SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Men Do The Silliest Things

THE PLANK DECEMBER 5, 2009

Men Do The Silliest Things

Ian Buruma's New Yorker piece on the attempts of Dutch liberals to manage Muslim immigration in the Netherlands has one particularly interesting nugget. The piece is not online but Buruma--while narrating some history--notes that relations were relatively smooth until Muslim women began to arrive (previously, men from places like Morocco and Turkey came to work without their families). This, in turn, necessitated more visible signs of Muslim and immigrant communal life, which led to friction between the new arrivals and native Dutch communities. 

Buruma does not mention it, but I wonder whether the arrival of Muslim women (which really began in the 60s and 70s) also played a role in radicalizing immigrant men. It has been known to happen. Just glance at any former British colony and look at how British officers behaved once British women arrived on the scene. The presence of their precious women made the men suspicious, insular, and fanatical. Indian history, especially, is replete with hinge events (notably the Amritsar Massacre of 1919) set in motion by colonial officers enraged that British womanhood was being insulted (or, God forbid, violated). Even the creation of the British Raj--which replaced the East India company--owes something to the outrage felt by many British citizens over the supposed dishonor brought upon British women during the 1857 rebellion. The male's need to control the female cannot be overestimated as a historical force.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show 1 comment

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

1 comments

Any advice in history on how I can control control my wife, instead of the vice versa that now exists? One thing you are missing is that single men who are there only to make money, have the goal of returning back to their home countries to get married and use the money they save to make their lives easier, they have no need or desire to change the society to how they want it to be since they view themselves as transients. Bring the women, have kids, etc. and then you view where you live as home and you will want to change it (in fact, you will think you should have that right). No need to look for tenuous connections to the British Raj. They viewed Indians as sub-human from day one, to be controlled and used, and would have used any excuse available to impose their will.

- blackton

December 6, 2009 at 2:26pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close