SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Sean Penn Doesn't Know How Lucky He Is

THE PLANK APRIL 6, 2009

Sean Penn Doesn't Know How Lucky He Is

I was rooting for Mickey Rourke to win the Academy Award for Best Actor over Sean Penn because a) I thought his performance was more deserving, and b) an acceptance speech that in any way resembled the one he gave at the Independent Spirit Awards would have been a contender for the best Oscar moment in a generation.

What didn't occur to me until I saw the footage from this weekend's Wrestlemania--in which Rourke again displays his trademark knack for career management--is what might have happened to Penn if Rourke had taken the loss poorly:

 

You can keep all your actor/directors and actor/musicians. Rourke is the clearly most versatile entertainer in America today.

(Via Vulture)

--Christopher Orr

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 5 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

5 comments

BTW if this post had been written by Jamie, all the Jamie haters would have said that they IDed it by the title alone.

- achester99

April 6, 2009 at 2:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I had long supported Mr. Rourke for a cabinet position in the Obama White House. Why Obama didn't name him to the Department of Hollywood, I will never understand. Plus he could send Mickey and the Wrestlemania folks up to Wall Street to make them an offer they can't refuse. We could already be well into the next bubble by now. The sub-prime entertainment industry is ready and waiting to explode. Celebrities are lining up left and right to be bought and sold like houses.

george

- iambiguous

April 6, 2009 at 2:21pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I thought that Rourke should've won it and was rooting for him to. Penn was fantastic as Milk, what a great great actor is her, and Rourke was fantastic as the wrestler, but Milk kind of closed on itself, as biopics will, do, whereas Rourke and The Wrestler expanded ever beautifully outwards in the emotion they generated.

I love Rourke and Penn as  actors, larger than life characters and as men.

It surprises me not at all that they are great friends.

I loved the acceptance speech linked to here and hadn't seen it before. To call Marisa Tomei's performance courageous was on the money, and she should have won best supporting actress.

- basman

April 6, 2009 at 2:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Sorry, Mr. Orr, but Sean Penn acted circles around Mickey Rourke.  Don't get me wrong, Rourke's performance was heartbreaking and wonderfully honest, but Sean Penn did the tougher assignment of the two and accomplished much more.  Take it from someone who teaches acting (how's that for an attempt to establish some authority on the subject!).

- shaw-man

April 6, 2009 at 4:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Shaw man, I've been thinking about this. I think Sean Penn gave a more demanding performance, iin part by playing so much against type, unlike Mickey Rourke, who sort of played himself, as did Dexter Gordon in Round Midnight. But it's hard (for me) to separate the exemplary acting of an actor from the movie itself as a whole,  and from the emotion the movie arouses. Every time I think about The Wrestler and of the Mickey Rourke figure, I start to feel moved like I'm on the cusp of tears or some such. When I think of Sean Penn and Milk, for as much as I very much liked the movie and *appreciated* his performance, I sense the same lack of emotion as I had when I saw the movie. I for among those reasons would have cast my vote for Mickey Rourke.

- basman

April 6, 2009 at 5:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close