn't make it so. I live in his district and I get his propaganda newspaper all the time, paid for by the taxpayers, and there isn't a single person who has ever spoken or seen him in my very large community. He may have been effective at one time but no longer. He needs to get a real job and off the welfare dole. Smith Gotta Go! He sucks!
- popin-in
September 12, 2008 at 3:07pm
Wow. Thanks for taking the time to tell your story. It's quite an effective counterpoint to the deification of a certain woman enjoying taxpayer-funded healthcare for her large family.
- Track Palin
September 13, 2008 at 3:28am
Deb--who are the people you're talking about? I'm not following you. Anyway, this article isn't about pro-life or pro-choice. It's about a horrible form of homophobia and collusion with some nasty segregationists. I'm not sure you're addressing the article itself.
- Hal
September 13, 2008 at 1:05pm
If you would have done your research, you would have noticed that Chris Smith has always voted for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services appropriations which included title X family planning funding. Why can't the media ever do proper research? and tell the truth? that Chris Smith voted for Planned Parenthood funding which is included in Title X within the Labor and Health bill.
- Aida
September 15, 2008 at 9:21pm
popin-in: you don't have your facts, chris smith was taken off a house veterans' committee by bush and hastert because he wanted to appropriate more money, not less. So, enough of your silly, knee-jerk reactions without the facts. C. Smith didn't always vote the way bush wanted him to.
- aida
September 15, 2008 at 9:24pm