SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Huck Attacks the "Big Tent"--in Canada!

THE PLANK DECEMBER 11, 2009

Huck Attacks the "Big Tent"--in Canada!

In case you missed it, once-and-maybe-future presidential candidate Mike Huckabee traveled to Calgary, Alberta, Canada the other day and delivered himself of an address (according to his own pre-speech account, reported in the local press) focused on the terrible temptation of conservatives in the United States to tolerate diverse points of view, under the shorthand of a "Big Tent."

That would be bad, said Huck, struggling from afar against the vast forces calling for ideological heterodoxy within the Republican Party. 

As someone who adores our Neighbors to the North, and has made speeches there on occasion, I was struck by how odd it was for Huckabee to be sending this particular message in this particular place.  It is customary for Americans speaking in Canada to express a great deal of interest in, you know, Canada.  Maybe Huck did that in his actual speech, but he sure did seem to make it clear to the S.E. Calgary News that he wanted to inform Canadian conservatives of the threat of creeping liberalism among their counterparts down south. 

To be sure, Huck's on a long-term mission to make his image among conservatives match his actually extremist views.  He outraged most of the Right's chattering classes in 2008 by suggesting there were grounds for resentment of economic inequality in George W. Bush's America.  And his many detractors on the talk radio circuit have just been handed a big hammer, via the Maurice Clemmons story, to crush his presidential ambitions. 

So maybe Huck's just exhibiting message discipline.  But you have to wonder if in Calgary he went over the brink into an assault on those godless socialists in the U.S. who contemplate a pale imitation of the notoriously totalitarian Canadian system of publicly provided health insurance (which most Tories in Canada would not even think to repeal).  And you also have to wonder if U.S. conservatives generally will ever stop beating the dead horse of Republican "moderation."  

Ed Kilgore is Managing Editor of The Democratic Strategist and a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 4 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

4 comments

The funny thing is that Mike Huckabee is for heterodoxy on economic policy in the Republican Party by implication, because his views there differ radically from the mainstream of the party. The Chamber of Commerce types and the supply-side ideologues came down hard on him when he ran in the Republican primaries in 2008.

- liberal reformer

December 11, 2009 at 5:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Huckawho? The guy should stop talking now. He doesn't like Big Tents or Big Jails. Let all out. I wouldn't waste ink on the guy, he's toast.

- CRS9TNR

December 11, 2009 at 8:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

liberal reformer: no kidding. He was even speaking to a Canadian branch of the CoC! I'm not sure if his railing against heterodoxy was meant to assure them he's joined them, or if it was a threat against going with a Romney-type social moderate.

- Simon Greenwood

December 11, 2009 at 8:22pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

...Canadian system of publicly provided health insurance (which most Tories in Canada would not even think to repeal... Damn straight they wouldn't! And I'm voting Tory next time I now think, if the choice is Ignatieff as against Harper, even though I'd typically vote Liberal federally. Huck is a schmuck.

- basman

December 13, 2009 at 1:24am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close