SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Five Other Politicians Who’ve Said Idiotic Things About...

PLANK AUGUST 20, 2012

Five Other Politicians Who’ve Said Idiotic Things About Rape

Representative Todd Akin, the Republican challenger to Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill, is in trouble for announcing that a the odds of a woman becoming pregnant from "legitimate rape" are vanishingly small. "If it's a legitimate rape,” Akin explained in a weekend TV interview, "the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."

The damage to Akin has been appropriately profound. No less a figure than Mitt Romney has issued the requisite disavowal of Akin’s words. (No sign yet that Romney is not OK with his running mate’s actual actions to prevent rape victims from receiving abortions…) Various Republicans are now calling for Akin to bow out of the race. Even if he sticks around, the remark could cost him the election anyway. (Before this weekend, polls predicted that he would beat McCaskill this November.)

Like a lot of pols, Akin's apologies come with a self-exculpatory caveat: Everyone does it! On one stop on his apology tour, Akin told Mike Huckabee, "I don't know that I'm the only person in public office that suffers from foot and mouth disease here." On this question, unlike on the subject of reproductive biology, Akin happens to be right. With his comment, he joined a pantheon of idiot politicians who have said abhorrent things about rape and rape victims.

Below, a list of five other clowns who have done the same.

1. Clayton Williams: "Just relax and enjoy it."

Part of Clayton Williams’s whopping fall from grace in the 1990 Texas gubernatorial election was a nasty joke he told to reporters at his ranch about rape. From a 1990 New York Times article: "[Clayton] Williams made the remark … while preparing for a cattle roundup at his West Texas ranch. He compared the cold, foggy weather spoiling the event to a rape, telling ranch hands, campaign workers and reporters around a campfire, 'If it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it.'" Williams lost to Ann Richards eight months later.

2. Sharron Angle: Rape is God’s plan.

The GOP Senate nominee who came within a hair of beating Sen. Harry Reid in 2010 once affirmed that if you are a victim of rape who has become pregnant as a result, you just need to "have a little faith." When a radio host asked her, in January 2010, whether she believed in abortion for cases or rape or incest, she responded, "You know, I’m a Christian, and I believe that God has a plan and a purpose for each one of our lives and that he can intercede in all kinds of situations and we need to have a little faith in many things."

Angle doubled down months later, when she responded to a hypothetical question about a case of incest that resulted in a pregnancy with an anecdote about a 15-year-old she had apparently counseled to have her baby: "[T]hey found that they had made what was really a lemon situation into lemonade." Idaho lawmaker Brent Crane put this same logic to work in 2011.

3. Ken Buck: Rape victim had "buyer’s remorse"

Five years before he was the Republican challenger to incumbent Senator Michael Bennet, Ken Buck, as a district attorney, declined to prosecute a rapist for less-than-solid reasons. To wit: Although the assailant in question admitted to police that his victim had had told him, "No," before he raped her, Buck concluded that the facts of the case were enough to convince a jury that the victim was merely experiencing "buyer’s remorse." He also appeared to blame her for the assault in a conversation she taped and leaked to the media. Buck only narrowly lost to Bennet.

4. Kathleen Passidomo: Well, she was dressed like a prostitute.

Early last year, Republican state legislator in Florida Kathleen Passidomo ascribed her support for a school dress code bill to its ability to keep slutty girls with irresponsible parents from getting raped. From the Tampa Bay Times: "There was an article about an 11-year-old girl who was gang raped in Texas by 18 young men because she was dressed like a 21-year-old prostitute," she said. "And her parents let her attend school like that. And I think it’s incumbent upon us to create some areas where students can be safe in school and show up in proper attire so what happened in Texas doesn’t happen to our students."

5. Steve King: "They don’t even know what they’re talking about."

When he voted against a bill to expand the power of Native American law enforcement to investigate rape on tribal lands, Rep. Steve King of Iowa declined to say why. But he did have some choice words for the many female Native Americans who protested outside of his local congressional office: "This is completely a campaign stunt, and it should be viewed as that. … They don’t even know what law they’re talking about."

Bonus Round: Over at The Atlantic, Garance Franke-Ruta has compiled a rich collection of lawmakers who have argued—very, very erroneously—that the female body has ‘natural defenses’ against rape, rendering rape exceptions in abortion laws unnecessary. The argument may be biologically dubious, but it's become part of the ideological armor defending no-exceptions anti-choice laws. A sample:

In 1995, 71-year-old North Carolina state Rep. Henry Aldridge gained national notoriety after telling the N.C. House Appropriations Committee, "The facts show that people who are raped -- who are truly raped -- the juices don't flow, the body functions don't work and they don't get pregnant. Medical authorities agree that this is a rarity, if ever."

