SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? No One Really Knows.

THE SPINE MAY 15, 2010

Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? No One Really Knows.

Benazir Bhutto was murdered (along with 24 of her nameless countrymen) two-and-a-half years ago. Edward Jay Epstein has discovered that there was actually no proper—and barely an improper—investigation of the slaying. Her crooked and shiftless husband succeeded Musharraf as president, not that she wasn’t crooked herself. But shiftless she was not.

Anybody is likely to be assassinated in Pakistan. But this assassination is of greater interest than most.

The Assassination of Benazir Bhutto

By Edward Jay Epstein

On 27 December 2007, Benazir Bhutto was killed by a suicide bomber in the Pakistani city of Rawalpindi. 24 other people were also killed in the explosion. Bhutto had just returned from a nine year exile as part of a deal arranged by the United States through which she would run in a nationwide elected to replace the faltering military dictatorship of General Pervez Musharraf. After speaking at a rally at Liaquat Bagh park, Bhutto departed at 5 pm in a white armored Land Cruiser. As the convoy made a right turn on the main highway, Bhutto was waving to her supporters through the roof hatch in her car. Then gunman standing a few feet behind her car fired three shots and detonated a bomb. The video footage shows that only 1.6 seconds elapsed between the time of the first shot to the detonation of the explosives. Bhutto, with a gaping head wound, died in the hospital less than an hour later. Her doctors, finding no bullet wounds, postulated that she died from a head injury in the explosion, Since authorities did not permit an autopsy to be conducted, even though it is required by law, the cause of her death was never conclusively determined.

The crime scene investigation was also inexplicably limited by authorities. Only one bullet casing was recovered which was traced by DNA on it to the partial skull of the body of the presumed suicide bomber. The skull fragment, which was found on the roof of a building, was determined to have come from a boy no more than sixteen years old. Since the crime scene itself was hosed down within an hour of the shooting, other potential clues, including DNA evidence, were washed away. (The lone bullet casing was found lodged in a sewerage drain.) Similarly, Bhutto’s Land Rover had been scrubbed clean hours after the blast. The extraordinary cleansing of the crime scene before all the evidence could be recovered had been ordered by police authorities According to the UN Commission that investigated the assassination, “Hosing down the crime scene so soon after the blast goes beyond mere incompetence,” and raises the issue of “whether this amounts to criminal responsibility.” In any case, it made it all but impossible to determine if the bomber had any accomplices.

Despite the lack of forensic evidence, General Musharraf ordered a press conference the very next day to announce that Bhutto’s assassination had been organized by Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the Taliban insurgency in Pakistan, and by Al-Qaida. The government spokesman said that Pakistan ISI intelligence service had intercepted a message in which Mehsud congratulated a subordinate on the Bhutto assassination. Fugitive warrants were then issued for Mehsud (who was killed in 2009 by a CIA drone attack) and his subordinates. Meanwhile, the UN investigators obtained a transcript of the intercepted message, but it contained nu mention of either Mehsud or the Bhutto assassination. Instead, it contained a conversation in which someone called “Emir Sahib,” asked another unknown person merely “who were they?” After he was told 3 names, he said “The three did it?” When UN investigators attempted to pursue the matter, the ISI claimed it had been able to identify “Emir Sahib” as Mehsud through a “ voice signature,” and that from the context of the conversation, its analysts assumed that the “it” likely referred to the Bhutto assassination. the ISI refused to divulge either the date of the interception, the means by which it was obtained, or how it was verified. So the UN Commission was unable to authenticate it.

Soon after the December 28th press conference, the authorities in Pakistan closed down their investigation. According to the UN Commission report, they “ essentially ceased investigating the possibility of other perpetrators, particularly those who may have been involved in planning or directing the assassination by funding or otherwise enabling the assassination” and “even ended its efforts to identify the suicide bomber.” So the question of who killed Bhutto remains unresolved?

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

Is not the assassination of former Lebanon Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005 still unsolved? After reading Bernard-Henri Lévy (2003 translation from the French by James X. Mitchell), "Who Killed Daniel Pearl?", I would imagine no one in Pakistan or the U.S. really wants to dig that deeply into the killing of Benazir Bhutto. What the British created as a Muslim nation has struggled for 63 years to forge a true national identity. It would seem the time for a great, unifying leader to emerge in Pakistan was the 1980's. Was that not Bhutto? Is Pakistan not an army with a nation, rather than a nation with an army. Should we not be more concerned about the fact that both Bhutto and her surviving husband Zardari are Shi'a, not Sunni? Zardari is a Shi'a Sindhi-speaking Baloch. Does that mean he has ties to Shi'a Iran?

- K2K

May 16, 2010 at 7:18am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

With respect, K2K, there is a Baluch (Baloch) insurgency in Pakistan but that doesn't align them with Iran. In fact I think that's a stretch. There are several tribal groups who are called Baluch, it's a language group and anything but monolithic. More to the point the insurgent Baluch Jundallah claimed responsibility for the murder of several Revolutionary Guards: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/world/middleeast/19iran.html

- Sophia

May 16, 2010 at 6:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

With respect, Sophia, I was making the point that Bhutto and Zardari are Shi'a in a majority Sunni/Sufi country. I thought they were both from the Sindh landowning 'aristocracy'. My apologies for not being clearer. Their People's Party political party appears to be everyone versus the Punjabis who dominate the military. Just could not resist indirectly questioning why Peretz is wondering about Bhutto's assassination. I do know that Pakistan's Baluch 'insurgency' actually spills over into Iran's Baluch population, although my understanding is that Pakistan's Baluchis mostly want more revenue-sharing of their natural gas wealth and devolution of political autonomy. On my ethnoreligious map of Iran, their Baluchis are majority Sunni. Well, actually, I am still unclear if there is a Baluchistan self-determination movement that transcends the Pakistan-Iran border. Every so often, I study the Ralph Peters "Map of the New Middle East", noting Baluchistan, which actually appears on global maps before 1857. The British never really controlled the Baluchis, and relied on the beyond rugged geography to protect their empire in Hindoostan. The land route from Persia into Afghanistan through Herat was a much greater concern to the British in their Great Game with the Russian land empire of the late 19th century. More on the Ralph Peters map at (among other sources)http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3882 note how little is left of today's Pakistan.

- K2K

May 16, 2010 at 7:20pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Who killed Benazir Bhutto? No one really knows -- Not even the dusty wind That over Kashmir blows. Who killed Benazir Bhutto? O don't let it bother you -- We'll just keep sending Pakistan dollars, Our ally straight and true!

- ironyroad

May 17, 2010 at 1:31pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

from May 18, 2010 HongKong based AsiaTimes (for what it's worth): By Syed Saleem Shahzad "Militant splits span AfPak border" "...The group seeking ideological dominance in Mir Ali was once linked to the LJ*, whose mentor was the slain Tahir Yuldashev, leader of the al-Qaeda-linked Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan when he operated from South Waziristan. The underpinning of their belief is to stage an Islamic revolution in Pakistan by creating chaos. They were responsible for several assassination attempts on former president Pervez Musharraf and the killing of ex-premier Benazir Bhutto in 2007. ..." *"... Laskhar-e-Jhangvi (LJ - an anti-Shi'ite militant group) who were desperately wanted by the Pakistani security forces...also moved to North Waziristan. ..." Would anything be different today if Benazir Bhutto were President of Pakistan instead of her husband Zardari? Not that I support assassination, but it would still probably be U.S. military working directly with Pakistan's military...

- K2K

May 17, 2010 at 4:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close