SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Election Day: The Worst Day for Headlines in American...

PLANK NOVEMBER 6, 2012

Election Day: The Worst Day for Headlines in American Journalistic History

Election Day, as everyone knows, is the most sacred of days in America’s civic religion—the pageant of democracy, the fundamental exercise of self-government, the day citizens in their millions get to choose their own leaders.

For the Fourth Estate, meanwhile, the first Tuesday in November is rather less glorious.

On no other day of the year do America’s newspapers—and websites, and televisual chyrons—feature such banal headlines. It’s hard not to feel for the folks who have to write them: Hemmed in by a lack of news on one side and an institutional culture that shrinks from any appearance of bias on the other, the great American broadsheets go through a quadrennial exercise in adorning their front pages with news that is at once accurate, unbiased, and utterly unsurprising.

Thus do some of the most storied champions of the free press feature front-page scoops that boil down to this: Today is the day when many citizens will vote, and the results of their votes will determine the president.

Stop the presses!

Courtesy of the Newseum’s daily compendium of America’s newspaper front  pages, a selection of this year’s classic election-morning headlines:

“2 CHASE WINNING VOTES TO END” – Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

“IT’S NOW IN VOTERS’ HANDS” – Fresno Bee

“IT’S ALL UP TO THE SWING STATES” – Los Angeles Times

“ALL OVER NOW BUT THE VOTING” – San Francisco Chronicle

“IT’S DECISION TIME” – Oakland Tribune

“NOW, IT’S THE VOTERS’ TURN TO SPEAK” – The Washington Post

“FINAL COUNTDOWN” – Miami Herald

“DECISION DAY FOR AMERICA” – Pensacola News-Journal

“CAMPAIGN ENDS; NOW VOTERS’ TURN” – Atlanta Journal-Constitution

“ELECTION DAY DAWNS” – Moline (Ill.) Dispatch

“THIS IS IT, AMERICA” - St. Paul Pioneer Press

“RIVALS RACE FOR DECISION DAY” – Albuquerque Journal

“STATE BY STATE, BATTLE FOR PRESIDENCY GOES TO VOTERS” – New York Times

“WHO GETS OUR VOTE?” – Lima (Oh.) News

“STATE VOTERS HEAD TO POLLS FOR NATIONAL, LOCAL ELECTIONS” – The Oklahoman

“IT’S ALL OVER BUT THE COUNTING” – Politico

“ELECTION DAY IS FINALLY HERE” – The Reporter (Fond du Lac, Wi.)

“IT’S ELECTION DAY!” – The Columbian (Vancouver, Wa.)

Hard to disagree with any of that!

It’s not all banality, though. The good citizens of Modesto, Ca awoke to “BABY’S GRANDMOTHER HELD,” a piece about a child-endangerment case that ran in the Modesto Bee. Denver residents got “DA OPENS GENSLER PROBE,” a Denver Post piece about an investigation into alleged impropriety by Colorado’s Secretary of State. The Tampa Tribune splashed “FAILED LAWSUIT COSTS UTILITY $20M” across its front page, though the exercise in scoopdom was marred by an adjacent piece titled “PRESIDENCY NOW RESTS IN THE HANDS OF VOTERS.” And in Battle Creek, Mich., there’s a meaty front-page lede under the Battle Creek Enquirer’s banner headline “FAMILY WONDERS WHY MATTHEW DANIELS HAD TO DIE.”

Follow the links to relieve your pre-vote tedium.

Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 4 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

4 comments

It's actually the best day for headlines since they are less tendentious than usual. How can you fault a headline like: "It's election Day." it's boredom is a function of its tautological accuracy. If papers practiced more such "boring headlines" we would be better off. State the factual, the obvious, and then in the last few paragraphs speculate about it's meaning.

- arnon1

November 6, 2012 at 1:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Actually, I take those headlines to affirmation that voting matters - that for today at least, the media takes a back seat while the citizenry does its duty. If I have a regret it is that those headlines imply a faith in the system and the electorate that I don't think either deserves.

- IowaBeauty

November 6, 2012 at 1:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well, for almost two years the papers have had a field day with speculative horse-race polls on who's up, who's down. On election day itself, they have to shut the hell up and let people vote. Of course that's banal -- they have to stop predicting success or failure, and wait with baited breath for actual success or failure. Compared to the excitement of the horse race, we now have a short period of reality. At least until the polls close. Now, the day after election day -- then they can let loose again. But let's not be too critical if "Election Time Again!" is as good as it gets today.

- AllanL5

November 6, 2012 at 1:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Arnon makes a good point. It's like the Weather Channel where there is no disagreement over the meteorological evaluation of that system out in the Atlantic, but wild controversy if someone later talks about climate change being the cause. But the WC itself is mostly a non-partisan reality-read that all types of people can watch.

- ironyroad

November 6, 2012 at 6:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close