SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Cut Them Some Slack

THE PLANK OCTOBER 3, 2007

Cut Them Some Slack

CNN has a story up on its homepage that speaks to the level of self-righteous outrage that grips the illegal immigration warriors.

The gist of the piece is that some active duty servicemen are facing the unsettling prospect of coming home from Iraq to find their spouses, who, for a variety of reasons, aren't legal residents, deported. (For instance, the featured sailor's wife was brought to this country when she was five years old by her mother, both of whom were granted asylum as refugees from Guatemala. The mother later applied for citizenship for them both, but, because the daughter got married before the application was approved, her application process was derailed and her legal status remains tenuous.)

Anyway, some military advocates favor implementation of a special policy to deal with such cases. (Apparently, it's tough for a serviceman to stay focused on patrolling Baghdad when he's constantly wondering whether the mother of his children is at that moment being hauled off by the INS.) But the illegal immigrant crusaders reject anything that smacks of special treatment. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, told CNN:

"What you're talking about is amnesty for illegal immigrants who have a relative in the armed forces, and that's just outrageous," he said. "What we're talking about here is letting lawbreakers get away with their actions just because they have a relative in the military. ... There's no justification for that kind of policy."

Really? No justification? I can actually think of a few reasons why we should grant any number of reasonable dispensations to our military families. These people are serving this country in a uniquely demanding, bloody capacity that increasingly few Americans are willing to subject themselves to. That doesn't make them or their families above the law, but it does suggest that perhaps a little effort could be made to find targeted legal remedies to address such special cases.

At the very least, you could postpone deporting these women until their husbands are finished getting their asses shot at.

--Michelle Cottle

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

Who drive SUV's with "Support the Troops" stickers and rail about government bureaucracy.

- dubyadoubte

October 3, 2007 at 10:53am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Occasionally I get mildly sympathetic to the anti-illegal immigration crusade. Then they immediately go and blow it. Yes, securing our borders is important, but I'd rather stick with the current dysfunctional system than let those fanatics change it.

- ratnerstar

October 3, 2007 at 10:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

but a comfortable, self-righteous focus for their latest hate laser. If it wasn't them, it would be the Chinese or gay people or enviromentalists. They disgust me, I hope more illegal immigrants come, drown the place.

- Wandreycer1

October 3, 2007 at 11:08am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, is a complete and total jackass. She came when she was five and was granted residency, lived an upstanding life here, got married and had an American baby, her husband is serving in Iraq but should be deported because of a loophole? Anyway, Krikorian doesn't sound all that American to me, it sounds vaguely Communist and Middle Eastern, like he is from Azerbaijan or something. Get him to Gitmo.

- blackton

October 3, 2007 at 1:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Fine, we can stay deportations of spouses of illegal immigrant soldiers. Meanwhile illegal immigrants continue to have their foot on the throats of the African-American underclass (among others, but that's the most egregious result). And today there's a news report that my state, Illinois, is going to lose Congressional seats because illegal immigrants are counted in the census -- what effect will that have on our poor in terms of social programs?

- Lymon1

October 3, 2007 at 3:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close