SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The House GOP Post-Ryan Survival Plan

JONATHAN CHAIT JUNE 16, 2011

The House GOP Post-Ryan Survival Plan

I've said the best way for House Republicans to minimize the political damage of their Huge Mistake of voting for the Paul Ryan is to cut a deficit deal with President Obama. Yuval Levin agrees:

If Obama now makes a deal that involves some step, however small, toward transforming Medicare into a premium-support system, he would make a campaign of Medicare demagoguery far more difficult for the congressional Democrats, leaving them nothing to run on, unless they want to run against their own president.

But you can also see why this might appeal to both Obama and congressional Republicans. Even if the Medicare component of a debt-ceiling deal (a deal that would presumably also include serious discretionary cuts and statutory spending caps) was by no means a comprehensive reform, it could easily be enough for Republicans to try to run on building on a first step and for Obama to try to run on having done something to address the problem. More important, it offers each the prospect of taking some of the edge off of the other side’s chief political argument—the Republicans’ spending and debt crisis argument against Obama, and the Democrats’ Mediscare arguments against Republicans—while also actually doing something (however small) to begin to address the main driver of our fiscal problems.

The upside is probably larger for Republicans. If the economy remains in the doldrums, the party that, as DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz said yesterday, “owns the economy” will be in very serious trouble, and having made some modest start toward a Medicare reform will not be enough to save the president. For the GOP, though, neutralizing the Democrats’ Medicare attacks while not taking Medicare reform off the table (indeed, while endorsing the key premise of the Republican reform proposals) would be immensely helpful.

Obviously I agree that Republicans would benefit from a deal that included Medicare. I'm not sure it would be "immensely helpful," though. The fact that Republicans voted to transform Medicare into coupons good for a discount off private insurance isn't the main problem. The main problem is that they voted to make those coupons radically and increasingly inadequate while also voting to cut taxes for the rich. That's an extremely unpopular policy tradeoff.

A Medicare deal wouldn't entirely or even mostly eliminate the liability. It would allow some moderate Republicans to edge away from the Ryan plan, by taking the view that they've solved the problem now and the radical plan they voted for will no longer be needed. That would help muddy the waters but it wouldn't completely shield them. Still, if I were a potentially vulnerable House Republican, I'd be looking for whatever cover I could get.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 7 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

7 comments

Yuval Levin certainly overhypes the benefits that would likely accrue to the Republicans if they were to cut a deal. The Republicans are so hopeful these days, with so little reason.

- liberalref

June 16, 2011 at 11:58am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Obama has already made a huge step toward controlling costs in Medicare/Medicaid, only the Republicans call it "Obamacare" and threaten to repeal it every other day. This makes it ridiculous for Obama to reverse himself and embrace such stupidity as a 'voucher' mechanism, even in a "small way" whatever that means. The best way for Republicans to repair some of the damage the Ryan plan did to them would be to sign the Debt-Limit Raising bill -- if they need to accept some pieces of Obama's deficit-reduction plan to do so, so be it. The Bush Tax-Cuts must expire, Republicans don't have to agree with that, but then they're not in power. They certainly can't hold America hostage, yet again, to prevent that. Not without yet another financial disaster laid squarely on their doorstep.

- AllanL5

June 16, 2011 at 12:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Jon, I don't think the Republican electorate that is upset with RyanCare really gives a damn about the tax cut. I think the one interviewee from NY-26 stated the entire problem: their children and grandchildren should receive the same Medicare coverage they did. We happen to think that combination reveals the GOP for the flagrant hypocrites we think they are, but I think that's where the significance ends.

- GSpinks

June 16, 2011 at 12:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Note how low Chait and many tnr commentors set the bar for BHO: Hey-- he's better than Ryan and other crazy Repubs. Not: How should BHO act to help the average American or to really advance the status of the US. By such measures, James Buchanan was a great deal better than Jeff Davis, Richard Nixon than George Wallace, even Warren Harding than some 3rd party extremist.

- drofnats1

June 16, 2011 at 12:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

And behold, the liberal ideologue with his own Tea Party type message of "Let the Perfect be the enemy of the Good.".

- GSpinks

June 16, 2011 at 12:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Great point, Dro.

- Curran1

June 16, 2011 at 1:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

allanL5: enjoy your comments and your new BOLD look is great! The Obama problem is still in communication. We need him as a fighter. Now, if I only new how to make FIGHTER bold!

- kras

June 17, 2011 at 9:50am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close