SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Honoring Milton Friedman

OPEN UNIVERSITY JANUARY 29, 2007

Honoring Milton Friedman

by Richard Stern
I've just come from Rockefeller Chapel, the huge, beautiful 20th-century Gothic chapel which was the last great gift of the Rockefeller family to the university whose founding constituted the first major charity of this most famous charitable family in U.S. history. The service this afternoon honored another University of Chicago saint, the brilliant economist Milton Friedman, who may be said to have been the most influential of all its faculty members. His influence, intellectual and personal, two sides of the Friedman coin, was celebrated by five people whose lives he re-energized and by the new president of the university who ended his excellent, if standard, remarks by reading a conventional, if lengthy, letter signed by George W. Bush and a more personal and thus telling letter from Alan Greenspan recalling among other things how Milton faced down General Westmoreland in a debate about the volunteer army (Westmorland wanted the draft to continue) and then convinced the then-secretary of defense that such an army would be the form the American military should take. "That day, the pen was clearly mightier than the sword," wrote Greenspan. Vaclav Klaus, the president of the Czech Republic, then told how reading Friedman in the dark days of Soviet controlled Eastern Europe ignited his intellect and spirit, how, years later, he visited Chicago simply to see where this great man had walked, and years after that was able to reform his country's finance along the lines of the free market. He was followed by Leo Melamed, founder and former head of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, who told how this open market treatment of currency as if it were pork bellies or soy beans broke through the opposition of almost everyone because Friedman not only agreed with it but for a $7,500 fee ("I'm a capitalist," he told Melemed who insisted that Friedman "put into writing" what he'd just told him) wrote the eleven page paper which turned the world tide in its favor. Arnold Harberger, Friedman's one time student and longtime colleague, spoke movingly about Friedman, dwelling on the Friedmans' seven day visit to Chile in 1975 which were to bring Friedman years and years of contumely although three of his five speeches dwelt on political freedom growing inevitably out of the economic freedom which was soon put into place by the Pinochet government. Michael Walker, who runs the Rose and Milton Friedman Foundation, followed with a slightly hagiographic devotion to the great man, and finally, Gary Becker, perhaps Friedman's single most productive and brilliant student, followed with a moving account of his first meetings with Friedman, including Friedman's exposure of the weakness of some of Becker's class responses and then of the initial draft of what became Becker's pioneering book on discrimination. He ended with an amusing account of driving with Friedman and consistently missing the correct exit because of the intensity of their discussion. (The last time this occurred was but a few months before Friedman's death last month at the age of 94.)

Such services as these are important at a university which prides itself--sometimes a bit too loudly--on its special character as a place where what counts above all else is the truth and damn whatever stands in its way, including at times, decorum and graciousness. It turned out that every one of the six speakers made a point that this most intense knight of the truth was himself an absolute model of amiable decency whose worst foes, once they knew him, were disarmed into friends. The celebration of Milton's tolerance of human beings (not of poor thinking or ideas), his lack of interest in the rank of an idea's champions (a cabbie did as well as a prime minister), his courage in defending his ideas even when they were scorned or ridiculed by almost everyone, his lack of vainglory when he was finally recognized as the great thinker he was became the ground bass of the whole occasion. In the gorgeous chapel, built from the profits of America's most famous capitalist, they acquired the kind of beauty which Friedman once said, using the words of the poet Keats (who lived 70 fewer years than the economist who quoted him), price theory had for him: "Beauty is truth, truth beauty. That's all ye know and all ye need to know."

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

A great man's worst enemies are often his followers. And these includes the toadies who spout panegyrics, either written or spoken. Stern calls Friedman a "saint," then refer's to Michael Walker's "slightly hagiographic devotion". The precious Mr. Stern.

As I wrote elsewhere:

. . . he may have been the wise little man to his fawning academic groupies and to others in thrall of his Nobel laurels, but to me he was nothing more than a tory economist, an apologist of that most pernicious of frauds, the "free market".

Friedman was fundamentally wrong -- free markets are not self-regulating, and governments indeed do some things better than the private sector -- but he built up such a mystique, that his gospel gave legitimacy to the spiders and snakes who control, manipulate and exploit the nation's wealth for their own ends. The shrinking middle class, the obscene wealth of those who game the system, the ruinous consequences of deregulation for its own sake -- these are part of Friedman's legacy.

I took the measure of Friedman when, in an interview, in the 80s, he was asked to account for the well-being of the Scandinavians, with their social democracies. His reply was, "Well, you know, they have a high suicide rate." That cheap nostrum was just his way of evading the fact that the emperor had no clothes.

Yes, RIP, Friedman. Your long, prosperous life was its own reward. But you were still a hack.

- jm_rice

January 29, 2007 at 8:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Actually, Friedman was a great economist, but he was a great propagandist too, and was quite willing to say things that he knew weren't true "for the greater good." Contrary to what he claimed, capitalism and freedom don't necessarily go hand in hand. As many studies have shown, the slave plantations of the Old South were quite profitable, and would have survived indefinitely had it not been for "government intervention." In addition, the demise of the draft back in the seventies was a simple political necessity, not the result of Friedman's insight. Friedman himself recently noted that a mercenary army made wars too easy, saying that he opposed the invasion of Iraq. If Gen. Westmoreland had been a little faster on his feet, he might have said "Professor Friedman, there's a difference between a mercenary who writes for a living and one who kills for a living." Want to read more dry-eyed commentary on Uncle Miltie? Try http://reason.com/news/show/117278.html (the Pinochet connection) and http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/07.01.28. html (an economist's take).

- AMVHuck

January 30, 2007 at 12:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you for that report. Well written and enlightening. Mr.Huck is a bit hard on him. No, Milton Friedmon was not perfect (and I dissented from some of his positions) but his was a courageous and brilliant LIFE. He labored against the grain at a time when the elites were championing one workers' paradise or another. aS FOR jm_ricE, his post is exposed for all to see, marvel and shake the head. No comment is required.

- ipuritani

January 30, 2007 at 2:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Paul Krugman has an excellent article on Milton Friedman in the latest issue of the New York Review of Books.

The final paragraph of the article provides a flavor of its argument:

In the long run, great men are remembered for their strengths, not their weaknesses, and Milton Friedman was a very great man indeed - a man of intellectual courage who was one of the most important economic thinkers of all time, and possibly the most brilliant communicator of economic ideas to the general public that ever lived. But there's a good case for arguing that Friedmanism, in the end, went too far, both as a doctrine and in its practical applications. When Friedman was beginning his career as a public intellectual, the times were ripe for a counterreformation against Keynesianism and all that went with it. But what the world needs now, I'd argue, is a counter-counterreformation.

- ndmackenzie

January 30, 2007 at 7:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

about the dead. I still remember, about 1947 or so, the great man arguing (at lunch in Hamilton Hall) that continuing rent control in New York City was confiscation of private property and would be bad for the city.

- oxheadone

February 1, 2007 at 3:19am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close