SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The Right-wing Rivalry Behind Dinesh D’Souza's “Sex”...

PLANK OCTOBER 16, 2012

The Right-wing Rivalry Behind Dinesh D’Souza's “Sex” Scandal

Updated 10/18/12: Dinesh D'Souza resigned his position as president of The King's College on October 18, 2012, after two days of meetings with the school's board of trustees. The board chair and now-interim president Andy Mills announced D'Souza's resignation, and told faculty and students, "I have to admit, I got a little over-enamored with him," according to King's student newspaper. In a written statement defending himself on Wednesday, D'Souza insisted that his wife asked him for a divorce two years ago, and blamed the World magazine story on personal "bitterness" toward him from editor-in-chief Marvin Olasky, citing the story below. However, D'Souza did acknowledge he had made one crucial mistake: "I had no idea that it is considered wrong in Christian circles to be engaged prior to being divorced." 

If you detected a whiff of schadenfreude in the air today, it is probably connected to the story of Dinesh D’Souza and his lady-friend. D’Souza is a conservative political commentator and author whose conspiracy-laden movie 2016: Obama’s America has been breaking box-office records for political films. He has also been married for 20 years to his wife Dixie, who he has credited with encouraging his evolution from mostly-Catholic to mostly-evangelical. Last month, D’Souza spoke at a religious conference in South Carolina, but instead of bringing along Dixie, he squired a woman at least 20 years his junior and introduced her as his fiancée. Only a few weeks later did D’Souza file for divorce.

Needless to say, this sort of thing is frowned upon in the conservative religious circles in which D’Souza is usually celebrated. So it is perhaps unsurprising that the story was broken by Warren C. Smith, a writer and associate publisher for the evangelical World magazine. The publication has a history of covering problems within the evangelical world, and it has not shied away from stories about preacher scandals or church abuse of women. But this particular story may have interested the magazine for a different reason: World’s editor-in-chief is Marvin Olasky, the sometime Bush advisor who is no fan of D’Souza.

Olasky has been editor-in-chief at World for more than a decade. But in 2007, he shifted most of his focus when he was named provost for The King’s College, an evangelical school housed in the Empire State Building in New York City. Originally an unremarkable Christian college located in Westchester County and run by fundamentalist but apolitical leaders, King’s was re-launched in the mid-1990s with the purpose of bringing conservative culture warriors into the heart of the secular city.

Only a few hundred students are enrolled at King’s, which provides a choice of only two majors—business and politics/economics. The school offers no science classes, and students reportedly complained early on in Olasky’s tenure that he weakened academic standards. One of his main efforts at King’s was a guest lecture series that mostly brought in conservative heavyweights like Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee, but also invited the occasional liberal for ambushing. After one such event at which Olasky harangued Duke theologian Stanley Hauerwas—who can hold his own when it comes to harangues—the student government at King’s was so appalled that it voted to rebuke Olasky and demand he apologize to Hauerwas. (He did not.) I endured a similarly unpleasant experience with Olasky when I spoke at King’s in 2009. It is the closest I have ever come to walking out in the middle of an event.

Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.

With his high profile in the conservative world, Olasky was the face of King’s, and in 2010 he declared that one of his roles as provost was to make sure that the school “remains firmly in the Protestant, evangelical tradition.” Not long after, King’s hired D’Souza to serve as the school’s president. D’Souza sometimes identifies as an evangelical, sometimes as a Catholic, and his hiring raised eyebrows in the Christian press. Those eyebrows lifted even further when, just a few months after D’Souza’s hiring, Olasky resigned his position.

Olasky’s vague explanation for his departure didn’t help matters. When Christianity Today contacted him about the resignation, Olasky replied: “It will come as no surprise to you that Dinesh D’Souza and I have different ideas about some things. I’d like to leave it at that and not do an interview.” Those differences certainly extend to the theological orientation of King’s, although Christianity Today reported that D’Souza signed an evangelical statement of faith before coming aboard as president. But it’s also very likely that a school of two-dozen faculty is simply too small for two such forceful and uncompromising personalities.

The King’s College board will discuss D’Souza’s situation at meetings later this week and surely has some questions for its celebrity president. Divorce is still a tricky subject for many evangelicals. In a 1998 New York Times Magazine profile of Olasky, David Grann noted that the conservative did not reveal—and in fact seemed eager to hide—a first marriage that ended in divorce. But if divorce is a no-no, brazen flaunting of mistresses is something else entirely.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 12 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

12 comments

College Presidents Go Wild

- ironyroad

October 16, 2012 at 7:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

That ten commandment bullshit is for the sheeple. Not for the Dinesh D'Souzas and George Wills of the world. C'mon what percentage of the conservative intelligentsia really are devout and church-going and not a bit agnostic? How many of their number own guns? How many of those conservative jingoists serve in the U.S. military?

- tec619

October 16, 2012 at 9:45pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Btw, Olasky--whose compass needs a swing/calibration (e.g., practicing Jew, agnostic/Marxist, Agnostic, christian, (evangelical!?) Presbyterian) unless his is routinely subjected to EMPs--isn't the only conman, er conservative to avoid mentioning his first marriage. George Allen doesn't mention his first marriage either. I wonder why the bad marriages are considered crosses that god gave them to bear?

