JONATHAN COHN SEPTEMBER 16, 2010
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

The new income statistics from the Census Bureau paint a grim picture, with 43.6 million people living in poverty. But it could be a lot worse. According to analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, extensions of unemployment insurance kept an additional 3.3 million jobless people from falling into poverty. The Center's Arloc Sherman explains:
Total unemployment benefit payments increased by fully $78 billion (154 percent) in 2009, reflecting both a massive influx of laid-off workers qualifying for help and temporary changes made to the program in the 2009 Recovery Act and other legislation. The Recovery Act raised jobless benefits by $25 per week (the increase expired June 2) and, together with other legislation, gave additional weeks of benefits to long-term jobless workers.
And that actually understates the extent to which government kept people out of poverty during the recession. Census income figures don't include refundable tax credits and food stamps, both of which the Recovery Act bolstered. The Center on Budget estimates that accounting for those programs would have reduced the poverty ranks by a few million more, although it's hard to calculate a precise figure right now.
In other words, the income picture is actually a bit less grim than the official income statistics suggest. And it's because of all that dreaded government spending.
4 comments
According to Republicans these people are just to uppity to take jobs that are otherwise available to them.
- subterran
September 16, 2010 at 2:40pm
subterran: Or they just deserve to be poor.
- cspencef
September 16, 2010 at 9:24pm
80% of government spending is Medicare/Medicaid, Social Security, Defense, and interest payments on the debt. To significantly reduce spending as percent of GDP you have to slash the above. Who among the tea party is calling for that? The rest of the Federal government is pretty cheap and no bigger now than it was 20 years ago as share of GDP. There is a transient burst of spending related to the recession, but that is already starting to ebb (no more TARP, no more unemployment extension, no more stimulus etc).
- nayyer_ali
September 17, 2010 at 1:37am
I think there are members of the Tea Party or worse, mainstream Republicans who are essentially saying, "Let them eat cake. Oh and by the way please do not repeal the tax cuts because the rich might be discomfited." This whole situation makes me ill.
- Sophia
September 17, 2010 at 4:07am