SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home “Homeland,” Argo, and the Changing Role of the Rogue CIA...

PLANK OCTOBER 26, 2012

“Homeland,” Argo, and the Changing Role of the Rogue CIA Agent

Argo has gotten a lot of flak for the creative liberties it takes in depicting its particular corner of the Iran hostage crisis, in which six employees of the U.S. embassy were sheltered for months by the Canadian ambassador before being smuggled out under the noses of the Iranian government, disguised as a Canadian film crew. The real story of the Canadian Caper might be about diplomatic collaboration and the heroism of an American ally, but Argo is something else: the rare action film in which the CIA plays the hero. More specifically, the hero is one CIA agent in particular: Ben Affleck’s Tony Mendez, who follows the clarion call of his intuition in the face of bureaucratic roadblocks. “We’re responsible for these people,” says Mendez. “What we are is required to follow orders,” replies his supervisor, played by Bryan Cranston. In a dramatic bit of historical revisionism, at the last minute the Agency pulls its support of Mendez’s plan, but he goes ahead with it anyway, harebrained and implausible as it seems. Spoiler alert: he pulls it off.

Argo’s dramatic engine is the tension between gut human instinct and institutional order. In this, it is echoes  Showtime’s “Homeland,” the story of another rogue agent with prophetic good sense who is straining against the bureaucratic current. Rogue agents, of course, are a staple of movies and TV shows about the CIA. But historically, they have tended to make the institution surrounding them look either buffoonish or conspiratorially sinister. In films like Three Days of the Condor (1975), the rogue CIA agent is a lone pocket of sound moral judgment within an evil organization. In The Amateur (1981), he is coldly calculating, blackmailing the Agency into training him as an assassin so he can avenge the death of his fiancée at the hands of terrorists. The ’90s saw a rash of aggressively critical representations of the CIA, including Oliver Stone’s JFK (1991), with its suggestion of an Agency conspiracy, and In the Line of Fire (1993), in which John Malkovich is a crazed former CIA officer who sets out to murder the president. These negative depictions had to do partly with the Agency’s closed-door policy toward Hollywood in the ’90s. The Times reported in 2001, just one week before 9/11, that the CIA had decided to start consulting on film and television projects because it was “tired of being depicted onscreen as a nefarious organization full of rogue operatives.”

But the image of the rogue CIA agent seems to be changing shape in the post-Bin-Laden world. The figure is complicating: it seems less like a way to incriminate the Agency than a way to further humanize it. The Bourne series—in which the CIA is the embodiment of evil, employing mind control to create killing machines—is the obvious exception, but Bourne has been around since the paranoid anti-Agency culture of the early 2000s. The new rogue agent doesn’t go off the rails because the CIA is ineffectual or malevolent, but because the operative is resistant to the organization’s reasonable doubts about collateral damage and rule of law. Though Argo is set in a different political era, it still reflects contemporary concerns about diplomacy and the reliability of American intelligence. And since Argo is based on real events, we know from the beginning that Mendez’s plan succeeds. But the film’s many distortions of historical fact—specifically the pulse-thumping final scene in which Iranian security officers chase down the Americans’ plane—make us feel like Mendez has narrowly avoided making a big mistake.

That same anxiety, to a much greater extent, courses through “Homeland,” where Claire Danes’s Carrie is brilliant but deeply unreliable; you can’t fault the system for doubting her. She is teetering on the thin edge between heroism and total self-destruction. “You’re a disgrace to your nation, Sergeant Nicholas Brody. You’re a traitor and a terrorist,” she says after impulsively confronting Brody—the congressman and former prisoner of war she has long been convinced is trying to sabotage the American government—while her superiors at the CIA looked on via surveillance in horror. It is a satisfying moment, but also an uneasy reminder of the fragility of Carrie’s competence. There is a dark, constant emotional undertow pulling at her professional judgment. And in last night’s episode, her interrogation of Brody after his arrest is a mix of desperate vulnerability and cool expertise. “You broke my heart, you know,” she tells him, coaxing out a confession that he had been wearing a suicide vest in the safe room with the vice president. “Homeland” is fully a projection of this particular political moment, a world caught between post-9/11 awareness of the limits of American power and the renewed faith in American espionage in the wake of the Bin Laden raid. And so the CIA is neither incompetent nor darkly efficient, as it has been in so many other onscreen representations, but conflicted and human, set in a morally ambiguous world that blurs the boundaries between crazy and clairvoyant.