- tec619

October 16, 2012 at 9:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I participated (openly as an atheist) on World Magazine's blog site for years, until they finally kicked me out. World Magazine has had a huge schism and a large number of their (faithfully evangelical) participants have hived off to a new web site (which so far has let me participate, much to the horror of a few people). This story about D’Souza is absolutely hilarious. It reminds me of a close friend I worked with for years, raised as a thoroughly groomed evangelical child by devout parents. Then her dad ran off with another woman. My friend was shell-shocked but remained evangelical. In fact, she got a degree in divinity and planned to be a missionary in Africa. Except she became an evangelical Christian feminist and decided if she went to Africa she would either be a wife of a missionary or the "gofer" for a missionary. As she is a very intelligent and competent woman, she decided **** that and became a computer expert and educator. She's still a Christian, married to a wayward son of a Minister. However, she is now a tolerant and open-minded Christian. So some people outgrow the worst parts of the evangelical nonsense. I offer you little hope for World Magazine and Olasky and company. Religion is nonsense, but some is worse than others.

- skahn

October 17, 2012 at 1:44am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Of course, hypocrisy has no political bias. But when piety is the religion (and for an increasing number of Americans, it is), the hypocrisy is jarring. Public expressions and displays of faith are so common ("God bless America") that Jesus's instruction ("But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you") seems like the devil's work. Indeed, such expressions and displays make the religion appear more like a cult or political movement, where the true believers must always be proving their faith or loyalty by perpetually repeating an oath, or their faith or loyalty will be doubted. It's ironic that the Christian faith, the beginnings of which were as much a political as religious movement for the oppressed (Jews) against their oppressors (Romans), has become just the opposite for so many. Now that's hypocrisy!

- rayward

October 17, 2012 at 7:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The divorce of Dinesh D'Souza teaches us much. First, he who is without sin should cast the first stone. Second, a person can be happily married and be a leftist: Barack Obama seems to be a good husband and a good father, whereas Newt Gingrich has been a disgrace in his private life. Third, how someone behaves during a marriage is an important barometer about character: Bill Clinton has no character, and his adultery and perversion have become legendary. Fourth, Dinesh D'Souza should be crushed by his divorce: a Christian should want to save a marriage at all costs. Moreover, how bad could his first wife have been? Fifth, the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. Dinesh has allowed his fame to get the best of him. He will reap what he sows. As an aside, Jesus Christ was not a politician, and the message of Christianity is not political.

- john336

October 17, 2012 at 8:07am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"[A]choice of only two majors—business and politics/economics. The school offers no science classes." Really? The two majors aren't Christian Religious Studies and Heretical Mythology Studies? And why should the school provide science instruction? Man didn't descent from monkeys, the earth is 6000+ years old, Copernicus is a liar--geocentrism is a fact(!!) and "faith" heals not doctors and medicine. :-)

- tec619

October 17, 2012 at 8:21am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"As an aside, Jesus Christ was not a politician, and the message of Christianity is not political." Thanks for the helpful reminder, john336. I look forward to you not commenting further on politics given your views. Good news for all of us perverted leftists here at TNR.

- wildboy

October 17, 2012 at 8:54am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains on." Capitalism, with all its incentives, lacks that incentive. It's an odd thing, to me anyway, this obsession with whether one will have eternal life. And it is an obsession. Meet an evangelical Christian, and it won't take long for her to ask whether you will have eternal life. The American culture is self-absorbed, so it's not surprising that so many American Christians would be obsessed with whether they will be part of the elect. And that so many American Christians believe they have a personal relationship with God, who takes a personal interest in every aspect of their lives, from curing their cancers to helping them accumulate wealth. I'm a Christian, have always been and will always be. But it has never occurred to me that my faith is all about me.

- rayward

October 17, 2012 at 8:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Nobody wants to die, but the idea of "eternal life" strikes me as fairly crazy and incoherent. The idea of a "soul" that exists separate from our brain and nervous system makes no sense. I can imagine being interested and curious about various things for a million years or so, but for all religious believers talk about "eternity," I hardly believe they really comprehend the word. We're animals with big brains; unlike other critters we comprehend our mortality; we invented religion (very clever); maybe it's time to grow up. Everyday I ruefully say to myself, "I will die; probably not today," and gratefully go about my business for the day.

- skahn

October 17, 2012 at 2:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

...I'm a Christian, have always been and will always be. But it has never occurred to me that my faith is all about me... Christianity ought not be all about "me." It ought to be about one's relation to God through acceptance of Jesus Christ, the son. Heavenly life everlasting awaits the pious faithful; eternal hellfire damnation awaits the unrepentant sinner, not to mention the faithless. I'm not a Christian, being an atheist. But if I were one and so believed in its eschatology and its thereafter I'd be pretty pumped about life everlasting. So it'd be pretty hard, I'd think, for all my attempt at relative selflessness, to distinguish between my heavenly reward, which is the best thing I can imagine imagining, something pretty me-based, and the purity of my reverence. But, then again, if a Christian tells me that notions of life everlasting aren't at part of the heart of his belief, I'd think that that's a sign of a fairly attenuated Christianity.

- basman

October 17, 2012 at 9:51pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. I hope he rots in hell. And I mean that in the most Christian sense.

- icarus-r

October 18, 2012 at 2:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close