PLANK SEPTEMBER 6, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Republicans have been hitting Democrats hard over the God Gap. A blogger for the Christian Broadcasting Network reported that the phrase God-given had appeared in a 2008 Democratic platform passage about the party’s desire that all people “make the most of their God-given potential,” but was nowhere to be found in a 2012 Democratic platform passage making the same general point. Rather than point out that (duh!) most of the other phrasing was changed, too—more notably, I think, the 2012 version de-emphasizes the role that government should play in helping people “go as far as our talent and drive take us”—the Democrats hastily shoehorned “God given” into the text, but not before Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan took the opportunity to label Democrats godless heathen.
It’s all pretty stupid, as TNR’s Amy Sullivan (who follows this issue much more closely than I do) points out. Indeed, Sullivan notes, the Christian Broadcasting Network’s blogger seems entirely uninterested in the fact that the 2012 Democratic platform also omits other 2008 language decrying the use of public funds to “proselytize or discriminate,” mainly because Obama has been cowed into allowing it, lest he be accused of religious persecution. (Obama is continuing a 2002 Bush policy that reversed a federal anti-discrimination policy in place since the administration of Franklin Roosevelt.)
Being a liberal I’m easily distracted by numerical quotas, and I can see the game is already lost on the playing field of party platforms. The Democrats now have one “God” mention in their platform while the Republicans (damn them!) have 10 in theirs, including no fewer than seven “God-given”s. According to the GOP, talents, motivation, individual rights, citizenship rights, the right to self-defense, the nation’s exploitable natural resources, and the natural beauty of said exploitable natural resources are all God-given. To the Republican platform’s authors, “God-given” is really just shorthand for “I can do whatever I please, and don’t you dare stop me,” which doesn’t sound especially pious to me. Still, on the numbers, the GOP is ahead.
But all is not lost. My two best friends these past two weeks have been the New York Times’s interactive (i.e., searchable) word clouds for speeches at the Republican and Democratic conventions. From these invaluable tools I learn that the word “God” was uttered 95 times over three days at the RNC and 66 times over two days at the DNC. That averages out to not quite 32 mentions per day for the Republicans and 33 mentions per day for the Democrats. The Democrats are already winning! All they have to do is make sure they say “God” 29 times today and they've evened it up. If they keep the pace of the last two days, they’ll be godlier than the Republicans.
6 comments
I just wish the Dems had made a simple point: God was mentioned in the original draft of the party's platform exactly the same number of times it appears in the Constitution
- jzack
September 6, 2012 at 6:19pm
Indeed. Aren't we supposed to separate Church and State? The Evangelicals have gotten way too much power. Can't you see our Enlightenment forbears turning in their graves?
- Sophia
September 6, 2012 at 7:15pm
Sophia, since our Enlightenment forbears generally had doubts about the immortality of the soul (their own included), I don't think they would have conceived of the capability to turn in their graves.
- wildboy
September 6, 2012 at 7:25pm
It does not say in what context the word God was used. Does saying "God dammit," count as a mention of God? If so I'm seriously godly--especially when doing plumbing or carpentry work.
- Vogelfam
September 6, 2012 at 10:58pm
"...God-given...": I've always wondered how anyone can know what "God" is thinking.
- Claris
September 7, 2012 at 4:33am
If, as I do, you reside in a region where acts of piety are as common as the heat and humidity, you learn to ignore the God-talk as you learn to ignore the heat and humidity because there's nothing you can do about either. Ridiculing the pious for being pious is about as effective as ridiculing the French for being French. As a (most of the time) faithful Christian, I both appreciate their devotion and abhor their hypocrisy. Of course, there's plenty of hypocrisy to go around. My own journey as a Christian is both spiritual and inquiring. I sometimes ask those who equate the pious with the patriotic if they have read "Jefferson's Bible". For many years, new members of Congress were given copies, a practice discontinued long ago for reasons understood by anybody who has read it. Jefferson did two things: First, he combined the four canonical Gospels into chronological order (as best he could given that events were described as occurring at different times in different Gospels). Second, he removed the supernatural. I recommend Jefferson's Bible for anybody who wishes to increase her understanding of the founders' concept of God or to put a little doubt in those who would equate the pious with the patriotic. And it doesn't require ridicule to do it.
- rayward
September 7, 2012 at 9:51am