SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Romney's Turnout Strategy Puts The Ball In Obama's Court

ELECTIONATE SEPTEMBER 20, 2012

Romney's Turnout Strategy Puts The Ball In Obama's Court

Why was the Romney campaign talking about God's place in the Pledge of Allegiance, attending NASCAR events, endorsing Steve King, and whatever else? According to three Romney advisors cited by BuzzFeed, Boston has apparently calculated that there aren’t enough undecided voters and that it’s time to turnout the base. This represents a stark reversal from the Romney campaign’s initial view that they needed to relentlessly hammer the economy to appeal to undecided voters, under the assumption that they would ultimately flock to the Republican nominee. And, if Romney has indeed switched to a turnout-oriented messaging strategy, it's a tough spot for the Republican nominee.

Would a strong Republican turnout help Romney? Absolutely. But if the Romney campaign isn’t convinced they’ll win an outsized share of undecided voters, then Obama’s route to victory starts to look pretty good. Whether you look at the universe of registered voters in terms of Party-ID, racial demographics, or Obama’s standing, it’s more than apparent that strong GOP turnout alone is insufficient for Romney to win the election. In post-convention polls, Obama holds nearly 41 percent of the white vote, enough to win reelection if minorities again represent 26 percent of the electorate. Among registered voters, Obama leads by nearly 7 points with 50 percent of the vote. And Democrats routinely outnumber Republicans by half a dozen points, or even more, in polls of registered voters.

So Romney can’t win by simply turning out Republicans and calling it a day. Romney would need to couple strong Republican turnout with a relatively weak Democratic turnout, or he would need a strong showing among undecided voters to close the gap. Realistically, the Romney campaign is going to try and accomplish both tasks by talking about base issues on the stump and airing advertisements aimed at persuading undecided voters that the president has failed and therefore that he must be replaced by the Republican nominee.  Three Romney strategists talking about a base turnout strategy suggests that Boston is not banking on undecided voters to resoundingly break their way, at least not to an extent that would hand them a victory without a strong base turnout.

But the alternative to a resounding performance among undecided voters is Romney crossing his fingers and hoping that Obama can’t produce a strong turnout of his own, since Boston couldn’t match a hypothetically large Democratic turnout and they can't do much to interfere with Obama’s turnout effort. And it's not like the Obama campaign hasn't heavily invested in the ground game, either. If Obama’s expensive ground operation can produce a strong Democratic turnout, that’s probably enough to ensure an Obama victory given his big lead among registered voters and proximity to 49 percent among those already deemed likely to participate. So if the Buzzfeed article is right, the race is potentially out of Romney’s hands. He's crossing his fingers hoping that Obama can't generate big turnout.

 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 3 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

3 comments

nate has hit the nail on its head with his summary. what's troubling remain reports of voter suppresion efforts along with any likely turnout complacency, too; reports seem mixed/dubious about the latter.

- cdmcl3

September 21, 2012 at 4:19am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

If Romney's campaign depends on relatively weak turnout, then this practically binds to the campaign to any and all of the notorious voter restriction measures in the states. Yet if OH and PA are any indication such efforts are likely for naught.

- riley

September 21, 2012 at 4:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Aren't Republicans the ones worried about the government spying on and controlling them? Isn't Voter ID improvement leading to that end? On the other hand, we probably need better citizen ID to run a more effective modern society? There are good reasons why a lot of the Democratic base don't have the best ID, but painful as it may be, why not get people upgraded to modern society? Now, where did I leave my identification papers . . .?

- skahn

September 24, 2012 at 12:13am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close