OPEN UNIVERSITY SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
by Jacob S. HackerSince I was on the American Political Science Association panel on the health of American democracy of which both Alan and Dan speak below, I want to endorse both their explanations for the low turnout: There is--lamentably, in my view--a good deal more interest in democracy promotion abroad in intellectual circles right now than in the state of American democracy at home, and there was a felt need for more diversity of opinion and more debate on the panel. (My attraction to these explanations is in no way influenced by the fact that they point away from the obvious conclusion that what really killed turnout is that nobody is that interested in what I have to say.)
For those interested, however, there is a real debate about American democracy--or more precisely about the American Democratic Party and its stance on economic issues--taking place on the websites of The Democratic Strategist and The American Prospect. And while I am taking part in both discussions, I am certain based on the fine analyses of Alan and Dan that you will go to them--or not--for reasons entirely unrelated to my participation.
2 comments
Even the names of the panels were telling. "American Hegemony" beats "Democracy Audit" (or something to that effect) any day. Not to mention, the Ernesto-storm was starting to get exciting as Friday afternoon moved on. I left early to drive back to Jersey... (To be honest, Jacob, the 8am panel that you participated in on Friday was the most staid. It felt like continuous advertisements for the participants' books.)
- 16272974
September 6, 2006 at 9:44pm
No offense, Mr Hacker, but if your posts are going to a) refer to academic conferences and then, when you appear to be on the point of rendering an opinion, b) direct us to other websites, there's not really much point in walking the Plank, is there? What's your take on the controversy you mentioned? For that matter, what exactly are the outlines of the controversy?
- teplukhin
September 7, 2006 at 10:59am