THE PLANK SEPTEMBER 26, 2007
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
The Times has a sure-to-be-widely-emailed story up today about how men have become gradually happier since the early '70s, while women have become gradually less happy. While I applaud the light these studies shine on the real ways in which policy hasn't caught up to culture (as the story points out, very correctly: "Although women have flooded into the work force, American society hasn't fully come to grips with the change. The United States still doesn't have universal preschool, and, in contrast to other industrialized countries, there is no guaranteed paid leave for new parents"), it's annoying the way (usually male) writers tend to twist them into the same tired old "women are overworked and virtuous, men are beer-drinking, TV-watching slobs" paradigm--it's Marge and Homer, Edith and Archie, Katherine Heigl and Seth Rogen, etc. The author concludes: "Inside of families, men still haven't figured out how to shoulder their fair share of the household burden. Instead, we're spending more time on the phone and in front of the television. This weekend, I think I may volunteer to do a little dusting."
It is certainly true that women do more housework than men and that men should take responsibility for making a better balance. I just hate the idea that that's the best thing a man can do to make his wife happy--as if the feminist movement was only about getting men to pick up after themselves a bit more. Men are not children; women are not their mothers. Get over it! There are more important things at stake here than dusting.
--Britt Peterson
16 comments