THE PLANK NOVEMBER 24, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
It was nice to see City Journal run a critical review of Paul Johnson's forthcoming Churchill biography, but Mark Riebling's piece contains one of the more ridiculous lines you will read all year:
In more than 40 books, Johnson has attacked what liberals defend (modernity, secular intellectualism) and defended what liberals attack (Judaism, Christianity, America).
"Secular intellectualism" is one of those phrases that is completely indecipherable (what does it possibly mean to support or oppose it?), and yet Riebling's motive in combining these two words is obvious enough. Still, I can't quite decide whether this comment is more insulting to liberals or conservatives. The former are accused of being bigoted anti-Americans, yes, but the clear implication here is that liberals are the only ones who will defend modernity.
2 comments
Not only that, but he claims that liberals attack Judaism. Given that the vast majority of American Jews are liberals to one degree or another, this is various kinds of nonsense.
- ironyroad
November 24, 2009 at 10:57pm
I guess "He built his career jousting with straw men" doesn't sound quite as impressive. It's even worse that he's written forty whole books and the straw men haven't been singed in the least.
- Geoff G
November 25, 2009 at 9:27am