ELECTIONATE AUGUST 27, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Tropical Storm Isaac could have charged at Tampa, but it didn’t. Instead, Isaac moved further west into the Gulf of Mexico. So although the risk posed by Isaac was enough to cancel the first day of the RNC, the reporters, delegates, and politicians gathered in Tampa will only need to deal with Isaac's gusty outer rain-bands. It could be tempting for politicos to rejoice in a near miss, but Isaac now poses a second, indirect threat to the RNC: a landfall near New Orleans on the seventh year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.
Now in the Gulf of Mexico, Isaac will have more time to intensify before a final landfall with the continental United States than it would have if hit the Florida peninsula. To date, Isaac’s strength has been limited by land, dry air, and a disorganized inner core (to take a baseball analogy: you can only throw so hard without decent throwing mechanics). But with the next two days over the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico and favorable upper level winds, Isaac will have its best opportunity yet to get its act together—and that’s exactly what computer models and the National Hurricane Center predict. The official forecast projects that Isaac will make landfall as a Category 2 Hurricane with winds of 100 mph.
Although it is too early to determine precisely where Isaac will make landfall or exactly how strong it might be, RNC planners will be forced to deal with a hurricane landfall for the second straight convention. Holding a convention during a hurricane landfall isn’t optimal in the abstract and Isaac adds a dose of symbolism to boot. The most recent forecast path takes the storm right toward New Orleans on the seventh anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, and it’s hard to imagine the RNC getting anything near an optimal amount of media attention when pitted against a combination of disaster porn and a great hook.
Isaac is hardly assured to hit New Orleans—in fact, the forecast is unusually uncertain due to a split in the computer models. But a landfall somewhere along the Gulf Coast is all but assured and it would put the GOP in a tough spot. Four years ago, Gustav forced the GOP to delay the start of the GOP convention, indicating a recognition that it's not wise to convene while others are enduring a hurricane. But Isaac’s near miss already forced the GOP to cancel Monday. Would the RNC delay an additional day and shorten the convention further? Can they extend the convention later? Or would the RNC plow ahead and commence in spite of Isaac? There wasn't much reporting on these questions this weekend, but RNC planners will start to grapple with them today.
5 comments
Now, I don't wish a hurricane on anyone, least of all the longsuffering people of the Crescent City, but as for the GOP tool convention in Tampa...HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
- AaronW
August 27, 2012 at 8:16am
For the Repubs it appears to be a case of "Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad" [[For both meanings of mad, in the case of the Repubs]].. For BHO running for Prez and the Dems, it appears to be a case of "How long wiill the luck of the gods last"?? My guess is until they win their Presidential prize-- and then can't or won't govern when the economy seriously declines in 2013. They may wish Isaac had hit a week later.
- drofnats1
August 27, 2012 at 8:50am
I saw this headline and was like "Chotiner? Does he have some really devastating book reviews up his sleeve?"
- subterra
August 27, 2012 at 1:14pm
I can't be the only person anticipating the symbolism if this storm takes a hard right turn and does heavy damage to GOP territory, can I? Or would it be more symbolic if it drifted around the gulf aimlessly, becoming progressively more and more violent, but less and less relevant?
- gwcross
August 27, 2012 at 2:01pm
I'm just hoping a giant head appears in the Tampa convention center and says, "Could you please stop pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Your Pal, God. P.S., Next time won't be just a warning."
- Nusholtz
August 27, 2012 at 4:45pm