His argument came during a debate over "a proposal to eliminate a state abortion fund for poor women," according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

In 1980, attorney James Leon Holmes wrote, in a letter arguing for a constitutional ban on abortion, "Concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami.”

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 10 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

10 comments

Speechless; the women too?

- Sophia

August 20, 2012 at 2:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

PS Paul Ryan. Worse than I thought, even.

- Sophia

August 20, 2012 at 2:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What awful human beings. Who votes for these people?

- miceelf

August 20, 2012 at 2:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"If it's a legitimate rape,” Akin explained in a weekend TV interview, "the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." This is the same Akin who sits on....wait for it.... the House SCIENCE Committee. Stay classy, gop.

- Tristan

August 20, 2012 at 2:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The part that bothers me the most is how the GOP glides past the issue; even if it's scientifically proven that the chances of getting pregnant from rape are the same as snowfall in Miami, that still leaves the issue of when women do get pregnant from rape wide open. At best, it's a non-answer that only serves to illuminate the misogyny.

- GSpinks

August 20, 2012 at 3:06pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Republican's have a laser focused ability to adopt a position unsupported by evidence: Pregnancy and rape, global warming, WMD's, low top rates strengthening the economy, regulation and the economy, the president not being born in the U.S, how Terry Schiavo will return to consciousness, voter fraud and etc.. Reagan almost tripled the debt with low rates and Bush doubled it, but there's Romney and Ryan with their top rate cuts claiming concern for the deficit, as if it were something new we hadn't yet tried and regretted.

- Nusholtz

August 20, 2012 at 3:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's as if there's a parallel Planet Earth somewhere, on which all the GOP believes holds true.

- ironyroad

August 20, 2012 at 3:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What's really astonishing about this story, and the reaction to it, is what it says about the extreme shift to the right in public discourse. The outrage is focused on Akin's ignorant comments about biology. No one seems scandalized by the fact that a major party's nominee for the US Senate wants to criminalize abortion even when the woman is a victim of rape or incest. (The GOP presidential campaign released a statement that a Romney-Ryan administration would endorse exceptions for rape or incest, but does anyone doubt that a Ryan administration would act differently?) To get the proper focus on what the Republicans are talking, some actual journalists (the few that are left) need to ask Ryan, Akin, and others: "what length of prison sentence would you support for doctors, nurses, and other health care providers who perform abortions?" This goes to the heart of what Republicans are really saying when they airily speak of "repealing Roe v. Wade".

- bjones

August 20, 2012 at 5:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

bjones: "No one seems scandalized by the fact that a major party's nominee for the US Senate wants to criminalize abortion even when the woman is a victim of rape or incest." I am. I guess the GOP's strategy is working: Say things that are so outrageous that things that are only "slightly" outrageous seem reasonable. Is the "life begins at conception" belief gaining traction? This is a terrifying thought. What the GOP seems to have forgotten is what's truly "holy" or "sacred": two people choosing deliberately and joyfully to come together to create a life. Rape and other forcible sexual acts aside, everything else is fucking. Not that there's anything wrong with that - we're animals, it's what we do. In this day and age, the weirdness is taking normal, human behavior and trying to conscribe it in ways it no longer needs. And if a fuck results in an unintended pregnancy, why should the outcome of that fuck, a private act by private persons living in a democracy, suddenly become a moral issue subject to public decision? It shouldn't. Pregnancy and parenthood by choice, not dictate. It's no else's business.

- Claris

August 20, 2012 at 7:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You're right, Claris, that's their strategy. Whether the issue is taxes, Medicaid, conservation, immigration, or abortion, the GOP and its media outlets have been engaged in a disciplined effort to shift the discussion of issues rightward (although Akin probably wasn't part of a "disciplined" effort in this case:). I hope Democrats will pick up on my second point: it is fine and correct to raise the argument about the Republicans aiming to restrict women's freedoms, but the pro-choice argument that really ties the Repubs in knots is the one focused on what it means, in practical terms, to "outlaw abortion". It means that (after Romney-Ryan appoint a couple more Scalias) any state run by Tea Party Republicans (that's several) will pass criminal statutes which not only criminalize soliciting an abortion, but also performing one. And "criminalizing" means specifying prison terms for doctors, nurses, and other health are workers. This line of argument is one we have not used often enough; watch the Repubs duck for cover when it comes up. And watch undecideds flip to Obama voters.

- bjones

August 20, 2012 at 10:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close