More Obama-Freeze Backstory

The New Republic

You have read:

0 / 8

free articles in the past 30 days.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

sign up for unlimited access for just $34.97Sign me up

JONATHAN CHAIT JANUARY 26, 2010

More Obama-Freeze Backstory

As I mentioned this morning and in my recent piece, not everyone in the administration was enthusiastic about the freeze idea from the get-go. Some were concerned about shifting to deficit-reduction mode too quickly, while job-growth was still a big problem. (The National Economic Council, for one, was initially pretty skeptical.)

At the same time, some in the administration who worried about the deficit didn't see the freeze as a huge help in that regard. Here's a quote from a senior administration official I talked to shortly after the idea trickled out which reflected that view: "They're being hard-asses, which is appropriate," this person said of OMB. "But it doesn't move the needle. The money is in entitlements, and defense, interest payments." (On the other hand, as I note in the piece, the point of the freeze isn't necessarily to move the needle today, but to buy a little time before the needle has to get moved.)

For what it's worth, my understanding is that no one really dug in on this--everyone outside OMB understood the importance of beginning to think and talk about reining in the deficit; and OMB itself understood the importance of not stepping on the recovery at a still-fragile moment. The differences were basically differences in emphasis, and so they weren't that hard to work out.

share this article on facebook or twitter

posted in: jonathan chait, economy

print this article

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Back to Top

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK