Did The Dems Muzzle Casey?

The New Republic

You have read:

0 / 8

free articles in the past 30 days.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

sign up for unlimited access for just $34.97Sign me up

THE PLANK APRIL 3, 2008

Did The Dems Muzzle Casey?

Over at the Daily Howler, they've got a thorough examination of the old claim (repeated in Michael Gerson's column yesterday) that the Democrats refused to let former Pennsylvania Governor Robert Casey, Sr. speak at the 1992 Democratic convention because of his pro-life views. Is there any truth to this? It's not entirely clear, but probably not. On the one hand, that's what Casey believed had happened; he wrote, "the party denied me ... the right to speak because I am pro-life and planned to say so from the convention podium." On the other hand, the Clinton camp sees things differently, as Mike Crowley reported in TNR in 1996:

According to those who actually doled out the 1992 convention speaking
slots, Casey was denied a turn for one simple reason: his refusal to
endorse the Clinton-Gore ticket. "It's just not factual!" stammers
James Carville, apoplectic over Casey's claims. "You'd have to be
idiotic to give a speaking role to a person who hadn't even endorsed
you." "Why are you doing this to me?" moans Paul Begala, who, with
Carville, managed two Casey campaigns before joining Clinton's team in
1992. " I love Bob Casey, but my understanding was that the dispute was
not about his right-to-life views, it was about the Clinton-Gore
ticket."

It's hard to believe Casey and the Clinton campaign couldn't work out some sort of arrangement under which Casey would endorse Clinton and in return be given a speaking slot at the convention to air his anti-abortion views, though probably not in prime time--as Mike notes in his article, Casey was retiring and major convention speeches are usually given to candidates up for election in the fall. (And a handful of pro-life Democrats did speak at the convention in 1992, though not about abortion per se.) Pro-lifers are an important segment of the Democratic Party and should be
afforded the opportunity to make their case at the convention, so the Casey story would be disturbing if it were true, but absent some further evidence, it doesn't look like it is.

--Josh Patashnik 

share this article on facebook or twitter

posted in: the plank, person career, robert casey , sr.

print this article

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 3 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Back to Top

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK