JONATHAN CHAIT SEPTEMBER 20, 2010
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
Via Dave Weigel, I see that National Review's Stephen Spruiell is arguing that Delaware Democratic Senate nominee Chris Coons is "the epitome of a party apparatchik." His evidence? Coons is running for the Senate -- as a Democrat!
In a wave election year where voter sentiment is running strongly against the Democratic party, Coons is the epitome of a party apparatchik. When all signs were pointing toward Mike Castle’s being the Republican nominee, Coons was recruited by Democratic elders to run against him, and he gladly accepted the mission, despite its apparent futility. Castle, a fixture of Delaware politics and winner of eleven straight statewide elections, was expected to win the seat walking away. Ted Kaufman, the longtime Biden aide who took over Biden’s seat, had already announced that he wouldn’t run. Most political observers assumed that Kaufman was keeping the seat warm for Biden’s son, Beau, an Iraq War veteran currently serving as Delaware’s attorney general. Beau was widely expected to run in 2010, but last January, following the Scott Brown stunner in Massachusetts, Biden fils announced that maybe this just wasn’t his year. The party needed someone else to get beaten by Castle, so — loyal party man that he is — Coons stepped up to take the fall.
I really can't argue with the logic here.
4 comments
"QED, Motherf*cker" - my new blog name
- timcrim1
September 20, 2010 at 4:10pm
Wow. Just when I thought that the National review could not get any more banal, we learn from that august publication that the Democrats are running a .... Democrat.
- liberal reformer
September 20, 2010 at 4:11pm
I thought that word was spelled with a 'u'.
- mmathog
September 20, 2010 at 4:32pm
As in u motherf*cker?
- Nusholtz
September 20, 2010 at 5:55pm