THE PLANK JULY 31, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size
While the Obama administration waits to see whether Iran is willing to talk, Congress is moving forward on tough economic sanctions. A bill targeting Iran's refined petroleum imports now has 71 Senate co-sponsors, and was the subject of a Senate Banking Committee hearing yesterday. The House is scheduled to vote on the measure after its August recess.
A Ha'aretz article today indicates that the Obama team, which has thus far been privately winking at Congressional action on the issue, is getting ready to throw its public support behind the bill:
U.S. National Security Advisor James Jones, who is
now in Israel to discuss Iran's nuclear program, indicated that Tehran
has until the UN General Assembly in the last week of September to
respond. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates delivered a similar
message during his visit here earlier this week. If no satisfactory
answer is received, the Americans said, they would work to form an
international coalition to impose harsh sanctions on Iran.
A senior source in Jerusalem said the American message to Israel in
these talks was to "lower its profile" and refrain from "ranting and
raving" about Iran in public until the international evaluation on Iran
takes place at the end of September. "Until that date, we must give
diplomacy a chance," the official said.New sanctions would mainly aim to significantly curb Tehran's ability
to import refined petroleum products. Despite its huge crude oil
reserves, Iran has only limited refining capacity, so it imports large
quantities of refined products such as gasoline....
The Americans are proposing financial sanctions such as banning
insurance on trade deals with Tehran, which would make it difficult for
Iran to trade with other countries. They also want to impose sanctions
on any company that trades with Iran and use this to pressure other
countries, mainly in Asia, to resist making deals with Iran.
In the next stage, the Americans will consider even harsher
sanctions, such as banning Iranian ships from docking in Western ports
and, as a next step, banning Iranian airplanes from landing in Western
airports.
We could be in for a pretty tense fall on this front.
--Michael Crowley
2 comments
On paper a "refined petroleum products" ban aimed at drying up Iran's gasoline supplies sounds great -- particularly in view of Iran's limited refining capacity; one would think it could be just the kinds of "stick" that would persuade Iran to reconsider its nuke R&D. Indeed it has been bandied about for years as an ideal sanction. Although it can be negated by building & staffing more refineries, that takes time and requires a huge capital investment.
But alas there a fly in this ointment as well. The Iranian leadership may be crazy but they are not stupid, and they too are aware of Iran's limited refining capacity and that their dependence on imported gasoline is a potential Achiles' heel (it helps that these threats have been kicked around, but never acted on for years).
But they are also aware that Iran has huge natural gas reserves and natural gas doesn't require any refining to be a good (and arguably, "green" fuel). So for some time now, the iranian have been experimenting with converting cars to run on natural gas!! It's not difficult to do and modification kits are readily expendable. Add to this that about a year ago two Austrian companies (at least one, state-owned) signed a deal with the Ayatollahs to develop a large natural gas reserve in Iran's north, and poof!! the effect of the gasoline ban is negated.
But hey, TNR staffers don't seem to trouble themselves with such details. Indeed, Jason Zengerle, in his reciprocally infinite wisdom, recently (here: blogs.tnr.com/.../iran-and-the-politics-of-pipelines.aspx) castigated the Bush administration for deigning to INTERFERE with an Austrian sponsored project to hook up the Iranian natural gas fields to a natural gas pipeline going from Azerbajan to central Europe. Zengerle just couldn't understand why the Bushies blocked the Iranian hookup.
So much for tough sanctions. It's time to start thinking of a plan "B"... and do the necessary homework.
Hershel Ginsburg
Jerusalem / Efrata
- ginzy
August 2, 2009 at 8:46am
In the closing years of the Bush administration, Nicholas Burns was America's lead negotiator in
- Anonymous
August 4, 2009 at 12:38pm