SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home What's Gotten Into Tim Geithner?

JONATHAN CHAIT MARCH 23, 2010

What's Gotten Into Tim Geithner?

[Guest post by Noam Scheiber:]

I've long been of the view that the Treasury secretary gets a bad rap despite some rather impressive accomplishments. That's true even when it comes to reforming Wall Street, where, despite some reservations, I think the administration dropped a pretty solid reform proposal last year. (In fact, to the extent the reform effort has been weakened in Congress, it's generally because it's drifted away from the principles the administration laid out.)

Still, you don't normally see Geithner get worked up about reform in public--or really about anything for that matter. He is nothing if not circumspect and understated. Or at least he was until yesterday afternoon at AEI, where he delivered a positively forceful speech about the need for reform, going so far as to take some well-deserved shots at reform opponents. To wit:

These are difficult issues and our legislators and their staffs often look to the financial industry for advice as they try to sort out what makes sense.  This is important to get right but be careful whose voice you listen to.

Listen less to those whose judgments brought us this crisis. Listen less to those who told us all they were the masters of noble financial innovation and sophisticated risk management. Listen less to those who complain about the burdens of living with smarter regulation or who oppose having to pay a fee for the costs of this or future crises.

Instead, listen to the families and businesses still suffering from this crisis.  Listen to those who borrowed responsibly but today can't get a loan or can't refinance their mortgage. Listen to those who lost their jobs and their healthcare and their pension savings. Listen to them.

Geithner also took on the way over-used and endlessly expandible argument that we can't reform Wall Street because it will create uncertainty (something I've pushed back against, too). Here he essentially turns the argument on its head: 

Even with improving credit markets and reduced borrowing costs, when you talk to businesses across the country, they tell you that banks are lending less in part because they're not certain what new rules are coming. If you delay reform, you force them to live with that continued uncertainty.

And if the opponents of reform succeed in slowing this down – opponents who according to a report issued today are spending $1.4 million dollars every day to lobby Members of Congress; if the opponents succeed in stretching out the debate, they may think they're helping banks in the short run, but they will be hurting the customers of banks – American families and businesses. 

Reform is not going to go away. If we don't get a strong bill now, here's what will happen: We're not going to move on to other things. We're going to keep fighting for reform. We're going to keep working with those who want a strong bill enacted into law.

But in the meantime, the rest of the world is going to move on without us. If we don't lead, others will. They will move to protect their citizens and their economies with rules that fit their needs.  ...

I'll have more to say on this in a piece later this week. But, in the meantime, you really have to read the whole speech to appreciate it. Among other things, Geithner uses a time-honored TNR technique of quoting conservatives (like George W. Bush and Richard Shelby, the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee) espousing reform principles that they're now running away from. It's an impressive display all around.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 3 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

3 comments

Did AEI make Geithner pay for his lunch? Actually, Geithner was clever to deliver that speech at AEI, with the (in theory) economic libertarians sitting next to the bailed out bankers. I'm not sure who would be the most uncomfortable, the "scholars" at the AEI who are the beneficiaries of the bailed out bankers (the folks who give the money to support AEI) or the bailed out bankers themselves.

- raylward

March 23, 2010 at 12:20pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Maybe he's saying this since he is 1) sick of the jerks in the finance sector and is finally seeing them for what they are or 2) afraid he'll be replaced since he's been too chummy with the cretins that created this disaster and is seen as part of their cabal I hope both are true.

- tnmats

March 23, 2010 at 12:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thanks Noam for the update. It's timely, I was souring on Geitner big time. He must have felt the lack of love. I just talked to an acquaintance not just an hour ago that up until 2008 owned a bond house as part of a group of companies belonging to a major international insurance/financial corporation with offices nearby. He had to close his doors as a result of the collapse. I asked how he made out. "I got out early than most, and did well, I'm in a better position than most". But he's understandably upset with the bigs regarding the mess. Tim Gimein also had a nice piece over on The Big Money about why regulators can't see fraud. In a nutshell: because traditional market economists can't believe it exists. Story line for those interested: "What the Mafia can teach us About Corporate Fraud" http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/money-trail/2010/03/19/bust-out. Looking forward to your piece.

- jet

March 23, 2010 at 2:46pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close