PLANK MAY 30, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

The New York Times, May 27:
In a new effort to halt more than a year of bloodshed in Syria, President Obama will push for the departure of President Bashar al-Assad under a proposal modeled on the transition in another strife-torn Arab country, Yemen.
The Washington Post, May 29:
Across the vast, rugged terrain of southern Yemen, an escalating campaign of U.S. drone strikes is stirring increasing sympathy for al-Qaeda-linked militants and driving tribesmen to join a network linked to terrorist plots against the United States.
Associated Press, May 29:
[U.N. envoy to Yemen Jamal] Benomar said 10 million people—almost half the population—are not getting enough to eat and almost one million children under the age of five are suffering from malnutrition. Five million Yemenis need immediate assistance but donors have only funded 43 percent of the $455 million needed to tackle the humanitarian crisis, he said.
On the security front ... Benomar said al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula and Ansar al-Sharia “have extended their reach into areas previously not associated with their activities.”
Here’s one measure for how bad things have gotten in Syria: our new definition of success is a country so poor it can’t feed its people, and so anarchic that we’ve been forced to ramp up a covert war against significant portions of its population. With success like this, who needs failure?
2 comments
Ah, so Yemen is our new measure of success? Well sure, their leaders aren't killing mass quantities of their own people, so I guess that IS a success. At least compared to Syria. And what's this "we've been forced" garbage? You've been listening to Fox-News lately, encouraging America to invade other countries because we're "forced" to do so? Especially if that's not what Obama is doing, because criticizing Obama is more satisfying than actually trying to prevent war.
- AllanL5
May 30, 2012 at 6:45pm
"Here’s one measure for how bad things have gotten in Syria: our new definition of success is a country so poor it can’t feed its people, and so anarchic that we’ve been forced to ramp up a covert war against significant portions of its population. With success like this, who needs failure?". Who is the "it" and who is the "we"?
- rayward
May 30, 2012 at 7:47pm