SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Daily Breakdown: Romney's Best Polling Day Since DNC

ELECTIONATE SEPTEMBER 15, 2012

Daily Breakdown: Romney's Best Polling Day Since DNC

If Obama’s bounce fades over the next week, today might stand out as the day when the polls began to shift back in Romney’s direction.

After yesterday’s triumvirate of NBC/WSJ/Marist polls, today’s state polls show a tight race. Perhaps most surprisingly and importantly, SurveyUSA shows Obama up by just 1 point in Colorado, even though their other state polls have shown Obama leading by nearly ’08-esque margins in the blue states and the battlegrounds. By that same standard, we might have expected Obama up by at least 5 points, since he won by 9 in 2008. 

The big news might initially seem to be a CBS/NYT poll that provided some mixed news. On the one hand, Obama made a 8 point gain among registered voters since their pre-convention poll. But CBS/NYT applied their likely voter model for the first time and found Obama with just a more modest 3 point lead, although he still held 49 percent of the vote. Ultimately, a 3 point lead with 49 percent of the vote is largely consistent with the other post-convention polls, so it's not the big newsmaker it might have been a few days ago. In an average of post-DNC polls, Obama leads by 4 points, 48.8 to 44.4 for Romney.

Gallup also tilted back further in Romney’s direction, with Obama falling beneath 50 percent in Gallup’s polling. On the other hand, Obama retained a 49 percent approval rating in Gallup, suggesting that he’s held relatively steady at elevated levels over the last few days, even if not quite at his post-DNC peak. On the other hand, the Reuters-Ipsos internet tracker showed Obama leading by 7 points among likely voters, his best showing yet.

Rasmussen showed Romney reclaiming his pre-convention lead of around 3 points, but as I said yesterday, firm party-ID weights complicate their ability to accurately measure bounces. Imagine, for example, if some share of Democratic-leaning independents decide to describe themselves as “Democrats” following the DNC. This type of temporary shift in party-ID would be beaten out by Rasmussen’s weights, and the corresponding “bounce” might be as well, since the now over-weighted independents would include a disproportionate share of Republican-leaners.

Rasmussen did show Obama leading Virginia by 1 point and trailing in North Carolina by 6. Neither is especially surprising, although the Virginia tally looks decent for Obama compared to Romney’s 3 point lead nationally.

On balance, today's polls pointed toward a narrower Obama lead than surveys had shown over the last few days. If one had assumed that Obama's up 4 or 5 points nationally, then none of the battleground state polling would have lived up to your expectations. And of the national polls, only the Reuters/Ipsos and Zogby internet polls showed Obama holding his own. Next week, polls could return to showing Obama up by 5 in states like Colorado, Virginia, and Michigan. But if they don't, today might stand out as the day Obama's bounce began to fade.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 6 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

6 comments

I'd like to play poker with the people at Rasmussen.

- Nusholtz

September 15, 2012 at 9:27am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Wait for the Galson article predicting a Romney landslide, accusing Obama of failing to be adequately bipartisan and therefore losing the Republican vote, and arguing that a combination of Bain and Strickland is responsible for the Democratic loss of the presidency and the Senate, and the formation of a 1000-year Republican majority.

- icarus-r

September 15, 2012 at 3:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Nothing against Nate Cohn, but why does this blog exist? Anyone that really wants to understand what's going on with polls and what they mean will surely be reading 538 (even Romney's people, rail as they might about Silver being an O tool). BTW, the comments on 538 are among the more intelligent ones I read on political blogs - not too many mouth breathing trolls from either side. This blog sort of feels pointless.

- austinous

September 15, 2012 at 4:47pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Austinous, in '08 538's Nate Silver was blogging here at TNR, but then the NY Times poached him. Nate Cohn obviously has been tasked with filling that gap here at TNR for stats-geek, horse race coverage, and he's doing a fine job of it giving the relatively limited resources at his disposal, but I agree that he seems not to have attracted much of a following, though I reckon the activity on all these TNR discussion boards is down significantly from four years ago.

- AaronW

September 16, 2012 at 11:04am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

given the...

- AaronW

September 16, 2012 at 11:06am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well plus this way we can read the polls, since we're already here:)

- Sophia

September 17, 2012 at 2:29am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close