SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Daily Breakdown: Romney's Chances Fade In The Final Stretch

ELECTIONATE NOVEMBER 5, 2012

Daily Breakdown: Romney's Chances Fade In The Final Stretch

Over the last week, the best arguments on behalf of a Romney win have fallen off one-by-one. Before the final presidential debate, one could credibly argue that Romney had taken a slight lead in the national polls, that the big southeastern battleground states were tilting toward Romney, and that even though Romney trailed in Ohio, Obama was beneath 48 percent in a traditionally Republican state where the president was defying gravity. The national polls cast additional doubt on the state polls, or were at least cause to think that Romney could claw his way to an Electoral College victory. Just for good measure, there was still time left. Not only have intervening polls weakened or outright defeated many of these arguments, but Romney’s time is up.

Rather than shrink over the final two weeks of the campaign, Obama’s lead in the critical battleground states has actually grown. Obama now leads in Ohio by nearly 3 points and the president exceeds 49 percent of the vote. If Romney loses Ohio, he would need to carry the toss-up states carried by twice by Bush and then Wisconsin plus either Iowa or New Hampshire. But the polls have gotten out of hand for Romney in Wisconsin, which might have something to do with why Ryan and Romney made more campaign stops in Pennsylvania and Minnesota than they did in Wisconsin over the final three days of the campaign. Combined with Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin are sufficient to provide Obama with the presidency and Romney does not lead in a non-partisan poll of either state.

Just for good measure, Romney’s position in the next tier of battleground states has also worsened. Yesterday, 5 polls showed Obama ahead in Virginia. Not all of these polls are of the highest caliber, but the big picture is that Obama now leads by 1.2 points in a state that Romney can't lose if he trails in Ohio and Nevada. 10 of the 16 polls following the final debate show Obama leading in Virginia, compared to just 3 for Romney. The polls have been somewhat better for Romney in Florida, but it would be generous to characterize the state has leaning clearly in his direction, especially if one would not say as much about Obama’s tenuous edge in Virginia. It is perhaps telling that there is a case that the polls are kinder to Obama in North Carolina than they are to Romney in Ohio. 

To the extent that the national polls added to uncertainty or otherwise cast doubt on Obama’s lead in the battleground states, the national polls have also moved in Obama’s direction, narrowing the gap between state and national polls and reducing the degree of uncertainty about the state polling. Just for good measure, Obama averaged 48.9 percent of the vote in yesterday’s national polls, which is somewhat more impressive than the narrowness of Obama’s lead. 

And perhaps most importantly, time is up. 

The polls are quite consistent and clear in the battleground states worth 270 electoral votes. With Obama above 49 percent in Nevada, Wisconsin, and Ohio, a wave of undecided voters can't flip the outcome. At this point, the polls must be wrong for Romney to prevail. The polls have been wrong before and they will be wrong again. The race is close enough for the polls to conceivably get one of those states wrong, but the odds are against it.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

I'm wondering if the voters of Ohio, who were happy to have been saved by the President, were sent back to the President worried when Romney said they were going to lose their jobs.

- Nusholtz

November 5, 2012 at 7:20am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

but where is the unskewing of the polls? Don't you know that all of these polling companies are willing to ruin their reputation because (fill in the blanks). For good news Fox news is telling me right now the Romney is winning Ohio because Romney rallies are happy but Obama rallies are grim affairs, this is what Kasich is saying right now. Hey Kasich, screw you, I am very enthusiastic about Obama.

- blackton

November 5, 2012 at 8:56am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What Bill Clinton has earned with his unstinting commitment and service to the campaign is President Obama, in 2016, thanking Biden earnestly for his contributions and then handing his backing and his organization over to Hillary. In 2008, I didn't think Hillary had nearly enough electoral experience, or any other sort of experience, to beat McCain (her senate seat was handed to her on a platinum platter), even with Bill's help. I think she has now paid her dues in real-world experience and I am ready to be an enthusiastic supporter of Hillary in 2016. Twelve years (preferably 16) of Democratic governance should be enough to set the country back on the progressive path, championed by TR, FDR, and LBJ, as Cohn points out, and interrupted by Reagan for a generation. The neo-con, supply-side, reactionary experiment is a total failure, in every way. We need a bit more time for that to be apparent to overwhelmingly low-information Americans. We need enough time since Bush's disasters to have elapsed so that the benefits of a reality-based approach to governance can be felt.

- roidubouloi

November 5, 2012 at 10:08am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well said, roid. What a lovely vision!

- JackR

November 5, 2012 at 2:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Howdy, Jack. Glad to see you are still around.

- roidubouloi

November 5, 2012 at 8:58pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close