THE AVENUE OCTOBER 27, 2010
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Just back from a four day trip to Toronto with my University of Michigan graduate students learning about pedestrian-oriented urban development. We toured seven major walkable urban places from downtown to a couple downtown-adjacent places, but especially suburban-located walkable urban places redeveloping old town centers and strip commercial centers.
What did we see? A forest of cranes building 30 to 50 story condominiums, rental apartments, and office towers in these walkable urban places and ground level street life that rivals the best metropolitan areas in the world.
The reason I selected Toronto for the students included the generous invitation of Richard Florida, a beacon for my students for having zeroed in on the knowledge economy and the rise of the creative class.
Another reason to see Toronto is that Canada had much more sober banking practices over the past decade, unlike the U.S., so that their five major institutions, all with headquarters in Toronto, have continued lending. The result is seen in the skyline, reflecting the continued engagement of the built environment, representing 35 percent of the assets of the economy, at work. Canada, like China, India, and Brazil, reasonably painlessly continued to grow through the Great Recession.
While Canadians have some behavioral differences from Americans, their demand for higher density walkable urban development is a look at the future of real estate development in this country. As Patrick Doherty and I write in the Washington Monthly, sustainable walkable urban development is essential to a U.S. economic recovery. No recovery since the Depression has happened without the built environment being engaged. Transportation infrastructure (rail transit, biking, and walking) that supports the higher density walkable urban development the market is demanding is essential if we want the economy to rebound.
2 comments
A bit sanguine here, I am afraid. I live in DC area now but grew up in Toronto (I am dual Canada-US citizen). The city I knew as Toronto was like a rather chic and big small-town with a well-covered public transit system. It is still a great city and relatively clean and safe for its size, but now Toronto is a big sprawl and its transport infrastructure has not kept place with growth, either with public transit or major road arteries. Traffic is as bad as anywhere and air quality is a persistent issue. The outgoing mayor Mr. Miller seemed to have a plan for less auto congestion as the article stated, but Torontonians just elected a new Mayor, 41-year old Rob Ford who, from what I have heard, would qualify as a backward thinking lout even by US standards and has expressed open hostility to all the initiatives stated in the article. He has also shown little enthusiasm, to say the least, for the multicultural vision of previous leaders. So we will have to see.
- NR027810
October 27, 2010 at 5:54pm
I heard of Rob Ford. He is "sick of the spending" and won with over 50% of the vote, apparently because other Torontonians are sick of the spending too. But, if the city is developing, growing, and a walkable city is what the people want, Mr. Ford will have to cede his ambitious cut spending agenda to include those demands. Toronto is a growing metropolis, unlike most U.S. cities that are either in decline or are heavily in the red.
- RedState
October 29, 2010 at 2:17pm