THE PLANK MARCH 11, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
David Roth is a
freelance writer living in New York.
My affiliation with Topps--first as an editor of the cards'
"back content" and now as a sometime-freelancer writing that content--hasn't
been without its regrets. (I related a few in a 2006 piece for Slate.) But I enjoyed a great deal about my Topps tenure, too.
Right up there on my list of high points, alongside the bottomless supply of
Bazooka gum and the thrill of trying to sneak Thomas Pynchon references onto
the back of Renaldo Balkman's
rookie card (it almost worked), was telling people, "I work in the baseball
card business."
Even the iciest hipsters retain dorky traces of their
ten-year old card-collecting selves, and come alive at the mention of the
subject. Oddly often, they want to talk not about Topps, but Sportflics,
a short-lived line of holograph-enhanced cards from the 1980s. Tilted just so,
Sportflics displayed a flipbook-style progression of, say, Dale Sveum in
action; more often, kids just ran their fingernails over the ribbed plastic
surface for a satisfying "wicky-wicky" effect. Sportflics were the last real
attempt I can think of to challenge the idea of the baseball card. After they
failed, it was business as usual: picture on the front, stats and text on the back,
forever and ever, amen.
But earlier this week The
New York Times' Eric Taub reported
that my former employers are attempting to mess with cards' analog essence.
Hold a Ryan Howard Topps 3D Live card up to your webcam and you'll see "a
three-dimensional avatar" of the Phillies slugger on your screen; rotate the
card and Ryan rotates with it.
It may well be that the trading card business needs this new
technology more than my over-alliterative, hyper-punny back-of-the-card text.
Professionally, I can take that. But as someone who still loves cards, there's
something sad about seeing this last, goofy stronghold of my childhood under
siege. Economic pressures and attendant cuts in photo budgets--as well as
humorless editors at the licensing leagues--mean that the front of cards are
often less interesting than in years past, but since Topps stopped pulling copy
directly from team media guides in the 1990s, the card backs have actually
gotten better.
I can't say I admired the prose of those old Topps rip-jobs;
they were usually something along the lines of "John's hobbies are hunting and
napping." I devoured it all the same, though, and did so with more eagerness once
the cards got more literate and interesting. I was usually able to fit at least
a little bit of fun trivia or color into my card backs. This isn't novelistic
detail, exactly--it's just mentioning the former Colorado Rockies prospect
whose father performed "You're the Best" on the Karate Kid soundtrack, or Kevin Garnett's ultra-competitive golf
games with former Janet Jackson producers Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis.
Will childhood change dramatically now that kids can wave Robinson
Cano 3D Live cards under their webcams or whatever? Probably not. But it's
still painful to see the kind of goofy,
transcendentally useless information I hoarded and cherished as a kid being designated for
assignment in favor of some lumpy avatar.
--David Roth
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times

3 comments
The whole thing's a damn shame. Damn whippersnappers. When I was a kid, the only time we got 3-D avatars was when Pop got drunk and smacked us on the side of the head. Then 3-D avatars appeared all over the living room. And we were damn grateful for them, too.
Amazon should market a baseball card-oriented version of Kindle that allows folks to post comments. So in addition to Junior's stats, you get "Griffey's over the hill. What's Zduriencik smoking?" from TempusPuget etc.
Meanwhile, I think I'll cut up some blank shirt cardboard into baseball card-size rectangles and sell them on eBay as "CIA Agent Trading Cards." Most good ideas start during recessions, after all.
I'm thinking tobacco-juice-spitting ring tones for the iPhone is another money-maker.
- williamyard
March 11, 2009 at 2:03pm
I can't think of baseball cards without wishing I hadn't lost that Nolan Ryan rookie card when I was a kid...
And who wants Robinson Cano in 3-D anyway? Do the 3-D images fluctuate with steroid use? Eh, whatever...
- cspencef
March 11, 2009 at 6:16pm
When you talk about back of the card text, it takes me back to 1959 when I had the seeming misfortune of being stuck with a dozen Topps cards of a gawky and geeky looking third baseman for the Washington Senators with the goofy name, Harmon Killebrew. I knew he was a dud when I looked at the back of the card and where it usually said things like, "Led the American Association in doubles in 1957" for Harmon it said, "Discovered by Idaho Senator Herman Welker." The text was accompanied by the cartoon image of a Senator in formal attire and the Capitol dome in the background. Boy, was I wrong. Two years later, the Senators moved to Minnesota and became the Twins. They immediately became my favorite team and I spent hours arguing with my sister over who was the best player, Harmon or Bob Allison. No doubt Senator Welker has long since gone to his reward but to this day I thank him for discovering one of the best to ever play the game.
- dhuey0
March 11, 2009 at 9:35pm