SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Obama's Advisors And Basketball Ethics

THE PLANK JULY 27, 2009

Obama's Advisors And Basketball Ethics

Mike's blog post below touches on a very, er, touchy subject in the world of pick-up basketball. Imagine you are playing a game with people you either do not know, or do not consistently play on the same team as (in other words, you rotate teams daily). And you are playing without uniforms. In the heat of the moment, someone will often shout for the ball, hoping that a member of the opposite team passes it and commits a turnover. Because people are constantly yelling for the ball in basketball, this can be a very effective trick. But is it ethical?

Mike ends his post by saying that if you are silly enough to fall for this maneuver, then you deserve to face the consequences, and I agree with him. However, it is no exaggeration to say that this is one of the most contested moves in pick-up basketball. And as far as I can tell, different games view the move completely differently. In some games this is a constant feature, so much so that almost no one falls for it anymore (the trick in an experienced group is to yell "ball, ball!" in an urgent and pained manner, thus fooling the opposing player into thinking that if he does not pass the ball instantly, he will blow his chance to make the right play). In other games, however, this practice is so frowned upon that it can cause fights. I was once playing on 17th and P streets in downtown Washington when someone tried this tactic. Not only did the guy who turned the ball over start swearing, but he refused to continue the game as long as the trickster remained on the court. After a heated back-and-forth, and some shoving (which is literally a heated back-and-forth), the game continued. On other courts, the maneuver will simply lead to a stoppage of play and dirty looks. If you are new, you have to adjust.

How does this all relate to Axelrod's game, the one Mike mentions? I have found that this ploy is most often used in games with older players, or people who are less athletic. Everyone knows that if you play with the old folks, they will do anything (anything) to make up for a lack of speed or quickness. And it often works. Who has not lost a game to a team full of guys who are on average twenty years older than your squad? They are cagey and clever, and know all the tricks (they also, if I may generalize, know how to throw elbows). Anyway, in this game you can only expect moves like this one. Axelrod (and Obama) are no longer spring chickens. However, if the president himself decides to adopt this tactic, he might find himself in a tricky situation one day. Passions run so high on this subject that even the leader of the free world might be shown a surprising lack of deference on certain courts.

--Isaac Chotiner

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 2 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

2 comments

Its a good lesson for everyone to learn, Isaac. Always be alert to your surroundings. In the ring, its called "defend yourself at all times."

Jack dempsey had already lost his title to gene tunney, by the time 1927 rolled around, and naturally, the public was clamoring for a rematch. Before that could happen, though, jack would have to beat a ranked contender. So, he faced an elimination bout with with a fighter named jack sharkey. I've seen this fight on video several times, and its my observation that sharkey was winning as it went to the 7th round (if i remember correctly.) Sharkey got hit with what he thought was a low blow, (it wasn't, though)dropped his guard and turned his head to complain to the ref. At that instant, dempsey saw the opening and fired a left hook that caught sharkey flush on the jaw. It was all she wrote. Goodnight sweet prince.

Sharkey's mistake? A failure to defend himself at all times, which is the ref's main instruction he tells both men just prior to the start of the bout. Dempsey did nothing more than to instinctivly take advantage of an opening.

- wldctfan142

July 27, 2009 at 9:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

isaac:

"....is it ethical?"

george:

Ethical? Compared to, er, what?

And it's not the ball that's being shouted about in the White House. It's the money. And there really isn't any reason to resort to trickery here. The money being funneled from Washington and New York and back again is never in the hands of anyone who hasn't already been fully vetted to pick it up.

Or, to paraphrase Sprint, if the deals in Washington were nailed down by the folks at NBA Inc., there would be no need for zones, backboards, nets, foul lines, referees, hoops, slam dunks or...for that matter....basketballs. Instead, from the top on down the players would just keep circling the court passing out and receiving stacks of money; and then double dribbling the loot all the way to the banks.  

Why make things more complicated then they have to be?

And stuff like "passion" and "emotions running high" are for the suckers who tend to the trees not the CEOs and their managerial staff that shape the forest.

gw

- iambiguous

July 28, 2009 at 12:17am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close