Both “Homeland” and Argo are strangely patriotic stories, even though they are ultimately dealing with major failures of American intelligence. The figure of the rogue operative has become a way to wrestle with ambiguities at the heart of U.S. foreign policy, the messy questions of who can be trusted and how much collateral damage in pursuit of the truth is too much. The rogue agent offers up a kind of backdoor patriotism for a new political age: a symbol of an underdog American ingenuity that acknowledges its potential to be tragically wrong.

Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 16 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

16 comments

I saw Argo last night and even though I knew the story I still enjoyed it a great deal, the only 2 flaws were what was mentioned, the first when Mendez said he would go regardless of orders (which I found ok as a plot device) and the ridiculous chase scene at the airport, but the rest of the movie was superb and astounding that they even pulled it off.

- blackton

October 26, 2012 at 8:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

would have liked USA cable channel's "Covert Affairs" included in this, or not.

- K2K

October 27, 2012 at 6:22am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'd go out on a bit of a limb here and say that espionage drama tends to be oriented more toward a liberal-left perspective on the world simply because a too-definite conservative viewpoint marginalizes the drama -- and the best drama is ultimately the drama of loyalties. Liberals are more likely to entertain the concepts of uncertainty, fuzzy borderlines, and the like in a positive way, while conservatives are more likely to respond with a doubling-down on certainty. Thus stories with a maverick agent against the backdrop of a cautious or rigid organization/agency can often be very powerful even if the politics of the drama are not distributed exactly the same way (e.g. the agent can be more of a hawk than his/her bosses while being, as a character, more attractive to liberals). I'm just reading Robert Littell's long novel 'The Company' and he does a remarkable job of showing characters whose ideological settings are somewhat removed from their personalities or activities -- there's a CIA officer who has severe misgivings about the Bay of Pigs operation, for example, both because he thinks the U.S. is too quick to assume Castro and the communists have no popular support and because he's been through the Hungarian uprising in '56 and watched the rebels risk all in the hope of American military support that never came.

- ironyroad

October 27, 2012 at 6:11pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Blackton (aka a fellow lover of The Wrestler) I agree with most of your take on Argo-- I didn't mind Mendez's bucking of orders--and thought the final car chase gilded the suspense lilly. But here's the thing: even as I was thinking that, even as I knew the escape was gonna' be successful, I was virtually on the edge of my seat and full of movie induced anxiety in wanting the plane to get off and away. That's some good filmmaking in my book.

- basman

October 27, 2012 at 6:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

...I'm just reading Robert Littell's long novel 'The Company'... Something's happening to me. I forced myself to read The Brothers Karamazov, which after some tedious impatience, was worth it, and was 1/3 of the way through The Red And The Black, when, as if unconsciously impelled, I just stopped, meaning to get back to. I haven't picked up a long novel since, and that was a few months ago. Dr. Dr. I don't know what to do, I've got them mean-old-can't-read-a-long-novel blues.

- basman

October 27, 2012 at 6:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Martin Kramer on watching Argo: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151110624922293&set=a.103151622292.93283.21262362292&type=1 "Affleck used documentary film, in the raw and as inspiration, so I was sorry he didn’t feature Iran’s current “Supreme Leader,” Khamene’i, quizzin g hostage John Limbert on how well he was being treated. Yes, Iran’s supremo, whose finger may soon rest on a nuclear trigger, was tight with the hostage-takers http://youtu.be/lmeUKh1u1lA at min. 7:15."

- Noga

October 28, 2012 at 11:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmeUKh1u1lA&feature=youtu.be

- Noga

October 28, 2012 at 11:40am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well, The Company is long (about 850 pages) but one mitigating factor is that it's definitely a narrative-driven novel, potentially easier to get through than Stendhal.

