The good news--society is becoming more open and honest: Money used to be a taboo subject. Not anymore, thanks to Web sites such as Facebook and MySpace, which have created a generation willing to talk about anything and everything online. Several new sites are incorporating that impulse into the world of money, blending social networking with personal finance. The bad news--guys like this: Brian Zacharias, 23, a senior economics major at the University of Virginia, was very aware of how he was doing and wanted others to know it.
Everyone should read Ronald Brownstein's fascinating cover story in National Journal. Here's the crux of his argument: From New Hampshire to California, and from Arizona to Wisconsin, exit polls from this year's contests show the Democratic coalition evolving in clear and consistent ways since the 2004 primaries that nominated John Kerry. The party is growing younger, more affluent, more liberal, and more heavily tilted toward women, Latinos, and African-Americans.
Ann Friedman has an excellent and much needed piece on identity politics, which she argues have been played for a very long time: But just because our front-running candidates are a woman and a black man, it does not mean that this is the first election to hinge on candidates' identities. All those other election years, when only white guys were vying for the nomination, well, those were "identity politics" races, too. Why weren't they framed that way?
Via The Page, this memo from the Clinton campaign is pretty hilarious: With an eleven state winning streak coming out of February, Senator Obama is riding a surge of momentum that has enabled him to pour unprecedented resources into Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont. If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there’s a problem. I look forward to a Wednesday morning (victory) memo if Obama wins Texas, Ohio, and Vermont, but loses Rhode Island. --Isaac Chotiner
In The New York Times today, Serbia's foreign minister has an op-ed on Kosovo's independence. Here's the key section: The case against recognition is based not only on the Security Council’s 1999 resolution reaffirming Serbia’s sovereignty over Kosovo, but also founded on the view that the international system has, as a result of this hostile act by the Kosovo Albanians, become more unstable, more insecure and more unpredictable. Here’s why. Recognizing the unilateral declaration of Kosovo’s independence from Serbia legitimizes the doctrine of imposing solutions to ethnic conflicts.
Readers can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that for the first time Clinton just apologized for her Iraq war vote. She has parsed this issue before, but tonight's answer seemed somehow different. If so, it is very interesting that she waited until now. ("Interesting" is a euphemism...) Update: Here is what she said: Well, obviously, I've said many times that, although my vote on the 2002 authorization regarding Iraq was a sincere vote, I would not have voted that way again.
The Obama campaign wasted no time in sending out an email that claims Clinton's best moment of the night was plagiarized from John Edwards. Clinton: “You know, whatever happens, we're going to be fine.
I think Marc Ambinder, the Fox News focus group, and all the television analysis is basically correct: Obama had a very good debate and kept his momentum despite Clinton's marvelous final answer. I would just add that there were a couple of moments where Obama's cockiness was extremely off-putting. His comment about "very good" speeches was tonally wrong, and he needs to stop saying "I was right" about matters of foreign policy (especially when the subject is murky questions like what to do about Pakistan).
Can't CNN tell the audience to stop clapping? Neither candidate can mention the current president or his administration without getting enthusiastic applause. Similarly, Obama just said he wants everyone in America to prosper, which drew sustained cheering. --Isaac Chotiner
The new ABC News/WaPo poll has Clinton ahead of Obama by 7 in Ohio and 1 in Texas. She had double-digit leads in both states last week. Meanwhile, Rasmussen has Clinton up three in Texas (last week he had the New York senator up 16). The most interesting internal from the WaPo survey is that Texas voters are one-and-a-half times more likely to say that health care, as opposed to the economy, is the most important issue facing the country (needless to say, this is not the case in Ohio). --Isaac Chotiner