SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The Corporate Welfare-Obamacare Link

PLANK DECEMBER 3, 2012

The Corporate Welfare-Obamacare Link

The New York Times is two days into a terrific and important series about the proliferation of the tax incentives desperate local and state governments dole out to businesses to set up shop within their borders. Today's story focuses on the granddaddy of them all, Texas, which, by the Times' count, gives out a whopping $19 billion in tax incentives every year.

I reported on Texas' corporate-welfare grab-bag as part of my profile last year of Rick Perry, who has greatly expanded the state's incentive program. But even I was shocked at some of what Times reporter Louise Story turned up, including the role of a tax consultant by the name of G. Brint Ryan. Ryan, who typically gets a 30 percent cut of the incentive award he secures for companies, has helped companies get tax incentives in more than half the states in the country, but specializes in Texas, where he and his wife have contributed more than $4 million to state politicians since 2000, and where more than a third of the awards from one of the state's biggest incentive programs, more than $80 million, has gone to Ryan clients. Ryan employed the former state treasurer before Perry named him to oversee an overhaul of the state tax system that left the incentives intact, and Ryan is now himself sitting on a commission named to review the incentive program.

It's a remarkable racket. But there's one angle that I thought the Times story could've emphasized more: health care.

The story does a good job of drawing the link between the Texas incentives and the state's woefully underfunded schools: not only do the state incentives leave less money for state funding for schools, but Texas cities and counties are engaged in a race-to-the-bottom of their own, awarding property tax exemptions that result in far less local tax revenue for schools.

The impact is no less deleterious for health care. Many of the jobs being lured to the state under the incentive programs are low-wage ones without good benefits, like the Amazon warehouse featured in the Times story, which got a slew of tax breaks and was eventually let mostly off the hook (with help from a Texas legislator who works part-time for Ryan) for a $269 million tax bill that resulted from its refusal to charge Texans sales tax on Amazon purchases. As a result, Texas has the third-lowest rate of employer-provided health insurance in the country -- only 61 percent of Texans under 65 are covered on the job. Meanwhile, doling out so many incentives -- thus slashing tax revenues -- leaves the state with far less money available for any sort of safety net. Texas has some of the most stringent standards for Medicaid eligibility in the country -- non-disabled adults without dependent children are ineligible, period, while parents must earn less than a quarter of the poverty level to be eligible. For a parent in a family of four, that means they must earn less than $6,000 per year. Put it all together, and you have the highest rate of uninsured in the country -- a quarter of the state population, about 6 million people.

Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.

The kicker, of course, is that the federal government did something to help Texas out of this bind: it passed the Affordable Care Act, which is geared above all to helping cover people in the states that lack the political will to care of the uninsured themselves. The law would bring Medicaid eligibility to a national threshold, 133 percent of the poverty level, with the federal government picking up 100 percent of the tab of the expansion in the first few years, sliding down to 90 percent in a few years. This would mean, essentially, a huge infusion of federal cash into Texas hospitals and clinics and doctor's offices. But Perry and Republican state legislators have deemed even the slight additional outlay that the state would have to make as part of this deal unacceptable, and are refusing to go along with the Medicaid expansion, as the Supreme Court's ruling on Obamacare allows them to do. So millions in Brownsville and Beaumont and elsewhere will remain uninsured. Meanwhile, G. Brint Ryan will continue collecting his cut.

Follow me on Twitter @AlecMacGillis

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

I would guess that Michigan comes closest to Texas on giveaways to private companies, though nowhere near Texas. Many years ago I worked on a project in Michigan for one of the big car companies, and was surprised to learn how easy it was to get tax breaks and even low interest government loans for projects which benefited the car company (by significantly lowering the developer's cost, the car company paid significantly lower rent). I wondered at the time how Michigan could afford such quality public facilities and programs, the University of Michigan being one that came to mind since I worked with graduates from the law school, with such a depleted tax base. Texas is now the leader in giveaways to private companies in efforts to attract them to Texas, as Michigan was the leader in giveaways to private companies in efforts to keep them in Michigan. A beggar thy neighbor policy didn't work in Michigan and it won't work in Texas because there's always somebody else willing to up the ante, using other people's money (OPM) of course.

- rayward

December 3, 2012 at 3:35pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You called it, Rayward. Guess who the final piece in the series is about? Michigan!

- Alec MacGillis

December 3, 2012 at 3:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

(brief and outstanding article. thanks.)

- cdmcl3

December 3, 2012 at 3:58pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Percentage fees in domestic relations cases were unenforceable as against public policy - by encouraging divorce. I could make a strong case that percentage fees in government giveaways should likewise be unenforceable - by encouraging government giveaways. If I'm the beneficiary of a government giveaway, I'd challenge the fee. Has there ever existed a bigger huckster that Brint Ryan.

- rayward

December 3, 2012 at 4:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Times has a great map here - http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/12/01/us/government-incentives.html - that allows you to check out the incentives given out by each state. Michigan is close behind Texas, giving out $672 per capita vs. $759 per capita for Texas. Both are far above average, although West Virginia and Nebraska give away a lot as well.

- Attrill

December 3, 2012 at 6:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Considering that almost half of the Louisiana State budget comes directly from the Federal government, a good portion of that goes directly to the $1.79B in corporate tax welfare incentives the State gives out, which means tax payers are paying businesses to do business here in LA while simultaneously seeing a $2B shortfall requiring draconian cuts to higher education, education and health care here in the State. I guess Jindal doesn't mind that kind of redistribution especially when he's turning down yet more free money to cover the expansion of medicare in the state.

- singlspeed

December 4, 2012 at 2:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close