SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The Economy Is Creating Jobs. Very, Very Slowly.

JONATHAN COHN MAY 4, 2012

The Economy Is Creating Jobs. Very, Very Slowly.

The government's new jobs report is out and, according to the folks who study the labor market, it's disappointing.

The economy created barely enough jobs to keep up with population growth and, although the unemployment rate actually fell to 8.1 percent, more people have dropped out of the workforce. But the update, which comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, also suggests the past few months were stronger than previous reports had indicated. If the pattern holds, we'll eventually hear the same thing about this month, suggesting the news is a bit better than it seems at the moment. 

The optimistic spin is that the private sector continues to create jobs. Particularly if you examine the past few months in the aggregate, the economy is continuing to recover from the recession. The pessimistic spin is that the numbers suggest the economy isn't going to grow any faster without intervention in the form of fiscal or monetary stimulus. The case for intervention seems strong and clear: Millions of people are suffering; old-fashioned, Keyensian solutions would almost certainly help. But neither the Congress nor the Federal Reserve seems inclined to act right now.

Either I or one of my colleagues may have more to say on this later. For now, and until more formal analyses are online, I'd suggest following the twitter feeds of folks like Neil IrwinMatt O'Brien, Betsy Stevenson, and, especially, Justin Wolfers. "My conclusion on the jobs report: More meh than bleh," he wrote. "Yet again. Not the strength you might hope for; not the weakness you might fear."

Wolpers makes one other point: A big reason the economy has not created more jobs overall is that government jobs have been declining even as private sector jobs have been increasing. That's exactly the combination that conservatives say they want.

Update: As usual, here's the full analysis from Gary Burtless, the labor economist at Brookings:

Payroll employment increased a modest 115,000 in April, about half the pace of job growth in the previous three months. The change in employment recorded in the BLS household survey offer an even bleaker picture. The number of employed adults dropped an estimated 169,000 in April after falling 31,000 in March. The employment-population ratio has fallen 0.2 percentage points in the past two months, erasing some of the improvement we saw in the fall and early winter. In the seven months through February, respondents in the household survey reported monthly employment gains averaging 340,000. In the past two months, reported employment losses have averaged 100,000 a month. The unemployment rate declined a total of 0.2 percentage points in those two months, falling to 8.1% in April, because the labor force shrank even faster than the number of Americans who report being employed.

The latest BLS report contained some good news. Upward revisions in estimated payrolls in February and March added a total of 53,000 to previously estimated payroll gains in February and March. This means the preliminary estimate of payroll job growth in April follows job gains this past winter that were faster than initially estimated. The April payroll jobs report also showed a turnaround in employment gains in the temporary help industry. Payroll employment in this industry had increased for 8 successive months before shrinking in March. In a reversal, the number of jobs in the temporary help industry climbed 21,000 in April, suggesting that more employers need to supplement their own payrolls to fill their customers’ demand for goods and services. Manufacturing employment also increased in April, though at a somewhat slower pace than the rate we have seen since early last fall. Payroll employment in retailing also improved in April after two successive months of job loss.

Government employment continues to be a source of weakness. Since private payroll employment began to recover in winter 2010, government employment has slumped more than a half million, offsetting about one-eighth of the job gains in the private sector. The weakness in public employment continued in April. Payroll employment fell 15,000 in April after shrinking 12,000 in March. Surprisingly, drops in federal employment accounted for a quarter of the public-sector job losses in March and April. The lion’s share of employment loss was in local payrolls for education. Since January 2011 school payrolls of local governments have fallen about 117,000, or 1½%.

State and local government revenues have improved in recent months, so the weakness of public employment should eventually come to an end. It is remarkable, however, how much government employment has declined during the recovery. Private payroll employment stopped shrinking in February 2010 and has grown in every month since. Over the same period government payrolls have shrunk 502,000, or 2.2%. This experience contrasts with that in the Reagan Administration, when the nation also suffered a severe recession. After the 1981-82 downturn, government payroll employment increased 426,000, or 2.3%, in the first 26 months of the recovery. The severity of the current recession was worse than the one in the early 1980s, and the private-sector recovery has been weaker. Astonishingly, the public-sector employment response has exacerbated our current job market woes. Shrinking government payrolls are creating a persistent headwind that is slowing the labor market recovery.

follow me on twitter @CitizenCohn

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 9 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

9 comments

Isn't there a real problem now developing with the Quality of jobs being created as much as the number Jonathan? "..full time jobs dropped to 114,478,000 from 115,290,000 an epic drop of 812,000 in full time jobs which was the biggest since... March 2009! The offset? Why a surge in part-time jobs of course, which increased by 508,000 in the month of April." "the average hourly earnings barely budged at $23.38 from $23.37 last month, and in fact declined on an inflation-adjusted basis."

- IggyPop

May 4, 2012 at 12:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Everywhere I have been going I have been seeing help wanted ads at local retailers. Iggy could be right, the quality of these jobs is not great but if employers can't fill these jobs in a terrible market like today eventually they will have to pay livable wages. And I noticed the previous job report was revised upwards by over 50,000 jobs, to nearly 200,000. And job losses are at a multiyear low. Yes, it might suck to be a fresh college grad, but holding onto your job has a far greater impact. My wife and I are going to buy a house in the states soon, I would not do that unless I felt pretty secure.

- blackton

May 4, 2012 at 12:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Romney says President Obama is a failure because we should be producing 500,000 jobs a month, which has only happened 4 times in the last 50 years. http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/05/04/477983/romney-claims-economy-should-be-adding-500000-jobs-a-month-which-it-has-done-only-four-times-in-50-years/ And what Republican policies will do this, when Democratic Presidents outperform Republicans on job creation? See Link below: http://europeancourier.org/test/2011/06/02/which-president-created-the-most-jobs-in-the-u-s/

- Nusholtz

May 4, 2012 at 3:35pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

On a positive note -- more people continue to drop out of the workforce, lowering the unemployment rate to 8.1%, and wildly distorting the true destruction Obama has wrought. If the same number of citizens were in the workforce now as when Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 10.5% -- and Obama would have no chance of re-election. See, a silver lining.

- mr_rationale

May 4, 2012 at 4:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Obama wrought the destruction? Silly me; I thought the damage was in full swing already before Obama took office.

- Sophia

May 4, 2012 at 6:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Sophia. A pox on those who create the problem--- and a pox on those who act too weakly to solve it.

- drofnats1

May 4, 2012 at 6:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Sophia. A pox on those who create the problem--- and a pox on those who act too weakly to solve it.

- drofnats1

May 4, 2012 at 6:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Washington does not understand the Jobs situation on the ground, and they are losing credibility reporting these same numbers every month. No one has any faith in the unemplyment number any more. It is not telling the story. Dept of Labor needs to consider a new more accurate statistic to report. Percent of labor force employed is probably better right now. Maybe something based upon wages to allow the inclusion of part timers and overtime. The big issue is the off-shoring of manufacturing to China. All those low skill jobs are gone, and the layer of high skill jobs is gone too. This economic recovery will be different from all of those that came before. And no one knows how to model this China Effect. I think the current administration looks inexperienced with how they are handling this. They are not inspiring confidence and are reactionary. They need to make some predictions, recalibrate when they are wrong and demostrate some grasp of the details. Right now they are putting out a number and telling us it will get better. When will it get better, and by how much? Start showing some leadership.

- CRS9TNR

May 4, 2012 at 7:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Heh. "A pox" on those who created the problem -- Republicans. And "a pox" on those who prevented stronger actions to resolve it -- also Republicans. Have you forgotten 2011 so quickly?

- AllanL5

May 7, 2012 at 12:21pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close