SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Bad Timing For The Palin-Is-Brilliant Crowd

JONATHAN CHAIT JANUARY 11, 2010

Bad Timing For The Palin-Is-Brilliant Crowd

Another funny aspect of that bizarre Commentary piece by Jennifer Rubin castigating Jews for spurning Sarah Palin is its timing. The article, naturally, contends that Palin is far more intellectual and informed about politics than the Jews understand:

Palin’s intellectual unfitness in the eyes of Jews was exaggerated during the course of the campaign as they, like other Americans, received an incomplete image of her abilities and talents. In Going Rogue, Palin devotes dozens of pages to eye-glazing particulars about Alaska state budgets, energy deals, and the new methodology her administration devised for calculating Alaska’s share of revenue from resource development. By offering this level of detail in her book, Palin is attempting, she and her boosters hope, to establish her bona fides as a fiscal sharpshooter and cagey negotiator who took her job very seriously and whose skills were cultivated without reliance on an elite university education. But that understanding of Palin’s work as a public servant—as someone who solved difficult problems and did so by working across partisan lines—was obscured during the 2008 campaign by the successful effort to paint her as a know-nothing lightweight with a stunted vocabulary.

That latter image was forged in a disastrous CBS interview with Katie Couric. During the course of it, Palin appeared miffed when asked to name her favorite news publications. Whether this was evidence of her lack of interest in reading and current events or whether it was a display of intellectual modesty (she would later say she refused to answer out of irritation), Jews found such reticence hard to fathom and quickly came to believe it was not reticence but utter ignorance. When rumors circulated that she had “banned books” (she had not), that image became intensified, as pro-Obama media outlets suggested ominously that she was not simply lacking in sophisticated book learning but was literally anti-book.

Of course, a few days after this came out in Commentary, the book "Game Change" reports that McCain officials were apoplectic over Palin's lack of understanding of public policy and world affairs. She believed that Saddam Hussein planned the World Trade Center attack, and didn't understand why North and South Korea were separate countries.

I see on Commentary's site, Jennifer Rubin is celebrating another "Game Change" nugget, about Joe Biden. Yet, as of noon, no comment on the devastating new disclosure about Palin's ignorance. Maybe Palin had actually written her thesis on the history of the Korean War, and could discuss it in minute detail, but was too reticent to admit it.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

That picture is great.

- benberger

January 11, 2010 at 4:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The plot is stacked; the blot is black. We’re under Rorschach attack: An utter lack? A lying sack? Another whacko robohack? Alaskan crack from shotgun shack? Their favorite fat-free salty snack To keep the peeps and polls on track And stab mere reason in the back? From Kabul Sarah sees Iraq! (Palin's fluffing up her PAC.) Chauncey Gardiner with a rack. Please, someone, pass the Ipecac.

- williamyard

January 11, 2010 at 5:36pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I say bullshit. Biden and Obama knew each other quite well before he Obama picked him, so he knew what he was getting from day one. Most of the times they are shown together it is pretty apparent that they are quite at ease with one another, contrast that to McCain's cadaver like reaction to Palin. And Biden is very far from being an idiot, the worst that can be said is he is a motormouth. And I also have to say, her timing and Politico's on this is pretty bad form. The guy just lost his mother, the story can wait a week.

- blackton

January 11, 2010 at 5:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Agreed, blackie. This is utter drivel. Of course Obama knew perfectly well that Biden had a habit of saying the wrong thing, or saying the right thing but to go on for too long. But the plusses of Biden as a running mate far outweighed the tendency to rush out into the traffic without looking: a connection to white blue-collar democrats and a capable guy who could take over if anything terrible were to happen. My guess is Obama also wanted to balance out the button-down vibe that sometimes dogged his campaign, and Biden's Irish garrulousness was one way to do that. But of course Obama lost the election, and badly, so in hindsight it appears that he was wrong and the critics are right.

- ironyroad

January 11, 2010 at 8:06pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Is anyone here old enough or travelled enough to know why the Korean Pennisula is divided? I never knew why.

- CRS9TNR

January 12, 2010 at 10:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close