SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home An Undecided Voter Watches the Vice-Presidential Debate

PLANK OCTOBER 12, 2012

An Undecided Voter Watches the Vice-Presidential Debate

One of the great things about being an undecided voter is that politicians are desperate for my vote. And believe me, I make them work for it.

You see, I don’t belong to a political party. I’m more complicated than that. I like to dig a little deeper than most voters, and I take my decision about who to vote for very seriously.

So when my dry cleaner told me there was going to be a debate between America’s vice-presidents, I got excited—I'm always eager to learn more about the people running for the White House, but especially during an election year since that’s usually when I vote for them.

The debate did not disappoint. I’m glad I cancelled my kite-making workshop to watch it. It featured many interesting questions and answers, and gave me a lot to think about as I prepare to cast my ballot.

Here are some impressions:

- The candidates’ names were Joe Biden and Paul Ryan. I know this because I wrote them down on my pad.

Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.

- The moderator (whose name I didn’t catch) was very professional, a credit to all people of gender. I must remember to start taking them more seriously.

- On foreign policy, I was impressed that both candidates knew about the attack on our embassy. This is an important issue for me, as I consider myself a bit of an expert on Liberia.

- Joe Biden had a lot of energy. At first I thought it was charming when he’d interrupt Paul Ryan to say, “You must be smoking crack to think 15 percent deficits are possible with 7.1 percent unemployment rebates on middle-class deductions since 1982” (or whatever). Then I found his outbursts condescending. But eventually I grew to love them again. After a few seconds, however, they annoyed me. Eventually I reached my conclusion about how Biden’s behavior would influence my vote, but I forgot to write it down, so I can’t remember what my conclusion was.

- Paul Ryan was commanding with his mastery of the details, especially when it came to definitively explaining how Romney’s budget would close the deficit. (I missed his definitive explanation because I was reheating a burrito, but I know he made it because how could he not, with both Biden and the moderator nagging him about it?)

- Mitt Romney is a good man with a large heart. I know this because Paul Ryan told a story about a family that got hit by a car, and how Romney paid for them to go for college for free. My son Scott graduates high school next year; if he asks me to pay for college I will throw him in front of a car.

- Joe Biden said 47 percent of Americans are his mom and dad. Catholic families are even bigger than I thought!

- When the debate turned to Medicare and Medicaid, I was surprised to learn they are actually two separate programs. The way I explained to Scott was, “think of the AL and the NL in baseball, but with medicine.” One thing we can agree on: Everybody loves baseball, and people who like soccer can't be trusted. (I don’t know what Social Security is.)

- I’m no fan of loopholes. I think loopholes should be closed, and I was reassured when Ryan said his boss (Romney) would solve the budget crisis by closing all the loopholes. Biden said something about one of the loopholes being the mortgage interest credit deduction loophole (?). In the spirit of bipartisanship and undecidedness, I vote we keep that loophole open and solve the budget crisis without it. Let’s try cutting taxes instead.

- I was touched when Biden and Ryan were asked how their Catholic faith informs their views on abortion. Abortion is a very important issue for me, and I always ask where candidates stand on it, because it helps me determine if they’ve heard of abortion.

- Paul Ryan looks vice-presidential. His eyes shimmer like diamonds even as they burn like coals. This makes sense when you think about it, because diamonds come from coal. They are both fossil fuels, and I hope one of the candidates has a plan to increase domestic production of diamonds, because that could really help the American jewelry industry. Not to mention the wedding industry! (Sorry, couldn’t help but put a joke in there, as humor is one of the tools I use to get my points across.)

- In the end, I have to give the debate to Paul Ryan. He seemed focused, competent, with good solutions for the problems we face in this country. I thank both campaigns for their appeals for my vote, but they can stop now: I am casting my vote for Obama/Ryan 2012.

 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 11 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

11 comments

Yes, and if you're an undecided voter in a schwing state, they're really desparate for your vote and each campaign is spending, by my estimate, 4.3 gajillion dollars per undecided voter. You may catch one of their $4.2 million dollar/sec 30 second ads. From what I've learned, both Barry Bin Obama and Mitt Romney love grandmothers, haggard looking waitresses, and coal miners. There are a lot of padlocked gates with "factory closed" notices. Both will create jobs, but for some reason send them overseas in shipping containers painted with Chinese flags. Oh, and Obama likes lazy people on welfare. I'm not on welfare and I like the word "malarkey" so I'm voting Romney/Biden.

- dubyadoubte

October 12, 2012 at 12:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Pretty lame parody.

- arnon1

October 12, 2012 at 12:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Bwahahahah

- Sophia

October 12, 2012 at 1:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Lame yes, but at least nobody is going to mistake it for reporting.

- aduncanson

October 12, 2012 at 1:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

On the plus side, I laughed at the 47% mom and dad comment.

- Nusholtz

October 12, 2012 at 3:12pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

And, all people of gender should be respected! Yes!

- Sophia

October 12, 2012 at 3:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It was ok for a rush job. Humor takes time.

- ironyroad

October 12, 2012 at 3:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

actually, I liked this bit. I think anyone undecided at this stage to be nothing more than ignoran, though to be fair the same can be said for most Romney supporters (except the rich). I have conversations with my elderly aunts and mother (all Romney supporters) it is all Fox talking points and nothing else.

- blackton

October 12, 2012 at 5:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This not quite up to the standard I expect from TNR. It's a parody, but not very obvious, as you can tell from some of the other comments.

- waroberts

October 13, 2012 at 2:40pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You laugh, or some may call it a "lame parody," but it is a lot closer to reality than one might think. The speaker in this parody sounds like the work of a policy wonk compared to one "undecided voter" I talked to last week.

- matthawk14

October 14, 2012 at 12:29am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I think the problem is that it's not quite clear whether the crux of the joke is centered on the undecided voter (the character speaking), the notion of undecided voters in general, or the ignorance of the imagined voter portrayed here. It sort of works -- it's funny -- but the whole piece remains a bit ambivalent.

- ironyroad

October 14, 2012 at 1:47am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close