- ironyroad

October 28, 2012 at 3:20pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Stendhal isn't bad. The Brothers Karamazov killed me. After it Stendahl just seem to breeze along. It's being read wasn't the cause of my temporary suspension of suspension of that kind of disbelief. It was just coincident with it. I think the cause was delayed PTSD from the trials--and the trial was nearly impossible to read through, all those long winded speeches killed me, especially by the defence lawyer--and tribulations of la famille K. Narrative-driven may be just what the Dr. ordered. Thanks doc.

- basman

October 28, 2012 at 5:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

My clinic is always open for patients with literary trauma! In any event, let me know what you think, if you get around to it. It has its glitches and bumps but I'm giving it a second reading now (pedagogical motive -- I'm doing a class on the espionage novel) and I'm still impressed.

- ironyroad

October 28, 2012 at 7:29pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

irony "I'm doing a class on the espionage novel" Good for you! Are you starting with John Buchan, widely considered to be the father of the spy thriller with "Thirty-Nine Steps"? I liked "Greenmantle" better, but Buchan's Richard Hannay certainly was the prototype for everyone from Le Carre' Smiley to Fleming's 007. And, Buchan wrote rollicking novels, after his stint field reporting on WW1, which he then turned into a definitive history of WW1. Anyone with electricity and a tv can watch Mossad agent Eyal Lavin trying to flip CIA's improbably talented, sometimes rogue, field agent Annie Walker on USA channel at 10 p.m. Helpful to have watched all the episodes leading up to this one to understand how close Eyal and Annie are since Eyal managed to free her from the Russian prison where no one ever escapes.

- K2K

October 28, 2012 at 7:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I don't know what you are talking about, K2K, since I don't watch the series but it sounds like a kinder view of the Mossad agent than the one we had in the second new Bond movie, A Quantum of Solace. In that film the Mossad Agent was one of the trio of arch villains scheming to take over the water sources of the world. Another riff on ZOG.

- Noga

October 28, 2012 at 8:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

hi noga. You can watch prior episodes here: http://www.usanetwork.com/series/covertaffairs/?__source=ggl|covert+affairs|Brand|G_CovertAffairs3.5&sky=ggl|covert+affairs|Brand|G_CovertAffairs3.5 Different producers have different views of Mossad. NCIS has had lots of episodes with Ziva David as Mossad-ninja-liason, but now she is a US citizen. I mention NCIS because USA channel also broadcasts NCIS re-runs a lot, so I suspect whoever owns USA channel must be Mossad-friendly. Got to go - back tomorrow!

- K2K

October 28, 2012 at 9:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

K2K -- we started with Kipling's 'Kim,' which appeared in 1901. I have to admit somewhat sheepishly that time and other constraints made me leave out a lot of early 20th c. fiction, Buchan, Conrad, and Childers in particular. Kipling, Maugham, and Ambler are the pre-Cold War authors I assigned. I don't think Hannay is quite the same as Bond or Smiley, however (who are themselves rather unalike) as he is more the gifted amateur than the trained professional. Somerset Maugham's Ashenden -- I read those stories for the first time preparing for the class -- seems to straddle the professional-amateur line. Le Carré has complained that reviewers casually link his name with Graham Greene, when in fact his influences have been more Kipling and Conrad. The Mossad character in 'The Company' is a kind of sorcerer character, one who knows the game better than almost anyone and has contacts where the CIA has none.

- ironyroad

October 28, 2012 at 11:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

irony - that is why Buchan's' four Richard Hannay novels are considered the prototype for the spy thriller. Hope you read "Greenmantle". I think Sorkin's 2008 "Charlie Wilson's War" should be added to any thread about "rogue CIA agents" Philip Seymour-Hoffman's character, Gust Avrakotos, certainly went roguer than most: Israeli and Egyptian brought together to supply Israeli-captured Egyptian weapons (from 1973 war) to Pakistan - great scene.

- K2K

October 29, 2012 at 1:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

One of my favourite movies ever. Money quote: " Charlie Wilson: These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the endgame. "

- Noga

October 29, 2012 at 2:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close