WORLD NOVEMBER 5, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Almost three decades ago, a group of radical Islamist students, dressed in army fatigues or covered in scarves and black chadors, forced their way into the American embassy in Tehran. According to some accounts, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then a student at a second-tier technical college in Tehran, was invited to join the hostage takers. He declined, saying he would join only if they would also occupy the Soviet embassy in Tehran. “No to the West, No to the East” was in those days the much-touted slogan of the regime.
The students, we now know, initially planned their action as political theater, no more than a daring stunt. After a few days, and some publicity, they intended to end the occupation. Regime leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, however, had other ideas. Sensing the political gains of prolonging the crisis, he called the take-over of the embassy the Second Revolution and used it to consolidate his hold on power. Every year since, the regime has organized mass demonstrations to celebrate this brazen breach of diplomatic decorum as a way to bolster its own popularity.
Yesterday, the regime tried to repeat this ritual--but something else happened on the way to the embassy. From weeks before, sources close to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and the Basij declared their intention to make the day into a showdown with the opposition, a day the regime would bring out its forces in full. In the words of Sobhe-Sadeq, the political organ of the IRGC, the world would be forced to accept that “the people” are with the regime, and that the democratic opposition is nothing but a silly handful of effeminate upper-middle-class sissies.
But the rifts within the regime were on full display during yesterday’s ceremonies. Days earlier, Ahmadinejad had declared his “satisfaction” with the results of the negotiations with the United States in Geneva, and promised more direct contact. In response, Hossein Shariat-Madari, the infamous editor of the daily Keyhan--nowseen asthe semi-official voice of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei--wrote in a surprisingly sharp-tongued editorial that only Khamenei sets Iranian nuclear and foreign policy; the editorial went so far as to even deny there had ever been direct negotiations between the United States and Iran in Geneva. Leaving no doubt as to his true feelings, Khamenei began yesterday’s commemoration with a scathing attack on America. Obama has been all talk and no action, Khamenei said, and his talks and his smiles have been so transparently bereft of real substance that they would not even “fool a child.”
Before regime supporters and critics took to the streets yesterday, another key development took place. Ayatollah Hossein Montazeri, now clearly the spiritual father of the Green movement, issued a remarkable statement, apologizing for the fact that, 30 years ago, as one of the leaders of the clerical regime, he had supported the occupation of the American embassy. It was, Montazeri declared, a foolish, costly decision, tantamount to a declaration of war. He went on to lambaste the regime for now selling the country cheaply to China and Russia. What is the difference between Russia and America, he asked, and why is it acceptable to give the former all kinds of concessions, while refusing to even negotiate with the latter?
As the day wore on, it became clear that the regime’s attempt to intimidate people into silence or inaction had failed again. Regime critics showed up in impressive numbers. Hundreds were beaten by security forces, including opposition leaders Mir Hussein Moussavi and Mehdi Karubi.
One of the most clever and telling slogans of yesterday’s demonstrators was a play on Barack Obama’s name. Obama, if written in Persian, is composed of three words--ou, ba, ma--meaning, “He is with us.” During yesterday’s protests, people tore down posters of Khamenei, and shouted “Obama, Obama, ya ba oona, ya ba ma”--“Obama, Obama, either with them, or with us.”
President Obama’s statement remembering the anniversary of the hostage crisis invited Iran and America to put the past behind them, and look to a better tomorrow. But his reference to the democratic aspirations of the Iranian people was too oblique. “The world,” he said, “continues to bear witness to their powerful calls for justice, and their courageous pursuit of universal rights.” In Tehran and several other major Iranian cities yesterday, people risked life and limb demanding these rights. Confirming that the world is watching leaves the question Iranians are asking of Obama--ba ma ya, ba anha--still without a clear answer.
Abbas Milani is the Hamid and Christina Moghadam Director of Iranian Studies at Stanford, where he is the co-director of the Iran Democracy Project. His latest book is Eminent Persian: The Men and Women who Made Modern Iran, 1941-1979 (Syracuse University Press).
4 comments
Where's TE Lawrence when we need him?
- sighthnd
November 5, 2009 at 2:59pm
Really ... what would you have him do?
- benberger
November 5, 2009 at 3:11pm
Have sex with the Revolutionary Guards ...? But seriously folks ... "this brazen breach of diplomatic decorum" - how about a violation of international law? The way Milani puts it, it's as if the students were eating green peas with spoons instead of forks. I remember that day, though increasingly hazily. There was jubilation everywhere in the streets of Tehran: by the revolutionaries for the sheer brazenness of the violation; by the anti-revolutionaries (such as myself), for its brazen insanity, which we thought would bring swift retribution from the US and an ignominious end to the rule of the crazies. We had not counted on monumental incompetence in DC - after the Debacle in the Desert, I disavowed any and all notions of even the possibility of any sort of international conspiracy and became a believer in the single magic bullet theory. As the days wore on into weeks and months, and the crazies ruled and killed and destroyed and played with the impotent Great Satan, despair overtook us; and then came the War and ... The article is misguided in one important element. Slogans aside, Obama is not the loser. No one in Iran expects even the soi-disant leaders of the Green Movement to be able to do much for them, let alone Obama from 8,000 km away. This is a mass movement in its truest sense; from inception, its slogan in confronting government forces has been, "natarsid, natarsid/ma hame ba ham hastim." (Don't be afraid, we are in this together.) This - and this alone - is the most remarkable strength of the movement, whether or not Obama manages to make a deal with Iran.
- icarusr
November 5, 2009 at 4:02pm
Thanks for that reality check, icarusr. TBH, Obama just does not have any good options in Iran. Thanks to the CIA overthrowing Mossaddeq in 1953, the US can't actively support the opposition without discrediting it in the eyes of the Iranian people, and handing Khamenei a propaganda coup. And with the nuclear issue, we need to make a good faith effort at negotiations. I don't think Iran will be anything but duplicitious over its nuclear programs, but that behavior needs to be seen for other nations to rally in opposition.
- zardoz67
November 6, 2009 at 11:21am